/siberia/ - Off-topic

>>838859
>considered this "radical leftist" thing
by who?

>>838860
I don't know, I was admittedly pretty young, I just remember it having that connotation, same thing as something like this

It wasn't considered radical leftist. They were lynching mainlanders by burning them alive. Course it was pretty interesting to see how they were making PPE out of soda bottles and using umbrellas and giant spoons to bounce smoke grenades and water cannons off of themselves.

>>838862
All these neat homemade rioting tricks that only work on governments that do not want to kill protestors. Fizzlegang won btw

>>838861
that pic is just run-of-the-mill western liberalism and so was most of the support for free hong kong

>>838859
at least in burger political discourse a huge amount of people are idealists who have no real conception of history or context and all there political knowledge comes from a mix of pop culture, aesthetics and vibes. For a while occupy wall st. and guy fawkes masks was the images of "radical leftism" these people were constantly seeing on the screen. I actually think the Guy Fawkes mask itself is kind of a neat metaphor for this pop culture-spectacle-vibes based worldview since actual ball knowers will know the guy was a reactionary monarchist while the idealists just see that shit in memes and movies and just assume it means government bad without any further research or investigation.

tldr: many burgerians use pop culture to analyze real world politics and not the other way around

>>838883
Those masks are clearly a reference to the guy from V for Vendetta not to the actual Guy Fawkes himself

>>838888
quads of truth, thats what Im trying to get at, all of these people are on stage 3 or 4 and don't even consider stage 1/material reality when forming political opinions. Pure simulcra and spectacle brained.

>>838883
>I actually think the Guy Fawkes mask itself is kind of a neat metaphor for this pop culture-spectacle-vibes based worldview since actual ball knowers will know the guy was a reactionary monarchist while the idealists just see that shit in memes and movies and just assume it means government bad without any further research or investigation.
TBH, there's a lot of "government bad" attitude in tradcath circles. A lot of them are right libertarians. It's in tradcath interests because they think a weaker state (esp. secular state) means a stronger church.
I have to agree with both the christcoms and natsoc neopagans that Christianity was always kind of anti-social and more appropriate for anarchists at times.

Not only are Tradcaths anti-social that way, but Protestants as well.
The more hardline Christian the Christian is, the more second society, Church über alles, and Neronian they are.

>>838859
"China bad" is classic leftism. Remember the Asiatic mode of production?

>>838895
>>838894
I say this quite contrary to the social conservative who constantly praise Christianity for social utility's sake* but the truer the Christian the less they care about social utility.

>>838894
Kys subhuman

>>838897
you are retarded