GTA VI TRAILER 2 JUST DROPPED!!!!!
245 posts and 60 image replies omitted.>>47905>show don't tell<the most cliché, sexist, regurgitated to death scene of a couple being late with the female asking what to wear to them immediatly dismiss the male's answer and choose something completely differentground breaking stuff.
>>47905You don't understand, they put woman in video games, they targeted gamers, gamers!
>>47908Media literacy much? The cliché of the scene is the purpose, it is the whole entire point. It establishes the relationship dynamic as the anchor point of the entire story and juxtaposes it with the couple's extreme lifestyle. It's supposed to portray the relationship as the only genuine thing there is in the story(until it isn't or the player decides that during the game).
But hey, if a classic love story that features a scenes millions of people can emphasize with then maybe this game isn't for you?
Here is some avant-guardist ballet that might be more up your sleeve.
>>47910>cliche>genuine>relatableretarded shit that doesn't exist in real life, doesn't add anything to the story (we already know it is a couple), reinforces hetero-normative stereotypes. look the gymnastics you have to do to justify something that you admit is a cheap media cliche that you have seen a thousand times before
btw you write like a llm. "relationship dynamic" "anchor point" "juxtaposes" "until it isn't" get real
as I said, the only way of enjoying this is pointing at the screen while screaming
<I GET THAT, IT IS REFERENCING THE OTHER MEDIA >>47910>It's supposed to portray the relationship as the only genuine thingwritten by someone who never was in a relationship whiteknighting and shilling the ass writing of corporate slop for having a cis couple as protags. lmao.
anyone who has experienced such a situation can only be annoyed by this scene because it wastes the male protags time as well my time as a player. sadly rockstar didn't include a QTE 'triangle = dress 1', 'square = dress 2' for ultimate immersion.
>>47915>>47916Butthurt LGBTQian.
>>47908>ground breaking stuff.where did i imply it's groundbreaking? rather the opposite, it's very conventional and thus effective. you don't disagree with the execution, you just disagree with the vision.
>>47907eggsactly
>>47904yeah? also the vast majority of american men are uglier than male protag. i think the guy is hotter than probably all GTA protags, now that I think about it, except arguably CJ.
>>47922fucker i literally disagree with the execution.
>visionfucker, this is slop to be peddled to millions of people, there is no fucking vision.
>>47931>fucker i literally disagree with the execution. what do you disagree with? you called it cliché, i said that is what makes it effective.
>there is no fucking vision.i'd say that's a disagreement right there
>>47915>retarded shit that doesn't exist in real lifeLol, you just expose yourself as being utterly alienated from mainstream heteronormie society and not knowing what the fuck you are talking about.
>btw you write like a llm. "relationship dynamic" "anchor point" "juxtaposes" "until it isn't" get realYes, I get this a lot from illiterate people who don't read books and never encounter big words outside of the aislop they generate themselves. Everything I have said is completely coherent and correct. If you can't offer a rebuttal you attack the form. Classic coping strategy.
>>47916>written by someone who never was in a relationship whiteknighting and shilling the ass writing of corporate slop for having a cis couple as protags. lmao.Wow, the projection is crazy. Being asked what to wear by your girlfriend before a social function is not 'just' a media trope. I am in a happy 3 year heteronormative with my gf, we were invited to a laid-back millennial wedding that caused a brief and similar discussion, the only difference being that she sent me the pictures of the dresses via text. There was for example some discussion on whether the cream-colored dress was too close to the color white and thus not appropriate for the wedding.
>>47921Could be. This person is basically just a projecting incel (using whiteknighting this casually is an indicator) who thinks everything is a media trope or someone who has spent too much time getting their brainrot on catboy discord servers and now doesn't know how heteronormie society operates. However plenty of LGBT individuals enjoy romance stories, including heteronormative ones, so this is just alienating you and your little circle here.
>>47931>there is no fucking vision.You better be joking, this is a huge break from the earlier games and this is now being clearly communicated. You can disagree with the 'vision' but denying that it exists is just crazy. None of the earlier games featured a story element that create this degree of tension throughout the game.
>>47916>doesn't add anything to the story (we already know it is a couple)Now we didn't. This might come as a shock to you but there is a huge difference between being a couple and actually being in love. The dynamic could have been completely different, like a pimp-hoe thing. From the trailer we now know that there is going to be a genuine love story which will be the major point of tension in the main story because obviously decisions of the player will influence the outcome of it.
>>47941>>47942>everyone who mocks my imaginary GF simulator is an incel, a chud and never kissed a girl>a person wasting his partner's time by asking for his opinion to dismiss it outright is symbolic for the deep and true love they feel for each other>this is groundbreaking, ney, VISIONARY. the billion dollar stock exchange traded entertainment company is revolutionizing gamingyou guys are caricatures
>>47943>you guys are caricaturesprobably because you are making up strawmen because you are incapable of comprehending simple concepts
>>47943Just say you hacer never felt the warmth of a woman in your life bro
It's hard for me to get excited knowing the PC release is probably a year away and will be full of hackers but, with the return of the weight and muscle systems, I'm looking forward to minmaxing Lucia's ass.
>>47953this reminds me the woman they picked to showcase the mocap has crazy assets
>>47966there's also 5-10 minutes of dialogue so you dont get bored driving from point A to point B
I hope customisation options will include terf bangs and broccoli haircut.
>>47972CritiKKKal support for AmeriKKKan Treatlerite General StriKKKe
>>47893trvth nvke
>>42992TRVTN NVKE
am I the only one that finds the modern setting boring? they made the right choice with vice city and san andreas by setting the games in the recent past. san andreas for example was made in 2004 but set in 1994
the surveillance state is even more pervasive now, so any piece of media that deals with crime has to be self-serious because the era of amateur criminals is over, the only people that can rob a bank and get away with it nowadays are either cia agents or fbi informants
maybe I'm too disconnected from the general public, but whenever media starts referencing THE NEWS my eyes start rolling. it feels dry and sterile, uninspired even. and they should bring back silliness and whimsy, like, compare the plot of gta v to the plot of san andreas, one is trying to emulate prestige tv, the other is a shitpost. I guess writers now are too educated to write meandering nonsense? oh, and maybe they should set it not just in the past, but also outside amerikkka
>>48166San Andreas was set in 1992. Also I hope they bring back the jet pack that was pretty cool.
>>48166These games take so long to make that all the music, humor and pop culture references in GTAVI makes it feel like a mid 2010s period piece despite it supposedly being set in 2026.
The mission design is gonna be even more linear than RDR2 isn't it
>>48175it comes with a game license to download the game you entitled gamer chud. pay up or we'll hire some hooligans to come to your door if you keep complaining.
>>48175They should've included a Lucia pocket pussy. Lucia's her name right?
>>48176 it actually doesn't, believe it or not!!!
>>48177 man, if it had a Jason dildo and a Lucia pocket pussy then I'd consider it
>>48175shan't be buying, sir. I shan't. porky might like it though, it gives him something to burn 400 dollars on that isn't socialism. porky would rather buy baubles like this than give you universal healthcare.
>>48178>it actually doesn't, believe it or not!!!lmfaoo
>>48175At that price Lucia better come out of the screen and give me a sloppy toppy.
>>48166>san andreas for example was made in 2004 but set in 19941992*
>>48171>These games take so long to make that all the music, humor and pop culture references in GTAVI makes it feel like a mid 2010s period piece despite it supposedly being set in 2026.yeah this. i thought the same thing
new leaks
>>48229apparently gtavi is going to be an open world game
>>48229There will be cars.
>>48233i heard you can even steal them
After seeing the new leak: It would look really good if it came out in 2016, but holy moly they fucked up with the physics. Looks 1 to 1 copied from GTA 5, gameplaywise its outdated by 10 years even 15 years. The dirtbike racing looks straight up ass
>>48242And yet none of it matters because it will sell 300 million copies regardless of quality.
>>48242> holy moly they fucked up with the physics. Looks 1 to 1 copied from GTA 5which itself was a significant downgrade from IV because they wanted to cut back on the realism for the sake of online play
gta online has been basically roblox and/or second life for a while now, genuinely i'm even surprised the ads have been focusing on the main story so much, when it's kinda obvious it's secondary on rockstar's financial plans and the main course is the map itself which is mostly going to be a lobby for roleplayers
Unique IPs: 36