GTA VI TRAILER 2 JUST DROPPED!!!!!
92 posts and 25 image replies omitted.>>42374damn i didn't see this trailer until now lol, i feel like the main guys delivery is kind of trash? whats up with that? they made him some boring chad-face block of wood?
>>47176 just noticed that it looks a lot like Vice City's cover art
>>47178 they're probably gonna give him depth and stuff
>>42808>With the current culture around stylization??
>>47177november 17 afaik only for consoles, for PC it's expected somewhere around 2028, but i'm lowkey expecting some twist where it never releases on PC because of current market conditions
>>42808I think realistic style is the smart choice. What I do think is lame is that every single GTA game since 4 has been set in the current era it's released. I don't know why nobody is interested in doing anything set in an past era anymore. Would've been way cooler IMO, but I'm probably alone in that, people just want references all the current slop from their lives. Man you think they'd just reskin the map and sell it as an expansion pack.
>GTA V but now it's 90sI'd like to see them do 60s or 70s, that'd be cool.
>>471821: GTAV and VII are literally the two single games in the franchise that take place in their current year.
2: GTAVI will take place in Vice City, and there's already a game that takes place in Vice City that takes place in another decade, and it's called GTA Vice City.
3: there are lots of modern AAA games that take place in other decades or centuries… Probably most of them.
>>47182i mean TBH since every GTA now takes like 10 years to come out, they do all basically take place in a different 'era'.
>>47182>I'd like to see them do 60s or 70s, that'd be cool.rockstar already did LA Noire, dummy. They did 80s, 90s, 40s, if you count the 2D games, then also 60s, and if you count RDR, then 1900s, that's half the 19th century already lol
>>47183>GTAV and VIIGTA 7? Are you from the future? Actually most of them take place in the year they were released.
>and there's already a game that takes place in Vice City that takes place in another decade, and it's called GTA Vice City.Yeah and they could do it again. 2020 Miami and 2010s Los Angeles just don't seem that different aesthetically.
>>47184Yeah, but this decade and the previous two are so sauceless they're not even really stylistically distinct like previous decades were.
Could've been even more bold and do a city they've never tackled before. I guess they've done most of the good choices but there is still Chicago.
Is there even any info about new features in this game vs V besides enhanced twerking dynamics or something? Ok I'll look it up.
>Realistic Weapon System: You are no longer a walking armory; you can only carry a few weapons at a time. The rest of your arsenal must be stored in the trunk of your car, requiring preparation before committing crimes
That's kind of a cool idea, but it's not exactly original. I think most shooters don't let you hold multiple long guns and stuff. It would be even cooler if you can't even bring the long guns everywhere.
>Deep Social Media: A heavy emphasis is placed on viral culture. In-game social media apps allow you to record and share your criminal exploits, which influences a region-based reputation and follower system.
Lol brainrot GTA.
>>47187>Lol brainrot GTA.mneh, if other players can see your recordings and rate you or whatever, then it's just the beefed up version of sekiro's ghost things, i don't think it will get that much use but it's cool to see.
>>42379>this game was made for 4chudcel coomershttps://www.thegamer.com/rockstar-president-sam-houser-former-gta-lead-leslie-benzies-mentioned-epstein-files/>>47187>In-game social media apps allow you to record and share your criminal exploits, which influences a region-based reputation and follower system.Eddington (2025)
>>47187According to the leaks, the main improvement is that the AI is going to be much more sophisticated than before. Probably even better than the AI from RDR2, which is still on a league of its own when it comes to real time interactivity.
>>428083D GTAs have always kinda been pushing the realistic cinematic angle. Like they had a whole ass plot with fully voiced cutscenes in the earlier ones which was itself pretty unusual.
>>47197Why do I have live in this reality? Why can't I live in the sexy cartoon world instead? WHY?!!?
>>47198even in cartoon world they would ignore you and let other dudes run a train on them
>>47201Well hopefully I'd just be an ugly bastard type with a massive cock. That may be a slight improvement than what reality is for me.
>>47196You sure its the chuds? Tatted bimbo doesnt seem like their dream tradwife.
>>47208subtle gem most will not see
>>47187>>47191i would accept going back to GTA SA graphics and physics if they actually made the missions fun instead of cutscenes on rails
>>47179their covert art always looks like that. squares , logo, girl, helicopter, random characters included
>>42807>but i don't like the game promoting latino-gringo couplesagainst racemixxing to own the chuds
>BUT ITS A FUCKIN WHITE KKKOLONIZERlook man, it's gonna happen as long as de jure segregation is abolished, cope
rockstar pisses me off because the pc release is going to take another 6 months to a year for no reason at all. that's really the only thing that makes me mad about this shit company
>>47232it's so they can sell the game twice, solid strategy
>>47232they fear voices38
>>47241it is apparently $80 for the standard edition. $100 for the special edition.
>>47241Shouldn't it be like 140? Turok 1 was like 70 bucks in the late 90s.
>>42374>>42382the whole "bonnie and clyde" thing they're going for with this one kinda makes me think about Catalina and Claude from GTA III. It was a really shallow story but GTA III starts with your girlfriend Catalina betraying you and leaving you for dead. The entire story is just you trying to get revenge on her and everyone else kind of serving as a stepping stone or obstacle in that path.
Then later on San Andreas came out and CJ does missions with Catalina briefly while stranded in a rural area, only for her to run off with Claude.
Catalina was kind of this psychopathic and sadistic character with no redeeming qualities, and Claude was a blank slate with no personality, so the 8 years they were together between 1992 and 2000 is a blur as far as the GTA lore goes. But I remember thinking as a kid that they would eventually fill that in. I was wrong of course because they abandoned the original 3D universe and started fresh with GTA IV. Ostensibly V and VI take place in the same universe as IV, but with VI centering around a couple doing Bonnie and Clyde shit it's almost like my idea came true, but in another way.
Since RDR2 had fairly good writing and story, at least compared to the stuff they were making back in the PS2 era, I feel like these characters will be more interesting and compelling than Catalina and Claude were, but at the same time I feel like the story will end with them betraying each other and the player having to pick which one they want to play as after the story ends. GTA V did something like that, though of course there was a feel good option where you could keep all 3 protagonists.
That is my prediction, it will end in betrayal.
>>47295>I feel like the story will end with them betraying each otherAlmost cerainly will not, the romantic Bonnie and Clyde angle is punshed in the marketing, they are not going to attempt to subvert it.
>>47301I still don't believe this, no way they are doing some shit like locking in game stores
>>47300but the 3 protags betray each other at the end of gta v and the gang falls apart at the end of rdr 2, it's entirely plausible
>>47303But rockstar cucked out and made everyone betraying each other optional. I could believe that they will have it where there's an option for them to betray each other but probably won't be mandatory
>>47304>>47303There is certainly going to be "good" ending in which they end up together. Maybe its going to be like decision whether to escape and abandon your partner, or both of you going to prison or something like that. But there is no way in hell Rockstar will give player option to murder their girlfriend.
>>47305>Maybe its going to be like decision whether to escape and abandon your partner, or both of you going to prison or something like that. But there is no way in hell Rockstar will give player option to murder their girlfriend.the game literally ends in the game theory prisoner dilemma lol
>>47307If I can't murder by girlfriend then what's the point?
>>47307how is that supposed to work in a single player game?
>>47309it looks at who you have played as the most and you make the choice for them while the game makes the choice for the other character based on like relationship or karma or whatever.
>>47301>>47302the sad thing is that i think the special edition is vastly outselling which shows despie all the people complaninig rockstar won fleecing their fans.
Unique IPs: 33