>>809837>So accelerationismnice mental gymnastics, but turning the other cheek is not sufficient to constitute "accelerationism" and even if it were "accelerationism" is not communism.
>Is that why you believe the bourgeois nonsense of Marx and Engels? Is that why you revere the Bolsheviks, who were nobles sponsored from abroad? Is that why you revere various communist streamers with watches costing thousands of dollars?just because some bourgeoisie become communists doesn't mean the bourgeoisie as a class will voluntarily give up power or or that asking them to in a christian and pacifist way will result in that
also your allegation that the bolsheviks were a "bunch of nobles sponsored from abroad" is a very lazy reactionary slander, considering a coalition of 14 imperialist countries including the USA actually sponsored the white army during the civil war. The best evidence your theory has is that the German government allowed a bunch of exiled Russians (Bolsheviks, Mensheviks, Anarchists, and even some Liberals I think) to return to Russia during WW1 beecause the Germans hoped it would have a destabilizing effect on Russia, and also because the German government wanted to be rid of these destabilizing radicals in their own country.