>>2683529OI! U WOT M8? FEELIN A BIT OF THE Ol' WHEELY CHINKY?
>>2683529> "what you're okay that it's Chinese?, you okay that it's that Chinese?! ARE YOU OKAY THAT IT'S CHINESE!!??"holy fuck my sides
>>2684728all we need now is digital ID to compromise the entire nation 🥂
>>2684826your first mistake is posting on reddit
>>2684834yeah but that is where basically all forum engagement is these days. Go to /pol/ and it's people who think Jews are literal demons, Reddit is where most normies and political people discuss stuff beyond Discord and I don't use Discord shit out of principle due to how annoying it's made troubleshooting stuff online (Join the discord to get the manual! fuck off)
>>2684837Ayy, I am an appreciator of you from across the bond my weirdo mutt bonger.
>>2684850>it is perhaps the one positive anomaly in british opinion surveying: unlike america and continental europe, young men have not turned into 60% feral little weirdoesIsn't this just a very (i.e. last couple of months) phenomenon?
Swear young men were more likely to vote for Reform not even a year ago
>>2684854they were willing to vote reform because reform tried to pander to them, and since the other parties were for the middle aged (labour), the elderly (tories) and whoever the libdems appeal to, problem is though that's easily countered when another party just offers to do better
>>2684854not even the far right support reform anymore
the con is revealing itself
>>2684854I'd have to refresh my memory (it's annoying to disaggregate because yougov will give you age or gender but not let you combine them) but in 2024 young men were 12% Green, 12% Reform.
It's possible Reform surged and then crashed, but if they've been stagnant that would be pretty funny.
>>2684858>It's possible Reform surged and then crashedi'm pretty sure that's happening now, if you look at a broad poll of the parties, you'll see that reform is in declne
>>2684897It's scary to think we now live on an era of sourceless claims shat out by the Information Machine
>>2684862Farrage is not a leader, he will never be PM. He is a shit stirrer
>>2684906sources are highlighted at the top and can be expanded. any and all provided information can also be verified by a more extensive google search. i for one, find the AI feature extremely convenient.
Why is Starmer such a yank-loving cuck?
>>2684914Because I fuck his bussy right.
I wonder if the Information Machine would tell us that the Pallestinians entered the holy lands in a series of waves after Rome BTFO the prior occupants? All part of one marvellous tapestry amirite?
>>2684735>Why are bongs so aggro?Symptom of our rigid class culture.
>>2684911searched "celtic migration into britain" and got this BBC article:
<Scientists have uncovered evidence for a large-scale, prehistoric migration into Britain that may be linked to the spread of Celtic languages […] From around 1,000BC, suddenly that ancestry seems to disperse all the way through southern Britain, particularly," he explained, adding: "There's no particular genetic change in Scotland, but everywhere in England and Wales, this ancestry has an effect." […] As for where the initial migrants originated in continental Europe, their closest matches are with ancient populations in France […] Characterising any differences in ancestry between Ireland and Britain during the Early Bronze Age will allow us to better understand the extent and direction of migration in subsequent periods.https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-59741723>>2684921you are a gaulish invader of the isles. get over it.
>>2684930I'm French nobility sunshine.
Your linked article cites 'large scale migration', but regardless, the propaganda robot is linking current migration events to ones in the past and disregards all the bloodshed and wars that happened as a result, not to mention the people at the time probably weren't happy about it either.
>>2684935or reporting on facts requires neutrality?
the article doesnt say "… and here's why thats a good thing!"
Zultana status?
>>2684929Ad de-industrialisation
we can see a replacement of native british culture from a neolithic age (c. 4000-2500 BCE), characterised by stone implements and monuments such as stone henge, to the disruptive introduction of metallurgy with copper by the "bell beaker peoples" (2500-1000 BCE) who also have a custom of singular burials with weapons (as opposed to the weaponless mass burials of before). after this we get the celts who replace a much larger amount of native britons and further advance metallurgy (e.g. iron work; literally a descension of the ages, as described by homer and hesiod, 800 BCE). the celts also introduce writing into britain. after this you get romans (c. 50-450 AD), then the english (450 - 1000 AD), then you get the normans (1000 - 1400 AD). i choose this span of time because it was henry iv during his reign (1399-1413) that unburdened some of the norman yoke by having english be his native language. during this period also we are in the midst of the hundred years war with france (1337-1453), which shortly transitions to the war of the roses (1455-87) which sees the tudors come to power by a bloody civil war. its then the tudors who bring capitalism to england, as previously discussed. we can also characterise the racial period as a time of english ascendancy (1500-1700), culminating in another civil war, with the expansion of the empire. i set a limit to the 18th century since at this time, king william is a dutch import, so disrupts the chain of succession (as referenced by defoe; that many of the english saw william as illegitimate).
>>2684947how do you feel about big rocks?
>>2684948Ask again later
They're also having issues expelling Piers Corbyn and are up in arms about it calling him a Fascist, when in fact he's just a loon
look at this adventure time ahh art style:
<Cadwaladr Fendigaid [7th century king of wales]. A crude illustration from a 15th century Welsh language version of Geoffrey of Monmouth’s highly influential Historia Regum Britanniae (‘History of the Kings of Britain’)https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:History_of_the_Kings_(f.104.v)_Cadwaladr_Fendigaid.jpg#mw-jump-to-licensequite cute tbh 🥺
>>2685035Hang about then, she was fired/dismissed/whatever for tax diddling and now she's back? Is that how it works?
>>2685064she was pressured to be sacked for tax fraud but never was. her defence was that she only broke the law accidentally.
>>2685088So she just stopped working for a bit? Went on her holidays until the heat died down and now she is back to carry on lile it never happened
in the anglo-norman history "description of england" (1140) it describes how the kings of england separated the land into 7 kingdoms, only for them to be usurped by the "king of wessex" (presumably aethelstan, c. 925-39), who further divided the unified kingdom of england into 35 sections, which he called "shires" (or what is called in the french, "counties"). the history further states that the welsh are extremely vengeful against both the english and french, and call upon the name of king arthur in reclaiming land (lines 220-228).
aethelstan as first king of england is also the one who licensed freemasonry in england, according to the matthew cooke manuscript (1450 - which also claims that the craft originates with euclid, c. 300 BCE), which in its french and english forms, goes on to author the bourgeois revolutions of the 18th century. i also speak on the racist agenda of much freemasonry here:
>>2684824rudolf steiner alsk describes the absolute decline of freemasonry during the 20th century here (1906):
<Freemasonry, however decadent it is today […] Freemasonry today as a caricature of the great Royal Arthttps://rsarchive.org/Lectures/GA093/English/RSP1985/19060102p01.htmlconjoined to this spiritual history is crowley's "aeon of horus" (1904-), which aquino claims was usurped by the age of satan/set (1966-). so, the craft can be said to be operative from 300 BCE to around 1900 CE; a period of 2,200 years, like an astrological age.
Everyone that fucked Jeremy Corbyn over is losing their job and getting shit on, it’s awesome
we never left the stone age…
<The Stone of Scone (/ˈskuːn/; Scottish Gaelic: An Lia Fàil, meaning Stone of Destiny […] is an oblong block of red sandstone that was used in the coronation of Scottish monarchs until the 13th century when it was seized by Edward I during the First War of Scottish Independence and taken to England. Thereafter, it was used in the coronation of English and later British monarchs […] In 1296, during the First Scottish War of Independence, Edward I of England took the stone as spoils of war and removed it to Westminster Abbey, where it was fitted into a wooden chair – known as the Coronation Chair or King Edward's Chair – on which most subsequent English and then British sovereigns have been crowned. Edward I sought to claim the status of the "Lord Paramount" of Scotland, with the right to oversee its King […] On 11 June 1914, as part of the suffragette bombing and arson campaign of 1912–1914, suffragettes of the Women's Social and Political Union planted a bomb loaded with metal bolts and nuts to act as shrapnel next to the Coronation Chair and Stone; no serious injuries were reported in the aftermath of the subsequent explosion despite the building having been busy with 80–100 visitors, but the deflagration blew off a corner of the Coronation Chair and broke the Stone in half – although this was not discovered until 1950, when four Scottish nationalists broke into the church to steal the stone and return it to Scotland.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stone_of_Sconedid the suffragettes reverse the magic of the stone?
>>2685128>Everyone that fucked Jeremy Corbyn over is losing their job and getting shit on, it’s awesomeIncluding Jeremy Corbyn lol
>>2685153Did anyone control f Jeremy Corbyn in the epstein files and find anything?
Unique IPs: 18