KCK: Neither Rêber Apo nor our Freedom Movement will accept faits accomplis.The KCK Executive Council Co-Chairmanship stated, “For some time now, there has been a debate in the Turkish press and public opinion regarding the framework law. Interpretations that do not conform to, and even contradict, the peace and democratic society project pursued by Rêber Apo are being voiced in the press. Most recently, the proposals Rêber Apo presented in İmralı on May 24th and the meetings held by the DEM Party delegation with AKP officials have been presented as if they were new. However, no meetings have been held with Rêber Apo since May 24th. The proposals Rêber Apo presented after the May 24th meeting were to be evaluated by the government. These evaluations were to be conveyed to Rêber Apo, and the results were to be communicated to our Movement. However, this procedure has not been followed to date. Therefore, there has been no contact or development to be evaluated from that day to this. While Rêber Apo remains in isolation on such a historical and important issue, our Freedom Movement has had no information about this during this time.”
The KCK statement, which said, "Our Freedom Movement has stood by the process led by Rêber Apo and has made every effort necessary," further stated: "While we have made multifaceted efforts towards the democratic political solution of the problems, we have also taken important steps. We supported the efforts to enact freedom laws that would allow for free democratic politics. In this regard, although we see it as incomplete and insufficient, we found the report prepared by the brotherhood, peace and democracy commission to be positive."
<PASSING A LAW WITHOUT CONSULTING THE LEADERSHIP IS CONSIDERED A GAME, AN IMPOSITION, AND A CONSPIRACY.The Peace and Democratic Society Process directly concerns us. We have frequently avoided making statements on behalf of the Movement to avoid negatively impacting the Process and the dialogues with Rêber Apo. However, recent policies, statements, and assessments have made it necessary to issue a statement and present our views to the public.
To say that a law will be passed, without consulting and discussing it with the leadership, without taking the Movement's opinion into account, and that it will contain such and such, is considered a game, an imposition, even a conspiracy. Indeed, Numan Kurtulmuş made a statement to the effect that a law will be passed, those who come will come, and if anyone doesn't, the necessary action will be taken against them. Decisions regarding this organization are made and implemented holistically. Our Freedom Movement only takes holistic laws and steps into account. Otherwise, it will not be a situation where some come and some don't. The issue is not just about the fighters laying down their arms. Of course, the attitude towards the fighters and leadership of this movement will be unified. Adopting a different approach would sabotage this process.
<IF A POSITIVE APPROACH IS NOT SHOWN TOWARDS RÊBER APO'S POSITION, NO ONE CAN ENSURE THAT THE DECISIONS MADE ARE IMPLEMENTED IN PRACTICE.At the congress where we dissolved the PKK as the Freedom Movement, we decided that the dissolution and disarmament process could only be led by Rêber Apo. Rêber Apo can only lead this process under conditions of freedom. Our people and our Movement have made it clear from the beginning that they will not accept any policy and practice that does not include Rêber Apo's freedom and the conditions under which he can live and work freely. Without a positive approach towards Rêber Apo's position and without taking steps in that direction, no one can ensure the practical implementation of the decisions taken at the PKK congress.
The purpose of dialogue with the leadership and our relationship with them is to develop a holistic policy and approach. Otherwise, simply passing a law, with those who want to come and those who don't, won't work. Is a solution being sought through this process, or is the public being confused, or is a special war being waged against the Freedom Movement? If a law like the "Return Home Law" is not passed, and a comprehensive democratic solution approach is not presented, neither our people nor our organizational structure will accept it. From this perspective, if a century-old problem, a fifty-year-old conflict and issue of rupture is to be resolved, a correct understanding and approach must be put forward.
<WHAT IS THE HEAD OF THE NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY DOING IN BAGHDAD, SULEIMANIYAH, AND HEWLÊR?Now, policies are being implemented that are almost like preparing for a new war. The head of the National Intelligence Organization (MİT), İbrahim Kalın, is touring Iraq not just as the head of the intelligence agency, but almost like the prime minister of the government. Similar meetings were held during the attack on Rojava. What is the MİT head doing in Baghdad, Sulaymaniyah, and Hewlêr? Are these forces being assigned roles in a plan to attack and eliminate our Freedom Movement? Undoubtedly, all Kurdish people and political forces should be vigilant against such policies. Türkiye's statements should be seen as unilateral and not in the best interests of the Kurds. Instead of solving its own internal problems, is Turkey planning an attack against our Freedom Movement with Iraq following the Iraqi government's decision regarding armed forces outside the army? It is known that similar discussions are taking place with Iran. If the Turkish state has such plans, we believe that Iraq should not accept them.
We want to emphasize this clearly: neither Rêber Apo nor our Freedom Movement will accept any fait accompli. To consider a policy of special warfare, such as "we passed a law, but they don't accept it," would be an irrational approach. It would be a continuation of policies that have yielded no results for a century and have led to a rupture between the Kurdish people and Türkiye. In this respect, it is necessary to act seriously and responsibly in our approach to both Rêber Apo and our Freedom Movement.
As the Freedom Movement, we possess the will and determination to implement a political approach that will ensure democratic integration with Turkey on the basis of a democratic political solution that will eliminate the century-long climate of conflict and rupture. It is also the historical responsibility of the Turkish state to do its part in ensuring democratic integration through policies and steps that will enable the practical implementation of this will and determination.
"The democratic public and our people must be vigilant against approaches that would sabotage the Peace and Democratic Society Process, and must fulfill their responsibility to ensure the success of the peace and democratic society process by more effectively combating the isolation maintained in İmralı."
https://anfenglishmobile.com/guncel/kck-230521