No.12017
>>351Mediocre to bad show but gets my favor over military nazi loli magic shit like Tanya
>>795 No.13515
>>370It's funny seeing you call the show asinine and then gush over the exact reasons why everyone else loves it. We both know the show is cool, just own it.
No.13529
>>13515I didn't "gush" over anything, I only pointed out the minor part I liked, as a story it's trash and that's undeniable.
No.13545
>>11404>Pokemon Snap XXXHoly fuck that's an old reference… I totally forgot about that shit.
No.14524
>>1281>the Tanya thread>>795 As a side note I'm surprised to find little Tanya v Katyusha fanart.
No.18998
>>11043>This is why ZUN didn't let corporations touch touhouThank fucking god he didn't
No.19001
>>11120>Arpeggio of Blue Steel Blue Submarine No. 6 & Tide-Line Blue are similar post-apocalyptic anime, though far less moefied.
also Mars Daybreak is kinda post-apocalyptic.
No.19110
>>19001This is what we should do with Dolphins man, Give them exosuits to exert their dominance if we are unable to uplift them into Swolphins.
No.19127
>>19124Glad you thank so, because then the Dolphins can achieve their true form and purpose. Together with the Ayy Lmaos can we totally be united as a Confederation of the Earthclan and the Ayy Lmao Comrades.
No.19746
>>356>Very heavily traditionalist tooJust like most of the anime. Those that aren't are niche and underground stuff nobody knows about.
No.20253
>>3061>how popular ship-girls got among weebs a few years back, before being frogottenIt was completely artificial. Company behind it invested a lot of money into becoming the next Touhou, even paid some Touhou circles into making content for them.
No.20788
>>20253Huh, I never heard of that, got a link to it.
>>356>Very heavily traditionalistIn what way is cute schoolgirls driving tanks and engaging in tank battles traditional?
No.20850
I just realized it's a mecha anime.
No.20948
Buhanochka is a gijinka of the UAZ-452 'Buhanka' (bread loaf) van of the USSR which was widely used, including in the military, even to this day. When they appeared at the beginning of the SMO February 2022, they got memed by Russian anime enthusiasts and this was quickly picked up by /chug/. It's gotten to the point where the character has hundreds of images on a booru and a VK page dedicated to her and other gijinka of the conflict.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UAZ-452?useskin=vector https://booru.eientei.org/posts?tags=buhanka-chan&z=1 https://vk.com/buhanka_chan However I digress. Why I'm posting it in this thread is because I noticed off-handedly that Buhanochka reminds me of Katyusha, especially when the latter is in her tank-helmet, which makes me wonder if the Russians that started the meme were 'inspired' by the character… or maybe I'm wrong and it's just generic battle-loli aesthetics.
No.21896
>>21773 I've noticed anime tends to split between wehraboos, Japanese nationalists, america-boos with a small number of Soviet-fans, hailing back to Soviet influence in the anime sphere back in the 70s/80s.
No.21948
>>21896soviet influence? Is it the result of the co productions between soviet and japanese animation studios?
No.21949
>>20948>zgang animethis just as bad as wehraboo anime
No.21951
>>21949>another liberal retard pulling a horshoe theoryGo back, your subreddit misses you.
No.21953
>>21951No, he is absolutely right, literally sexualizing war.
No.21955
>>21953>cute cartoon chibi that soldiers use for laughs like they've done for the past century of modern combat <iTs SeXuAlIzEd!!!Anon, I'm an anti-loli-fag, but this is just reaching, That's also not what he's bitching about. They're comparing "wehraboos" who fellate anything German and like cutesy shit of horrific SS criminals to simple silly gijinka of a Soviet van that is iconic in Russia.
TL;DR: It's neither sexual, nor about sexualization, but a implicit comparison of NAZIS with the Russian military, i.e. accusing them of being fascists.
No.21964
>>21955>>21962First of all, I wasnt just refering to two pictures posted, back when the invasion started, there was whole bunch of Z anime porn on /siberia/. Second, she wears a dress with side slit going all the way to midwaist, revealing she isnt wearing panties, its fucking sexualized.
No.21965
>>21963theres no fucking sexualization going on you pathological projecter
No.21967
wait THIS
>>20948 first pic is what you fags are calling "loli"? jesus christ youre retarded
No.21968
>>21965>P-projectorRepeating the same retarded shit is not an argument, especially since you clearly have no reading comprehension.
Anon 1 posted about how the popular niche Buhanka Gijinka is similar to Katyusha from Girls Und Panzer and speculated as to why.
Then anon 2 declared it the same as wehraboo-shit, which was retorted to as being liberal horseshoe nonsense. Then a third anon somehow interpreted this as "sexualization of war" which regarding the posts ITT is untrue. The first anon replied that there IS no sexualization going on in the images and added that they're anti-lolicon so as to dismiss any "muh lolicon bias" or other bad faith arguments, only to get a bait reply about "people that dislike sexualized cartoon children are projecting their sexual thoughts" which is both a strawman and bad-faith bait, to which the other anon replied.
>>21964>there was whole bunch of Z anime porn on /siberia/ None of which was lolishit. Also it's fucking /siberia/ what are you expecting from the local /b/oard? It's literally chockfull of bestiality, furry, sexual fetishes, aeromorphs and train-fucking, pirate-shitposting and any number of nonsense, that's really not an example to use.
>she wears a dress with side slit going all the way to midwaist, revealing she isnt wearing panties 1) That's not a loli, she's got clear breasts
2) You've never seen a woman wear a cocktail dress, have you?
Take meds, I'm no lolicon, but this is just pathetic handwringing of the same sort as people reeing over fanservice in schlock isekai anime.
No.21970
>>21969>>Lolis can't have boobs1) Stop derailing further and take any more loli "arguments" to
>>>/siberia/2) No, oppai loli is a deliberate contradiction, it's a meme. A "loli" is an underage little girl, they don't have developed breasts for the most part, at least in the stuff that most people that aren't sick in the head are concerned over. The context is clearly not talking about teenagers.
A petite woman =/= loli
end of conversation
No.21973
>>21968>None of which was lolishit>1) That's not a loli, she's got clear breastsI havent said anything about any loli.
>of the same sort as people reeing over fanservice in schlock isekai animeAnd of course you would be into that garbage too.
No.21974
>>21972
I like lolis but I just think we should be honest with ourselves
No.21977
>>21973>I havent said anything about any loliStop goalpost shifting, anyone can read the replychain and see what relevance loli has to the conversation at hand
>of course you would be into that garbage Nice assumption, asshole. And no, I'm not into fanservice, because it's usually poorly done and for the sake of padding runtime, but I'm not a retard going "ewww icky" about some boobage.
Also, if you want to be pretentious, lets put aside that the context is clearly complaining about lolishit and focus on a little skin being "sexualization".
Soviet female troops wore skirts and leggings, often enough you could see skin. Was there some sexual element? Maybe as inherently part of being a woman, and there's nothing wrong with that, but if that's the only part you focus on in an image not blatantly being erotic, then it speaks more to YOU having subconscious thoughts about it, than the image being "sexualized"
And again, this has been done by soldiers for the better part of the past century, this isn't new; pic rel.
No.21978
>>21977>Stop goalpost shifting, anyone can read the replychain and see what relevance loli has to the conversation at handNone, because that wasnt my issue, some other poster bringing it up has nothing to do with me.
No.21979
>>21974When I think of loli I think of a flat as a pancake anime girl with zero secondary sexual characteristics, not someone with tits and hips.
No.21981
>>21979I don't know if you've looked at any girls age 12-18 but many of them have tits and hips
No.21984
>>21981Nobody would refer to 16 year old character as loli.
No.22011
>>21984dude there are people that call iiniku ushijima loli and she's like in her 50s now
No.22016
I found it funny how they are so nonchalant in having an anime ᴉuᴉlossnW as a heroine.
No.22584
>>20948Dunno why but these designs for Buhanka and Katyusha also reminded me of Iona Rockshow from the light novel RWBY: The Session
Her character - small and techie and fierce also relates.
Unique IPs: 21