This is true. Not agreeing with this is reactionary idpol.
Yeah but what if i used a square?
back in the bernie era people were making shit like this constantly and thought they were cooking so hard
>>828088They were. It's 100% correct.
>>828090the conclusion isn't the issue, if you think drawing some lines on a triangle is a powerful argument you might be retarded
>>828094if you think typing some letters into a box is a powerful argument you might be retarded
(literally all arguments are retarded, and not even violence convinces people, it just makes them scared of you) >>828094That's no meant as an argument but as a description. Like a dictionnary definition isn't an argument either.
>>828096>literally all arguments are retardedthe absolute state
>>828097it is an argument in the sense that it's trying to convince people of a conclusion (that class is structural while the other stuff mentioned is not)
>I can magic away the superstructure and it's imprints on the base by chanting
OP you really need to learn to let go of catharsis driven politics and actually learn the intricacies of things.
Also learn to annotate things you read so you don't come away from theory with such shallow readings.
>>828086There's a whole book dedicated to that triangle if that's your thing.
>>828129by the standards of that anon they are. he has marketing brain. HURR DURR DO YOU REALLY THINK PEOPLE ARE CONVINCED BY FAX N LOGIC N SHIT….
yeah of course not