/siberia/ - Off-topic

the harvest is bad and youre asking for a lower yield?

>>821931
>the harvest is bad and youre asking for a lower yield?
It's far worse and more eventful if the harvest was good and a surplus. I'm just saying more efficiency and slightly lower yield, so that there would be more freedom from lower needs and expectations.

Aborting half of males fetuses would be good for both sexes

>>821972
Trvke

>>821972
wtf how do you abort half of a fetus

>>821972
>Aborting half of males fetuses would be good for both sexes
Well not aborting them because that's aggressive, maybe choosing the embryos is the way to go? Default to girls unless you really want to choose boys is better and in the latter you will be more intentional about raising them properly. I've seen these attitudes in other places before.

>Ladies, without men who will take care of you? When the electricity brakes who will fix it, you?
Not him either, but seriously meaning that depends on need vs. meaning that depends on being wanted. This is where the world is headed.

>>821980
that's true. All things equal women are superior to men

>>821978
You could merge two into one, like those conjoined twins.

>>821982
How are they superior if they are equal? Dumbass.

>>821985
>How are they superior if they are equal? Dumbass.

1. Men & Women
   
   

After making them equal

1. Men & WoMen

>>821985
If they're socioeconomically equal, they still have superior intelligence and emotional control, is what I meant.

>>821926
>What if we had slightly fewer men in the society?
Dont care. Pure idpol genderslop.

>>821993
>Dont care. Pure idpol genderslop.
Is this some trolling or what? Persons are diverse so you can't really avoid having conversation about the differences. It is what it is.

>>821991
>they still have superior intelligence and emotional control, is what I meant.

i would disagree, i met and seen for myself many women nowadays with neither, and what you have feels like just a media facade, some effect they are beautiful, especially the emotional control for i was raised on them being more emotionally open, not controlling it.

in fact i've seen enough women act arrogant or Mean to know, you never raise kids with princess treatment or they turn out expecting it.

>>822017
>especially the emotional control for i was raised on them being more emotionally open, not controlling it.
>control
NTA, but I don't think you understand the full extent of this. It's off-topic from this thread but you don't understand what control over narrative truly means towards a man.

>>821985
>superior
This isn't about that at all. It's the difference between demand and necessity. Each and every historical caste needed shit to get done so they wanted to produce more males to get more powerful. Because of technological progress there is less shit to do every generation so everyone would get slightly richer over generations.

Women are necessary for existence but men are wanted for personality and what they do. This is about being more intentional about males.

>>821926
it would be better to, instead of aborting a portion of male fetuses, instead use genetic modifications to turn a larger percentage of males, maybe like 20-30%, into exclusive homosexuals.

>>822067
>it would be better to, instead of aborting a portion of male fetuses, instead use genetic modifications to turn a larger percentage of males, maybe like 20-30%, into exclusive homosexuals.
It's a circular problem. If you're a homosexual, you need more homosexuals. Sadly, gender is not the only dimension that makes the person and being minority gendered is a small problem. Move to a bigger city.

>>822070
I mean gay men are so cute though I think it'd be great if there were a lot more of them like society would be way cuter and thus better.

>>822071
>I mean gay men are so cute though I think it'd be great if there were a lot more of them like society would be way cuter and thus better.
I don't mean to be an asshole (don't get any ideas lol) to you but what if there was an actual cure (oh god the offence lol)? The species is heterosexual and given how ancient anisogamic sex is to life, it's going to take a billion years at least to add homosexuality to the primate family tree because it's older than animals themselves playing the genders. It's not worth it to change the species because of the dirty side-effects so you have to work with the people on this one.

Have your own subculture and recruit the like-minded but leave the heteros alone.

>>822071
>are so cute though
Say no more. Women are cosmically cute so I get you bro, no discrimination. I don't hate you for your orientation and subculture.

>>822148
That's too far. If people were like that then humanity is cooked.