>there are people in socialist circles who unironically agree with Agent Kochinski on this take.
Why is it so hard to fathom that both CSAM and child sweatshops/slavery are bad and both should be horribly illegal.
>should be
Meaningless.
Look at Marx's commentary in the Critique of the Gotha Programme about the German economy being dependent on child labor, and apply that to the international economy today.
>there are people in socialist circles who unironically agree with Agent Kochinski on this take
Then they should be put on a watchlist.
A computer isn't inherently harmful the way child pornography is. People purchase child pornography because they get off on the sexual abuse of children; the harm is inherent to the good itself. People aren't buying computers because they enjoy child labor. The use-values simply cannot be equivocated.
The use-value of child pornography is fulfilling a sadistic paraphilia.
The use-value of a computer is fulfilling some sort of computing need.
>Then they should be put on a watchlist.
Yeah they should. I've seen people on this website make these arguments
why are half of all agent doublechinski clips i see of him saying "tankies bad, vote bloo" and the other half are "what if the child consents?"
And in what way is he wrong? Just because CP is heckin immoral to you? Moreover, no one buys CP, it is available for free in the public domain - often even on the clear web.
>>826275>whatchlistGo fuck yourself, Glowie. You used the "protect da children" strategy to turn every country into a police state.
(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)>>826334Likely taken out of context + fakes.
>>826348There's definitely people that do buy CP, that's why bots spam it on this board, they're selling access to material. I've seen the same kind of thing on telegram as well
>>826350>There's definitely people that do buy CP00000000.1% and I have nothing against putting them in jail.
>that's why bots spam it on this boardI saw it, but I didn't click the link. It's probably a honeypot.
>>826275>Then they should be put on a watchlist.the pedophile warlord administration is in charge of all the watchlists
>>826410its illegal to fire someone for being gay, but fine to fire someone for being pedo? what an injustice!
>>826365Its some Russian distributor, they've been at it for over a decade.
>>826348>And in what way is he wrong?The use-value of child pornography is different from the use-value of a computer, retard.
>You used the "protect da children" strategy to turn every country into a police state."Protect da anything" can be used to turn a country into a police state. This argument is silly.
"Protect against fascists." "Protect against communists." "Protect against criminals."
>>826443Put them on the watchlist too.
>>826507Also take off that flag, poser.
>>826505>use-valueOld men in the village don't need a computer either – so what? Nobody needs coconut oil harvested by slaves – so what?
>"Protect da anything" can be used to turn a country into a police state.Nevertheless, the pedohysteria is a 100% glowie project.
>>826541>Nobody needs coconut oil harvested by slavesFix
>>826541>Old men in the village don't need a computer either – so what?Exactly. Non-pedophiles don't need child pornography. The paraphilia is inherent to CP's use-value, which is why you can't compare it to something mundane like a computer.
>the pedohysteria is a 100% glowie projectProof?
>>826544I use it in my after shower moisturiser.
>>826648>You chose the most normal opinion he has chose to depict himself as "having" so you can accuse people calling you a dumbass of being Agent Kochinski appologists.How is equating purchasing child porn to buying a computer the "normal" opinion? Do you think people buy computers because they want to support child labor?
>ultimately believes punishment can deter crimeIt does. You're less likely to commit a crime if you know you're going to get caught and punished. Actually, the certainty of getting caught is a stronger deterrent to crime than the severity of the punishment itself.
>material conditions don't need to be changed because punishment-based crime prevention is sustainableA punishment is a type of material condition. Stronger enforcement is a change in material conditions.
>>826656You are a liberal
>>826505>Put them on the watchlist too.sadly, until they are defeated, it's their watchlist and they get to decide who goes on it.
How the fuck is this even a conversation? There are just some things that everyone sane on any side of any discussion just agrees is wrong like murder, and CSAM is one of them.
The only thing we should discuss is whether we should execute adobe PDFs immediately or torture the fucking adobes, and I believe that torturing the adobes is perverted.
WTF guys?
>>826768Then defeat them.
>>826768>sadly, until they are defeated, it's their watchlist and they get to decide who goes on it.What if the value is conspicuous consumption?
>>826350>There's definitely people that do buy CP, that's why bots spam it on this board, they're selling access to material. I've seen the same kind of thing on telegram as well>>826365>I saw it, but I didn't click the link. It's probably a honeypot.Maybe it's a DoS tactic.
>>826943Voosh, The guy who talks about "left pragmatism"
>>826792Nah, it's not posted anywhere near often enough to be a DDOS or anything like it, I'm sorry to have to tell you but people do definitely buy and sell CP
>>826958It makes the sites it gets posted to effectively NSFL so it is a form of legal DoS
>>826968Posting CP isn't legal anon lol.
Also like I've said I've seen this on Telegram too where bots will say you can buy 50 telegram tokens or whatever and pay them to the bot and you'll get access to the room with 'private collections' etc and heavily implying nonce shit
>>826966
I wonder how many girls and women got raped by that guy tbh
>>826970It's legal DoS because it's illegal to possess and will get the service in trouble with the law. It's also a conspicuous consumption filter but that's a rabbit hole.
There's no contradiction that they're being sold too. That just makes the case against the service stronger.
If this clip isn't an argument for objective morality, I don't know what is.
>>826965
>It was invented by feminazis and populist politicians in the second half of the 20th century
And they mind controlled the public into viewing pedophilia with disdain? Really?
>>826982the folks who post it go from imageboard to imageboard, even imageboards about trains or being NEET or whatever else.
its not just /leftypol/ being targeted as part of Trump's War on Dengoids or whatever.
>>826966
"Cunny for me, not for thee" – Joseph Stalin
>>826966
Damn, nvm
Someone needed to Article 121 Stalin himself
Unique IPs: 30