>>2937718"AI" is only as useful as the hardware it runs on and the humans managing and directing it. And since most humans don't know how to use it, and are simply trying to get it to do everything for them without thinking critically, it's not very useful. "AI" has this thing called a "context window" and most people don't even know about it. If you try to get an AI to write a novel for you, it will forget the plot after a few thousand words and you'll need to keep reminding it. That means you filled the context window. You have to pay for more context. This is capital intensive. Read this thread:
>>>/leftypol/2930210AI exists as the data centers, GPUs, etc. it runs on. That is constant capital. Dead labor. Doubly so because its training data comes from work written and edited by actual humans in the past. Without that accumulated and objectified-as-data past labor it would not be able be able to generate any kind of statistically likely output.