/siberia/ - Off-topic

I'm retarded, actually, here's image without the spoiler.

That highly depends on who the attack is targeting and how much faggotry there is in the manifesto.

Another consideration: which flag would they post under?

>>837190
Make it spin the other way

now make a mirrored image so that the hooks are facing the right.

We can guess that any mass shooter posting here would post their manifesto under Posadism or Accelerationism. If that is the case, they would probably have about as much faggotry in their manifesto as rightoids like Tarrant, so a fuck ton of that.
To add on, lets say they attack Wall Street, with some level of success, and kill enough capitalists to stay in the news cycle for at least a month and trigger an executive order to be passed to investigate 90 gorillion antifas or some shit. Then what?

>>837200
nice! now stand on one leg, juggle 15 hackey sacks, and recite the swedish national anthem backwards in the key of D minor, after having eaten a ghost pepper.

ahem.

to answer your question: everyone loved what luigi mangionie did, because his actions, whether morally justified or not, brought the simmering discontent that most everyone feels regarding healthcare to the forefront of public discourse, even if for only a millisecond. it's a harsh way to bring up the elephant in the room, but it's effective, especially considering how unwilling the media and the healthcare industry were to respond. it's like a mic drop, they responded in the way everyone expected them to, i.e. have a fit and call him a terrorist while conveniently sidestepping the issues at hand. they couldn't have made his trial a spectacle because his actions were a salve on the collective rash brought about by the festering rot of the american healthcare system, and provided a catharsis that would ultimately christen him with sainthood in the eyes of the people.

so yeah, if you kill the right people, in a way that touches upon a social ill, and one that is important enough that it's pretty much a bipartisan issue, then you'll get lauded as a hero, too.

>>837202
That is probably what would happen, yes. But specifically what would happen to this site? Would it also be brought up on the news? Would there be a raid of some sort, from the alt-right and/or normies? What would users here think about it? Would the site owners get busted by the feds? What would happen to us in specific?

#darkwoke

>>837203
>what would happen, specifically?
beats me. maybe some of that would happen. maybe this site would be mentioned in the news cycle, which might do something to tarnish its reputation; it might conversely attract an influx of normalfags and alt-right fags; it's equally possible that the opposite would be true and the site wouldn't be much affected at all. it's hard to say, because the news coverage would depend on who the killer is, who he targeted, what was said in the manifesto, and what changed as a result of his actions.

if some accelerationist schizo blew up a building in NYC or something and killed a bunch of prominent trust fund kiddies, while dropping a manifesto here that was filled with decade old pasta and memes that no one in their right mind would take seriously for a second, then I imagine it'd be a highlight for some period of time, a few weeks at best, and then it'd be forgotten like pretty much everything else. if it stayed in the news cycle for a month and forced the investigations into a number of known associates of this one guy, then I doubt much more would happen than a half assed investigation, as per usual, that wouldn't get round the clock media coverage.

do people remember kirk's assassination? the attempted assassinations of trump? yes, they do, but they're not culturally relevant, and neither would something like this be, really.

>>837204
now put giga in front of it

>>837205
That probably explains why this hasn't happened yet. Most leftists are smart enough to know that individual mass shootings don't have much of an affect, and at the same time don't have the means/are too lazy to organize and make a real impact.
Now, another hypothetical. Most people probably know what Anonymous is. Emerged out of the asscraack of 4chan, and got in the news for years and not months. What if something similar to Anonymous emerged out of leftypol, and started pwning the fuck out of rightoid/nazoid infrastructure for a couple years. Ex. Operation RNC-DNC-PRC, where some people here manage to hack billboard systems of the RNC and DNC and blast the Internationale on the intercom while displaying Marx with his cock out, and also DDOS both their websites, or hack them and replace them with redirects to MIA or some other site. It probably wouldn't happen all at once, but if we got an operation running, it might have more of an effect on the news than a regular run of the mill mass shooting.

it's only a matter of time before some MKULTRA'd chudkid or chudman or chudgeezer or chudlady becomes the first to hold the honor of "I did a mass shooting and posted my manifesto to leftypol"

but hopefully it will be none of us

>>837207
the only thing that hurts capitalism is the loss of capital. trump knows that, his billionaire friends know that, and that's why they do what they do; to take wealth away from americans and put it into their own pockets. only, that has a price, which is to say that it destroys the country in the process, the pilfering and pillaging of wealth will leave nothing but rubble in its wake.

my point is that unless your grassroot leethaxor cyber activism schenanigans does something substantial enough to truly hurt the pocketbooks of your political adversaries, then you're wasting time and effort that could be better spent elsewhere. but would it be more efficacious than a random shooting or assassination attempt? perhaps, but again, it depends on the targets and what happens in the wake of that. to go back to luigi, his killing was successful but ultimately fruitless, outside of galvanizing a base around the specific issue of healthcare reform. that's something, but not nearly enough. if some crazy bastard killed the president, that'd be much more impactful, but even the president can be replaced, right? there are built-in contingencies for that very reason.

if someone managed to kill a number of people who are instrumental to the smooth operation of a given organization, then you'd be getting somewhere, but that takes a lot of… something. preparation, effort, intelligence, experience, etc. theoretically, a hacking group could probably do more to destabilize any given institution more through their tomfoolery than an assassination would, but I don't know the technicalities of that. that too would equally require preparation, effort, intelligence, experience, etc.

fuck I don't know, man.

>>837207
People are allowed a little bit of adventurism, as a treat.

>>837204
>>837200
>>837197
>>837190
>>837187
nazi shit kill yourself