>>809309Yeah I agree. Apparently there are sequel books which are better though.
Also I think there's a problem where the best reviewed sci-fi books are usually the most literary, or the softest and most fantasy-like. Like I think people only talk about Hyperion because its a space fantasy that references old literature. Harder sci-fi then gets worse reviews and is forgotten about by the general public, apart from Andy Weir's books for some reason. But like, book reviewers want all of literature to be like the kind of modernist litfic they specialise in reading, and if something is just not a character exploration, they think it is slop. The worst reviews of all time are the ones giving one star and then saying "I can't understand this book, it is incomprehensible to me since I'm not a scientist". Then when I read it I understand it fine, despite not being a natural scientist or programmer or mathematician! The hard sci-fi books that are introspective and have great characters are then ignored.