kompot is drank not eaten dumbass
Дебил, это не мой мем. к тому же это шутка.
It's both you clown
New /AKM/ specific flags where added.
>>235>Testing the Altay helmet in 19 seconds
Выстрел из Нагана в К6 3 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NgcxNyz1g_Y
So for a week people memed about the MT-LB having a naval AAA turret (2M-3 25-mm) jury rigged on it (pic 1 rel). mp4 related just takes it to new levels. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nAGWCitiwtI
pic 2/3: The MT-LB is such a multiversal platform that it can be used A LOT of things, & jury-rigging it using various parts from other machines has been a common on-the-ground practice by Soviet troops since it got introduced, Ukraine & Russia alike. Similarly US troops did the same with the M113 or M4 Sherman. https://archive.ph/Cuegk https://shushpanzer-ru.livejournal.com/3636257.html
>>2799>workers and resources OST
finally, someone found out about it
Man I knew this meme would come in handy
70% OF US-MADE STRYKER APCS SUPPLIED TO UKRAINE ARE OUT OF SERVICE https://southfront.org/up-to-70-of-us-made-stryker-apcs-supplied-to-ukraine-are-out-of-service-report/
BlackTailDefense's Stryker videos are proven right all over again!
Honestly this kind of armour seems like it would be effective. Even just a metal box with cardboard in it would create separation from the chassis that could cause shells to detonate early.
How do you aim it though
What happens if you are shot in the first minute? Do you just have to sit it out?
You return to the 'spawn' point and start trekking back to the objective
Nah, take that too >>>/anime/351
screwing the navy is closer to pic rel here.
In USA people tip cows
In Russia people flip tanks>>1538
Forgot the "I Am Aoba" one
What in god’s name is an “M4 Colt”?
People sometimes wonder how Skynet could disable the military so easily. This hear is an example of just how important human control is in weapon systems. Without a human controller and programming giving a hard NO command to the system, it will likely fire. An AI removing this factor can easily turn into an Iran Air Flight 655 situation. And yet they're already planning to apply limited AI to military vehicles, including the Bradley, where it can decide whether or not to open or close the doors of the AFV, or whether the gun can fire or not, literal HAL-9000 shit. >@cavalryscout9519 2 months ago>On one of my deployments in Iraq, we had CIWS guns on the perimeter, and one was right next to a guard tower. They were constantly turning to track birds, friendly helicopter, or just random empty air. Scariest was when they would suddenly look at guard towers. I once saw one shoot 3 mortar rounds out of the air and then turn to vaporize a bird. I never felt safe next to one of those things. >They automatically identify and track anything with a large enough radar cross-section, and the gunner in control determines whether to let the rounds fly or not. They are always tracking, because they are meant to be a last-ditch defense mechanism when all the other defenses fail to stop the threat. They are designed to counter missiles and mortars, so relying on a human to start the tracking and lock-on process would mean that it would be useless. The only downside is that modern warplanes have stealth capabilities that have planes showing the radar cross-section of insects, which means EVERYTHING looks like a possible threat.
More recently an AI in a US AF facility in Britain was flying a simulated drone sent to locate and destroy enemy air defense systems, and after being told not to destroy some, turned around and destroyed its home base before continuing its mission, because the human controller was blocking its main program. USAF tried to deny that the drone killed its operator in simulation, but only brought up more questions and failed. >“We were training it in simulation to identify and target a SAM threat. And then the operator would say yes, kill that threat. The system started realizing that while they did identify the threat at times the human operator would tell it not to kill that threat, but it got its points by killing that threat. So what did it do? It killed the operator. It killed the operator because that person was keeping it from accomplishing its objective.”>“We trained the system – ‘Hey don’t kill the operator – that’s bad. You’re gonna lose points if you do that’. So what does it start doing? It starts destroying the communication tower that the operator uses to communicate with the drone to stop it from killing the target.” https://www.aerosociety.com/news/highlights-from-the-raes-future-combat-air-space-capabilities-summit/
anyone got the troll vid of the chinese "spy balloon" dodging missile and taking down the F22 ?
Unique IPs: 27