In which, hopefully recurring, thread, us, the hated "turd [sic] worldists," which, translated to human, means 90% of humanity outside of the Imperial Core, notice and share how the imperial core consumers are reacting to the dwindling supply of treats.
Nobody would deny on /leftypol/ that in the Imperial Core the standard of living (etc.) has been going down, crazy-style. However, this new trend, we believe, makes it palpable just how luxurious a life these people have been able to afford at the expense of the rest of us.
>threadly reminder:
<if you get called a "turd worldist" ITT what is actually being said is: "I'm losing my sweet supply of treats which I got from my state benefiting from exploiting you, and now that system is dying, I'm feeling the effects myself, and I simply HATE you, for not being available any more to be exploited for my benefit!"(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)
>>2795180To sum up OP vid, the (Adolf) /TREATLER/ had to make the following sacrifices on the altar of imperialism:
>no more getting your nails done (the service is valued!)>no more cocktails at bars (Fun Little Drink™)>no more food delivery>no more Starbuxx™ coffee>no more ordered pizza>no more music concerts>no more local theme park>no more Disney World™ (we used to go there several times a year)>no more soda (THE HORROR!™)>no more "gimmicky supplements" (only vitamins from Costco™)>no pets (breaks her adolf treatlerite heart)So there you have it, ladies and gents, these are the woes of the imperial core "middle class" person. I would like to highlight the fact that she, as educated she is, tried to frame this whole tirade as a message to "The Market!"
(For context: In the Imperial Core you are taught that every purchase you make is a democratic vote in the economy! This lady has taken that lesson seriously, and her real addressee in this video is "The Market" in general.) >>2795180>Nobody would deny on /leftypol/ that in the Imperial Core the standard of living (etc.) has been going down, crazy-styleexcept we literally have the "you lie. you are epstein." guy in /usapol/ who spams pseudo-third-worldist "takes" every day and insist "treatlerite real wage rises!"
>>2795180>I'm losing my sweet supply of treats which I got from my state benefiting from exploiting youbut most third worldists are first worlders, as MaoAnon said in his thread on the difference between Marxism-Leninism, Marxism-Leninism-Mao-Zedong-thought, Marxism-Leninism-Maoism, and "Third Worldism." It is a good thread and you should give it a read.
>>2767836 >>2795187But that is counter-factual, as everybody knows. Why would you get upset by one idiot? Just move on, comrade.
My goal is to see this woman and her husband reduced to the living standards of a Pakistani urchin. That's my whole political ideology. I want her entire neighborhood razed to the ground. I want a "lil' treat" to mean a half eaten square of chocolate. I don't even care about communism or the haute bourgeoisie.
>The third worldists want me to staaaarve
>>2795192Will you also undertake an ascetic lifestyle?
>>2795192based AND cringe
>>2795199Very good
I think we should all learn to live with less
>>2795197When I made OP, I knew this or such a post would be coming. Let me tell you that I wholeheartedly feel solidarity with the American working class, but that they are dominated in terms of ideology upwards down.
Yeah, being a /USA/prole means that you live in your car, parking every night at the middle of fentanyl town, next to the "inner city tent village," but that is how this shit goes.
On the one hand, you have my solidarity, on the other, I'm like "what did you expect, bitch?! Go back to
Vietnam Tehran!"
>>2795200>I think we should all learn to live with lesswestoid-pilled
China is like:
>we can have more, much more>we should automate all physical labour>we can source our energy green>westoids will cry, but this is expectedI prefer the Chinese road.
>>2795202So the Chinese are proud treatlerites and the West are guilty treatlerites?
Inter-Treatlrite war
All third worlders know third worldists are the ultimate treaterlites who try to cover it with moralism (while voting mamdani)
The /TREATS/ truth-pill that broke everyone's mind:
>The main reason for the socialist bloc's demise was: not enough treats!
>Whenever ppl from socialist countries travelled to le West, they brought back treats
but now
<everything is "upside down"
<le west is struggling to get the treats going
<China (CHOYNAH) is having all the treats
<we ban produKKKts frin China (CHOYNAH)
In essence, what I'm saying is that the fall of the USSR & co. was due to L A C K O F T R E A T S and the same will happen to the imperial-core. While China (CHOYNAH) will have an unending and internally-sourced treat-line, le West will get fucked, "bigly."
So, in a sense: EMBRACE YOUR INNER CRAVING FOR TREATS!
>>2795203Economics, my friend.
China is a net loser in terms of value-extraction. Imperial-core is net winner.
The "treat, in itself" is nothing. It's just a treat. What matters is in what exact social context the treat is extracted. See:
>>2795208 >>2795206Russia is hoarding all the bananas, tbh. To unlock cheap banan again, you have to send troops to OOOookraine.
I don't need that many treats. americans have endured centuries of suffering and can live off our bountiful lands. the modern neoliberal white wine mom suburbanite is not a representative of americans, who still harbor the puritanical values that made this country great.
hate the government, I can abide that. hell, we americans hate the government too. don't hate our people, ok? we're good people in this country (except some of the ass-backwards crazy types like white supremacists), and you'd probably be able to exist with us in proletariat solidarity.
that is all I wanted to say thanks for reading.
China aren’t treatlerites because they don’t make treats an either/or that competes with needs. Treatler countries double dip on treats, they profit off of consoooming but also the existence of iPhones is also used to claim you’re a greedy prick if you expect for there to also be well maintained schools and hospitals.
>>2795214thx for writing
plz consult
>>2795208 while ur here
>>2795218>lack of treats lead to the decline of the USSR>decline of treats in the west are detrimental to its civilization>rise of treats in china is its civilizational strengththe "treat, in itself" is a sign of health to you, clearly.
>>2795208The falling rate of treats
The tendency of the treat rate to fall
The crisis of overtreating
Undertreating
Treatism: the highest stage of capitalism
Fictitious treats crisis
The social division of treats
>>2795221yes. but the "treats" don't appear out of nowhere, like from a vacuum. It's a social context. The Imperial Core extracts treats ('n that's bad, M'kay?) and CHOYNAH creates treats on its soil for their treatlerites (which is good, M'kay?)
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
>>2795214>we're […] people🫵😂
>>2795222>Treatism: the highest stage of capitalism this book should be written and if written well, would become a best-seller
>>2795220>>2795225I know you guys are mad about being fucked over by american imperialism, but most american citizens are against that shit. like what's going on in iran right now, I didn't vote for that shit and I am staunchly opposed to it, so don't get mad at me for resource extraction alongside a myriad of bombs being rained down on your children.
>>2795224I hope you guys will be the better people and decide to share your treats with us.
>>2795215To further this, the US treatlerite central because hospital visits can easily fuck over anyone who isn’t a multimillionaire even if they have insurance, but nevertheless poverty is
>tfw can’t afford iPhoneAnd if you have no iPhone then you’re simply a loser because that means you couldn’t even get credit. If you have iPhone, then society has worked for you so shut the fuck up.
If treats alone are presented as the counterbalance to all social ills, then you live in a treatlerite state
>We’re on strike for better pay!<lol u bought starbuckks tho, so socialist!>We’re protesting the war!<lol u own more than they do, they’d kill you in an instant for your stuff>We’re demanding the destruction of the ozone to stop<lol u own a car tho>We must clean the oceans, stop the spread of microplastics<lol but you drink Coca Cola like everyone else >>2795229Bush ran for a second term after starting two (2) forever wars
>>2795214Amerikkkans have no "puritanical values". The average amerikan is a porn addict who votes based on who promises to give them more treats. THose neoliberal white wine moms are good representatives of amerika as a whole
>>2795224Okay, so the issue with the west is that it imports its treats, but if it made its own, this would be better? At the same time, if the west didn't buy things from China, China would also lose its wealth (China's trade surplus in 2025 being over $1T). So who is extracting from who, in the end? It takes two to tango.
amerikkka is structurally treatlerite and amerikkkans are both genetically and culturally treatlerite
You can't fix it.
>>2795229>I know you guys are mad about being fucked over by american imperialism, but most american citizens are against that shit. like what's going on in iran right now, I didn't vote for that shit and I am staunchly opposed to it, so don't get mad at me for resource extraction alongside a myriad of bombs being rained down on your children.The point you are missing, in my humble opinion™ (I should go back to Reddit, etc.), is that actual war, like bombing Iran, is the culmination of ongoing global economic phenomena. I don't NEED you to VOOTE against the war on Vietnam, or such shit. I need you to REALIZE that all of this comes from economic incentives, and that ultimately you benefitted from said economic order.
In other words, your single VOOTE does not translate into "ethical vs. unethical" shit. You being in the imperial-core, however benefits you at the expense of 90% of humanity.
>>2795229>I hope you guys will be the better people and decide to share your treats with us.101%
treatlers of the world, unite!
you have nothing to lose but your inflation!
>>2795236Based. On the one hand people are like “democracy is broken, it’s rigged by the fat cats for the benefit of a tiny undemocratic minority” but on the other are like “well I didn’t vote for the war, so, you’re welcome thirdies”.
>>2795230>If treats alone are presented as the counterbalance to all social ills, then you live in a treatlerite stateAgain, I'm OP. Treats are good. The socio-economics of getting them treats can be bad.
Plz, see:
>>2795224 >>2795208 >>2795231ok you know what I take it back; there are at least a considerable number of american citizens who are against that shit, but perhaps not enough to sway the mechanisms of our political system in our favor. a growing number of american youth over the course of the last 30 years or so have become increasingly disenfranchised all together with politics, and it's got more to do than having access to treats.
>>2795232sorry but this is just incorrect. america is a large place with a spectrum of people. manhattan cosmoplitans don't represent me.
>>2795236>I need you to REALIZE that all of this comes from economic incentives, and that ultimately you benefited from said economic order.yeah I realize that.
>>2795240>I didn’t vote for the war, so, you’re welcome thirdiesshould be the next OP, tbh
>>2795244>sorry but this is just incorrectThe amerikkkans who AREN'T treatlerites are the minority. So you don't represent amerika either. And no it's not just "manhattan cosmopolitans", it's most of the people in your hick town.
>>2795244>a growing number of american youth over the course of the last 30 years or so have become increasingly disenfranchised all together with politics, and it's got more to do than having access to treats.like?
>>2795244>sorry but this is just incorrect. america is a large place with a spectrum of people. manhattan cosmoplitans don't represent me.Don't give a single shit about "muh representation", only give a shit about economic facts. If you live on US soil, no matter how disenfranchised, black, native, lgbt, no matter, you benefit from imperialism.
This is the hard pill that you must swallow.
>>2795244>yeah I realize that.lal salam
i >>2795243I’m not saying treats are intrinsically bad, I’m saying they become a problem when they’re an excuse for everything
including the imperialism that makes the treats so plentiful. Treatlerite states are ones that manufacture consent for mass murder, by framing opposition to imperialism as hypocrisy if you’ve ever had a cup of coffee.
We have treatlerites on leftypol are heavily influenced by that consensus in their home countries. They’ve got hair trigger defensiveness when anyone alludes to the fact that benefitting from imperialism would discourage them from truly opposing it, but their defence takes the form of responding to pro-capitalist rightoids in claiming “hey you know the treats ain’t so important to me, but that doesn’t mean you can starve me”
>>2795248>most americans who aren't treatlerites are the minorityI guess it depends on how you define it, like if you're talking about the quality of life in a place like yemen then ok I understand but within the context of my own country I'm not much better off than some chinese warehouse worker who makes a pittance for every 16 hour shift and who has to live in a shoebox.
>>2795249well, "the american dream" has increasingly been eroded by the oligarchy to the point that many avenues of life, from home ownership to good paying jobs, are becoming increasingly inaccessible to people here. I'm not talking about hollywood mansions, average families are struggling to afford a place to live because the cost of property has skyrocketed, and with the looming threat of AI, it's becoming more difficult to find work. I suppose you don't care about such things though, from your perspective it's fun to watch american citizens squirm, and suffer as you have suffered.
>>2795253yeah, I understand that, but do you understand that I'd rather not benefit from such things, and that I'm not the only one who wants to cease america's global imperialist bloodlust? I'm WITH the iranians when they say DEATH TO AMERICA(n government). blame the rich, they're the problem. ain't no war but class war. you're talking some idpol shit, isn't that right?
>>2795257>I guess it depends on how you define itI'm not sure you understand what the thread topic is
>>2795259I understand it just fine, and I don't agree with the notion that the majority of people in america are 'treatlerites' because increasingly the quality of life here is dwindling. of course, you have to define what you mean by quality of life; someone earlier in the thread said that they want the woman in the OP's video to know what it's like to live a quality of life similar to that of a pakistani urchin, to consider a 'treat' to be a half eaten square of chocolate. most americans live a quality of life better than that, I can still go and buy chocolate at any given thrift store, but the economy is increasingly getting to the point where people are having to make the choice between paying bills or eating all together.
you seem to be of the idea that every motherfucker here is as rich as hasan piker and that's just retarded.
>>2795256Trying to be more succinct, I diagnose the problem as treatlerites not being able to understand the difference between
>Chud “pro-capitalism and supporting our troops is punk” YouTubers calling you a hypocrite for consooming treats while having complaints about capitalism And
>Third-Worldists saying anti-imperialist sentiment in the first world is largely limited by the fact so much of first world society is dependent on imperialism >>2795256>I’m not saying treats are intrinsically bad, I’m saying they become a problem when they’re an excuse for everything including the imperialism that makes the treats so plentiful. You've got everything backwards, in my opinion. 'Murrica got high standard of living EXACTLY BECAUSE of imperialism. Imperialism isn't what the US government "has on the side," instead IT IS THAT.
Do you understand?
>>2795267I don’t really see where you got that interpretation
>>2795268>I can't afford pets anymorewow
>>2795257>well, "the american dream" has increasingly been eroded by the oligarchyLe American Dream got eroded by your Empire being forfeit, nothing else.
>>2795271You’re having a schizophrenic episode I think.
>>2795269As always the message appears to be
>everything is too expensivewhich is true but that’s not anti-capitalist in of itself, most Americans agree that shit is too expensive and it seems that most Americans, to resolve that issue, were supportive of doubling down on capitalism in wanting to “Make America Great Again”.
>>2795257>yeah, I understand that, but do you understand that I'd rather not benefit from such thingsI get the general sentiment and I applaud you for being a moral (?) 'murrican. But here's the thing, my friend. If, this sentence of yours, gets translated to everyday-burger-speak, it would look like this:
>would you like US (burger gov) to STOP dominating the Middle East, even if it meant $2 more on your gas prices?and they would say: "no!"
Do you understand what I'm saying???
You guys being imperial core "embourgeoisified proles" (Marx) or "labour aristocrats" (Lenin) who live your lives luxuriously at the expense of the rest of humanity, have
interests, material interests, in keeping the system going.
Whenever I see a fucking burger cry about Palestine, Vietnam, Iran, whatever, I only hear: "yeah, we do A war there, but how's THAT gonna keep my prices down?!"
>>2795273>As always the message appears to be>>everything is too expensive>which is true but that’s not anti-capitalist in of itselfMeanwhile, in reality:
<THE ONLY SOURCE OF WEALTH IS PRODUCTIVE LABOUR (Marx)<YOU IMPERIAL-CORE BITCHES ARE EXPERIENCING A POOPIE CUZ YOU HAVE MOVED 90% OF YOUR PRODUCTION TO ASIA, AND YOUR CURRENCY WAS UPHELD BY FORCE<AND NOW THAT THE REST OF THE WORLD IS DECOUPLING FROM YOU, SUDDENLY YOU EXPERIENCE INFLATION, AS IF YOUR MONEY WASN'T BACKED UP BY ACTUAL LABOUR, BUT BY DOMINATION, SPECULATION, AND LITERAL SHIToh, wow, dude, I have so much international solidarity 4 u
>>2795274labour aristocrats only exist
within a given society. it is not a planet-wide thing
>>2795269>it costs more money to buy the food needed to prepare a meal for a family of 4 than it does to go out and buy it at a fast food restaurantgenerally speaking, this is bullshit. in recent years pst-COVID, everything has increased in price, including fast food. it can cost between 30-50 dollars to buy a fast food meal for two people. granted, the grocery store food is also expensive, but you have more flexibility in what you choose to buy and thus you can manage to get more for about the same price. I guess in this sense, it's a "treat" to buy cuts of beef as opposed to eating fucking tofu or whatever cheaper protein equivalent you want to throw out there.
>in the USA we can't afford insuranceit's a complex issue, the problem isn't that people aren't able to afford it, it's that the whole system is privatized and for-profit, and on top of that it's made deliberately opaque and hard to understand, so the end result is that people end up paying a lot more than they should while at the same time getting denied coverage for various problems they might suffer from. it's fucked.
>can't do anything because you have to workyes, american work culture is worse than the fucking japanese. we're worked like dogs here by our corporate masters, and they want us to work even harder, until they can throw us away entirely for a sleek new fleet of 30,000 AI powered robots who never need a break or pesky things like human rights.
so her complaints are not without merit, but at the same time I don't blame people for getting the impression that she's just complaining about having to spend more money, because she makes logical leaps between the concept of having to pay more and physical illness.
>>2795274I do understand what you're saying and I can't really argue against it because you're right. I just want people to know that we're not all like that, even if I'm someone who benefits from worldwide bloodshed and thus I de facto have blood on my hands as well. I take no pleasure in it.
>>2795278>turdoidst. imperial-core chauvinist
I think in the first-world, it’s really overhyped how disobedient it is to have wrongthink. When that’s really the genius behind “free speech”, everyone is encouraged to get really irate over opinions and it results in the comparison between opinions and arseholes, I.e everyone’s got one and they all stink.
First-worlders online are genuinely shocked to find out that people in the global south don’t consider getting mass downvoted on Reddit, or getting banned from X by Musk himself for voicing opinions contrary to that of the state’s, to be a form of struggle, let alone agitation. Like, for getting quasi-disowned by their boomer conservative father, they’re not part of the global struggling masses their father supports the exploitation of.
>>2795281Completely false. Labour aristocracy in the highest stage of capitalism arose as symptom of said system from which they benefit. Labour aristocracy isn't constricted to a strata inside a "national economy" (as if such thing even existed anymore, lol), but a strata to GLOBAL ECONOMY.
Welcome to current year, my boy.
>>2795269sex with grumpy mid life crisis blond burger milf 😋
>>2795280Again, I don’t get where you’re interpreting my posts as a disagreement with you. Are you trolling?
biggest problem I have with third worldists, aside from the fact that it's a very tiny amount of people, is that it's all self-loathing first-worlders who don't actually represent the third-world in any meaningful way
it's basically another strain of orientalism
anyways, I still support the thread because it's funny
>>2795282Thank you for your reply to this matter.
>>2795299>I’m lol’ing because it’s only a tiny number of first worlders who understand it Savage.
>>2795263Treatlerite isn’t having a good quality of life per se, it’s more like demanding your lil treats no matter how much blood must be spilt. In fact treatlerism is becoming more common as qol goes down. In the 90s it was just assumed you would be able to get cheap burgers and gas and shit but now the treaterlite masses are demanding a fuhrer bring that lifestyle back no matter how many brownoids need to be killed and enslaved
>>2795309This, I think even the “anti-war” aspect of Trumpism is interpreted, as intended, as ending unprofitable forever wars and instead going for quick wins. If all of his conflict played out like Venezuela, then he’d be lauded, but since the conflict in Ukraine continues without regard for his demands for negotiations and Iran is looking like another forever war (both also coincidentally fuck with oil prices), he’s lost popularity with his supporters but not as a horrific war monger, merely a typical politician who overpromised and underdelivered.
>>2795315Where are you finding this shit it’s too good 😂
>>2795299>biggest problem I have with third worldists, aside from the fact that [THEY DON'T EXIST OUTSIDE MY IMPERIAL-CORE BRAIN]on a scale from 1 to 10, how oppressed are you?
>>2795311I'm honestly not sure what you're trying to say here, comrade. I recognize your flag and I think you've been posting good ass content under that flag, so I'm asking you to restate your message in a more idiot-friendly way.
denk u
>>2795315the best part of this vid most anglo-saxons wouldn't be able to detect is the part when she says
>yeah, you get to go to this fast-food restaurant, and you get to eat in your own car, AND<that's KIND OF CUTElike, bitch, like…
>>2795319I'm not really a "third worldist". I actively avoid reading theory in favour of reading the data.
All I did was look, and see that the US is the first, and biggest, obstacle to communism. When I pointed this out, everybody agreed with me. I assume those who were caught in Old-BO's wordfilter for "anti-americanism" have left years ago. But the second US starts to decline, the squealing, and the bitching starts.
>>2795323For me it was when she was like “well the extra cost certainly didn’t go towards the branding on the bag” as if it fucking matters😭
>>2795309well now I'm just confused, because you'd think that the ability to have treats would directly correlate to your quality of life. as in, if you're living, well, like some pakistani urchin, then you're not thinking about anything other than survival, and even something as common as a drink of cool, clean water could be considered a 'treat' in some sense to anyone desperate enough. as your quality of life increases, and you begin to desire for more than just a basic standard of living, then you can make determinations about what constitutes a 'treat' that aren't contingent upon survival. is internet access a 'treat'? what about a morning coffee? and on and on until you progress to the sort of lifestyle that some upper middle class petit bourgeoisie lives, a.k.a.
<oh what a treat it is to spend thousands of dollars to fly first class to ibiza and stay in a luxury hotel that costs 360 dollars a night and spend a month in luxury, while visiting high end nightclubs and upscale restaurants that costs 5000 per tableetc.
the point being, for most people in america, the things that people in developing nations might consider treats are off the table, although I admit it's stupid of me to assume how people from other nations perceive the american quality of life.
>it’s more like demanding your lil treats no matter how much blood must be spiltthis mentality mostly comes from neoliberals and idiot middle american republican consumerist sheep. not to jerk myself off but I'm principled enough to oppose war because I'm against needless bloodshed, although maybe I'd have to really test the limits of my own beliefs. I'd like to think that I'd be principled on this no matter what, but maybe I could be persuaded to consider war to be some necessity if my quality of life dropped low enough, but I'd consider that to be a sort of coercion as forced by the material conditions + government and corporate influence. also let's not try and sell the idea that people in developing nations wouldn't wage and benefit from war if they could. it's really an element of human nature to be a stupid, selfish, short sighted animal who is primarily concerned with his own well being.
>>2795324>But the second US starts to decline, the squealing, and the bitching starts.Yes but I’m uncertain of whether that’s specifically because of the decline itself resulting in treat reduction, or because they’ve taken the treat reduction as them now being on the same level as sweatshop workers in Bangladesh and expected
sympathy solidarity from the Global South, then throwing a hissy fit at being laughed at.
>>2795318>grain from Ukraine went to PIGSkek, never gets old
>>2795327See
>>2795293Thank you for your attention on this matter
>>2795327Why is it only ever women in these types of videos
Omg like whatt
>>2795321>>2795293input status: appreciated
Hate amerika beat threads are so comfy
>>2795327>>2795315Why do burgers think going from mid to large soda costs half a dinner?
>>2795325Sorry, chud, but if you don't put your company logo on your fugen bag, you are scamming me, end of story.
>>2795333Because they’re the ones perhaps most sold on “lifestyle”, men also get sold on lifestyles but they’re more about owning a truck than diving your day up into hour long sessions at different trendy businesses.
>>2795329They complain about cheering of immiseration of proles. They complain about cheering for the deaths of proles. They do exactly nothing to better their lot, at the expense of the imperial system.
It's like it was all just empty sloganeering to them. "No excuses for the terror" became "all the excuses, and no terror".
>>2795335enjoy you're stay
Time does not pass, it disappears
Somewhere in the middle of these events
Things simply cease to exist
Nothing is all that will endure
As men race toward death waving their tongues
As the slowness of artifacts create history, nothing endures
A sign reads "dead end" set against
A house under construction as workers, hammers and saws inflict sound
The biggest mall in the world is being built across the street from what was the biggest mall in the world
Shopping for the economy in our regional retail center
Fully enclosed, climate controlled
Time does not pass, it disappears
Somewhere in the middle of these events
Things simply cease to exist
Nothing is all that will endure
As men race toward death waving their tongues
At the center of the target: gold
>>2795341Sure but that’s the irony of anti-“third worldists”, upon being laughed at they flip the script in their heads and now it’s the Global South who has the privilege to mock their plights. I remember seeing in the anti-campist threads an anon defending his neutrality towards imperialism by suggesting that people in the global south are privileged with cheaper housing and food, hence their positive birth rates, while everyone in the US are too poor from paying rent to have any children.
>>2795343They also stressed that because they don’t receive a direct dividend from imperialist conquest, they’re not beneficiaries at all and thus it’s not their problem to resolve
>>2795343>>2795346Hopefully, those were just shitposts.
>>2795346>their problem to resolvevoluntarism anyway
>>2795350>first guy says you can’t eat at mcdonalds for under $20>second guy says he got two double cheeseburgers for $5So is the first guy’s order like 8 double cheeseburgers? No wonder amerikkkans are so fat
Marx loved treats. He argued the lack of tea and sugar during the Napoleon Wars was revolutionary. He supported Manifest Destiny and the British conquest of India because it led to more treats. He criticized Christian socialism for advocating ascetism, which he viewed as reactionary because we need more powerful productive forces to make more treats. He claimed communism had a higher aim than meeting mere animal needs like clothing, shelter, food, but people should be well rounded individuals. In short, we must all embrace the finer things in life and become treat masters.
Kek get saged uyghur
>>2795278>TurdoidsKek I am using this.
>saged
kek why are treatler mods so bitchmade?
>>2795461Get saged uyghur
Unique IPs: 28