>Pedro Castillo and Verónika Mendoza signed a joint declaration on Wednesday sealing Mendoza's support for Castillo going into the Presidential runoff election. They also agree to work together in order to "achieve a government of the people."
The left in Peru is uniting behind a Marxist candidate who is on the verge of BTFOing the Fujimoris, neoliberals all around the world seething about his friendship with Morales & Maduro.
Can we show this based Incan some love?
566 posts and 146 image replies omitted.>>15197who cares. the government of peru has killed way more peasants in these villages than the senderos did, let alone the amount of people global capitalism has killed.
The only problem is that the Senderos were not able to break from the structurally violence of capitalisms and is now doomed to be victims of bourgeoise propaganda that self-proclaimed "leftists still repeat" repeat (same with the Khmer Rouge).
>I'll take electoralism over this bullshit LARP any day.Now you're just repeating rightist lines against Lenin, Stalin and Mao. It's all larp anyway as the Red Army were larping as the French Revolutionaries/ Paris Communes and the Chinese Red Army were larping as Soviets. What you are doing is essentially giving up on the masses and are going against the science of Marxism-Leninism
>>15213The practice of the Soviet Union and China before capitalist restoration proves otherwise, but, assuming you disagree with their economics, Lenin has already told us that to wait for global revolution is unrealistic and that we should sieze any opportunity for power and pave the road as we go.
Revolution is always justified!
sendero_luminosoSendero Luminoso >>15211You really like to suck dicks.
I hope you are the first one here admitting being wrong when the bourgeoisie starts sabotaging him, what you gonna do.
>>15220Since when Castillo is a socialdemocrat? lmao. He's a communist.
He has proposed worker-owned productive forces in his speeches. Get rekt, you dicksucker.
>>15226>That's not what communism fucking is>MFWThe fucking ultra doesn't know what communism is, lmao
And dares to send me to read a book.
Just because I am homourous. What "book"? Pol Pot and his "communists" idea that was anarco-primitivism?
Just by curiosity, which one is. Because it would be really funny that after I had read Das Kapital 3 times, and I have read shitons of Lenins' works, Cockshott, Stalin's, Kropotkin, and Stirner, I want to see what shit author you pull out of your sleeve.
>>15227>It's really ironic if any of you had any grasp of theory you would see who the CIA is really backinAh yes, the CIA loves now the one that in his speeches publicly calls to democratize labor forces giving ownership of the productive force to workers.
Better back-up those claims with real evidence, lmao
Because we have real evidence that communists in the past were killed and coupled by the CIA. And if they are not doing so, is because Chinese influence allows thriving higher independence from U.S. hegemony.
>>15206>I've seen a video of Castillo saying he's not Marxist, seemingly rolling back on his positions. Is this genuine or just an attempt to get increase his vote share?Could you perhaps try to track down the source of where you read/heard this?
>>15208>Anyone running for bourgeois elections in this day is not a Marxist.Bullshit appeal to blind adventurism.
>>15211>A better statement is: even if Castillo wins, nothing will fundamentally change, as he is a representative of the bureaucrat-capitalist class against the comprador class, and will simply be a social democrat in practice like Evo or Maduro. >Nothing would changeThis is just plainly false, in terms of material reality.
Also even for Maoists it's been made abundantly clear that it's better for them to rise with an ML/socdem leadership that then cucks out vs what happened with the PCP experience. Both Philippine and Nepalese Maoists are way ahead today as a result and you're coping badly with this fact.
>>15212>Socialism through bourgeois elections is impossible,Seems you need to re-read Lenin. The point of participating in elections for communists is to reach out to the wider populace in articulating your critique and program to raise class consciousness, not to expect to win by ballot-box (but recent decades have shown for this to be a possibility still in some cases, when paired with the threat of a more militant alternative, like the case in Nepal again).
>An active election boycott is the best way to court the massesUnder a military junta? Sure. Fascist govt? Yeah. Mainstreamed "liberal democratic government"? No.
You'd just be appealing to elements within the petit-bourgeois, like anarchists do, that find adventurism exciting. You're not after consciousness raising or to achieve
a successful revolution.
You're just advocating for dopamine rushes for small, bored, relatively well-off cliques. In reality you ignore Mao, Lenin, Marx.
Gonzaloists lead revolutionaries astray.
>>15229>>15229BUT BRING THE FUCKING BOOK, AND DON'T DEFLECT, YOU MORON
Lmao, you are really digging into your miasmatic shit.
>>15230>Ah yes, the CIA loves now the one that in his speeches publicly calls to democratize labor forces giving ownership of the productive force to workers.This isn't socialism. Co-operatives still yield profit and capital, the CIA doesn't care if it has to put up with one.
>>15231>This is just plainly false, in terms of material reality. >Also even for Maoists it's been made abundantly clear that it's better for them to rise with an ML/socdem leadership that then cucks out vs what happened with the PCP experience. Both Philippine and Nepalese Maoists are way ahead today as a result and you're coping badly with this fact.No it isn't brainlet. They aren't "way ahead" they're capitulationists who tail the liberal establishment.
>Seems you need to re-read Lenin.The willful misinterpretation of LWC by retards has been the worst thing to come out of the Bolshevik revolution lmao. Our situation is different, there is no chance to raise class conscious in a process the masses have no faith in or take part in. Nearly 42% of the electorate either did not vote or voted white or null, in the "most important" election according to the media. That should tell you something about your dated practice. Put up or shut up.
sendero_luminosoSendero Luminoso >>15220>>15220>emember what Maduro is doing right now, killing communists in the Colombian borderhttps://www.laiguana.tv/articulos/906893-farc-ep-deslindarse-caso-apure/
>Ejércitos de países vecinos no son objetivos militares: FARC-EP se deslinda de hechos en ApureArmies of neighboring countries are not military objectives: FARC-EP demarcates from events in Apure
You're sperging lies. Get banned, CIA-Operative
chavismoChavismo >>15245>Guys they said it was unfortunate so they're not counter-revolutionarySTOP
COPING
sendero_luminosoSendero Luminoso >>15120Good ideology, absolutely autistic praxis
>>15117Peruvians don't like the SP white boy
Unique IPs: 1