>>2888791stop imagining that the state is your friend. the state is run by those same billionaires. it means nothing if they replace rule by a glove puppet in their right hand with rule by themselves, directly, with the left hand. it is true that billionaires are doing these things, but some of them are popular with segments of the public: trump cultists do not worship trump because billionaires tell them to, they do so because trump is fundamentally appealing to their prejudices and instincts. even in a world with no billionaires, trump would have - at the very worst - come a close second in 2024. it remains eminently possible he might even have won. moreover, billionaires want war for many reasons, and discrediting the state is pretty far down the list of reasons. (below, indeed, that
they have the same personality defects as the average trump supporter, and therefore enjoy killing for killing's sake.)
the optimal configuration of the state at the moment would be for it to handle welfare transfers, infrastructure, basic public order (including elementary "don't put arsenic in food" regulation), and at a push antitrust policy, and not one thing more. the most reactionary people are almost to a t those in
uncompetitive sectors where the state has cut out a special little role for them, whether that's elon musk raking in NASA contracts, car dealers sitting comfortably knowing the government won't let car manufacturers sell direct even though it would be more efficient, or the entire british economy where the basic model of so-called privatisation was that you can run a water company made of leaky pipes and shit in every river and still have the government guarantee you a profit while protecting you from any threat of new, competitive market entrants.
that is, the state should do as much as it does now, but with a much narrower focus, including the removal of the means of war. meanwhile, much of the market must be exposed to much greater competition to neutralise reactionary influence.
no, none of this will happen. the fundamental problem underpinning this and all libertarian-ish visions is that people who're getting rich looting the current system will lobby for tax cuts, but not deregulation or pro-competition policy. that would interfere with their looting. meanwhile, those who would benefit from those changes cannot lobby you with the money they have not yet earned from the competitive market that does not yet exist…