"walkable" cities mfers when you ask them to stop hating disabled folx and people with adhd
>>821572>ADHD-ADJACENT FOOD SERVICESwhat the fuck does that even mean?
>>821573People that can't make the effort to cook I guess? Idk not everything has to be about whatever conditions you have though. Plus how do walkable cities prevent delivery services anyway, you'll be much closer to the restaurants so it would be easier if anything
>>821575I dont know if they're saying the companies are ADHD adjacent or their customers, or the employees? Not even sure what that would mean; you can't pay attention sometimes?
>Plus how do walkable cities prevent delivery services anywayThey dont. Bike delivery would still exist and be fast and efficient.
>>821577I'm 99.9% certain they mean that the customers have ADHD and need delivery services because of that, not that the employees or companies have ADHD
You can pedestrianize an area while allowing exceptions for accomodations, only city centers are pedestrianized anyways, you can have a walkable city while keeping car lanes
>>821583imageboard OPs really should have a system to append a reply like this to posts like OP's so that idiots don't get riled up by bait from twitter.
>>821582That tertraplegic people might need delivery service I can understand. But ADHD being unable to buy stuff? At some point hunger have to kicks in and force them to do the fucking groceries !
I, for one, do not give a SHIT about what "people" on xitter have to say about anything.
People who argue against walkability because "disabled people need cars" do actually need to be quietly eliminated.