>kink is an integral part of pride! we were at stonewall!
where? seriously, where are they?
<no u dont get it the kinksters were just outside of the frame
>>2934show us the kinksters at stonewall
show us the proof that bdsm actually has a place amongst fags as a fag thing and not a white cishet grift
>>2949>violation of consentlove hysterics using this wordplay to make their issues seem more important than they really are
>>2966>stop raping my eyesat least this retard plays it straight!
>>2967Lmfao, look if you think someone is fucking around take a look around. You're now a categorical rapist, try to rape someone's eyes again and you won't have none yourself.
>>2969so weird how literally none of those pictures have anything freaky going on, how i can see only a handful of handkerchiefs and most worn in regular stylings, etc.
>>2977I mean if we agree wit the framework of consent and you are an exhibitionist (=get turned on by people watching you, or being near you) you are envolving other people in your sexual act which may not have involved.
Sending porn to a group server may not have a sexual intent.
Maybe this is related with how pretty much everyone agrees that children shouldn't watch porn (maybe because they can't consent to sexual acts)
>>2982Again consent is between individuals and not the public sqaure. Seeing someone's presence in public of your consent you reactionary fuck
>>2996Hearing a man flirting with a woman is rape now
>>2997I don't know if I agree with what I am saying mainly because I am putting a lot of emphasis on consent (which is not enough to determine if something is "good" or "bad" like liberals want to pretend) and what we are discussing will not affect me in real life.
But didn't you say that "Consent is about sexual acts between people", how can you reconcile that with exhibitionism being a sexual act?
>>2940>>2941Bruh, why do you guys keep obsessing over zoomers?
Alot of this faux nostalgia crap is usually older people tbw
>>2997"Consent" is now just a shibboleth used against "ugly bastards".
>>2976It's amazing that we live in a time that preaches "diversity" and "appreciation of minorities".
Yet, anyone who goes slightest outside of plain vanilla sex are now pathologised as "groomers".
>>3002>male dom>female subLiterally the two most common and safest roles you could take in BDSM, admittedly male subs get shat on with good reason, imo. So much so it's almost yawn-worthy to admit to being so.
Sure you might see someone get accused of being a creep for being into BDSM, but most of the cases are either because they're an ugly fuck (pretty privilege) or they really are a creep.
>>2999some of the most abusive people ive ever met were people who prided themselves on only having "morally good fetishes" or "consuming good media" or w/e
moralizing random shit in this way is just giving abusers a new extremely low effort manipulation tactic because then you can pretend to be a Good Person(tm) easily
>>3007>theres more to abuse than meaningless aesthetic signifiers<erm youre doing a heccin fallacy (?)illiterate fucking retard lol
>"is this your first day on the internet
>>3013I don't give a shit about if you do kink, or what you wear if its a choker or whatever. Even one of those dog masks, that isn't what I'm complaining about. I just don't want to see any sort of sex in public. None of it. It's disgusting, it makes me feel uncomfortable and it makes places like pride unsuitable for children. Public sex completely changes the dynamics of the place it is happening. It has extremely deep social consequences on how a place feels.
Your petplay / degradation kink is not your identity. You don't need to ruin the park for everyone else to get off.
Unique IPs: 27