>>809602because if change isn't made from within the system, it is automatically branded as terrorism by the system. anarchism is a hotbed for terrorism to thrive, whether it's defined as terrorism by the state or not. 'adventurism' is a pejorative because there are people who don't want to utilize terrorism in order to enact change, for better or for worse. there may be some valid arguments in favor of using terrorism as a necessary evil to incite change, but these sorts of accelerationist positions are never given due deference and breadth of consideration by people who think revolution can happen without bloodshed.
on the other hand, there are bloodthirsty faggots who would take pleasure in the sowing of chaos for its own sake, and who are biting at the chomp to co-op any given political group's operations for the chance at drawing blood and sating said thirst. these are the sorts of people who willingly sign up to be part of porky's imperialist world policing squad aka the united states military, but they exist elsewhere.
some of those who work forces are the same that burn crosses;
some of those you'd call comrade are the same that'd bomb Baghdad