>>9326check these out if you have not already:
https://hidwehproject.nekoweb.org/pages/zine/lithp.htmlhttps://hidwehproject.nekoweb.org/pages/zine/pisas.htmlthe basic foundation of my religion is grounded upon the myth of biokinesis, i.e. the capacity to influence biological functions by establishing a more intimate connection with the body's processes. hidweh can be seen as the spiritual embodiment of the practice of biokinesis or a spirit here to guide people in the practice. from that basic orientation, other themes develop. for instance, we are inclined to want to push past illusions of necessity, refusing to simply submit to fate. "saklas" is sort of the embodiment of karma in the cosmology ive articulated as basically the god whose flesh is the manifest universe. he is a sleeping god with the laws of physics being merely his reflexes. there is also the great fleshly mother tiamat, another primordial sleeping god, who embodies the "platonic realm" of all bodily form. she is often spoken of as the flesh dimension. i have this apocalyptic intuition that with the development of biotechnologies, she will "wake up" and this shall disrupt the foundations of society..
hidweh is meant to point towards tiamat's awakening and also the underlying "ideality" implicit in the body .. im influenced by schelling's objective idealism, so i do like to think of the body as itself something like a mind-like process. this is one reason why i was attracted to dialectical materialism to explore that continuity between human rationality and more base material existence without drawing some sort of isomorphism.. michael levin's research into regenerative biology (i recc checking this out) seems to point to all of this. we can see a remarkable robustness with the body in following a general goal as well as remarkable morphological flexibility in response to bioelectric signalling. this points to the body itself having a certain level of intelligence. at the same time, i wouldnt think of the body as rational on the level as humans are. it is not yet a fully illuminated rational process, but rather something "psychoid"al or mind-like. ultimately, the body's behaviour and how it comes to incarnate small regions of tiamat's all-flesh is still very unconscious.. in that capacity it is a manifestation of that general "karmic" principle of saklas. hidweh in this regard represents a bringing of the light of spirit to the flesh and thereby redeeming it
this takes us to the christian influence. while christ is the logos made flesh, hidweh is the flesh made spirit. and so yes i do attempt to fit the trinity within my larger cosmology. i associated the trinity with the overarching structure of Being or the general structure of how things show themselves to us. however, before there can be that structure of disclosure, we must already be embodied. hence, the flesh, and hence Mother tiamat's "insistence", is logically prior to that of the Father. so there is a mythological story here of tiamat begetting the trinity which is meant to parallel the cosmological emergence of a type of organism whose being is a problem for it. hidweh then represents the opposite direction, regressing from Being back to this abyssal fleshly nonbeingness of Mother in order to illuminate it and wake her up
on the more ethical side of things i do take influence from o9a due to overlapping spiritual beliefs which i got more into detail with in blog posts n stuff. the notions of honour, empathy, cultivating weltanschauung, and aeonic insight are important values for me in this direction. i also believe in the importnce of pathei mathos and the practical necessity of going through hardship at times in order to grow and gain experience.
i also generally do not see humans as individualistic beings and i place more emphasis on how this whole thing is a collectively undergone project to bring light to the flesh. to me cultural practices subsist in something like a collective consciousness and you can make these practices stronger by participating in them and this helps everyone. there is this idea floating in my head of articulating a more collectivistic spirituality that places emphasis on sophiological eschatology and collective karma
politically i advocate for a localistic form of socialism which starts at the level of cooperatives and there is a bit of a council system of voting where representatives vote for the representatives to join councils at higher scales. my approach is in between prefigurative politics and AES. so the federation of cooperatives is something to begin building in the here and now, but i still believe interacting. with the larger system is important in order to access its supply lines and developed productive forces. hence i am not a full communizer trying to immediately abolish the value form, but i also do not want to risk instating another bureaucracy. also because this is a federation that really begins at the cooperative level and the federation may sprawl across national boundaries, my dealing with the national question is only touched indirectly .. i wouldnt see myself as a staunch globalist though, i dont think socialism in one country is necessarily a bad thing
–
oh yeah a more materialistic strain of some of the ideas ive developed is thato f "aeonic materialism" which is inspired by
https://mental-labour.neocities.org/liber909/strangeaeons .. ive written a short summary of some of the ideas
https://hidwehproject.nekoweb.org/pages/phil/terseaeonmat.html but it is rather dense (!!!) and there are multiple angles from which u can enter the core ideas. i guess from a more marxist angle, i take the notion of contradiction and i ground it on a deeper logic. one way of following this line is to look at the zizekian approach to the topic. he takes heidegger's description of dasein as having different modes of disclosure, and ascribes this plurality of modes to the structure of Being itself. hence, Being becomes a superposition between different existential possibilities. the thing though is that a superposition implies that we have fully parametrized the possibilities. it is like, imagine a program and the only data it is able to manipulate is an integer value j. well, there is an infinite number of states that program could reach, but none of them would be j='a' as j is expecting an integer and so you would get an error. the aeonic materialist proto-dialectic describes the reality below the parametrization of a superposition and thereby contradictions. this of course has mythological relevance as well. the dialectic is the realm of the trinity, meanwhile the proto-dialectic is the realm of tiamat
this view of tiamat places her within the proximity of dugin's 'chaos' and there are hence ethical implications. honour is important insofar as we should not hubristically imagine ourselves able to take a vantage point above the cosmos and flippantly judge others. this is very difficult not to do and i even have trouble with it at times. there are some ideas floating in my head of how exactly can too different civilizations can interact with eachother any way from the perspective of chaos
>Another thing I thought about is a o9a style secret movement except with the endgoal of promoting those left behind by society to ascend above it through unethical means if necessaryinteresting. something ive noticed is that what leftists call "entryism" would seem to be the same thing as insight roles or at least similar. i havent really heard as much trouble (like becoming too sympathetic of the party your are infiltrating) with insight roles compared to the trouble with entryism though or maybe it is because if an insight role is a failure the person is just discarded and no one talks about them anymore. what mythology did you have in mind