This is true. Not agreeing with this is reactionary idpol.

Posting mode: Reply [Return]
Name
Options
Subject	Spoiler Image
Comment
Verification
Flag
File
Embed
Password	(For file deletion.)

File: 1790716234746-2.png (38.85 KB, 1338x974, c371daab08ef644aea6e4d4558….png)

Anonymous 29-09-26 21:10:35 No.828086

This is true. Not agreeing with this is reactionary idpol.

Anonymous 29-09-26 21:13:03 No.828087

Yeah but what if i used a square?

Anonymous 29-09-26 21:18:49 No.828088

back in the bernie era people were making shit like this constantly and thought they were cooking so hard

Anonymous 29-09-26 21:21:31 No.828090

>>828088
They were. It's 100% correct.

Anonymous 29-09-26 21:38:54 No.828094

>>828090
the conclusion isn't the issue, if you think drawing some lines on a triangle is a powerful argument you might be retarded

Anonymous 29-09-26 21:39:56 No.828095

File: 1790717996385-9.jpg (162.37 KB, 533x575, this is your appearance....jpg)

life is more complex than an infographic

Anonymous 29-09-26 21:41:33 No.828096

>>828094
if you think typing some letters into a box is a powerful argument you might be retarded (literally all arguments are retarded, and not even violence convinces people, it just makes them scared of you)

Anonymous 29-09-26 21:43:07 No.828097

>>828094
That's no meant as an argument but as a description. Like a dictionnary definition isn't an argument either.

Anonymous 29-09-26 23:29:15 No.828129

>>828096
>literally all arguments are retarded
the absolute state
>>828097
it is an argument in the sense that it's trying to convince people of a conclusion (that class is structural while the other stuff mentioned is not)

Unique IPs: 6