GTA VI TRAILER 2 JUST DROPPED!!!!!
211 posts and 57 image replies omitted.>>47853>Having a virtual latina immigrant gf will unironically de-radicalize millions of young gamer chuds.on the contrary they will just want to deport the men and keep all the ladies
>>47870So one group of brown chuds deporting another group of brown chuds?
>>47871imagine once they realize they can't deport the no sabos/gusanos
>>47878Also for many not so young men
>>47878Maybe I should get this game… will it run on GNU/Linux?
>>47880I got a non-pirated copy of RDR2 to run on Linux with Proton… but only the offline campaign. Never got online to run…
>>47881(I only mention this because GTA VI uses the same engine as RDR 2… albeit with several years of development)
>>47878I thought the same thing, right when he was saying it, that her casual Latina combo is fine as it is, lmao.
>>47860It's funny because in the time that Rockstar has been crafting realistic testicle physics for GTA VI they could have dedicated one or two of their side studios to work on new or existing IP. At the very least, they could have release a smaller scale GTA side game or two like they did with VCS and LCS.
>>47884I would have liked Bully 2 tbh
>>47885Bully 2 or Manhunt 3 would have been great.
>>47884Rockstar has 2000 employees,the only AAA company that make smaller projects on the side on top of their big one is Ubisoft with 16000 employees
I hate that these trailers and media hype and kind of working on me, because I know for a fact the gameplay is going to be crap.
>>47878i am actually at a loss as to what rockstars goal was with their reveal. it all feels so random and off, poorly curated.
this scene for example. what am i supposed to take away from it? is it ragebait for chuds? is it to show how 'realistic' the game is supposed to be? is it to show what the relationship between the protags is like? whatever it may be - i don't feel this to be worthy of being in your long awaited reveal of a title that was in the works for well over a decade.
>>47891most normie people in a relationship will see this and think "wow litterally me" and buy the game. The turbo online, chuds, hikikomori will already buy the game anyway, it's not meant to cater to them.
>>47891Your take-away is that Rockstar did a bold creative decision to make the focus of the main story a romance, an element that was almost totally absent from earlier GTA games but very popular with virtually all GTA (roleplay) communities, especially among its female userbase. As a socialist applying materialist analysis here you should recognize this as a move by a profit-oriented business to expand its customer demographic to include and attract women, beyond its core male demographic.
>>47891>this scene for example. what am i supposed to take away from it? it's supposed to ground the characters as being in a relationship, by making them do couple stuff? what the fuck are you talking about, jessie. so maybe you don't like that they fuck and you don't, but at least you can recognize a scene that's functionally important for characterization, right? or do you autists not watch movies, and it's all anime gatcha games.
>>47890the netflix trailer made me go from 0 hype to negative hype
Lmao just heard a guy say he bought a netflix subscription to see the trailer
>>47898I might re-subscribe to Netflix if they gave me a free copy of or code for GTA VI. I don't even really want to play the game or really play games much anymore but it is my favorite series.
>>47894did you even read my post, before you went into your meltdown?
>>47894nta but you have reading comprehension issues
>important for characterizationit isn't. when a writer spends 100 pages of the novel establishing that the couple is a couple, that's just filler. if you want to act pretentious and cultured, you're supposed to put that in the same bucket as descriptions and adjectives: slop
I remember thinking back then when I was playing gta v for the first time that most of it felt predictable, cliche, kitsch
idk, it feels like the franchise is out of juice. the only way to enjoy this is to point at the screen while screaming
<I UNDERSTAND THAT REFERENCE
<IT IS THE RECENT THING I SAW ON THE NEWS!!!
the only lowkey funny thing is that it's the first gta targeting women, so the female protagonist is the median american young woman, but the guy is an emotionally mature, non-toxic, and pretty (I'm gay btw), white hunk
>>47902>I'm gay btwThat explain why you think she is "median american young woman".
>>47903so you think the vast majority of american young women are uglier than her?
>>47901>it isn't. when a writer spends 100 pages of the novel establishing that the couple is a couple, that's just filler.have you heard about "show, don't tell", it's a 20 second video establishing a character dynamic, it's perfect for establishing tone expectations ahead of release. you guys are just neurotic because you feel left out of the marketing. which what does it matter, i already feel alienated because there's no pc release
>>47900i did
like i seriously dont get it, GTA is one of the most normoid franchises in video games, right up there with FIFA, why are you surprised when they are establishing the relationship is going to be a strong element through previews. it's all over the marketing lol.
>>47905you mean the cia psyop?
>>47905>show don't tell<the most cliché, sexist, regurgitated to death scene of a couple being late with the female asking what to wear to them immediatly dismiss the male's answer and choose something completely differentground breaking stuff.
>>47905You don't understand, they put woman in video games, they targeted gamers, gamers!
>>47908Media literacy much? The cliché of the scene is the purpose, it is the whole entire point. It establishes the relationship dynamic as the anchor point of the entire story and juxtaposes it with the couple's extreme lifestyle. It's supposed to portray the relationship as the only genuine thing there is in the story(until it isn't or the player decides that during the game).
But hey, if a classic love story that features a scenes millions of people can emphasize with then maybe this game isn't for you?
Here is some avant-guardist ballet that might be more up your sleeve.
>>47910>cliche>genuine>relatableretarded shit that doesn't exist in real life, doesn't add anything to the story (we already know it is a couple), reinforces hetero-normative stereotypes. look the gymnastics you have to do to justify something that you admit is a cheap media cliche that you have seen a thousand times before
btw you write like a llm. "relationship dynamic" "anchor point" "juxtaposes" "until it isn't" get real
as I said, the only way of enjoying this is pointing at the screen while screaming
<I GET THAT, IT IS REFERENCING THE OTHER MEDIA >>47910>It's supposed to portray the relationship as the only genuine thingwritten by someone who never was in a relationship whiteknighting and shilling the ass writing of corporate slop for having a cis couple as protags. lmao.
anyone who has experienced such a situation can only be annoyed by this scene because it wastes the male protags time as well my time as a player. sadly rockstar didn't include a QTE 'triangle = dress 1', 'square = dress 2' for ultimate immersion.
>>47915>>47916Butthurt LGBTQian.
>>47908>ground breaking stuff.where did i imply it's groundbreaking? rather the opposite, it's very conventional and thus effective. you don't disagree with the execution, you just disagree with the vision.
>>47907eggsactly
>>47904yeah? also the vast majority of american men are uglier than male protag. i think the guy is hotter than probably all GTA protags, now that I think about it, except arguably CJ.
>>47922fucker i literally disagree with the execution.
>visionfucker, this is slop to be peddled to millions of people, there is no fucking vision.
>>47931>fucker i literally disagree with the execution. what do you disagree with? you called it cliché, i said that is what makes it effective.
>there is no fucking vision.i'd say that's a disagreement right there
>>47915>retarded shit that doesn't exist in real lifeLol, you just expose yourself as being utterly alienated from mainstream heteronormie society and not knowing what the fuck you are talking about.
>btw you write like a llm. "relationship dynamic" "anchor point" "juxtaposes" "until it isn't" get realYes, I get this a lot from illiterate people who don't read books and never encounter big words outside of the aislop they generate themselves. Everything I have said is completely coherent and correct. If you can't offer a rebuttal you attack the form. Classic coping strategy.
>>47916>written by someone who never was in a relationship whiteknighting and shilling the ass writing of corporate slop for having a cis couple as protags. lmao.Wow, the projection is crazy. Being asked what to wear by your girlfriend before a social function is not 'just' a media trope. I am in a happy 3 year heteronormative with my gf, we were invited to a laid-back millennial wedding that caused a brief and similar discussion, the only difference being that she sent me the pictures of the dresses via text. There was for example some discussion on whether the cream-colored dress was too close to the color white and thus not appropriate for the wedding.
>>47921Could be. This person is basically just a projecting incel (using whiteknighting this casually is an indicator) who thinks everything is a media trope or someone who has spent too much time getting their brainrot on catboy discord servers and now doesn't know how heteronormie society operates. However plenty of LGBT individuals enjoy romance stories, including heteronormative ones, so this is just alienating you and your little circle here.
>>47931>there is no fucking vision.You better be joking, this is a huge break from the earlier games and this is now being clearly communicated. You can disagree with the 'vision' but denying that it exists is just crazy. None of the earlier games featured a story element that create this degree of tension throughout the game.
>>47916>doesn't add anything to the story (we already know it is a couple)Now we didn't. This might come as a shock to you but there is a huge difference between being a couple and actually being in love. The dynamic could have been completely different, like a pimp-hoe thing. From the trailer we now know that there is going to be a genuine love story which will be the major point of tension in the main story because obviously decisions of the player will influence the outcome of it.
>>47941>>47942>everyone who mocks my imaginary GF simulator is an incel, a chud and never kissed a girl>a person wasting his partner's time by asking for his opinion to dismiss it outright is symbolic for the deep and true love they feel for each other>this is groundbreaking, ney, VISIONARY. the billion dollar stock exchange traded entertainment company is revolutionizing gamingyou guys are caricatures
>>47943>you guys are caricaturesprobably because you are making up strawmen because you are incapable of comprehending simple concepts
Unique IPs: 28