Post your arguments you've had online and I'll determine if you're based or cringe
I got into an argument with a liberal once about the Khmer Rouge and Pol Pot being the logical conclusion of Jeffersonianism
In a youtube comment section, I argued that homophobia is more genetic than homosexuality, or basically that the dna of a person predicts homophobia more than sexual orientation. It took days but I actually won and the other guy apologized
Theyve developed typoid
My most recent argument was about a post of a woman on tiktok saying she goons a lot and a commenter replying “wait girls goon?” to which a woman replied “men are so obsessed with sex until it comes to actually educating themselves on sex” to which I replied “he’s likely a boy not a man” (since we are on tiktok and he didn’t know something as basic) thereby excusing his ignorance, to which her and a few of other girls/women replied “she wasn’t talking about boys she was talking about men!” when her reply was clearly referencing the guy confused about girls masturbating, thereby implying that he is a grown man ignorant of the fact that women masturbate (which is supposed to be the “urgh, stupid men!!!” dunk they all upvoted).
They are clearly being obtuse and backpedaling here. Her point was that THIS is an instance and proof of how ignorant MEN are on women’s sexuality, but he was in all likelihood a minor, thereby excusing his ignorance just like a girl wouldn’t know certain things about guys.
>>820008not OP, but cringe