[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM / ufo / 420 ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]

/siberia/ - Off-topic

"No chin, no right to speak."
Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password(For file deletion.)

Check out our new store at shop.leftypol.org!


File: 1785286043721-5.jpg (70.81 KB, 686x386, hq720 (2).jpg)

 

the fact that perpetual motion machines are physically impossible proves that we are living in one of the worst timelines

Isn't nuclear power basically an infinite energy glitch already?

Perpetual motion machines are real, since the sun is a constant source of radiation that can be converted into energy freely, forever.

>>809296
no more a perpetual motion machine than any other material in the universe, only in the short term (ie billions of years) is this true

>>809300
Humanity will exist less than those billions of years so its practically identical.

>>809294
No, because there's a limited amount of uranium and we'd run out in a few decades if adopted at scale. Theoretically you could filter out a lot more from the ocean, but we don't know how to do that yet. Thorium might last even longer, but I don't think we know how to do that yet.

>>809296
its not perpetual motion, plus we cant even harness it fully

Your mother is a perpetual motion machine

>>809296
>>809294
This. Nuclear energy relies on atomic nuclei shedding protons and neutrons

>>809277
Wouldn’t perpetual motion machines only work in space?

>>809344
Fair point, but how is the sun not a good example of perpetual motion machinery?

>>809762
because it's not going to last forever? does bro not know how the sun works?

>>809763
Semantics, from the pov of humanity, it might as well be forever

>>809763
Not from the temporal viewpoint but from the energy viewpoint

The sun emits solar wind and uses nuclear fusion to shine

>>809768
but it still isn't.

>>809771
i dont get what your point is. it is neither infinite in terms of time, or in the amount of energy it will produce

>>809762
cause its not a machine. a perpetual motion machine is supposed to be a man made machine that is capable of generating energy infinitely with little force applied to it, like vid related but not fake. the sun isnt a machine and grabbing its energy is too hard to actually change anything about our society, whereas if these machines could work irl theyd probably make energy so cheap we'd be swimming in it

>>809782
You meant to say a machine is a man made object that uses energy to do work.

I view the sun as a machine, but naturally made. But then again, that may be my anthropocentrism acting up

Also are you saying the perpetual motion machine in the vid is fake?

Also, I don’t think perpetual motion machines may be an actuality because nothing lasts forever. Mass and energy are limited

In order to generate perpetual power, it requires something else to change its physical/chemical state. Unless you have a way of capturing byproduct material that can be instantly reverted back into fuel.

>>809302
>it's true in the abstract therefore it's true in the actual
no man


Unique IPs: 11

[Return][Go to top] [Catalog] | [Home][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM / ufo / 420 ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]