One of the most hollowing things about being a leftoid is just how much bad behavior is automatically given to you just because you want to live in a world where people don't starve or whatever and there could be more free time to do well whatever the fuck uyghas want to do. Yet leftoids are said to always have these Dysgenetic traits while rightiods get to portray themselves as the yes chad and we get saddled with soyjaks and shit. Even people who are just vaguely sympathetic to our cause is also getting that treatment and other such shit. "Conservatives/Chuds are the real punk rock/edgelords/contrarians" "Conservatives/Chuds are the real tolerant people", "Conservatives are all fit" yet if you ever bring up rural/urban obesity rates or notice how fucking ugly, the very obvious gap in autism score s between rightiods and leftoids, how much social conservatives have larger amygladas (Thus they feel fear and disgust more, not very stoic of them), how they think they can't even win a fight against DONALD TRUMP or even worse MID LOOKING all these rightiod look like and yet you still have vtubers and shit saying they want to be impregnated by Asmongold!
Being a leftoid is basically having no fucking ego defense and you have to be much more fit, intelligent and other such qualities to get ass while centroid/chud men get it easier despite them not even needing to be HALF of any of things we have to do.
213 posts and 33 image replies omitted.>>2854299>what good does learning about a problem do to fix iti'm blocking this fucking board on my browser
>>2846843Are the Welsh now considered queer?
What ever happened to the tough guy anarchist lefties we saw in 2020?
Fighting fascists, fighting the cops, now its people yelling at you for not wearing masks and not respecting neopronouns
>>2854623Who the fuck is yelling at you for not wearing a mask, it's 2026
>>2854623only people with OCD still care about masks in 2024 and neopronouns are a 2017 thing. what the fuck kind of wacky time machine have you fallen out of?
>>2845698>Who's the most masculine left figure in the USA?Haz
>>2845698>>2854628What use or good is masculinity? We don’t live on farms or in work in factories anymore
>>2854626>>2854625Yes they all have "OCD" or whatever "disorders" they were "diagnosed with" by checking off so many boxes in a survey for a DSM 5 test.
The truth is to so much of "the left" mental disorders ar no different than hair dye, tattoos, and your political label.
Its all aesthetics. Its all comidified into being accessories for these people.
>>2854629People generally want to follow masculine leaders.
>>2854632Uh oh grandpa is yelling at clouds again
>>2854634Yeah look at masculine leaders like Trump
>>2854634How does masculine = better when we live in a genderless economy?
>>2854637I never said it is.
People like to follow masculine leaders especially in the west.
>>2854632you think yourself better than them, but you're even worse. defining yourself not even against them but against your own poorly remembered stereotype of them. nobody is free from aestheticisation.
>>2854653Maybe these westerners are wrong
>>2854674Foolish moralist. Its not a matter of right and wrong. Its about capturing the hearts and minds of millions. In the current material conditions a masculine leader is best suited for this.
This is merely a question of strategy. Go knit some covid masks you silly leftist.
>>2854686Jesus why do half the people here try to talk like fucking JRPG villains
>>2854686I didn’t mean morally wrong, I mean practically wrong, wrong for the moment
>>2854701How did Kamala Harris and Hillary Clinton work out for you?
>>2854712Because they were gendered and non proletarian. Androgynous non binary political leadership NOW
>>2854686>Foolish moralist. Its not a matter of right and wrong. Its about capturing the hearts and minds of millions.No it's about
scamming millions. The thing about Haz and Eddie Liger and those guys is really they're just con artists who are trying to run scams. It's just about that, and the performance of masculinity thing that they really push is a confidence trick, people who fall for "don't be a pussy" and "real men do/don't do X" tend to be easy marks, more subject to manipulation. It's the same with the manosphere stuff, they're grifters, also goes for the religious hustling which those guys also try to exploit. It's why Christian rock tours are some of the most notorious in the business because the managers constantly try to cheat the venues.
Also a method used in police interrogation. Just a word of caution if the cops try to pull that on you, like if they say don't be a bitch/pussy/sissie/pansy which is what you're doing by asking for a lawyer and not talking. It actually works on men.
>>2854729this also works all the time at work. your a pussy for wanting health and safety equipment. real men work through their breaks. real men dont complain they just get the job done. then whn your heart goes pop or you lose a limb its tough shit
>>2854727
Anyone can do any job, gender has no economic basis anymore thanks to the breakdown of the family plot
>>2854739You just saved me 1,000 pages of Marxist theory, thank you.
>>2854727
TIL I can't both be a wagie and a queer. Gotta tell my cis straight boss we have to switch P card and B card and that he gotta hand over his business to me.
>>2854498The internet won't save your from IRL transphobic violence, otherwise transhumanist hookers wouldn't be ACKed by thousands every year.
>>2855336not untrue, but the internet saves a lot of people from violence (both as perp and victim) because they stay indoors all day. it's possibly the single biggest crimestopper since we stopped putting lead in petrol.
>>2854753Maybe after powered exoskeletons become popular.
>>2855814What do you think a forklift is?
>>2855566Pretty sure internet has killed alot of people too.
The internet turned a whole generation into autistic incels
>>2855336>hookersI have a feeling this is more pressing on why they end up killed,working in the street with zero surveillance
>>2855814You've never worked a physical job a day in your life we can all tell.
>>2855929Its wild to me that "leftists" use trans women to support prostitution. They claim its the only profession they can do. They dont view trans women as people capable of labor, just sex objects. Pure bourgeoise thought.
>>2856087Are you sure it's actually leftists and not chuds doing a false flag?
>>2856087So if you don't think sex workers should be murdered then you "support prostitution"?
>>2856037If you think physically demanding jobs are or could be 50/50 men/women you're delusional. Stop watching Hollywood movies.
>>2854628Oh joy and you're a retard who fell for a rich-kid con-artist (Haz). Seriously these "PatSocs" and "Conservative" Mano-sphere guys are all con-men trying to fleece you. Read this
>>2854718 >>2858535Precisely.
Fundamentally, today's political divide is between high openness and low openness people. Transgenderism is a lightning rod because it strips away all the distractions and asks: should people go for better things that run contrary to current norms?
A few neurotic libs and channer idiots think they can get by if they sacrifice someone else in their stead and think trans people are ideal to throw under the bus, but 99% of the time someone being anti-trans and unable to control their power level about it reveals that in their heart of hearts they are a reactionary, turned off the idea of a better future as soon as they realise it means no more precious god and no more precious tsar.
This platner thing shows how week the US left is.
They supported a man that admitted to murdering civilians however a white woman makes a claim of sexual assault with zero evidence and now hes a bad dude.
Weak weak weak.
>>2858535>Fundamentally, today's political divide is between high openness and low openness peopleHoly liberalism.
>>2862289- you quoted the wrong person bozo
- It is empiricism, not liberalism.
- the only reason you could interpret it as "liberalism" is because you've arrogantly assumed the wrong meaning to the phrase "political divide" in that sentence. (in context it clearly refers to which "side" or ideology people identify with and purport to hold, not to the "real" underlying material divide you think you're oh-so-clever for knowing about.)
post less, read more.
>>2862311Bruh how is that empiricism?
Its vibes based not senses based
>>2862316reams of survey data
(i
sense this will not be a productive conversation.)
>>2862324Where did they survey?
Your ass?
>you look bad!
<no, you look bad!
Everyone itt is formaly invited to looksmax.org
Unique IPs: 34