/ufo/ - Paranormal and Conspiracies

And he talks on and on about jews, but doesn't seem to be a neo nazi which is rare in those circles

Take out an ad, Miles, you lame schizo

belongs in siberia but it wasn't uncommon for well educated people (especially in prussia!) to have noble connections

>it's da jooz!
get new material

>>435
>just hates millionaire capitalist families
you are saying this as if it was good. it is not, I assume you aren't a leftists so let me explain it to you: most marxists don't care about those families, at least on the theoretical level (the one where marx is relevant) because it isn't that the system is good and the people are bad, but that the system works the way it works and the individuals are not necessarily important. if tomorrow you woke up in the body of one of the supposedly jewish dynasties you hate, you would still do the same shit they do because you would understand it is in your best interest to do that (or you would eventually fail and be replaced by someone willing to do the job). that's also why their religion or ethnicity isn't important: a business in africa or india has to minimize expenses and maximize revenue the same as a business in new york or tel aviv, after a certain baseline of development they all follow the same logic regardless of ethnic background

>the paper he says Marx was
>the people we trust and care about
no one "trusts" or "cares" about marx the person, mostly because he has been dead for centuries
the important thing about marx are his theories. this is the same as saying that you should discard newtonian physics, not because they are wrong or because you have a better model, but because the guy was a pervert or something. if marx was a politician or a public figure where trust plays a role, then maybe you could discredit him with personal accusations, but this shit is cope from anticommunists that can't refute his theories so they attack his personal life, often with lies (like in this case)

>but doesn't seem to be a neo nazi
so he isn't a nazi but he happens to find that every person that he doesn't like has some jewish ancestry, and the evidence he uses to claim this is nazi propaganda and antisemitic pamphlets that he accepts uncritically. it is on the same level as saying
>I'm not antisemitic but I'm reading this book called "the protocols of the elders of zion" and I find it very concerning
either you're making fun of the reader or you are kind of stupid

>>437
I'm not him I swear to god, haven't posted here in months. Was going to post it on /lit/ but I got a 3 day for ""trolling""

sounds like a follower of bakunin lol

>lets ignore the concrete and critical reasonings themselves and focus on the identity of the person behind them
i hate conspiracytards so fucking much, i bet OP is an amerilard too

>>436
> And he talks on and on about jews, but doesn't seem to be a neo nazi
Litteraly me

This would probably be better for /ufo/

>>440
>I'm not antisemitic but I'm reading this book called "the protocols of the elders of zion" and I find it very concerning
I don't remember what it said, but it was something like:
>We will destroy traditional values ​​and create something Jewish.
And here's a direct quote:
>The aristocracy, which rightfully enjoyed the workers' labor, was interested in their well-fed, healthy, and strong bodies.
>We, however, are interested in the opposite—in the degeneration of the goyim.
>Our power lies in the chronic malnutrition and weakness of the worker, because he will find neither the strength nor the energy to resist it.
Do you think this was actually written by a hater of the aristocracy? It's literally propaganda in its favor.
And as if Christianity isn't Jewish, and the Holstein-Gottorp-Romanovs were pure Russians and not at all Ashkenazi.

Evendoe marxism goes directly against those types of people so it makes zero sense for them to be funded. Also zero proof

>>447
the point of the analogy is that the pamphlet is fake, and to uncritically take it at face value is to play into the antisemitic propaganda. it is the same as reading a pamphlet about the yellow peril and saying "I'm not sinophobic but this sounds concerning" without first asking yourself if the book is real, and if not, why was it made and what agenda it was trying to push

He actually wrote a little bit on the protocols I'll have to find a PDF

Scientific socialism is a glow op. Lemme explain, Marx was from a middle class family and married an aristocrat while Engels was straight up bourgeois capitalist. They weren't the only ones, Kropotkin was a serf owning aristocrat. It has nothing to do with Jews. So these people were non-proles who infiltrated the workers movement because of a sense of bourgeois guilt and shame at raping the workers and their bourgeois values influenced their beliefs and theories. Scientific socialism is just socialism with bourgeois characteristics stealthily mixed into it. Anarchism is romantic aristocratic thinking pretending to be a popular movement. So all forms of Marxism and anarchism today are evolved from bourgeois systems.

Neo Nazi uyghurs say Jew because they project all the problems of white bourgeois civilization onto Jews so they can pretend someone else caused all their problems. This is sublimation of class struggle the way jocks sublimate their repressed homosexuality into sports.