/siberia/ - Off-topic

No.

No.

>>829486
Seems groundbreaking for its time (1912). Still I have this to say:

>collectivism is more stable than capitalism
It wasnt.

>in the future everyone will be slaves
We wont need human labor in the future at all.

>>829486
>state capitalism and socialism bad (corporatism bad)
>strong middle class good
You could get the crux of Distributism by reading Aristotle's Politics.

Notice how Right Libertarian & Catholic think tanks all seem to congregate on this point.
They all tout the same message and the reason why is obvious to see.
The Right Libertarian laments State Corporatism / Absolutism / Socialism or Fascism because he wants his private society – the libertarian favors "limited or small government" for the freeier reign of estates with the basic and concordant principle of NAP.
The Catholic appears to -want- his private society, but really it's just because he hates the predominance of secular government and nationalism all the same – wanting to limit the secular authority by the supremacy of the Church.
The Right Libertarian sees Church as a blank check for NAP and likes his appeal to limited government; the Church likes private society because tbh that is where it prospers.
Albeit from two completely different motives.

>>829492
I don't think he's arguing for collectivism, as for the second point you've made, we don't know as of yet what the future is going to look like in regards to who the true servant and true master is going to be.. I speculate, however, that ASI (or Artificial Superior Intelligence) guided by technocrats will be the new masters, and mostly everyone else will be a sort of recipient "sheep" group which is given universal basic income as grass to graze on but without much independence.

>>829492
>We wont need human labor in the future at all.

who the fuck is "we"