🗽UNITED STATES POLITICS 🦅
<Porky Wants Your Organs EditionThread for the hellish discussion related to
the scourge of the earth, the destroyer of nations, the father of fascism, the enabler of ethnostates, the treatlerite tyrant, the protector of pedophiles, the exporter of ecocide, the captain of capitalism, the king of coups, the sultan of sanctions, the emir of the embargo, the autocrat of austerity, the doge of deregulation, the baron of busting unions, the prince of privatization, the lord of loan sharks, the patron-saint of proxy wars, the sponsor of settlers, the guarantor of genocides, the Divided $nakkkes of Amerikkka™
🏈 💵 🌭 🍔
🛠️ Strike Tracker ⚒️https://striketracker.ilr.cornell.edu/🇺🇸 Deeds of the Burger Reich 🇺🇸https://github.com/dessalines/essays/blob/main/us_atrocities.md📺 Live News 📺(sponsored by USAID)
• CNN:
https://www.livenewsnow.com/american/cnn-news-usa.html• MSNBC:
https://www.livenewsnow.com/american/msnbc.html• FOX:
https://www.livenewsnow.com/american/fox-news-channel.html• Bloomberg:
https://www.bloomberg.com/live/usZigga News (Bloodgasm says don't watch this!!!)•
https://www.youtube.com/@GeopoliticalEconomyReport•
https://www.youtube.com/@BreakThroughNews•
https://www.youtube.com/@thegrayzone7996✊Live Protest Streams✊https://woke.net/Epstein's Client List DOES NOT EXISThttps://epsteinsblackbook.com/Track Zionazishttps://www.trackaipac.com/Previous Thread:
>>2440198 585 posts and 126 image replies omitted.>>2442738you said parenti was pro-tibetan feudalism when he wrote a book against it. you lie and repeat lie and never admit lie.
>>2442609> Parenti is literally feudalist tibet "independence" supporterthen i said
>>2442616>arenti literally wrote a book against tibetan buddhist reactionaries called "friendly feudalism (the tibet myth)" in which he praised mao zedong's liberation of tibetbut you never acknowledge this and just repeat lie lie lie even after ban and retreat to tor node like typical mass tor baiter
>>2442754>bizarre takeyou might be illiterate
he wasnt proletarian. he didnt even scientifically study the class struggle. his programme was never remotely marxist. nothing but class collaboration shit at the expense of the working class
>>2442747This text
>>2442738 is from that source. Parenti is literally screeching free tibet and calling China poor. How can you defend these lies? Parenti didnt explicity praise Mao a single time.
>>2442769I didn't say I never have emotions. I said I'm not emotional about this subject and especially in this moment. You can have negative opinions on things without an emotional reaction. I thought you were claiming you are have a negative opinion on myself with no underlying emotional reaction?
Anyways, you dumb faggot, you are the one who spun it around it to this faggot debate where we speculate on the emotional state of the entity producing the text characters. For all you know I am an LLM built just to trigger people like you.
>>2442249What if we got people to say they’re American - (what ever race) they are? You got American-blacks, American-whites, American-Chinese, American-Hispanic, ect ect.
Put the American first and your sub category second. A lot of American racial categories only exist and make sense in America in the first place. You can take anyone from that list and stick them anywhere and culturally they’ll still be an American.
>>2442802I made a passing statement in response to Houdini's post, and you became
OBSESSED with me, and you won't stop replying about this bullshit until you feel you have sufficiently vanquished me. I won't continue this stupid conversation in the next thread.
>>2442428they feed back to each other. one can't exist with the other and viceversa. that's why imperial nationalism never should be encouraged in leftists circles.
American Exceptionalism? no.
Manifest Destiny? no.
Racist founder fathers? no.
US constitution? no.
it should be a basic standard, but I've seen enough of US leftism, to understand the difficulty of dismantling these basic notions.
>>2442631There's definitely women out there you can enjoy your time just talking too, especially if you two share mutual interests.
Though ngl online hyper progressives, misandrists, and feminists – damaged my perspective on women, and I always have the thought in the back of my head that at any moment they'll falsely accuse me of rape and that'll be a whole mess to deal with.
>>2442776Maybe you should decenter women from your life by being bi or gay.
I thank god every day for giving me the opportunity to make interacting with women a choice.
>>2442889>All I said were women were boring and are bad conversationalists.some women are, other women aren't.
>Of course, this the crime of the century, no, not "crime of the century" just boilerplate misogyny
>spawning a battle that must be won at all costs by all true defenders of womankindpushing back against your misogyny because it's reactionary, not because all women are perfect
>Meanwhile of course, just as bad or worse negative generalizations were lobbedI made no hasty generalizations about men. I just fought back against your reactionary misogyny. I fought you and only you, not "men".
> the men, pseudo-men, and former mendamn you really can't help yourself with little remarks like these. you give it all away what you're about.
>spergoutyou actually sperged out about women and we just made a vain attempt to reeducate you but you double down on your reaction and accused everyone of being emotional, gay, trans, not real men, whiteknighting, etc.
>>2443132>hyper progressives, misandrists, and feminists – damaged my perspective on womenFeminists be like:
"rapists, soldiers, reactionaries – damaged my perspective on men"
you would call a remark like this "misandry" despite it being the mirror image of your misogyny
>>2443136Yeah you're not wrong.
I just wonder why if women are so intollerable why still think about them
>>2443154No I call misandrists misandrists since they take men hating to the next level and white wash capitalism plus attack other identities – like defending white supremacy in a means to attack black men, engage in terfism to defend their biological essential analysis, etc.
The feminists I have a problem with since they're liberals that either tolerate or sympathize with misandrists.
Also your argument proves my point of why to hate them lol.
> How many men are rapists and/or protect rapists?> How many men are soldiers because of some conscious decision and not massive conditioning or being groomed by recruiters> How many men are reactionaries because of a deep material interest (which makes them savable) and instead just pushed into it with that conditioning and being told that they are the supporter gender? For the feminist, the idea of giving a counter argument, aka critizing a woman, is rape – since men having consent is problematic to them.
Hence why they favor group pressure and sex withholding, and arguments are compromised by biological essentialism.
Unique IPs: 12