i fear leaving my pets alone with furries.(Rule 10)
Then don't? Retard
This is projection. Just because you want to diddle real animals doesn't mean that most furries would also want to diddle animals. And hot vaporeon, but pls spoiler the horny imgs
>>812971The same people who chimp out over lolicon btw
💩💩💩💩💩💩
💩
>>812975 💩
💩💩💩💩💩💩
boooooo!!!!
💩💩💩💩💩💩
💩
>>812972 💩
💩💩💩💩💩💩
these two things are not comparable most of the time though
>>812983Furry is given more slack than lolicon
Furries are the least of your problem. Most furries are not zoophiles.
Most acts of bestiality aren’t even due to furry fetish anyway.
>>812983>these two things are not comparable most of the time thoughRaping animals is a-ok?
>>812983>>813025I don't understand why people pretend there's no correlation between furries and zoophilia. Their entire "subculture" is based on zoophilia (yiff), and every year there's a drama about some furry freak who fucked an animal.
However, I don't give a shit that you jerk off to animals, as long as you don't rape them IRL. And I hope you'll feel the same way about other fetishes, dear SJWs.
>>813049Furries actually try to shame the Zoophiles out of the fandom. And yiff isn't zoophilia at all. Most furries are against Zoophilia. And we are not SJWs you /pol/tard tourist.
Seriously the whole "Furries are Zoophiles" meme is old hat at this point, stop being spooked. You seriously got it from Something Awful articles written by furries making fun of themselves but you took them completely seriously.
>>813053>Furries actually try to shame the Zoophiles out of the fandom.Lolicons too, but with pedophiles. So? Does that somehow make you non-zoophiles if you only jerk off to zoo porn, but don't act IRL.
>And yiff isn't zoophilia at all.At all? No, yiff is mostly zoophilia, maybe with a difference in anthropomorphism, but judging by the pictures above, furries often jerk off to just fucked animals.
>spookSpook is trying to pretend that drawn zoophilia is not zoophilia.
>>813053Furries have made a culture of buying dildos shaped like animal cocks. Bad dragon is THE furry business and its founder is a gay fat redneck zoophile who paid someone to molest a dolphin on video. There is no serious boycott- they still show up at cons. Furries condone zoophilia because it's good business. It's inseparable but no one wants to admit it since it's an obviously bad look. Saying this as a furry
>>813058You don't want to be convinced, you already think that anything furries do is "zoophilia" because you are arguing in bad faith.
And there is a difference between fictional humanoid animal sapient creatures. And there is a huge degree of difference between a drawing of a fictional anthropomorphic creature and a real animal. I'm a furry and I would never fuck a real animal.
Again, stop being spooked in thinking that fiction is anything like real life, you are literally acting like those religious freaks that somehow think that playing dungeons and dragons or reading Harry Potter somehow makes you want to do witchcraft in real life.
>>813060That's basically up to the con organizers whether or not to ban them. I never bought any of BD's products and will never will.
>>813058>>813060And Be thinks that this whole "Furries are Zoophiles!" says more about you than other furs. like what
>>812971 said:
>This is projection. Just because you want to diddle real animals doesn't mean that most furries would also want to diddle animals. IIRC there have been surveys that show zoophiles are overrepresented among furries, like by an order of magnitude. That's still a minority but let's not kid ourselves
>>813058>>813060You two can't tell the difference. Furries are attracted to fictional sapient human-like animals that are intelligent and can give consent. While Zoophiles are attracted to real life animals who cannot give consent.
It's like the people who make this sort of argument that "Furry = Zoophilia" can't tell the difference between fiction and reality.
>>813061>>813062>>813063>>813064>>813065>>813067Imagine chimping out so hard over the two posts. You are not beating the allegations
>>813070>>813043Except furry characters look nothing like real animals (most of the time) while lolis look way too much like kids. Judy hopps looks nothing like an actual bunny
>>813049 I'm not denying that there may be a correlation, but it's nothing like the correlation between being a lolicon and being a pedophile, if you take into account that anthro characters look nothing like real animals most of the time
>>813064 very cool!!!!!!
>>813073wait till you discover the "cub" shit,the unholy combination of both
>>813073>(most of the time)No, most of the time they look like animals that just walk on two legs (optional). The only ones who have more human than animal qualities are the kemono.
>while lolis look way too much like kidsYou're just a hypocritical zoophile. Also, let's not forget that there are many Pokémon lovers among furries, and I think hentai featuring, for example, Eevee could be considered zoophilia AND pedophilia.
>>813072As if those two posts were arguing in good faith in the first place. It's nothing but yet another retarded moral panic style of arguments.
You're desperate to have furries be connected to zoophilia to try to pretend to be more "Moral".
Sage and report this useless moralfagging /pol/tard bait thread.
>>813058As if you weren't the one who posted the image in OP. Like I said, retarded /pol/tard moral panic BS.
Sage and report this thread.
>>813186>reactionaryIt's progressive to be against zoophilia. There was a lot of bestiality in ancient times.
>>813191First, we need to ask: can this be considered furry? But to be fair, the Sonic fandom doesn't have the best reputation even without furries.
>>813198Of course it's furry. It's an anthropomorphic animal, and it even has fur. I just destroyed you in the marketplace of ideas
>>813061>you are literally acting like those religious freaks that somehow think that playing dungeons and dragons or reading Harry Potter somehow makes you want to do witchcraft in real life.Now we have a defense of mysticism under the rubric of letting people enjoy things. Wrong. Fiction will be banned. All you'll be able to read are industrial output tables. All the reactionary nonsense comes spewing out as soon as you poke one of these perverts.
>>813212You are a reactionary /pol/tard that hates fiction and fun. And I was mocking you when I compared you to those religious nutters that think Dungeons and Dragons is "Satanic" and "Leads you into a cult".
You literally sound like a "leftist" version of that fundamentalist evangelist Chick Track
dungeons and dragons is undialectical and idealist and must be banned by state security.
>>813239Yeah, Keep playing with your digital paper doll to pretend you're a "Chad".
>>813242Okay, Baltic pedophile.
>>812975TCC guys must die
Why did the OP pic first got spoiled, and then hours later deleted?
Unique IPs: 24