What is your opinion about 3d pornography?
>>9335What the frick did you just fricking say about my religion, you small child of the devil? I'll have you know I graduated top of my class in Bible Study, and I've been involved in numerous secret raids on Non-Belivers, and I have over 300 confirmed conversions of Non-believers. I am trained in baptism and I'm the top pastor in the entire Christian Community. You are nothing to me but just another sinner. I will convert you the frick out with blessings the likes of which has never been seen before the eyes of our lord and savior, mark my fricking words. You think you can get away with saying that sinful material to me over the Internet? Think again, sinner. As we speak I am contacting my friends and fellow christians and your IP is being traced right now so you better prepare for the flood, sinner. The flood that wipes out the pathetic little thing you call science. You're fricking done for, kid. I can be anywhere, anytime, and I convert you in over seven hundred ways, and that's just with my bare hands and the bible of Jesus amen. Not only am I extensively trained in exorcism, but I have access to the entire arsenal of holy water and bibles from the pope himself and I will use it to its full extent to wipe your sins off the face of God's green earth, you devil child. If only you could have known what unholy retribution your little "clever" comment was about to bring down upon you, maybe you would have held your sinful tongue. But you couldn't, you didn't, and now you're paying the price, you atheist idiot. I will spill holy water all over you and you will drown in it. You're fricking blessed, kiddo.
>>9343i dont think they are, intersex doesnt mean someone with both male and female genitalia.
>>9350futa by definition have a vagina, if not theyre not futa
>>9401 what, in morse code¿ lm
ao
>>9412 what th????????
>>9413 e dog doin????????
>>9441>suicide baybeeeeeee!D:
:D
>>94533D porn has a lot of it. I'm just surprised there hasn't been "human with pony head stapled on" stuff yet.
Like does this even count as furry? It's just the head. Replace the head with a TV and make the body grey, would it count as clank?
>>9462Why does everything have to be pedophilia with you guys?
No. Dog worship is because partly of misopedia/misanthropy.
People love dogs because we don't have to deal with an independent mind that can question things and say no.
>>9469More like one
There’s a
D
I
S
C
I
R
D
Mods and a lot of the deranged idiots on here use that’s infested with half the disgusting not just pedo but beastiality and inflation garbage. Don’t trust this info entirely as this is based off what I’ve heard off other users on this site
>>9470I feel like Thiscord shouldn't be word filtered. Like that's just a word.
Like, we can't say stuff like "In a state of fbi.gov" or "speading fbi.gov" because it gets rewritten. It's a funny joke but tiresome.
>>9479I was going to say I can’t believe twitch mods are that fucking ducked before realizing the video was fake
Holy that site is shit
OP asked for our opinions so
its not my thing and I suspect that the medium is for folks kinkier than myself, but with that said the stuff that A) doesnt try to be photorealistic and B) is spoofing pop culture (movies, bideo games etc) is often pretty hot.
Ill need the "graphics" to get better before I can shake off the uncanny valley vibes I get from most of the stuff itt though
>>9504This right here is perfect
>>9521>zeldapog
>linkpog
>bisexual zelda and link bjpog >>9523 i can't d
>>9521 ude this st
>>9522 uff confuses the HELL o
ut of my ochinchin
i like femboys & grills, but both at the same time to me are like putting chocolate on spaghetti, it don't work in my brain, it makes me
startled it's unexplored territory, it's the belly of the beast & i don't know what to do
>>9527 lmao what is the message here, that it's soy to not suck hitler's dick?
>>9525 but i already washed it AT LEAST three months ago
>>9541You can walk and you can talk in virtual reality
All you've got to do is dream
You can have whatever you want in virtual reality
All you've got to do is dream
Have virtually anything in virtual reality
Just do it
In moments when I want you
In moments when I want you so
All I've got to do is dream
In moments when I need you
In moments when I need you so
This is just like the real thing, only better
It's reality only better…
What's real to me, what's make-believe
I don't even care any more
When I dream
When I dream, oh
In moments when I want you
In moments when I want you so
All I've got to do is dreeeeaaaam
>>9541I'd pull her from my screen
Just like in my dreams
>>9587Which one?
Jack Nicholson?
Jared Leto?
Heath Ledger?
Joaqin Phoenix?
Why do a lot of sfms show the dick being mostly soft despite appearing erect? Do 3d porn actors all have ED or something?
>>9588This one is just grotesque, it's like a shitpost.
>>9592I need a doctor.
Get me a doctor.
To get me back to life.
>>9587Is there 3d clown
SEX pornography?
>>9315It's best when it has a sense of humour.
Too amateur to be taken seriously.
yes im talking about CGI, but it also applies to meatspace 3DPD >>9609>malesew
take it to the gay thread
>>9650Unironically this, somewhat.
People act like porn is bad, yet sexhavers end up in problems with STDs, bastard chuldren, or low prospects frm paying hookers.
Porn is better.
>>9652Yeah, but I think vasectomy in exchange for low-to-zero taxes would be a better incentive.
Idk why men obsess over their own fertility when they dont wanna raise kids.
>>9657The balls pressing the butt plug in is such a fun idea.
Also when there's no head shot to suggest otherwise I like to assume by default it's a centaur or something.
>>9686Cum belly inflation?
Instant 10/10.
>>9416>>9706Who is this?
I want to look up the full interview?
>>9733But why
>>9729 Hard to find a lot of Nyakumi's better stuff, since it gets deleted or minimally posted
>>9743 >normal shitty porn but without the irl rape What in the actual fuck are you talking about?
>>9742 The clitoris isn't as high up as a lot of porn artists like to draw, it's actually pretty sunken into the clitoral hood for a lot of women vid/pics rel.
>>9755I mean it's a Sangheili so it makes sense.
>>9756Also this.
>>9754 Wow… what a bunch of faggots… again. I'm betting it was NotMeNotYou the goreposting 'creator' of the site.
>>9763LMAO what the fuck is this? Some SumerianDragon-tier shit
>>9760 That's what you get from a gang of musty old wierdos.
>>9758Another one
>>9761>>9762 Very hyper realistic, especially for 3D in vid 1 and 6. Reminds me of Nyl2, lewy or serge3dx
It's strange how much 3D has advanced, 10 years ago some of the most advanced 3D stuff was horrifying as fuck or moe, usually made by people like sircus or gif author.
The only ones that weren't horrifying was ths stuff using premade models from video games like Mass Effect, Halo or Left4Dead
>>9759Another Nyaku
>>9764And another Rena POV
I'm honestly surprised why 3D CG isn't used MORE for aliens and robots, monsters and other (currently) impossible stuff like that.
BTW
3D sfw
>>>/draw/1454 >>>/draw/3811 Alunya 3D
SFM >>>/hobby/35530
>>9758 >>9754 >>9757Speaking of e621 and POV (and futa), for a site that LOVES to bitch about "correct" tagging, their tag system is horrendous. The furry.booru mirror is somehow even worse, but I digress. There is no taker_pov tag, instead there's like half a dozen different pov type tags from worm's_eye_view to submissive_pov to female_pov and fellatio_pov etc. Meantime the actual POV tag is so broad that it encapsulates way too much content, even with other tag filters.
Additionally there is no longer a singular active futa tag because it offended someone's sensibilities; thus intersex, dickgirl, shemale, cuntboy, hermaphrodite and more recently gynomorph is used instead. The futa tag is a ghost tag, so if you type it, it'll cover a large variety of the mentioned tags, however gynomorph is a more recent addition, and is used more for recent content so typing "futa" doesn't pull up some recent stuff under that tag, and cuntboy is also included in the futa tag for some reason, even though that term has always been relegated to chicks with dicks. That's not even going into "tag what you see", which resulted in inevitable tagging wars and bans for people adjusting tags for a character, even when the tagger is the artist in the first place.
The problem is that its the same circle of crusty furfags that own E621/Herpy/furaffinity/SoFurry/etc. and have a hegemon over anthro content, with alternative sites unable to compete, such as U18 or the various 8ch outgrowths. Not even talking about DMCA nonsense.
>>9776You sound in denial, are you perchance aroused by the train, anon-kun?
>>9775 Pokemon apparently, though they look more like WSache's pool toys.
>those creatures of InfernoNah, that's vid rel
>>9790>>9781>>9782>Nobody recognizes the old Biggie-Smalls / Thomas the Tank Engine SFM from years agoLMAO this thing is from the early 2010s, if that was disturbing to you… you're way too new to the internet.
>>9784 I mean it's not quite right in the animation (too low relative to the visual angle; problems of animating intimacy from a first-person POV) however a nose being visible within eye-sight is actually normal, it's just we don't notice our noses because our brains only acknowledge them subconsciously for orientation, it's the reason why people lose balance and get disoriented in VR games, the lack of a nose to see in front of your face means your brain is missing a focus point.
https://nowiknow.com/when-your-brain-nose-something-is-missing/ >>9785 LOL, I guess it's a good way to go. The only part that feels off was the way her butt caved in so much when he grabbed it, like a flaccid air-filled ball rather than a muscled 'cheek.
>>9791 Most of it is actually fairly 'realistic' in terms of physical motion and proportion, that butt squeeze was far more exaggerated and feels out of place because of it.
>>9795Another anon said the train music video I posted was "genuinely disturbing"
I also replied about the buttocks assassination, which is not from the 2010s, although I agree it does look like a shitty mobile game ad.
>>979716:9 view is roughly what we actually see clearly, the outer edges are something that can only be seen in a 3D or VR environment, which means on a 2D flat screen it views differently.
TL;DR: limitations of technology
>>9801>It's not a perfect rectangle.True, but as again, limitations of technology
>And if you don't ACTUALLY see the nose then why draw it You do, you just don't think about it, ergo the phrase "see the nose in front of your face" regarding people not seeing the obvious.
>creates an uncanny valley Almost all 3D POV stuff is uncanny valley to some extent, kind of a moot point
>Our eyes registering the nose and our brain drawing the picture are not the same thing. This video creates the opposite effect however because it's not in VR and thus our brain can actually see it. It's just weird.Perhaps 🤷
>>9803Good point, nice.
>>9805It's just an optical illusion lol.
>>9804>Seeing IS thinkingNot quite, our brains see, but unless we focus or observe, we will miss details. We don't think about our noses when looking at something until we consciously remember or are reminded of it, because the brain has subconscious signals that dismiss active processing of some visual information most of the time (such as what we see in the corners of our eyes) because its essentially unnecessary information.
>>456547 >>9807We are seeing it. It's like how we breathe without needing to think about it, but we're still physically moving and registering it, just not on a conscious level unless we are reminded of it.
>If something isn't registered in our consciousness then we don't see it We are seeing it, in our subconscious and just automatically dismissing it, the proof lies in the VR-simulation using fake noses projected into the image. Because a 3D simulation isn't actually part of us, we can't just dismiss it as the body ignoring itself; the brain actively dials down the visual significance in our heads, while simultaneously relying on it to provide balance and direction. But if viewed on a regular screen it creates cognitive dissonance when seeing it. The human brain is a complicated thing m8.
>You can have a condition where you can be blind yet detect objects with your eyes Blindness is the receptors in your eyes not connecting, that's irrelevant to this conversation because the brain IS seeing our nose, it's just passively assigning it to a background image in our aware consciousness.
>You can react to stuff appropriately but you wouldn't really acknowledge that you saw anythingWhat?
>your brain detects the signals from your brain I'm assuming you're referring to the nerves and eyes and other sensory organs.
>reacts to them but forgets to output a pucture to you No, it doesn't forget to output a picture, it places it in a background of sorts. It's part of the reason we only see in focus a small portion of what our eyes actually capture, it prevents the brain from being overwhelmed with information, something a digital camera or simulation does not replicate or cannot do so properly because of technological limitations
>Seeing is getting a picture printed in your consciousness Not quite, your eye is like
Camera Obscura which projects a real time image into photo-receptors which in turn register as an image in the brain. Your brain is like the memory drive that actually holds onto the image, it doesn't produce it on its own.
>That's how you're able to "see" dreams without using your eyes, it's not about detecting data with your organs.Again, not quite, the brain uses said data to form certain things within the brain, and while it can form abstract concepts in your sleep, most dreams are within a certain limit based on the physical and visual data the brain acquires over a persons continuing lifespan. A person born blind will almost never see anything in their dream, or have very vague perceptions based on what their other senses have gathered. Moreover the environment does impact dreams, as being touched or spoken to during sleep can sometimes be heard or sensed by the brain and register within the dream.
>>9813>The nose in the video isn't in the peripheral vision but in focus, and thus distracting.Yes, no shit lol.
>>9809>Read a book on phenomenology and neuroscienceI have
>what no philosophical education Irrelevant to neuroscience, and I do in fact have an education in philosophy.
This is derailing way off of the actual topic of 3D porn at this point, so we'll stop it here.
>>9815>I do in fact have an education in philosophyGigachad, I respect that.
By the word "seeing" I meant "experiencing a visual qualia" rather than any physical processes. And I know that dreams are built from one's own life experience, I'm a soft determinist and I do see porn while dreaming if I see too much of it IRL.
>>9816>By the word "seeing" I meant "experiencing a visual qualia" rather than any physical processes. And I know that dreams are built from one's own life experience, I'm a soft determinist and I do see porn while dreaming if I see too much of it IRL. I see then, I suppose that's true enough.
>>9817 What I mean is that philosophy can be based off science, but relative to actual scientific study is usually uninvolved, there is little philosophical discussion when you're inserting electrodes into a brain for study, or scanning brain patterns during R.E.M. sleep.
As a side note recently AI is being used to replicate what people see in their dreams, using brain scan information.
>>9818>What I mean is that philosophy can be based off science, but relative to actual scientific study is usually uninvolvedBut can't scientific study be motivated by philosophy? Like explaining the existence of qualia?
>recently AI is being used to replicate what people see in their dreamsThat's pretty based.
>>9821> scientific study be motivated by philosophy While true, philosophy can get in the way of scientific study as well, as proven in history when political and religious philosophies were contradicted by scientific research and the resulting research was suppressed for it. Hell the current scientific community still does that for research that disproves the status quo.
>pretty based.Very much so, though I fear that it'll be used for interrogation or some other CIA shit.
>>9844Nyl finally released that one huh? The intro reminds me of Affect3D's Bloodlust Cerene series or the various Lady Dimetrescu animations
Speaking of Affect3D DMCA's the hell out of its content, anyone know where their full length ones are available?
As a side note people are also using VRChat to experiment with 3d pr0n but it looks so janky, vid 1 rel.
Unique IPs: 154