The dean of the Marxism department at a university in Henan Province has been accused of harassing female students: He is described as spouting Marxism while harboring a mind full of immoral behaviour.This is a typical snapshot of the corruption and degeneration of numerous Party members and cadres, and an outward manifestation of the symptoms of genuine and false faith among Party members. It is necessary to thoroughly examine this 100 million yuan.picture
In the past, the masses jokingly referred to colleges that called a deer a horse as "deer colleges." Now, have some of them become terminally ill and turned into donkey colleges?
In the market, you often see a situation where the person who shouts the loudest and swears the most is the one who wants to sell the worst goods.
—Lenin.
<oneThe School of Marxism—what a wonderful School of Marxism!
Recently, the news that Zhao Mouyan, the former dean of the School of Marxism at Henan University of Economics and Law, is suspected of harassing female students has caused a great uproar in the public sphere.
According to screenshots circulating online and tearful accusations posted by students, this supposedly "Dean of the School of Marxism" engaged in despicable acts such as "hugging, touching hands, kissing faces, and kissing ears" while luring female students to tourist attractions. He even brazenly made the disgusting statement, "I need a kiss before I drive."
In the comments section, more students who had been victims of his actions came forward: adding female students on WeChat in large numbers during online classes, hugging and pinching their cheeks under various pretexts, and even making video calls to female students late at night with his upper body exposed…
The school's current statement is "suspending all educational and teaching activities and launching an investigation" and "zero tolerance for unethical behavior by teachers."
However, this report deliberately downplayed, and even concealed, Zhao Mouyan's most crucial, and ironic, identity:
Former Dean of the School of Marxism.
These people are not defending Marxism, but rather tarnishing Marx's reputation!
What is Marxism? It is the science of proletarian liberation, the weapon of truth that smashes all shackles and overthrows all oppression and exploitation.
Meanwhile, the "Dean of the Marxist Academy," who should have been teaching young students the theory of class struggle, analyzing the exploitative nature of capitalism, and defending the dignity of workers from the podium, secretly extended his dark hand of exploitation and oppression to unarmed female students.
During the day, he talks at length about "surplus value" on the podium, but at night he privately and ruthlessly exploits his students' "emotional value" and "physical residual value."
During the day, he would write "the complete liberation of man" on the blackboard, but at night he would transform into a feudal landlord, treating female students as "maids" and "private property" that he could play with at will and grope at any time.
This is not merely a moral decline; it is a complete betrayal of class and a desecration of faith.
<twoMany people have been asking this question, including the girl who posted the accusation but couldn't report it to the police because she "didn't preserve valid evidence and could only post a warning." She probably asked this countless times late at night:
Why?
Why have there been so many similar incidents in recent years? Why do such heinous and bestial acts keep breaking out in the ivory tower?
Ultimately, this is an irrefutable truth that Marxism has stated and Chairman Mao has repeatedly emphasized:
If power is not supervised, it will inevitably become alienated and corrupt; all dependent relations of production will inevitably give rise to absolute exploitation and oppression.
Today's universities are no longer pure and innocent ivory towers. In some corners, they have been transformed into "independent kingdoms" with extremely unequal power and extremely monopolistic resources.
Under the current academic system, what do professors and deans wield?
They hold the power of life and death over research projects, funding, postgraduate admission quotas, and paper publications, and can even directly determine whether a student can graduate smoothly, obtain a degree, or find a job to make a living in the future.
When a dean tells a student, "You have to kiss me before you drive," is it merely a vulgar and sexually harassing remark?
No, this is the arrogance of power, the absolute control that those in power have over those in power.
He's confident you won't dare to resist.
He knew that once you broke off relations, you would find it difficult to get anywhere in this school; he knew that you would have no choice but to swallow your anger for the sake of your diploma; he knew that the unspoken rule of "protecting one's own" within the system meant that even if you reported it, it would mostly come to nothing unless there was so-called "solid evidence".
Why didn't the girl who received a video call late at night from the shirtless dean of the School of Marxism dare to report it?
Because of fear.
This fear is structurally no different from the fear of the proletariat more than a hundred years ago, when they were forced to pay rent by landlords and arbitrarily dismissed by capitalists.
The so-called "teacher-student relationship" has at this moment been completely reduced to a "personal dependency relationship".
This is precisely one of the core characteristics of capitalist wage labor that Marx repeatedly criticized in Capital: the laborer loses the means of production, is forced to sell his labor power, and endures the despotic rule of the capitalist in the production process.
However, in the micro-sphere of universities, students are deprived of "academic means of production," while people like Zhao Mouyan are "academic capitalists" who monopolize these means.
<threeThe fact that the dean of the School of Marxism led the way in engaging in sexual harassment is an absurd drama with a dark sense of humor, revealing a deeper ideological crisis.
Why do people who wave the banner of Marxism do the most anti-Marxist things?
Because in the eyes of people like Zhao Mouyan, Marxism has never been a belief or a weapon to transform the world.
For them, Marxism is merely a stepping stone, a prestigious title, and a "super IP" used to apply for national social science grants, obtain professional titles, and gain political capital and academic status.
They dissected Lenin's works into numerous core journal articles written simply to fill space;
They dissected Chairman Mao's thought into rigid dogmas used only to pass assessments;
They talk about ideologies all the time, but their minds are full of business.
This precisely confirms Chairman Mao's deepest concerns at the time:
The bourgeoisie is within the party.
Why was Chairman Mao so wary of intellectuals and the old system of universities back then? Why did he launch such a soul-searching revolution to criticize "reactionary bourgeois academic authorities"?
Chairman Mao keenly perceived that without thorough ideological reform and institutional restructuring, those intellectuals cloaked in the guise of the proletariat, once they gained power, would not only quickly detach themselves from the masses but also form a new privileged class.
They will use more covert and hypocritical methods than capitalists to oppress the working class and young students.
"The academic clique is ruthless and uses scholarship as a bargaining chip. They only know how to instill knowledge in students and demand alcohol from them."
Mao Zedong's angry rebuke in the "Declaration on the Establishment of Hunan Self-Study University" in 1921, even after a century, still sounds like a resounding slap in the face to people like Zhao Mouyan.
However, today's Zhao Mouyans want not only the students' alcohol, but also the female students' youth, dignity, and bodies.
These two-faced individuals who wave the red flag while opposing it, these revisionists who use sacred Marxist theory as a fig leaf to cover up their personal desires and gain promotions, are they not the most hateful traitors in the history of the international communist movement?
<FourLet's go back to the event itself.
Students at Henan University of Economics and Law posted on campus, offered each other support in the comments section, and even called for "organized collective protests to rectify the school's atmosphere."
Such a voice is worthy of respect.
Under the pressure of power and in the predicament of difficulty in preserving evidence (who would have thought that going to see the dean would require carrying a recording pen and a hidden camera?), the only way for the weak to resist is to unite and break the spiral of silence.
This is precisely the first lesson Marxism teaches the oppressed:
Workers of the world, unite!
When the voice of an individual is weak, the cry of the collective can create a storm.
However, we must also recognize that relying solely on online public opinion and the school's "suspension for investigation" is far from enough to eradicate this structural cancer.
The school's announcement didn't even bother to mention the "former dean of the School of Marxism." What was the reason for this? Did they feel they were disgracing the school, or the School of Marxism?
True Marxists never shy away from admitting their shortcomings.
Lenin said:
Openly acknowledging mistakes, revealing the reasons for making them, analyzing the conditions that led to them, and carefully discussing ways to correct them—this is the hallmark of a serious party.
If we don't even have the courage to face the problems head-on, if we have to hide even our identity as "Dean of the School of Marxism," then what's the point of talking about "zero tolerance for professional misconduct among teachers"?
Today we dealt with Zhao Mouyan, will there be Li Mouyan and Wang Mouyan tomorrow?
As long as the "feudal indentured laborer" system, characterized by one-man rule by professors, a high degree of monopoly over academic resources, and the arbitrary control of students' fates, remains unbroken;
As long as those who rely on theoretical maneuvering and flattery rather than genuine belief in Marxism can still occupy high positions in universities;
As long as our education evaluation system remains bureaucratic and clique-based—
Therefore, the "Huang Shiren" in the ivory tower will never be completely caught, and those powerless young students will always face the danger of being exploited and violated at any time.
<PostscriptIn this bizarre and bewildering era, we have witnessed far too much collapse of faith and alienation of symbols.
However, we must never doubt the truth itself because of a few scoundrels who have infiltrated the revolutionary ranks.
On the contrary, the ugly deeds of people like Zhao Mouyan prove, from the opposite perspective, the greatness and insight of Marxism and Mao Zedong Thought.
Because it is Marxism that has given us the microscope to dissect their ugly faces;
It was Chairman Mao's theory of class struggle that gave us the mirror to see through their exploitative nature.
In his article "On the Correct Handling of Contradictions Among the People," Chairman Mao profoundly pointed out:
In my country, although socialist transformation, in terms of ownership, has been basically completed, and the large-scale, rapid, and intense mass class struggle of the revolutionary period has largely ended, remnants of the overthrown landlord and comprador classes still exist, the bourgeoisie still exists, and the petty bourgeoisie is just beginning its transformation. Class struggle has not ended. The ideological class struggle between the proletariat and the bourgeoisie remains protracted, tortuous, and sometimes even intense. The proletariat wants to transform the world according to its own worldview, and the bourgeoisie also wants to transform the world according to its own worldview. In this respect, the question of who will prevail between socialism and capitalism has not yet been truly resolved.
The sordid and despicable things happening in universities today are not just simple issues of teacher ethics and conduct; they are a living class struggle unfolding right before our eyes.
It is a struggle between "bureaucratic academic cliques" who attempt to privatize public power and treat students as slaves, and the vast number of young students who yearn for equality, dignity, and justice.
We must purge these academic parasites, strip them of their veneer, and reverse the distorted power dynamics!
This is the greatest comfort to Marx and the best commemoration of Chairman Mao.
This world should belong to laborers and awakened youth, and absolutely not to those corrupt academic cliques and beasts in human skin.
https://www.wyzxwk.com/Article/yulun/2026/11/537569.html