Are you addicted to pornography?
loling at that hairline
I can't tell if she's sitting or on her knees.
>>811132She's sitting, the chair is visible in the beginning.
Porn addiction isn't real. It's just a myth perpetuated by the left and right to control male sexuality.
>>811234>psychologytodayisnt that the same american "science" tabloid that perpetuated "YOU NEED TO GOON DAILY OR ELSE YOU GET BALL CANCER!!"
Bet they have no economic ties at all to the industry
>>811242What's bad about gooning every day? Or do you separate gooning from regular masturbation? And why would it be bad to masturbate every day?
>>811242Leftists hate reading:
>Josh Grubbs, Samuel Perry, and Joshua Wilt are some of the leading researchers on America’s struggles with porn, having published numerous studies examining the impact of porn use, belief in porn addiction, and the effect of porn on marriages. And Rory Reid is a UCLA researcher who was a leading proponent in gathering information about the concept of hypersexual disorder for the DSM-5. These four researchers, all of whom have a history of neutrality, if not outright support of the concepts of porn addiction, have conducted a meta-analysis of research on pornography and concluded that porn use does not predict problems with porn, but that religiosity does.And there's links to sources in the article, such as:
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10508-018-1248-x >>811245that's the joke innit
>>811242>>811243i hear simultaneously that ejaculating too much hurts your prostate and that not ejaculating enough hurts your prostate… may be we should be ejaculating moderate amounts…
>>811246but it looks sincere
>>811248true, what's her name, what other movies is she in
>>811233Porn addiction is real but it’s exaggerated
>>811251the funny thing is i usually don't jack off and am most likely to do so 1 day after having sex
I want to start a family with her. But that is a terrible idea.
>>811260Wanting to start a family in general is a bad idea especially nowadays
I want to start a family with her. But that is a terrible idea.
>porn addiction is real
555-cope-faggot
join the mormon church if you believe this shit
I just want to get her pregnant. I don't want to start a family. Some other anon could step up if they want to.
>>811245It's a joke, she has an onlyfans.
What is her name, she is very pretty.
>>811264Based. Put an article in your zine about how this shit is bullshit
>>811251It's no more real than videogame addiction, probably less since most people aren't gonna actually watch porn for 10+ hours per day
>>811274Yea. Scientific research articles tend to warp contextual issues.
Whenever they talk about addictions, especially electronic media, they make it sound as if though it’s a universal issue or that it’s inherent to the media itself
>I was too young I didn’t know what Inwas looking at
Ah yes, I love the deference towards “youthful innocence” whenever they talk about porn addiction.
Bitch please you knew exactly what you wanted and what you were looking at.
It’s just that for some people, not everyone gets to have ideal relationships nor have the opportunity or courage to advertise their want for intimacy
They’re just projecting their self-perceived immaturity onto others
>>811243This.
People are freaking out about gooning more than smoking and drinking
>>811242>isnt that the same american "science" tabloid that perpetuated "YOU NEED TO GOON DAILY OR ELSE YOU GET BALL CANCER!!"It's not any one source that has come to this conclusion. You can look it up yourself. It's widely accepted that ejaculating semi-frequently reduces the risk of prostate cancer.
https://www.health.harvard.edu/mens-health/ejaculation_frequency_and_prostate_cancerThe Harvard ejaculation study>The scientists found no evidence that frequent ejaculations mark an increased risk of prostate cancer. In fact, the reverse was true: High ejaculation frequency was linked to a decreased risk. Compared to men who reported 4–7 ejaculations per month across their lifetimes, men who ejaculated 21 or more times a month enjoyed a 31% lower risk of prostate cancer. And the results held up to rigorous statistical evaluation even after other lifestyle factors and the frequency of PSA testing were taken into account. >>811284yeah I think the order of priority is this:
- Stop doing hard drugs
- Stop smoking/drinking
- Stop eating junk food
- Start exercising/eating right
- Stop expensive addictive habits like gambling, partying, fucking prostitutes
- Stop cheap addictive habits like gaming, arguing online, masturbating to porn
Porn his like dead last on this list imo
Amelia Wet-Angel (she has nudes btw, kind of disappointing though)
>>811234This is the author of that article btw. Sponsored by a fucking CAMWHORE SITE of all things, but I’m sure he’s being totally impartial here.
Porn addiction is definitely real, but the addiction usually comes from an underlying problem that has nothing to do with porn itself. Usually it’s intense social isolation that leads people to get hooked; they might substitute sex with gooning to a screen 24/7 because they’re social rejects and can’t get laid.
>>811311So its not addiction in any meaningful sense, escapism. Is someone who spends lot of time reading books or watching movies because their real life sucks an addict?
>>811315If you can’t function without it, then it’s an addiction. An escapism you can’t function without is thus an addiction.
>>811318The DSM definition of addiction is that it is interfering with your daily responsibilities or not. Like watching TV everyday or listening to music all day is not an addiction.
>>811320If watching TV all day interferes with your daily obligations, then by your own definition it’s an addiction.
>>811324I said everyday. I gave another example, of music with all day. You can listen to music all day and not have it interfere with your responsibilities, therefore it is not an addiction. I guess that applies to whatever drugs you can be high on all day and take care of your responsibilities. I guess if you don't have any responsibilities, then nothing can really be an addiction:
> then by your own definition it’s an addiction.Not my definition, the DSM.
>>811327Coke fiends tend to be very productive.
>>811327I’m confused. Are you implying that high-functioning alcoholics are not addicts because their alcoholism doesn’t affect their daily obligations? Besides, that’s not even the only criteria for defining addictions. It’s also defined by why and how you stop the activity. Can you stop watching porn cold turkey for 48 hours with zero irritability, zero cravings, and zero mental preoccupation? If the answer is no, then it’s an addiction.
>>811337> Besides, that’s not even the only criteria for defining addictions.According to who? You? I told you I'm citing the DSM.
DSM-5’s 11 Criteria for Addiction
According to DSM-5, a substance use disorder (SUD) involves patterns of symptoms caused by using a substance that an individual continues taking despite its negative effects. Based on decades of research, DSM-5 points out 11 criteria that can arise from substance misuse. These criteria fall under four basic categories — impaired control, physical dependence, social problems and risky use:
Using more of a substance than intended or using it for longer than you’re meant to.
Trying to cut down or stop using the substance but being unable to.
Experiencing intense cravings or urges to use the substance.
Needing more of the substance to get the desired effect — also called tolerance.
Developing withdrawal symptoms when not using the substance.
Spending more time getting and using drugs and recovering from substance use.
Neglecting responsibilities at home, work or school because of substance use.
Continuing to use even when it causes relationship problems.
Giving up important or desirable social and recreational activities due to substance use.
Using substances in risky settings that put you in danger.
Continuing to use despite the substance causing problems to your physical and mental health.
3 Levels of Severity
Like other illnesses, substance misuse worsens over time. The substance use disorder criteria explained in the DSM-5 allow clinicians to determine how severe a substance use disorder has become depending on how many symptoms are present. For example:
One symptom could indicate an individual is at risk.
Two or three criteria point to a mild substance use disorder.
Four or five symptoms show someone has a moderate substance use disorder.
Six or more criteria indicate a severe substance use disorder, which signals an addiction to that substance.
Knowing how severe a substance use disorder is can help physicians and addiction specialists determine the best course of treatment for the individual struggling with substance misuse.
>>811130i had to get a porn addiction to graduate from maupin university.
>>811341Thanks for the copy-pasted ChatGPT response. So it looks like I was right and addiction isn’t just defined as:
>The DSM definition of addiction is that it is interfering with your daily responsibilities or not.Oh, and look:
>Trying to cut down or stop using the substance but being unable to.>Experiencing intense cravings or urges to use the substance.Isn’t that what I said already? Do you think high-functioning alcoholics are addicts or not?
>>811320And you are of course aware of the skyrocketing social maladaption gooner cases in the post-internet era where these porn addicts bring their shit into the public, workplaces, sexual harrassment, rape contexts, thus also effecting their environment, yes? So what's this timewasting shit you're "devil's advocate"ing?
>>811311Thank you! Blatantly obvious this was the process undergirding this pop sci BS in the background, great to have it more fore-fronted
>>811335>Ritalin is the exact same thing as methamphetamine Just shoot this moron
>>811376I would, so fucking hard, just because of those fucking knockers alone. christ what a specimen.
>>811378She’s pretty objectively mid but has god tier tits. If she were a guy, she’d be incel
>Completely loses bourgie talking point arg
>Starts waving more porn in face *look!* *over here!*
>>811376Wait a minute, is that the bitch in the OP? LMFAOOO
So, she’s warning men to stay away from her own product? Woman fights porn addiction… by producing more porn…
Love from Kazakhstan.
>>811400Unless the video in the OP is ironic and I’m just a retard.
>>811394tbh even minor differences can be significant
>>811394The actual differences are super technical but they have very similar effects.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norepinephrine%E2%80%93dopamine_reuptake_inhibitorNorepinephrine–dopamine reuptake inhibitor>Some NDRIs, such as methylphenidate, may not act as simple NDRIs but rather as DAT "inverse agonists" (and possibly also analogously at the NET as well).[3] If this theory is correct, then methylphenidate and other agents like cocaine may not be acting primarily as monoamine reuptake inhibitors but instead as robust monoamine releasing agent-esque drugs, albeit via a different mechanism of action than conventional substrate-type monoamine releasing agents.[3]
>Norepinephrine–dopamine releasing agents (NDRAs) like amphetamine and methamphetamine not only induce monoamine release but also act as monoamine reuptake inhibitors to a lesser extent and hence are additionally NDRIshttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norepinephrine%E2%80%93dopamine_releasing_agentNorepinephrine–dopamine releasing agent >>811402It is. I appreciate her acting including the amerikkkan influencer / ASMR / "voice actress" """soothing"""(TM) mannerisms lmao
It reminds me of a kindergarten teacher speaking to a 4 year old, but often used in pop sci psychology related "content", or really anything to do with bourgie slop alleged "social science".
>>811404Felt effects yes, but not long-term health wise. Amphetamine (either in adderal form or meth) is drastically more harmful biologically.
>>811406Sure one may be less toxic than the other, but since they have very similar effects on the neurotransmitters, then you can have a lot of the same problems from either.
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC181133/>Acute toxicity due to methylphenidate overdose results in symptoms similar to those of acute amphetamine intoxication. Reports of psychiatric symptoms that have occurred include euphoria, delirium, confusion, toxic psychosis, and hallucinations.8,16 Such symptoms should not be unexpected as methylphenidate's pharmacologic effects are “basically the same as those of amphetamines.”52 Cases of psychosis with methylphenidate abuse have been reported when the drug is used in “runs,” similar to amphetamine abuse.52It bothers me how people pretend they are completely different. People even pretend Adderall is completely different than meth, because one is prescription and one not(even though there is prescription meth as well.) A lot of the psychiatric problems from meth abuse are more to do with the doses and route of administration. That's why they put binders in the pills to keep you from smoking them. You can still get addicted and go crazy from the pills, amphetamine or methylphenidate.
Don't get me started about this phony ADHD diagnosis shit and about how "stimulants just effect me differently!" >>811407I'm not against drugs either. I just think they lie so much to people and you need to know you're getting yourself into before you start doing them and what to watch out for.
>Cases of psychosis with methylphenidate abuse have been reported when the drug is used in “runs,”
What does "runs" mean in this context?
>>811381>if she were a guy she'd be an incelno shit, because she's white.
white women = high demand
white men = low demand
black women = low demand
black men = high demand
life is unfair but there you go
>>811130version with sound? I need the ASMR
>>811445>>811405>ASMRHere's the version with audio:
>>>/latam/19375 Unless you have rollout of different very attractive girls on demand (not mid prostitutes that are there because you ahve money) which not not Epstein had it is impossible not to be "porn addicted" as long as you have a healthy libido.
>>811479Enjoying something isn't the same as being "addicted" anyway
i've noticed that even without thinking about it, there hasn't been a single day where i haven't looked at some form pornography at least once since my last relationship, not even to masturbate to, just to look at.
Been trying to cut down and stop overall, only looking at it when i'm actually gonna jerk off, but it's surprisingly difficult.
>>811452There is no audio in that version, why would you lie about it?
>>811381Explain. She would look good as a guy
>>811444Wrong
Black women are high demand
Race doesn’t matter as much as you think as long as you’re good looking
>>811515Being an incel is very easy for a guy. An Incel's sister will still get laid because men find a greater variety of phenotypes attractive.
>>811523No it really isn’t.
Incels are usually picky people
It’s not about not getting laid, it’s about getting relationships
Also, femcels exist.
Women find a lot of phenotypes attractive in men but women are not pursuers and will betray their own individuality in preferences for being basked in attention.
Also I hate the word “incel” being used for bitter relatively Allistic asocials who cannot get over themselves
Real incels would be men bound in wheelchairs, autists, and need hobbyists who never have any thought to dating or sex.
Redpill culture claiming inceldom is like how Palestinians being taken over by “Jewish” diaspora descendants
>>811304People have more sympathy towards drunks, horndogs, brawlers, gamblers than towards gooners
I mean video games are now re-stigmatized yet TV is now crowned as the only safe electronic vice
>>811515Not with that weak facial structure and norwood 3 hairline.
>>811527>Incels are usually picky peopleIncels are called picky for having any standard.
>femcelsAre larpers that appropriated the term to feel special. They're fundamentally different than actual incels.
>>811517The former is not confirmed by the latter statement
No joke attractive people gets more sex, but STATISTICALLY no, black women in the us (most countries in europe ban racial statistics, which is good tbh) are dead last in attractiveness for women
He's also wrong for black men demand, but that's typical bbc derangement syndrome
>>811548I think the reason for this is due to the ghetto fab culture and internalized aesthetic racism
I see photos of African girls and I think they’re way hotter than the urban Anglo American ones
>>811548>most countries in europe ban racial statistics, which is good tbh)How is that good? It's basically Trump's approach to public health monitoring. You can't discuss issues that you don't even acknowledge. It's just state sanctioned gaslighting and is more racist than honesty.
And while Black women are statistically the least desired women, they still outperform most men. Also, it's not really surprising men don't choose black women when you consider that a lot are obese, poor, and/or single mothers. I'm sure if it were possible to assess that study's results while excluding the aforementioned, the outcome wouldn't be so stark.
>>811550Rent free.
>>811536the post you are replying to is less commenting on what there are stigmas towards and more on what actually affects your health negatively
>>811543>weak facial structure What’s “weak” about it? I see men with looks like that and they’re not weak
>Norwood three hairlineExplain this
> Incels are called picky for having any standard. It’s more because most incels are dull in their looks, skillset, and wit
> Are larpers that appropriated the term to feel special. They're fundamentally different than actual incels.Just like their male counterpart
Again, “inceldom” means actual disability that prevents you from getting laid
>>811557> And while Black women are statistically the least desired women, they still outperform most men.Maybe because you’re looking at the good looking ones. And because men are not allowed to be viewed in a sexual lens the way women are.
> Also, it's not really surprising men don't choose black women when you consider that a lot are obese, poor, and/or single mothers. I'm sure if it were possible to assess that study's results while excluding the aforementioned, the outcome wouldn't be so stark. Lots of white women are also obese, poor, and/or single moms. Again it’s the ghetto fab culture that paints black American women in a bad light, especially since they pursue it.
Again, look at African black women and compare to their American counterparts
> Rent free.Explain
>>811562Damn how do you get internet access in your village? What kind of witch doctor voodoo shit are you doing to keep the connection so reliable?
>>811564Not an African. Also not all Africa is a wasteland.
I didn’t know racism was allowed on here
>>811567This guy is constantly posting racist shit about Black Americans. He's mentally ill and needs to receive treatment from his local witch doctor. His juju is out of balance.
>>811568It’s not racist it’s the truth.
Ghettofab culture is ruining the image of black Americans. Also the same flaws that black American women have are also present in white American women.
I’m talking about you posting racist shit about Africans
>>811570U must eat theee lizaaarrd b4 u leave thee villaaage.
>>811543>Not with that weak facial structure and norwood 3 hairline.she's got a fivehead but norwood 3 includes the kippah of baldness
not an addict, too busy wageslaving and sleeping
>>811130Porn Addiction doesn't exist. It's literally religious crazies feeling guilty over something that's natural. Seriously so many people haven't killed the cop in their head when it comes to this sort of thing.
Masturbation actually helps the prostate and the only reason they come up with this is that to Christians any sexuality that isn't ashamed about itself is seen as "sinful".
>>811607Porn addiction is real but it’s a strawman to control male youth sexuality. As a way to enslave them into mindless family-man culture that don’t appreciate wives and children as people.
>>811605>>811606In a way the fact that she looks so mid other than her titties makes her more attractive to me because she seems more attainable. Also I really liked that titty sucking video.
>>811611Mid doesn’t mean ugly
Even without her tits she’s not ugly. I’d still bang her.
>>811606>>811605She's so hot even the plastic penis is cumming?!
>>811611>>811614She's attractive imo. I think people in general are too eager to call people ugly or mid. In a way mid is attractive. What humans find attractive in general is how close a person looks to the "composite norm" if you know what I mean. Whether I find someone attractive also changes based on my mood. A woman might seem really attractive to me one day and not very attractive the next, depending on my own mood and other variables. It also depends not just on how they look, but what they're wearing, their personality, their opinions, their attitude. It even depends on weird things like whether they look too much like a family member. A person can be really attractive but if they look related to you it can become a turn off (or a turn on for some people).
>>811607I find the physiological/psychological addiction distinction useful. Porn or video games can be highly psychologically addictive but not very physiologically addictive like opiates for example. If you're jacking off more than once a day and it's interrupting your schedule and you're constantly afraid of guests arriving or phone calls coming in while you're jerking, you might have a problem. I have also heard that both cumming too often and not cumming enough are bad for your prostate, so just like most other physiological things, it's best done in moderation. Don't confuse moderation with centrism pls.
>>811624>I have also heard that both cumming too often and not cumming enough are bad for your prostate, Where did you exactly hear this, got any proof for this?
>>811624>She's attractive imo. I think people in general are too eager to call people ugly or mid. In a way mid is attractive. What humans find attractive in general is how close a person looks to the "composite norm" if you know what I mean. Whether I find someone attractive also changes based on my mood. A woman might seem really attractive to me one day and not very attractive the next, depending on my own mood and other variables. It also depends not just on how they look, but what they're wearing, their personality, their opinions, their attitude. It even depends on weird things like whether they look too much like a family member. A person can be really attractive but if they look related to you it can become a turn off (or a turn on for some people). Do you apply this to men as well? Or are you more indifferent towards male attractiveness, labeling them with black-and-white “chud or chad” bullshit?
Otherwise you’re correct
Lookism isn’t just about physiognomy. It’s also about your mannerisms and the sociophysical environment you’re in
>>811606Damn she looks MUCH better with her glasses
>>811639>>811638Men as well.
There’s a reason why glasses started to become popularized in fashion in the 2010s
>>811631>Do you apply this to men as well? Not really attracted to men but I apply this to people in general.
All this psychobabble and overintellectualized discussion on lookism is gonna disappear once we can start making designer babies so that all human beings become attractive.
It's like how before Ozempic there was the dumb body positivity and "fatphobia" nonsense then immediately once we had an easy solution that all disappeared.
Once it's possible for everyone to become attractive then we'll stop bullshittimg ourselves about which phenotypes are objectively attractive and which are not. Spoiler alert : absolutely no one will design their babies to be chinlets or have wide noses or be manlets. And the number of people with dark skin will decrease rapidly, although it won't be eliminated completely as enough people like it. But it would still decrease a lot, like maybe 80%
>>811795>And the number of people with dark skin will decrease rapidly, although it won't be eliminated completely as enough people like it. But it would still decrease a lot, like maybe 80%I don't know about any of that dawg. Just because you're an obsessed freak doesn't mean everyone in the world is. Yes there is subjective difference. I think it is more the opposite, that once European capitalist society no longer dominates the world, people won't be brainwashed by whatever they cook up. There is no objective shit, they promote some new arbitrary zeitgeist all the time. Beards are in, beards are at, big butts are in, big butts are out. Your mind is completely plugged into these arbitrary whims and you have no historical knowledge so you mistake it as objective truth.
Unique IPs: 52