Uhhh.. leftyxisters.. I don't feel so lefty anymore…
>ancaps learn about class interests
>>828106When I tell the others there is not enough uncle inheritance for everybody we will violate your NAP, skin you and string you up a lamp post
>>828100Only a petite bourgeois would be able to come up with this image. Who's gonna tell him that most people have nothing to inherit?
>>828107>>828108If we're going to make everything fair and equal we might as well make do with non-existence
Bait used to be believable. At the very least creative. What the fuck is this? OP kill yourself.
>>828111I'm telling you the truth, son.
>>828111Where do you think this society is going, if I may ask?
>>828110who wants to make everything fair and equal?
>>828110>we might as well make do with non-existenceBe my guest. Start practicing non-existence.
the ancom turned into a dengist… sad
>>828106growing up did not spontaneously give me a rich dead uncle. how old are you btw?
>>828108>Only a petite bourgeois would be able to come up with this image. Who's gonna tell him that most people have nothing to inherit?We're all materialists here. What does it matter? If it works, it works.
>>828110lenin spoke 11 languages, wrote more pages in his collected works than days he was alive, was basically a genius and hard worker, was born into a moderately prosperous family with a father who had become a local official, and he had this to say:
<Mr. Tugan repeats the old trick of the reactionaries: first to misinterpret socialism by making it out to be an absurdity, and then to triumphantly refute the absurdity! When we say that experience and reason prove that men are not equal, we mean by equality, equality in abilities or similarity in physical strength and mental ability. It goes without saying that in this respect men are not equal. No sensible person and no socialist forgets this. But this kind of equality has nothing whatever to do with socialism. If Mr. Tugan is quite unable to think, he is at least able to read; were he to take the well-known work of one of the founders of scientific socialism, Frederick Engels, directed against Dühring, he would find there a special section explaining the absurdity of imagining that economic equality means anything else than the abolition of classes. But when professors set out to refute socialism, one never knows what to wonder at most—their stupidity, their ignorance, or their unscrupulousness. Since we have Mr. Tugan to deal with, we shall have to start with the rudiments. By political equality Social-Democrats (this was before the 1914 split, so Lenin is still a "Social Democrat" by the standards of the time) mean equal rights, and by economic equality, as we have already said, they mean the abolition of classes. As for establishing human equality in the sense of equality of strength and abilities (physical and mental), socialists do not even think of such things.source:
https://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1914/mar/11.htm Wouldn't change me. I already make 140k a year and that's still chump change compared to the people I hate. It’s the billionaires that are the problem, not low millionaires. Especially ones that spent their entire lives getting there.
the corrupting power of capital over individuals is precisely why the system should be abolished.
>>828175You can't have economic equality without biological equality (the closest version of this could be ants), in any case, the Bolsheviks expelled/killed whatever opposition they could've had formal arguments with.. especially the Kadets of whom of this moment, were the intelligentsia.
>>828283Economic equality means abolition of classes which we can have in fact
>>828283>You can't have economic equality without biological equalityprove it
>>828288It's impossible with h*mans unless you were to institute Artificial Super Intelligence against all of them or something
>>828290It's quite simple, it was never done by humans. Now you could argue that before civilization there were hunter gatherers but, in my defense, and to your discredit: you would call such primitive organization anti-progressive.
>>828290Even in these primitive societies they were beginning to be unequal.
>>828290And furthermore, going far enough back you wouldn't really have much societal organization with hunter-gatherers because there were simply not many humans back then.
>>828293>it was never done by humanshumans? the guys known among the animals precisely for constantly doing shit that was never done before?
>>828303You aren't special.
>>828303>the guys known among the animals precisely for constantly doing shit that was never done before?humans for the most part do the same as any other animal, breed and kill shit
>>828293>it was never done by humansclassless society (which is how economic equality has been defined in this conversation; you seem to be ignoring this) has existed, and even if it hadn't, "hasn't been done" isn't proof that something can't be done lmao
>>828308utterly braindead response, i cannot believe that someone older than 15 would type this seriously. humans do considerably more than "breed and kill shit" you mongoloid
>>828309https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Disproved_conjectures i'm not gonna spend any more time on a thread filled with nothing but reddit platitudes but i cannot believe this mofo actually pulled out "you can't prove a negative" on me lmfao kill yourself my dude your brain is completely cooked
>>828310>humans do considerably more than "breed and kill shit" you mongoloidsome do, good thing I used the qualifier "for the most part", like it or not most human energy is channeled into keeping the genocide and ecocide machine going, and breeding
>>828135that's fucked up anon
>>828310>classless society (which is how economic equality has been defined in this conversation; you seem to be ignoring this) has existed, and even if it hadn't, "hasn't been done" isn't proof that something can't be done lmaoYou may not like the results of such a society if it were to happen (you don't know either way because you're not in one) and you may complain about it, regardless. For example did the peasants or lower classes necessarily, after the liberal revolutions were over, desire or like to be in such a society? What did they realistically have to gain from it? Did they gain anything from it?
>>828283>You can't have economic equality without biological equalitythe point of communism isn't "equality" as an abstract ideal but to end class society. there will likely be new issues to deal with because history doesn't just end. True communists aren't alt-Fukuyamists.
>>828322>but to end class societyWho's going to end it anyway?
Unique IPs: 16