>>776530Simp detected LOL
In all seriousness, most incels don’t even celebrate this, they just see it as validating their point and move on. And you know what? They’re right that society is gynocentric. The left’s inability to acknowledge this fact is why they can’t convince young men to believe in their platform, because the left is scared of losing the foid vote even tho up until recently women in democracies tended to vote for reactionaries (something that even Rosa Luxembourg pointed out) and even now the “leftists” women tend to vote in are largely liberals or soc dems.
The right may not have the best interests for young men, but they’re at least willing to discuss issues affecting men, unlike much of the left that tends to stigmatise any effort to address male-specific issues to subordinate it in favor of female-specific issues even if it ends in emboldening female anti-social behaviour (e.g., Aqua Tofana shorts going viral on TikTok with millions of upvotes, just because of that “your body, my choice” tweet from Fuentes). The responses here are proof of it.
Perhaps, rather than mocking men for voicing opinions against gynocentrism or not heeding for radfems, we should ask ourselves what are we doing wrong such that the left’s demographics is being increasingly made up of elderly people and women, demographics that are less willing for revolutionary action?
You can call men “incel” all you want, but that doesn’t make for good recruiting material, is all I’m saying.
As for feminism itself: I think MRAs are spot on when they say that feminists support equal rights but not equal responsibilities, considering how few feminists oppose women getting lesser charges for the same crimes men do, demanding women-only spaces whilst decrying men-only spaces outside of pride parades, having women be in the draft even tho women will be the ones to henpeck men into joining any war if the marketing for it is viral enough, etc….
Janice Fiamengo, despite being a dumb Canuck neocon, has done a good series deconstructing feminism:
Also, I should note that I don’t agree with Fiamengo on everything as her inability to question liberal dogmas means that she is keen into ideological mumbo jumbo about feminism being “anti-western” based on a few selective anecdotes when, in reality, feminism then and now has pretty much been an imperial project, and nowadays it’s by and large effectively an Anglo-American imperial ideology.
Any leftist pretending that this isn’t the case is as much of an ideologue detached from reality as the average Nazi who thinks that Judeo-Bolshevism is real.