>>2847599>>2847574First /siberia/ shooter.
>Therefore, we can now at last look with closeness at how monogamy has been largely done away with in high capitalism, and we also may view in detail the hypergamy that has replaced it.>To put it quite simply, capitalism is a system based on the continual profit of a select few people, who are the bourgeois class; and it was ultimately the case that the widespread practice of monogamy simply proved to be less monetarily profitable for the bourgeois than hypergamy did.>Remember, capitalism was never designed towards the benefit of the common male of the workingclass, or of the whole of society at all; but rather, it was designed by the bourgeois class towards their own
benefit. During the world wars of the twentieth century (and the interwar period), while capitalism was
increasing in its technological advancements, the stability of western bourgeois dominance was threatened
greatly by the rise of communism, a system which directly attacked the power of the bourgeois class, and improved the lot of the proletarian male.
>After the chaos of the world wars came to an end however, the international communist movementwas still not as powerful as the western capitalist world; and the western bourgeois class, which had been
increasingly gaining power for much time – and had just defeated its National Socialist enemies – suddenly
found itself in an outrageously prosperous and triumphant position, being absolutely free to restructure
western society to their own wishes, namely towards the goal of increasing their profit and power.
>20 This restructuring was not a wholly autonomous and deliberate act on their part, but was more so performed bythem due to the nature of their very role in capitalism as the bourgeois class itself; and it was thereby merely
an inevitable consequence of capitalism simply existing in western nations.21
It did not take very long at all for the sheer magnitude of the changes that western society was
undergoing to become blatantly apparent, and these changes occurred to a degree of rapidness that had
not been seen before.
>The 1950s, though so commonly idealized by conservatives today, was in actuality a time oframpant substance abuse, infidelities, and general degeneracy in the west as compared with previous times.
It was in that decade that the rapid growth and proliferation of a new degenerative capitalist monoculture
occurred. This monoculture was the direct predecessor of the one which still dominates excessively in the
western world today, and still indeed finds itself spreading to new corners of the earth. It was and is
characterized by the spread of unhealthy and commodified food; the propagation of increasingly vulgar
and degenerate commercialized music; and the replacement of more gentle, traditional, and localized
cultural practices with new commodified practices based heavily upon the inordinate idolization of so-called
celebrities, be they actresses, musicians, sports stars, or what have you.
>If one examines the particular changes more closely, one sees how they were most certainly madetowards the ends of bourgeois monetary profit.
>It is more profitable to produce and sell good-tasting but unhealthy food than it is to produce and sellhealthy food, which is more costly to produce, and is less enticing to a great portion of consumers. It is more
>profitable to promote and sell newfangled and ‘exciting’ musical genres to people than it is to promote andsell classical music, which has far less of an appeal to potential consumers generally. It is immensely more
profitable to inculcate and propagate a consumeristic monoculture within society than it is to maintain more
simplistic and traditional cultural practices.22
>The transformation process accelerated throughout the 1960s, and by the 1970s, society hadbecome practically unrecognizable from how it had been during the times before the second world war.
>There is indeed one change that was made, which was more striking, and more socially andculturally consequential than perhaps all of the others; and this change itself was the abandoning of any and
all societal aspects which had served the function of maintaining monogamy. Once this occurred, the
hypergamy state came to prevail in the west, and this catastrophic change, as we may expect, was made
towards the goal of bourgeois profit.