Wanna know what folks on here thinks of andrea dworkin and general sentiment around her work alongside others in her vein. Was she a genius or just stupid?
186 posts and 29 image replies omitted.>>2794018it's literally an israel for women
>>2794044
you're posting that literal neo nazi kirkergaard? nazipedo theory proven once again
>>2794091
>kirkergaard
Emil is different from Søren Kierkegaard, ones a nazi.
>>2794091
any group that promotes adults to have sex with children is a net drain on society, posting a literal neo-nazi to defend your hebephilic attractions shows there is nothing good about it
>>2794096the second study doesnt even backup what they're saying, this post is completely accurate to what they're doing, no critical analysis just working backwards from 'I want to fuck kids' and grasping/chimping anything that might even give the appearance of being correct, the fact they mixed up a neo-nazi from the 1990s with a phil guy from the 19th century really highlights this lmao.
>>2793534 >>2794101
how does your drive to fuck children help anyone at all? we don't want your kind here, go and receive treatment for this
>>2794101
My sympathy for 'MAAs' begins and ends when they start trying to legalize fucking kids, if they want to seek help to become normal im all for destigmatizing it but it this is the route they take im all for throwing them off the tallest bridge.
>>2794103no i just think you should stop hiding your hebephillic desires as being "normal", i don't think you should go to prison for having them, or be executed, i just think you should try to become a normal person
>>2794100it's really just pathetic
>>2794113
Not going to address you posted an actual neo-nazi while calling me one? You're a societal dead end, drink bleach.
>>2794113
>Should I be surprised that a KSA pfp nazi fuck would lie their way to uphold their bigotry? I think not. Go back to ACP you cunt.
it's the logo of hamas you dimwit, you can hover it and find that out
>The second study shows 2.4% of the sample (12 and 15 year olds) reported CSA experiences, of which the majority found them to be positive. For the boys, the experience was often positive (71%) vs (9% negative), whereas for the girls it was less often so evaluated (26%) vs (46%) negative. The most popular reason for not disclosing the contact to an adult was considering the experience not serious enough (41%). Despite a CSA sample of 256, the authors bizarrely refused to test for statistical significance of trends.
a lot of people believe that traumatic events were "necessary" or worth it, this doesn't mean they were actually positive experiences
>If most boys reported it positively unlike girls, and if the biggest reason for non-disclosure was that the minors didn't think it was noteworthy, then how is that not further evidence that the current hegemonic capitalist myth of "adult-child sex is always le bad and traumatising, m'kay"?
because boys in particular don't report molestation or other forms of sexual abuse? because it's seen as being "gay" and various other badthing? it's pretty blatant this is the reason if we actually look at the topic
>>2794113
According to your logic - people should approve of raping babies as a "victimless crime" since they don't have an experience report and would not remember it.
In the same manner, if you got shot in the back of the head when you least expected it, nobody can claim you didn't enjoy it and therefore it was voluntarily assisted suicide.
>>2794118
tell you what, run on a popular platform of legalizing fucking kids and il run on a popular platform of tying you to a train track and running you over and we'll see who wins
>>2794118
>That's how you sound like.
yeah 'cause i said it, and i'd say it again, and again, and again
>That's how you sound like, chudjak
funniest is part is i'm gay and i know for a fact that unlike your hebephillic urges, homosexuality at the very least is entirely defensible logically, since it doesn't require to go through mental gymnastics about how actually the child you're raping is entirely consenting and is in fact enjoying it, anything else is bigotry
>Genetic fallacy much, eh?
if it's a genetic fallacy to point out a clear and obvious conflict of interest (that guy is factually a pedophile, a neo-nazi, etc) and due to the fact that neo-nazis don't tend to report things accurately, i don't think there is any particular value in defending your use of such a source
>>2794121
>Or, they weren't traumatised at all? Try to apply Occam's razor for once.
yeah i applied it in that response, the answer that they are indeed traumatized and pretend it's positive is a conclusion that requires no unnecessary presumptions to reach
>Man, you have to be dumb to make these kinds of copes. What if they liked it? What if the main reason for the trauma has less to do with the willing sexual act itself and more to do with confounds like iatrogenic harm?
or maybe they didn't, because saying it was a positive event was far easier than admitting that you were a victim of sexual abuse?
>>2794129
the nazis where pro-pedo, the USSR would throw people like you down a well after 20 years of hard labor in Siberia, I think you might be on the wrong team buddy.
>>2794129
>Oh, the irony of a gay man defending illogical bigotry against more marginalised group. All the more ironic as pederasts were the ones in charge of the gay rights movement from the 19th century to 1994. Believe as you wish, but don't pretend that you're anything other than a house coon, especially as many of the arguments against legalising adult-child relationships can be easily used against homosexual ones:
then i'm the proudest house slave that there ever was, it was a mistake allowing pederasts into the gay rights movement, and it's a shame it ever happened
>>2794132
>False. Your presumption is based on the notion of all intergenerational intimacy being inherently harmful, of which you have no conclusive evidence for. If you start your answer based on a false belief, naturally it's going to be untenable.
a relationship between a 20 year old and a 40 year old is different to a relationship of a 40 year old and a 13 year old, 1 can reasonably be assumed to consent, and such a relationship can be healthy and last years, the other cannot be healthy and is inherently an abuse of power
>>2794142
they were "allowed in" we let them persist precisely because we were not big enough, nor really able to push them out, but when we finally gained the strength we needed, we removed the pederasts from our groups, because they brought no gains, and we had the systems to remove them, if you have a group of people who salivate exclusively over fucking children, and since this doesn't do anything but attract logical, obvious scrutiny, then we should kick them out, it's the basic principle of the paradox of tolerance, if we tolerate pedophiles and hebephiles, then we also logically tolerate even worse people, since our bar would be so low
>>2794145
it's a presumption that's backed up by evidence, is a teacher and a student of equal power, knowledge, development? logically we'd answer no to this question, if a teacher were to take advantage of this disparity to engage in sexual relationships with their students, then this would logically be an abuse of power
>>2794143
You are consistently wrong
>>2794150
Your only home is at an O9A nexion, go castrate yourself for some noctullian cosmic magik ritual or some shit, rational thinking is not your strength chomo
>>2794152Your home is Amerikkka. Go there boi
Under Foidreich panopticon you will be forced to have sexo with Andrea Dworkin under the barrel of a gun. Even gay men won't be spared.
>>2794183I didn't get an invite from Epstein like you did, fate would have it its not my home
>>2794126>feminism is a struggle between gendersIn practice, yes more often than not.
Most feminists don't even seem to disagree with patriarchy so long as patriarchy is saying that man bad and woman good.
Feminists would simply take T and hit the squat rack if they actually cared about half the shit they post online. Become unbeatable.
>>2763106I never understood the hate for Andy Warhol from the left. Like what he liked money and fame maybe a bit too much? His theoretical contributions to art are extremely Marxist coded.
>>2763106She wasnt even abused, her friend described her childhood as "Groovy"
Her schizophrenia probably made her think that shit happened.
>>2795820I think they're being contrarian to defend the Society for Cutting Up Men lady.
>>2761954>thoughts on dworkin?Top tier milf.
>>2800499Its like how antisemites see everything as Jewish
>>2800523That's hilarious.
Ultimate purity spiral.
>>2800523Yeah that's ideology for you. One day you're cancelling somebody or something and then the next day you're getting cancelled. It's like evolution.
I'll just say that lesbian culture just looks so totally different from gay male culture. There was (or still is?) a long-running lesbian music festival in Michigan which is all folk music, nature, Wicca stuff. You really won't get gay men to go spend a week camping inna woods, they'll be like "ew, bugs!" Lesbian culture seems much more political too which has its positives and negatives. There's a concept of "political lesbianism" but can you imagine guys being politically gay. You have just really had it with women and are going to be gay with the fellas.
>>2800563This shit is so fucking stupid lmao
>>2763063how is this reactonary lmao
>>2800689Who said anything about it being reactionary?
>>2800538>You really won't get gay men to go spend a week camping inna woods, they'll be like "ew, bugs!"95% of military reenactments involve gay sex innawoods
>>2801252not what he's saying, that's men basically "making due", he's referring of men making the political choice to be gay beliving that's revolutionary
>>2800696I don't know what you're complaining about. The thread got derailed for a bit, but it seems to have gotten back on track.
Unique IPs: 23