Why do they seethe at america so much when america is literally the only reason they aren't all just japanese slaves.
They literally don't though? Have you ever met a Chinese person? If anything general sentiment is slightly positive. Meanwhile Americans are hysterical about China. This is classic projection.
>>833222trvke. a lot of chinese people believe the hollywood version of USA with no homeless people. meanwhile americans believe china is literally 1984 or something.
>>833220>USA aiding KMT in revolutionary war and preventing unification of China>USA invades Korea>USA invades VietnamMany good reasons to hate mutts. Better question is why are mutts obsessed with China when Chinese havent done anything to them?
>>833220they don't. you're not that important little bro.
japan never could have conquered china, their aim was to try to intimidate china into surrendering and signing a treaty that would favor japan, but chiang kai-shek called their bluff and refused to surrender and retreated into china's vast unconquerable interior and japan became locked in a costly and disastrous war of attrition that was rapidly depleting their men and resources. this is why japanese soldiers were raping and mutilating civilians, because they had suffered massive casualties and national humiliation in their dumb crusade so they took out their outrage on a bunch of defenseless women and children and elderly villagers instead of fighting more chinese soldiers. it's also why japan bombed pearl harbor, blaming the us embargo for the failure of their invasion. the whole country was playing on tilt, out of their minds with ideological fervor and unwilling to face the terrible shame of admitting failure and pulling out, they just kept cramming their flaccid tiny chode in and blaming the entire world for their inability to cum.
>america is literally the only reason they aren't all just japanese slaves.
If Japan somehow managed to conquer China, Japan would have become Chinese by now.
>>833271>their aim was to try to intimidate china into surrendering and signing a treaty that would favor japan, but chiang kai-shek called their bluff No, Chiang initially did sign the Japan-favoring treaty. Japan under Fumimaro Konoe just ripped up the treaty and declared that it would no longer negotiate with the Chiang Kai-shek ROC and would try to establish its own Wang Jingwei ROC.
Look up "Trautmann mediations"
chinas literally just chilling and doing their own thing and this somehow causes the golden bilion to seethe eternaly
if anything china has too favorable an opinion of amerikkka
China did most of the heavy lifting in their war vs Japan.
They would have won in the end, it just would have taken them until the 60s to get there.
Why do they seethe at america so much when they're literally america but red?
>>834546I mean this site is full of reactionaries larping as leftists, using racist language like mutt or -oid is just one of the signs.
>>834548Mutt sucks, but what’s wrong with -oid?
OP is a retard
The US never fought on the japanese or chinese mainlands, it took the soviets joining in for them to surrender, and for the soviets and chinese to kick them off the chinese and korean mainlands
Japan would have lost eventually, the soviets and americans just expedited it
>>834674>Japan would have lost eventually,How did chinese nationalists come up with this cope?
>>834674The US actually did fight on the Chinesen mainland. They fought the PLA to protect the evacuating Japanese forces.
>>834719The USSR would have beaten Germany eventually too. The war would last a decade longer, but still. Same thing in the Asian theatre.
>>834737Not really china wouldve economically and politically collapsed in the long run in a war with japan with no outside intervention.
>>834623if i had to guess they probably mentally associate it with "mongoloid" which is a racist term they used to call kids with down syndrome, and of course, east asians. i heard that from the highly sensitive leftist site hexbear once. but I don't buy it. -oid is a suffix meaning "resembling" and can be applied to any noun. I could call someone a "chadoid" for looking like a chad. The fact that it is usually used contemptuously is a mere trend.
Unique IPs: 21