"Uhmm, all women are godesses, INCEL!"
No, she is. You are nothing compared to her(USER WAS WARNED FOR THIS POST)
Too bad she's slowly turning into stone…
>>808713do u think when she cums she reverts to flesh and then back, alternating rapidly
When women say all women are queens , it’s mainly to divert mens attention away from more exceptionally beautiful women.
Notice how feminists love to complain about “pretty privilege” or even the more nefarious accusations of “societal pressure about beauty” when men choose women like in OP?
It’s all covert jealousy
>>808724Dumb, hot women make those same points and the fact that you're holding a woman up higher based on her beauty basically confirms the talking points you're trying to debunk.
All women are queen and 10k times better than moids and I say this as a moid. Also all feminists are 100k better than your sorry ass
>celebrity worship but make it woke
human cattle
>>808791feminism is misandry
>>808794It isn't but it should be
>>808795bro i've got some wonderful news for you
>>808791Are you counting old women?
Fat women?
Butch women?
Boisterous masculine women?
Or is your definition of women just the cliche porcelain doll that are young women?
>>808791Not all women are queens just like not all men are kings
Feminists are glorified losers who use their genitalia to justify backstabbing fellow women just like their right wing counterpart using men to backstab other men
Also define how women are ten thousand times better than men without referring to their beauty
You’re an automisandrist that’s only praising women if they’re young slender and pretty
What about the cafeteria ladies, the bus drivers or guidance counselors?
I’m sorry but women will not respect you
>>808762You trying to flip the script on me just proves my point. You’re just rationalizing gynophilia.
>>808795It already is. The fact that you think it doesn’t just means you’re a sadomasochist.
>>808798Seethe
>>808802Did I stutter?
>>808805Mucho texto Louis
>>808806Just answer the questions
Don’t dodge them.
>>808808>hating women and being misogynistic is le heckin basedEven when dropping based statements, imageboards just cannot help but ruin it with willful petulant hatred
>>808806I’m still waiting for an answer
>>808802The fact you have to cherry pick bottom of a barrel women just proves that anon is right and women are better.
>>808825Wrong. Youre not proving anything correct.
Be honest: do you agree with anon because you’re dazzled by looks?
>>808827Spirit shapes its vessel, attractive women are more sovlful. Its also the reason most men dont really look like human being, just mishaped ape creatures, they are not ensouled.
>>808840So you’re applying lookism as a moral compass good to know
Men aren’t defective or misshapen vessels in average
You’re just too distracted from drooling over women who probably used photo manipulation filters
You dismiss men because they don’t have boobs and vaginas
I also notice that you only list “beautiful” women. So you discount elderly women, butch women, and ugly/fat women?
>>808840Spooks.
You’re brain fried from looking at beauty models.
Men are soulful just like women are. They’re not misshapen either
You’re just letting your dick control your judgement.
No respect for simps
Kill simps
Behead simps
Roundhouse kick simps
Throw simps into a trash compactor
Actually scratch that.
Have simps transform into sex dolls that can be ravaged by men.
Or castrate them and give them vaginas
Put them on estrogen so they can grow boobs
Make them be sexually attracted only to men
>>808847You are the one who couldnt go a single post without spilling your sexual pathologies and writing about how much you want to commit sexual assault. On men no less, so I can only imagine how you behave towards women.
>>808851What strawmen are you conjuring up now? This place is rife with sexual pathologies. People on here talk about wanting to kill off most men to get access to pretty women
People on here talk about wanting to rape/ eat right wing women
Or semi jokingly talk about MtF transitioning for chuds so you can get potential sex
MOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOODS
>>808805>You trying to flip the script on me just proves my point.you trying to flip it back just proves my point. take pretty girls off a pedestal you freak.
thank you hashem for not making me a goy, thank you hashem for not making me a woman
Where is her hair?
>>808883except I don’t put some on pedestal that’s what you all do on here
Bunch of simps.
Also interesting that you call me a freak when this place complains about normies
Learn how to appreciate women platonically
>>808935>I don’t put some on pedesta>When women say all women are queens , it’s mainly to divert mens attention away from more exceptionally beautiful women.>Learn how to appreciate women platonically>Notice how feminists love to complain about “pretty privilege” or even the more nefarious accusations of “societal pressure about beauty” when men choose women like in OP?>It’s all covert jealousyMost of my friends are women actually, you're implications that women are fighting to pull better looking women down to their level grossed out the two who are in this room right now and made my wife audibly ick. Maybe you should try appreciating them for something besides how hot they are.
>>808947I, uh. I am very enamored by women, though. I just AM, okay? Sorry, I can't help it. I see ass and tiddies and my almonds get activated. It's not like I want to dehumanize them and only think of them as meat, but meat they are, and well, as a wolf, it's hard talking to meat without salivating.
Yes, I am aware of how cringe I sound, and I apologize. Try to see it once my way.
>>808947Post evidence of your female acquaintances or I call it bullshit.
>>808965Nudes if possible. Thanks.
>>808952Are you the guy that made this post
>>808791?
>>808966Wrong anon. Also go jack off to e thots.
>>808965fine, but no face. they think you're a pig btw
I don't really hang out with men outside a small circle of childhood homies
>>808981I guess you’re one of those men who think other men are defective?
That they’re unworthy of company as well?
Also I’m a domestic boar not a pig, I don’t pedestalise women for their looks.
That’s what this site does.
>>809017>I guess you’re one of those men who think other men are defective?You guess wrong. I don't have a policy against hanging out with men, I just hang out with people who's company I enjoy and my small town doesn't have many interesting dudes.
>That they’re unworthy of company as well?I don't believe that of anyone, even the worst among us.
>I don’t pedestalise women for their looks.Then why ramble about how feminists are jealously trying to drag down beautiful women then? Cause that's how everyone in this room interpreted your post.
>>809018>Then why ramble about how feminists are jealously trying to drag down beautiful women then? Cause that's how everyone in this room interpreted your post.Because I notice that when it comes to mens body image, there’s no sympathy or support for the less physiognomically endowed.
But when it comes to women, there’s always these immediate platitudes about “all women are beautiful” as if though men don’t have a large palette of physiognomical preferences of womens bodies.
Or rather, that when men say they aren’t attracted to a certain female physiognomic type compared to others, he’s accused of lookism.
And then in comes the constant talk about “pretty privilege”
>You guess wrong. I don't have a policy against hanging out with men, I just hang out with people who's company I enjoy and my small town doesn't have many interesting dudesAre you sure? Because this place is rife with internalized misandry due to semi-imposed social isolation from peers and only viewing them as potential sexual partners due to unfulfilled desires and they dismiss men as worthless because they’re not attracted to men but they hyperfocus on women and use their sexual attraction to women as a moral compass
They even look down on cishomo guys and ace/aro folk on here
They only show interest in cis homo males that are androgynous or feminine
>>809031>Because I notice that when it comes to mens body image, there’s no sympathy or support for the less physiognomically endowed.True, but unrelated.
>when it comes to women, there’s always these immediate platitudes about “all women are beautiful” as if though men don’t have a large palette of physiognomical preferences of womens bodies. >Or rather, that when men say they aren’t attracted to a certain female physiognomic type compared to others, he’s accused of lookism.These are also unrelated.
>And then in comes the constant talk about “pretty privilege” Constant? I don't know about all that, but you're just being silly if you think looks don't give people social benefits. People are awful if you're ugly, man, woman, or what-have-you
>Are you sure? Because this place is rife with internalized misandry due to semi-imposed social isolation from peers and only viewing them as potential sexual partners due to unfulfilled desires and they dismiss men as worthless because they’re not attracted to men but they hyperfocus on women and use their sexual attraction to women as a moral compass>They even look down on cishomo guys and ace/aro folk on hereYeah I'm fuckin sure dumbass, you think I'm here for comradery? I'm here to get shitposting out of my system, do you think I'm actually defending these reactionary pseudo-commies?
Unique IPs: 18