>>822938In his novel "Temple of Golden Pavillion" he describes a boring, degenerate world where all mystery has been taken away - the protagonist's only friend is an enigmatic cripple who womanises using poetry. His resolve in the end is to burn down his temple as an act of suicide - but as he feels doom, he suddenly escapes, being burned in the process, but alive. This is the act of his affirmation, an inducement of conflict and transgression. The reasoning comes after, but it is encoded into praxis; a means to stir the waters of life, to not allow stagnation. The Satanic poet Charles Baudelaire would drink poison as a way to give spice to life. In all this is a rationale; to exceed.
>incels didn't exist before the term was coinedWhat would you call Nietzsche, then?
He was barred from a longing romance and became bitter toward women as a result.
>If a fascist rationalizes your behaviorIt's not my behaviour.
I am saying that there is coherence to the extremist, even if it is not annunciated. Most Fascists are practical, not theoretical people.