/siberia/ - Off-topic

kill them all

They're about 70\30. 70% based and 30% not based. But I'm not sure which are based and which aren't .

I dont think about them.

they become extremely annoying once they start taking estrogen

I want big hetmoid cock in my ass, I love straight men

>>812169
I am a heterosexual cisgendered man. now worship me :3

>>812170
/thread

>>812180
only because you used :3 at the end

>>812169
they make me pretty horny I guess

They are fine. Nothing out of ordinary.

>>812180
Nobody who uses :3 is straight.

The thing I hate the most about straight men isn't even how violent and irrational they are, but their lack of basic hygiene. Male bathrooms are the most disgusting thing in the world, you have to wear a hazmat suit in order to survive in there for 10 seconds. Motherfuckers don't even wash they hand, there's piss and shit and boogers everywhere, it's fucking disgusting. I think it's a perfect representation of the hetmoid soul.

>>812345
You've fallen to one od the classic survivor bias, if you actually talked to a janitor you would know why they're more dirty : because they get cleaned by the staff at least two times less than the women's bathroom, who needs way more regular cleaning because of how much of pigsty they are

>>812345
I could say the same about female restrooms.
Female restrooms have toilets overflowing with menstrual blood and feces.
And lots of used tampons littering the floors.

Women also don’t even wash their hands either

Perfect representation of the hetfoid soul

>>812350
I work as a janitor.
and from personal experience, fast food restrooms are hell holes regardless of gender

>>812350
Depending on the workplace you also have to contend with the period pads and blood around the toilets, but they're roughly the same as far as cleanliness goes, people dont give a shit if they don't have to clean up after themselves.

I see them no different from non-heterosexual non-cisgenser males - a misbegotten evolutionary relic, they have no place in the civilised humanity.

we can be a bit rascally

>>812375
The same could be said for cishet females

>>812375
Wouldn't the human history signify otherwise? It is seemingly visible that, males happen to be active contenders compared to the female contenders which was passive in history.

If they had an evolutionary advantage, why did they keep clinging to their "passive" role in society until the enlightenment era and so on.

From earliest philosophical discourses, to romantic self sacrifices, poems, literature, wars in the name of new valuations and truths, natural science… were all dominated by males.

Of course there were females too, but can you tell me, if you document all the people who wholeheartedly died for a struggle, be it love, curiosity, passion, whatever abstract desire you can tell, which gender would make the most of the death toll?

Gender roles are of course a cultural rite, and bound to change, but for now, how does one can brag about an evolutionary supeority of the female biology?