>Thread dedicated to /leftypol/ original content.>Post original content you've made, or OC someone else recently made which you want to share.>Or ITT collaborate on improving content already made.previous thread: >>1015618
>>>>/leftypol_archive/1015618
>This is the place where you can find all /leftypol/ memes n' shit:>https://lefty.booru.org/ >>572447A = LGBT
X = fascism
Y = communism
lefty guy is "gorkypilled"
right guy is idpol
>>572460Demonarchization needed
>>572462Can't seem to find a general on draw or siberia, but then again I don't use siberia
>>572462Leftypol was never your safe space, tumblrite.
>>572459Yeah it's off-topic. You can ask the booru admin to remove them.
>>572450Thanks a bunch. I searched online for a while and couldn't find it.
Any more stuff in your collection that you can add tot the booru?
>>572493What is so special about being able to hit targets with conventional rockets? Can’t they do that already (given enough time)?
How is this in any way comparable to nukes?
>>572503he had multiple servants while being detained by the Soviet Union
When he was in China,he lost all of them.
His post-war life is great to read,he sounds really pathetic in what he did and experienced.
>>572502>Growing up with scarcely any memory of a time when he was not indulged and revered, Puyi quickly became spoiled. The adults in his life, except for Wang, were all strangers, remote, distant, and unable to discipline him.[9] Wherever he went, grown men would kneel down in a ritual kowtow, averting their eyes until he passed. Soon he discovered the absolute power he wielded over the eunuchs, and he frequently had them beaten for small transgressions.[3] As an emperor, Puyi's every whim was catered to while no one ever said no to him, making him into a sadistic boy who loved to have his eunuchs flogged.[10] The Anglo-French journalist Edward Behr wrote about Puyi's power as emperor of China, which allowed him to fire his air-gun at anyone he liked:
> The Emperor was Divine. He could not be remonstrated with, or punished. He could only be deferentially advised against ill-treating innocent eunuchs, and if he chose to fire air-gun pellets at them, that was his prerogative. — Edward Behr[10]
>Puyi later said, "Flogging eunuchs was part of my daily routine. My cruelty and love of wielding power were already too firmly set for persuasion to have any effect on me."[9]
>Wang was the only person capable of controlling Puyi; once, Puyi decided to "reward" a eunuch for a well-done puppet show by having a cake baked for him with iron filings in it, saying, "I want to see what he looks like when he eats it".[9] With much difficulty, Wang talked Puyi out of this plan.[9] how could communists destroy such a regal system smh
>>572506>Many of the claims in From Emperor to Citizen, like the statement that it was the Kuomintang who stripped Manchuria bare of industrial equipment in 1945–46 rather than the Soviets, together with an "unreservedly rosy picture of prison life", are widely known to be false, but the book was translated into foreign languages and sold well. Behr wrote: "The more fulsome, cliché-ridden chapters in From Emperor to Citizen, dealing with Puyi's prison experiences, and written at the height of the Mao personality cult, give the impression of well-learned, regurgitated lessons."t. Behr
Man the emperor sure was a bastard, lying about the KMT like that. But for real is this just more propaganda or did the Soviets really take all the machinery in Manchuria?
>>572541>What are some way you guys use to mess with right wingers online?I don't. Get a life.
—–
But since we're here an you're too dumb to make a thread instead of crashing this one:Alright, let's make sure we understand the underlying issues before we start rubbing our hands in anticipation:
The left-right spectrum is undefined garbage.This is relevant because most people (especially right-wingers and USA victims) consider liberals to be left-wing. So when you say:
>Why do right wingers simp for billionaires?they believe left wingers do, because liberals are considered to be left-wing. Then they post le npc meme with le rainbow corporate logos.
So, how do you avoid this? Maybe:
>1 - disassociate libs: 'Right wingers are just like braindead liberals, why do you simp for billionaires?'or better yet
>2 - disassociate from the left with concern trollingSecondly, and you hinted at this, the general reason this works is 'guilt-by-association' trolling, putting up a strawman and the retarded unmaterial false associate of 'the right' with itself.
If you were messing with anyone more intelligent that /pol/shits and manchildren (and evidently you're not) they would understand and dismiss, but you're here to shoot fish in a barrel.
So, this helps to explain the mechanism of why these flames are so effective, hints on how to generate more, and aids you to spot and dismiss equivalents whenever you see them here!
>>572554reactionaries always idpol-bait and then accuse anyone who responds of derailing. I've seen it time and time again. I'm cheering on multipolarity the fall of NATO, the death of liberalism, the return of communism, but I also got fags in my family who I wanna protect so I guess that means I'm a "homofash." How compelling indeed.
>Damn you people are really seething if you're making a bloated strawmanJust saw it happen today in the ukraine megathread. someone posted this shit >>1257352 and it got the immediate response >>1257457
"fighting the urge to gorkypost." You hear that? It's not a strawman. Liberal think tanks are sheep dipping homophobic nazis like they're allies and then "gorkypilled" retards turn their ironsights on the LGBT instead of on porky's cynical idpol psy-op. I've seen it happen over and over and over. It's tiresome.
>>572556death to fascism
death to liberalism
death to imperialism
death to NATO
death to Banderites
I love my LGBT comrades
>>572557Yes
>>572558No, it was an obvious joke. I am not a fascist so sorry.
>Making LGBT comrades seethe Doubt
>nazis killed gaysYeah, where did spurdo disagree
>nazis are gaySome were for sure, there was a big scandal in the German Empire just before WW1. No doubt some of them got into the new goverment.
>i want to exclude from our movement and killI don't judge people by sexual orientation
>>572582i make non wojak meme
>>572572
>*crickets*i post wojak meme
>>572580
>wOjAk sHiTwhy do people only open their facehole to complain? Why do they never contribute?
>>572585It's an illusion based on anonymity.
I've made 14 of the OC images in this thread. I understand the annoyance of making something and it not getting replies, but that doesn't mean no-one liked it or saved it.
Your video is alright and will probably see life in /crisis/ sooner rather than later. Lenin was an interesting choice.
>>572609Those ones have the white outline, can you upload these instead? (admin can delete the old ones) >>>/siberia/345804
>>572610What tags were you searching? I managed to get it first try.
>>572617Why would you repost that?
Not only is it not leftist, not even one of the stalin edits of that image, but it's been a meme for at least 10 years.
>>572635What do you think you're adding by posting here? Unironicaly nobody even understands what you're trying to say.
Newfag faggot.
>>572644But could it?
The target audience is people who don't already understand what that is, and looking it up doesn't readily mention drugs trafficking nor show the Contras to be terrorists.
That said, just having the words "CIA involvement in Contra terrorist cocaine trafficking" would lead to this page:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CIA_involvement_in_Contra_cocaine_traffickingInterestingly, here is a nice wiki page
<> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_and_state-sponsored_terrorism <> >>572667Counterpoint: that is a stock image of a flag with plain text baked onto it. It's got it's use cases,
I assume people post that kinda stuff on Instagram? I remember people posting that kinda stuff on Google+ not sure I'd call it a meme.
>>572698Pick your favourite news source:
>A San Antonio police officer was fired on Wednesday after he shot a 17-year-old driver who was eating a McDonald's burger in his car.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shooting_of_Erik_CantuFrom memory, the officer claimed it was a stolen car (it wasn't).
>Cantu was rendered unconscious and put on life support as a result of the shooting [October 2, 2022]. On October 25, 2022, the family gave a press conference, where they stated that Cantu had developed pneumonia. In addition, the family stated that three of the bullets had been removed, but not a fourth, located near his heart. Cantu's father stated that his condition was "touch and go." On November 7, Cantu's family stated he was weaned off life support and was placed on high-flow oxygen via a tracheostomy. On November 22, Cantu was released from the hospital and returned home. >>572588For a long time I know this one and I can't help but to ask,
what's the name of the version of Hasta Siempre?
>>572720it's comfy. it's making me want to be a better uncle
>>572722remove the black bars please. or link the source, it's probably easier to youtube-dl from there and not rely on whatever phone app decided to letterbox it
>>572724That's how I found it (I didn't download it via mobile), and I can't find a better source, unfortunately. Otherwise I would've linked it for sure.
>>572726It was an instagram post.
>>572726I know but a non-zero amount of people are incompetent and will probably end up windowboxing it in their memes instead
>>572729based
>>572731looks like the squeaky wheel got the grease then :^)
>>572732saved
>>572751Fixed.
Seriously, why would you put the rest of that redundant junk there, comrade?
>>572756>dozensnice sample size, fool
if your making dumb nonsense shitposts 2 own da notsocs, might as well edit it to say thousands
>>572791Beautiful work comrade, almost brings a tear to eye
>>572793You sound cute ♡☭
>>572793cool
>>572794don't be weird anon
>>572793Please make her say
>Wow comrade that's some fucking spooky shit you believe inAlso you have very good voice acting skills
>>572411Any chance someone with a flair for these things could do me an upset soyjack pointing at the PRC?
Many thanks
>>572803Some of us had to work for a living and support our families from an early age, instead of fucking around with linuxes and pirated photoshop and toy image editors on our parents' dime.
Where's your solidarity, comrade?
>>572861>Expiredgets me every time.
not even human enough to 'die'.
>>572871lmao
>>572808which song is it? nice edit
>>572874How exactly does Ukraine act as a launchpad in a way the Baltics already don't?
Also the rightmost column could use more spacing and font synchronization.
>>572875Ukraine is mostly flat terrain and it's way bigger than the Baltic countries, so it's easier to stage an invasion from there.
>Also the rightmost column could use more spacing and font synchronization.Seconding this.
>>572874you should continue the lines to the right so it's clear it's a third column
>>572879gifs are the proletarian file format
>webm: soulless format invented by Google (active -> actively harmful to workers), only supports 4:2:0 chroma, does not work on Windows 3.1, will probably be replaced by some other format in 5 years>gif: SOVL, invented by CompuServe (dead -> harmless to workers), full chroma, works on Windows 3.1, will outlive us all >>572878Couldn't? It can.
It
shouldn't.
GIF is an image format which was not intended for animation, like video formats are.
GIF files have a colour palette that doesn't exceed only 256 colours, leading to the horrible dithering in the
ironic example. Chroma doesn't mean shit when it looks that crap.
GIF files are necessarily lossless and far less efficient, especially with photo-like images. Even the example conversion with an extremely obviously limited colour palette and downscaled by half in each dimension (1/4 of the pixels) is well over 1.5x the filesize.
A free and open format with development sponsored by Google does not make it harmful.
GIF, in most cases, is a coping mechanism for tradfag reactionaries.
>>572887Well first my ears bled, then I cringed a little bit, then I had to pause and go back to read Ben's tweet
x/10
>>572898Cope all you want but the hypebeasts will be the vanguard of global revolution.
We're winning in style compa
>>572916KEK
Incredible meme m8
>>572808Nice edits, Motorcycle Diaries and Che Part 1 & 2 are great films
Also, RIP Che, read his biography by Jon Anderson 'Che Guevara: A Revolutionary Life'
I forget if I've posted this OC on this site before
>>572946this is fucking incredible
>>572949Certified
>>572950Should be a "millions must unite" shirt, in the vain of Marx
Since the number of peasants and workers radicalized to kill the parasitic minority of landlords of course far outnumbered the latter.
>>572955 (me)
nvm now i understand everything
>>572960In fact, what should i even be using for Video editing in general (windows 7, laptop, only about 3gig ram)?
I only really make image OC usual.
>>572961>1337x.to/torrent/335775/Sony-Vegas-Pro-11-0-682-32-bit-patch-keygen-DI-ChingLiu/render as avc/aac/h264 mp4, when rendering always make sure to match source file's fps, audio sample rate (e.g. usually 44100hz or 48000hz, if you set it wrong the audio will distort badly from the original), don't bloat up video and audio bitrates (basically filesize per second) unnecessarily like
>>572962 did (e.g. never set video bitrate beyond 2600 kbps / 2.6mbps for 1280x720 resolution, never set beyond 1200 kbps / 1.2mbps for 640x360, of course too low video bitrate will add blockiness/pixelation especially in darker colors and high motion, never go beyond 160 kbps for audio bitrate with music, even audiophiles who are all liars could never tell from a blind test, in fact 96 kbps audio bitrate is enough for voice-only)
>>572965>>572961>don't bloat up video and audio bitrates (basically filesize per second) unnecessarily like >>572962 (You) didI tested a few different bitrates and the software I have on hand didn't give me a lot of options so I chose the lowest settings that wouldn't reduce the quality.
>never set video bitrate beyond 2600 kbps / 2.6mbps for 1280x720 resolution, never set beyond 1200 kbps / 1.2mbps for 640x360There are no hard and fast rules for this. The bitrate you need depends on the content of the video. More movement or complex changes to the image means more data since encoders generally use 1 key frame every so often with the frame after only storing data telling it which pixels to adjust. One one extreme end you have a static image or even a black screen, and on the other extreme end you have a flock of birds flying over a ocean waves or even pure RGB noise. Generally you should experiment with bitrates until you have a feel for how much is required and then do some quick test renders to determine what is necessary. Dynamic bitrates are also generally better for rendering videos. Important to understand is that you can only preserve or reduce detail, you can't improve quality the whole "zoom in, enhance" thing is not real. Depending on the limits of what you're working with it can be better to give a little extra room to avoid degrading the data.
>even audiophiles who are all liars could never tell from a blind testThat depends a lot on the audio codec, but for internet meme purposes obviously you don't need some uncompressed FLAC or whatever
>>572967It is just from some Glen Beck lookalikes video who inteviewed him:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nz8KR6pDC_o It was pretty boring over-all but this clip was amusing.
>>572960>>572961shotcut, kdenlive, olive..
>>572962based finkelstein
>>572974>shotcut, kdenlive, olive..I tried to do it in shotcut at first, (it is my go to tool for video stuff) and all it did was leave it in place and the video dimensions in place abd bkacked out everything but what i cropped. It didn't do:
>>572971>>572966 >>572965Thank you to both of you! I have a lot to learn, but this stuff really helps. I appreciate it. <3 :)
I send it to a friend and she said it would not post on twitter, what is the reason for this? Not a big issue but something I would like to understand.
Is there generally any good on courses on youtube to have a better understanding too of these things raver than just learning them by rote?
>>572975>would not post on twitterCould be any number of things the way the site is right now. Could also be how you sent it to them. Files often get messed with in transit on messaging platforms.
>Is there generally any good on courses on youtube to have a better understanding too of these things raver than just learning them by rote?If you just look up intro courses to videography production you can find a lot of stuff.
>>572975>I tried to do it in shotcut at first, (it is my go to tool for video stuff) and all it did was leave it in place and the video dimensions in place abd bkacked out everything but what i croppedyou probably need to set the project dimensions to what you want the final result to be. NLEs typically aren't engineered to just process a single clip but to string multiple clips together in a project with fixed dimensions. at least that's how editors based on melt work (
https://www.mltframework.org/ )
to do something like
>>572971 I'd probably use ffmpeg with -vf crop
>>572961install gentoo
start with kdenlive for a super simple yet powerful, free option, consider Da Vinci Resolve if you need more POWER
Unique IPs: 318