Wanna know what folks on here thinks of andrea dworkin and general sentiment around her work alongside others in her vein. Was she a genius or just stupid?
165 posts and 27 image replies omitted.>>2793401
>Because adopting any position that is even remotely seen as being pedo-friendly in the slightest will get you hounded out of academia in what can only be described as censorship and repression within academia for political reasons.
Cantor argues that pedophiles should be in the LGBTQ movement very openly. Seto argues pedophilia should be understood as a sexual orientation. I highly doubt their rejection of your ideas is because of fear of cancel culture.
>>2793442🙄 Yes, I'm sure the Epstein class have a material interest in stigmatizing pedophilia.
Everybody knows it's the priests and the nobs and the elites Diddying kids. It's no different than Roman times when the poor would sell their kids into slavery to be raped by the oligarchs.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kincora_Boys%27_Homehttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_Mountbatten-Windsorhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jimmy_Savile>>2793442
>Is that supposed to be an own or what?
You're bringing up other countries having lower ages of consent for pedophilic relationships when even your lowest examples are above pedophilic age of attraction anyway
>>2793458>Muh EpsteinOk Qanontard, ignore the evidence as you want, but it doesn’t change the truth pertaining to that farce:
https://www.mtracey.net/p/the-insane-multitude-of-misconceptions
>Everybody knows it's the priests and the nobs and the elites Diddying kids.If that’s the case, then how come most social media owned by said “Epstein class” prohibits any discussion of pedophilia and minor attraction that doesn’t amount to fascistic pedo-bashing in their TOS, with bans being handed out for it?
Citing some figures that got arrested or tarnished for “pedophilia” doesn’t help your argument at all, especially since Prince Andrew’s “crime” was having consensual sex with some prostie that was a year above the British magic age line, which was part of the reason why the Met didn’t prosecute him. Not that it negates how much BS the Andrew drama was.
>>2793478>above pedophilicDef not for the pedophobes and puriteens here, who think even being hebephilic makes you worse than Hitler.
>The Argument is that blurring the line between children and adults might facilitate the former's exploitation.
>Actual pedophile hysterically jumps into the thread immediately starting age of consent discourse will citing authors like Mises that quite literally advocated for slave markets.
Lmao.
>>2793442
>The Rind report of 1998 already faced harsh unilateral condemnation from US Congress despite the study having already undergone through extensive peer review by the APA. Susan Clancy literally had to flee to Nicaragua after receiving threats for proving that trauma isn’t inherent to adult-child sex in her book “The Trauma Myth” (despite coming to the asinine conclusion that the solution is to indoctrinate child sex partners into being traumatised), Richard Yuill and Thomas K Hubbard lost their academic positions for being not being sufficiently pedophobic:
Yes, and despite all of the shit they've gotten none of these figures agree with you! So clearly their disagreement with you goes beyond fear of the mob, since they're fine with expressing all sorts of other views despite those also prompting all sorts of backlash. Why are they fine with speaking for what they believe the evidence points to, despite all the harassment, for all of these other points but not for your pro-contact position, which to this day only fellow pedophiles like O'Carroll have promoted?
Seems to me like its clear that the pro-Contact position emerges not from evidence but from self-interest being a powerful motivator.
>>2793498pedo desperatly seeks to affirm confirmation bias, its a hallmark of a conspiracy theorist where they will just latch onto literally any nutjob who publishes a 'paper' on the thing they set out to prove while ignoring literally any contradictory evidence.
in order words do not engage
>>2761954>Is (idpol idealogue) genius or stupid This has to be a bait OP.
Someone check this uyghas hard drive
She was a chad. Anti porn and anti prostitution is based simple as, anyone saying otherwise can cry. We must destroy libfeminism
Right wing women was also a very good book
>>2793717
Rind does not agree with your views.
>>2793717
>Why not re-appraise and similarly undermine the campaigning of the Black or Gay Civil Rights Movements in postwar America? After all, their arguments were made by black and gay people themselves, and blatantly in their own interests.
Then stop calling it things like "youthlib" when it really is just for your own benefit above all else.
>>2794044
Personally my position is we legalise killing mass with hammers in the town square so everyone can take part
>>2794058MAA's/pedo scum*
>>2794059Reactionary blather
>>2794061I'm ok with being a reactionary in this instance
>>2794018it's literally an israel for women
>>2794044
you're posting that literal neo nazi kirkergaard? nazipedo theory proven once again
>>2794091
>kirkergaard
Emil is different from Søren Kierkegaard, ones a nazi.
>>2794091
any group that promotes adults to have sex with children is a net drain on society, posting a literal neo-nazi to defend your hebephilic attractions shows there is nothing good about it
>>2794096the second study doesnt even backup what they're saying, this post is completely accurate to what they're doing, no critical analysis just working backwards from 'I want to fuck kids' and grasping/chimping anything that might even give the appearance of being correct, the fact they mixed up a neo-nazi from the 1990s with a phil guy from the 19th century really highlights this lmao.
>>2793534 >>2794101
how does your drive to fuck children help anyone at all? we don't want your kind here, go and receive treatment for this
>>2794101
My sympathy for 'MAAs' begins and ends when they start trying to legalize fucking kids, if they want to seek help to become normal im all for destigmatizing it but it this is the route they take im all for throwing them off the tallest bridge.
>>2794103no i just think you should stop hiding your hebephillic desires as being "normal", i don't think you should go to prison for having them, or be executed, i just think you should try to become a normal person
>>2794100it's really just pathetic
>>2794113
Not going to address you posted an actual neo-nazi while calling me one? You're a societal dead end, drink bleach.
>>2794113
>Should I be surprised that a KSA pfp nazi fuck would lie their way to uphold their bigotry? I think not. Go back to ACP you cunt.
it's the logo of hamas you dimwit, you can hover it and find that out
>The second study shows 2.4% of the sample (12 and 15 year olds) reported CSA experiences, of which the majority found them to be positive. For the boys, the experience was often positive (71%) vs (9% negative), whereas for the girls it was less often so evaluated (26%) vs (46%) negative. The most popular reason for not disclosing the contact to an adult was considering the experience not serious enough (41%). Despite a CSA sample of 256, the authors bizarrely refused to test for statistical significance of trends.
a lot of people believe that traumatic events were "necessary" or worth it, this doesn't mean they were actually positive experiences
>If most boys reported it positively unlike girls, and if the biggest reason for non-disclosure was that the minors didn't think it was noteworthy, then how is that not further evidence that the current hegemonic capitalist myth of "adult-child sex is always le bad and traumatising, m'kay"?
because boys in particular don't report molestation or other forms of sexual abuse? because it's seen as being "gay" and various other badthing? it's pretty blatant this is the reason if we actually look at the topic
>>2794113
According to your logic - people should approve of raping babies as a "victimless crime" since they don't have an experience report and would not remember it.
In the same manner, if you got shot in the back of the head when you least expected it, nobody can claim you didn't enjoy it and therefore it was voluntarily assisted suicide.
>>2794118
tell you what, run on a popular platform of legalizing fucking kids and il run on a popular platform of tying you to a train track and running you over and we'll see who wins
>>2794118
>That's how you sound like.
yeah 'cause i said it, and i'd say it again, and again, and again
>That's how you sound like, chudjak
funniest is part is i'm gay and i know for a fact that unlike your hebephillic urges, homosexuality at the very least is entirely defensible logically, since it doesn't require to go through mental gymnastics about how actually the child you're raping is entirely consenting and is in fact enjoying it, anything else is bigotry
>Genetic fallacy much, eh?
if it's a genetic fallacy to point out a clear and obvious conflict of interest (that guy is factually a pedophile, a neo-nazi, etc) and due to the fact that neo-nazis don't tend to report things accurately, i don't think there is any particular value in defending your use of such a source
>>2794121
>Or, they weren't traumatised at all? Try to apply Occam's razor for once.
yeah i applied it in that response, the answer that they are indeed traumatized and pretend it's positive is a conclusion that requires no unnecessary presumptions to reach
>Man, you have to be dumb to make these kinds of copes. What if they liked it? What if the main reason for the trauma has less to do with the willing sexual act itself and more to do with confounds like iatrogenic harm?
or maybe they didn't, because saying it was a positive event was far easier than admitting that you were a victim of sexual abuse?
>>2794129
the nazis where pro-pedo, the USSR would throw people like you down a well after 20 years of hard labor in Siberia, I think you might be on the wrong team buddy.
>>2794129
>Oh, the irony of a gay man defending illogical bigotry against more marginalised group. All the more ironic as pederasts were the ones in charge of the gay rights movement from the 19th century to 1994. Believe as you wish, but don't pretend that you're anything other than a house coon, especially as many of the arguments against legalising adult-child relationships can be easily used against homosexual ones:
then i'm the proudest house slave that there ever was, it was a mistake allowing pederasts into the gay rights movement, and it's a shame it ever happened
>>2794132
>False. Your presumption is based on the notion of all intergenerational intimacy being inherently harmful, of which you have no conclusive evidence for. If you start your answer based on a false belief, naturally it's going to be untenable.
a relationship between a 20 year old and a 40 year old is different to a relationship of a 40 year old and a 13 year old, 1 can reasonably be assumed to consent, and such a relationship can be healthy and last years, the other cannot be healthy and is inherently an abuse of power
>>2794142
they were "allowed in" we let them persist precisely because we were not big enough, nor really able to push them out, but when we finally gained the strength we needed, we removed the pederasts from our groups, because they brought no gains, and we had the systems to remove them, if you have a group of people who salivate exclusively over fucking children, and since this doesn't do anything but attract logical, obvious scrutiny, then we should kick them out, it's the basic principle of the paradox of tolerance, if we tolerate pedophiles and hebephiles, then we also logically tolerate even worse people, since our bar would be so low
>>2794145
it's a presumption that's backed up by evidence, is a teacher and a student of equal power, knowledge, development? logically we'd answer no to this question, if a teacher were to take advantage of this disparity to engage in sexual relationships with their students, then this would logically be an abuse of power
>>2794143
You are consistently wrong
>>2794150
Your only home is at an O9A nexion, go castrate yourself for some noctullian cosmic magik ritual or some shit, rational thinking is not your strength chomo
>>2794152Your home is Amerikkka. Go there boi
Under Foidreich panopticon you will be forced to have sexo with Andrea Dworkin under the barrel of a gun. Even gay men won't be spared.
>>2794183I didn't get an invite from Epstein like you did, fate would have it its not my home
Unique IPs: 21