I don't understand, why is being a lumpen treated like a personal failure? Most of us are not unaware by choice, you need some sort of cognitive ability to get behind any political/economic set of ideas.
Me personaly, i'm a complete moron with zero aspirations in life, besides being the best riddim producer (delusional). What exactly did i do for communists to call me a retard and for nationalists to call me a race traitor? It's not like i don't want to understand complex ideas, i just can't. But i guess being sub-average is frowned upon no matter what, so why bother. I just hope you guys could be just a little less aggressive, that's all.
Anyway, let me know what you think down below.
>treated like a personal failure?
thats just how liberal idealists view the world in general, it all revolves around the binary moral choices made by individual atomized actors and there's no material no context and no history just the ego and vibes.
because communism is about who you're allowed to be angry at, duh.
>>833998"Liberal idealists" i'm not sure if leftypol users (or anyone at this point really) are liberal. My point is - if im wrong about something, why am i always getting judged for it? I have no problem admitting that i know very little, but sharing the same fate as a punching for, in my example, believing in genetic determinism seems counter-intuitive and emotional. Why?
>>834001at any given point a huge chunk of leftypol are just radlibs despite profusely saying otherwise. My best guess as to why you get this punching bag treatment is that certain aspects of social media in general encourage contrarian shitflinging regardless of the topic. You can approach a poster in good faith all you want but some people just want to be negative af and accumulate (you)s regardless of what a given thread is about.
>>834004I'll choose to believe you on this one, thanks
>>834008and as with all rape victims, they deserve nothing but our scorn!
>>834008Do you think that an 80 autism score person would be able to wrap their head around even the most basic concepts of wealth distribution?
I just don't think all the communist support comes from rational thought, alot of it could be emotional, and from what i understand such emotional support could flow into anything based on the snvironment (like, if i ever win the lottery im sure as hell not sharing it with any of you, sorry). So an emotional communist is just one step away from being a lumpen. Saying that anyone who isn't a communist was raped is kind of outrageous.
>>834012communism shouldnt just appeal to the lowest denominator, if you cant wrap your head around the basic principles of communism then you arent useful
>>834012>Do you think that an 80 autism score person would be able to wrap their head around even the most basic concepts of wealth distribution?you uyghas (i typed it out manually, take that societi) really think you're geniuses for thinking shit like "the poor should have more money" huh
>>834014But that's exactly my point, alot of people would be "useless" to communism, then why would they be considered any different from lumpen? If they support communism for personal reasons, they are simply lumpen with a different personality. Are they "raped" by default? Wouldn't it mean that they are born like that?
>>834018No, i'm one of the lumpen, and i consider myself to not be intellectualy aware enough to get behind any complex worldview.
The "share all money" crowd is emotional, not rational and i refuse to support somethimg just because i feel like without understanding it. Thats my main point
>>834023people who serve no meaningful purpose in society and arent communists are lumpens
>>834029Why are you ignoring everything else i said? Do you not want to talk? You feel ok? You can share if you want to, no judgement here.
In all of history more socialists were killed by lumpen than vice versa. Just a thought.