/siberia/ - Off-topic

>>778409
I have masturbated to yaoi hentai, trap hentai, crossdressing hentai, bodyswap hentai, scat hentai, guro hentai, piss hentai, rape hentai, furry hentai, etc and none of those things apply to my real life interest where I'm just a normal heterosexual male with fairly vanilla fetishes like missionary/doggystyle and post-orgasm cuddling and saying "I love you" a lot during sex.

Maybe stop trying to judge people so hard for the fiction they consume when they know there is no one being victimized. Just because I play violent video games doesn't mean I'm a serial killer. Because I still have morals and humanity and ethics and a brain and can identify fiction from reality.

>>778407
>pedos are gross
<NAZI
i wonder why the working class turned away from left wing politics

>>778412
the working class is firmly on the side of not censoring the internet
I don't know what angle you're going for but you're not working class, and you glow, epsteinite.
Porn bans, ID verification laws, and "obscenity" laws are all just reactionary nonsense pushed by the bourgeois to punish the proles for the bourgeois's own crimes against children.

>>778410
If they don't apply to your real life interests, you wouldn't masturbate to them broski.
It sounds like you have fantasies but are too deep in the closet to act on them.

>>778417
No, I just like it in fiction but don't like it in real life.
I've tried being "attracted" to men in real life but I just feel nothing for them. I've had femboys literally offer to cosplay our favorite vtuber and suck my dick and I declined because it just isn't the same. With hentai you literally can just draw anything and make it sexy if the artist is skilled enough and the plot is compelling.

Also GRRM wrote a very explicit and detailed rape scene of 14 year old Dany in the first GoT book, and under the UK guidelines for "simulated CSAM" that should be punishable since they've targeted people just for writing erotica about child characters. Weird how there's now government-approved CSAM I guess. Or maybe it's different because it isn't anime? idk. These laws are silly.

test

this is the future fascist puritans want to impose on you

Hey guys, so heads up: I am one of the users that has been pushing hard against the vtubersphere ITT and the exploitative nature of the industry. Most of my posts are using sage ITT.

I have just been banned for 3 weeks for 'rule-breaking' the rule I broke was 'Reactionary' yes, that was literally the reason given, lmao.

Apparently I have successfully appealed the ban because now I am able to post again. I am browsing leftypol, bareback, and AFAIK have a static home IP but there was no unban screen. So if due to some ISP fuckery I am ban evading without intending, well I am risking making very my last post in more than 10 years of browsing leftypol then and I didn't mean to evade. I have been posting when OldBO was still the 8ch board owner.

Anyway you should be aware that there are now apparently elements in the mod team that don't take too kindly if you shit on their personal hobbies and interests, like vtubers and they might have ties so some of those parasocial communities. This is eerily reminiscent of a recent incident on certain subreddits a few weeks ago where various moderators were caught unilaterally removing negative posts that spoke negatively about certain vtuber personalities (and subsequently removed).

I think most of you will agree that this is hugely problematic. You should be able to criticize a hobby, past-time and medium for its reactionary elements and even shit on them without getting the ban hammer because what's next? People getting banned for shitting on the casino mechanics in CS or Pokemon cards? People getting banned for shitting on Warhammer because it has a shitty plot and basically a big consumerist toy commercial just because a random mod is a warhammer fan?

So continue posting at your own risk.

>>778416
>the working class is firmly on the side of not censoring the internet
The working class doesn't give two shits if you and your discord server with 15 fat retards with beard and glasses has 1 less loliporn artist to wank to. The only reason you make this out to be a huge problem is because the average channer is a individualist obsessed retard who thinks that coonsoming shit is the most important thing in life.

>>778416
>if you aren't in favor of unlimited crypto casino access for minors you are an enemy of the working class
lol, lmao even

>>778412
>if I masturbate to yaoi hentai that means I'm gay
Nope.

>>778432
why are you letting your children access crypto casinos? is that not a parenting issue? why does your kid even have access to a credit/debit card if they're a minor?

>>778431
>the average channer is a individualist obsessed retard who thinks that coonsoming shit is the most important thing in life
So is average working class person.

>>778435
Do you think that forced child labor is a parenting issue that the government should stay out of as well?

>>778437
First of all, what does forced child labor have to do with internet censorship?

Secondly, gambling ruins families, communities, and societies and should be banned across the board for being gambling, not because it's on the internet.

And finally, we should let children unionize so they can vote to stay home from school. 8)

>>778436
No, lol

>>778440
If you asked the average worker if they'd rather ban cartoon porn or save $0.01 on their taxes from not having to financially sustain a government agency whose sole purpose is looking at cartoon porn, virtually all of them would vote for lower taxes.
Only an Epsteinite would think the working class wants the government involved in regulating cartoon porn. Because Epsteinites just love controlling the lives of the proles no matter how insane it is.

>>778440
You know what, you are right, I dont know why I said that. That would be an improvement, average working class person is a spooked retard with politics mostly determined by TV and facebook posts.

first they came for the vtubers and I did not speak up because I thought they kinda deserved it anyway

>>778442
>working class person
subtle

Not really a fan of all that arrogant PMC-style anti-proletarian discourse, straight from the anti-German playbook, painting workers as a gray mass of bigotted cattle.

>>778441
If you asked about the average working class person about the lolirapist1448 twitter drama, they would either ask you wtf are talking about or at the very very worst call you a pedo.
>>778442
>You know what, you are right, I dont know why I said that.
True
>That would be an improvement
False
>average working class person is a spooked retard with politics mostly determined by TV and facebook posts.
Half true, at least in burguerland. In some other countries, False.

>>778446
I also don't like the way reactionaries use "workers" to couch their own bigotry as some sort of "social reality" that you just have to accept as the masses' bigotry even though it's just them.

Working class people really do not care about loli cartoons, which is why they were legal in the United States for decades and got constant pushback any time a politician tried to change it despite there being no political lobby for lolicons or anything. This is recently changing in Republican states, coinciding exactly with the push for things like digital ID laws and porn bans, and yet chuds on this fucking site will insist it's ok because it's someone they don't like being victimized, completely missing the point that fascism always uses protecting children as an excuse to exert more power over your life in insidious and increasingly controlling ways. Working class people can see this, the 1st amendment is like the most well known of them all to anyone without a college education. It's in fact the PMC puritans trying to legislate morality that have to catch up to the working class.

>>778416
ur calling people epsteinites for criticising pedos uygha

>>778451
>criticizing
morality policing
>pedos
adult women who commission cartoons of their OC character and distribute it to other adults with a clear "MDNI" and "18+ only" in all their socials

stop being so dishonest. we know your tricks and leftists aren't in the business of policing morality. your kind just want to pass the burden of "punishing predators" onto innocent proles minding their own business so you can avoid prosecuting actual literal pedophiles in every single western government. how is this woman being targeted for drawings by the same government that let Jimmy Saville go free until his deathbed despite hundreds of allegations of actual rape and child abuse? You're a moron if you think prosecuting cartoons is somehow in any way a step in the right direction when it comes to punishing Epsteinites. These people don't use cartoons, they use real children, and you enable them by focusing all your ire on "icky cartoon porn" like the fucking goycattle you are.

>>778229
>because they hate anime lol
based

The cognitive dissonance required to remove porn of a child from drawn porn of a child and say one os pedophilic but not the other is staggering.
I guess I shouldn't be surprised because we're on an imageboard.

>>778458
were any children harmed in the creation of that drawing?

>>778459
>One act is harmful towards children therefore it is pedophilic
>One act is not harmful towards children but still sexualizes therefore is not pedophilic
Just admit you're a pedophile upset you're getting dunked on while the elites can do what you dream of with impunity.
Petite-pedophile

wtf did vtubers and anime do to trigger a government chimp-out?

>>778469
just not be conforming

>>778461
sounds schizo, videogames also don't cause violence, why you need to have chimp outs over innocuous shit like art fetish shit ?.
internet makes people retarded.

>>778486
I wouldn't entirely rule out the option that you're talking to an LLM

>>778486
>equating consuming violent media to being sexually attracted to drawings of children
i shiggy
I would look at people who say they love Martyrs the same way I look at people who love loli porn.

zoomers petitioned for this shit.

>>778488
>>equating consuming violent media to being sexually attracted to drawings of children
>they both may be taboo for humanty but one is lustful and other is bloodthirsty so it's not the same !!!
neither is happening with anyone real nor target the real in any meaningful way so it's a nothingburger to be getting hanged over it, simple as.
>>I would look at people who say they love Martyrs the same way I look at people who love loli porn.
>bro these fucked up shit for me is so bad you bad if you like it.
touch grass buddy, and not a drawing of a grass tuff, it's conection with nature not with a inexistant idea.

>>778461
>>One act is harmful towards children therefore it is pedophilic
>>One act is not harmful towards children but still sexualizes therefore is not pedophilic
yes that's generally how legislative ethics works; if a crime is victimless then it's a waste of time using taxpayer money to punish people for it.

should we ban violent video games because a couple mass shooters turned out to have played fortnite?

>>778228
>not even a vtuber
>no evidence of any of this happening
you retards are falling for bait meant for chuds lmao

>>778535
>no evidence
I'm convinced there's like a coordinated online campaign to repeat this lie over and over again on this specific case. Never in my life on the internet have I seen people so readily defend government tyranny by claiming it's fake unless the government confirms it to be true.

This girl's real life name was publicly doxxed, you can confirm that on Twitter and look her up if you want to.

She has a long history going back to mid-2025 of posting thousands of dollars of hentai art commissions, you can confirm this on baraag. All that content is now deleted from the internet except when posted by the artists themselves. She has scrubbed ALL of her socials of any kind of hentai.

She has a public post in the OP, likely crafted by her lawyer with VERY specific terms of what she was arrested for and what her bail conditions are, and they fall in line with the UK's past history of targeting simulated CSAM with a harshness that is never seen against Epsteinites.

But I've observed both here, and on 4chan, and on sharty that Epsteinites continue to call it "fake news" and insist she's just faking the whole thing for attention, even though numerous people and news outlets have reached out to the British authorities and received nothing debunking it, which would happen immediately if it was fake given the online public outcry.

And most of all: What the fuck would her angle be if this was all faked? She has no patreon or way to contact/donate to her, she deleted or locked all of her socials, she has no means of profiting off of the engagement on her story. So why the fuck would someone go to these lengths just to fake a story about something we know the British government already does, and that they have bragged about doing for years?

It just makes you sound like a gullible retard if you somehow aren't a bot and yet keep posting this "ITS LE FAKE" spam.

>>778534
Of course not.
I can see how this can be misconstrued, as this thread is explicitly about government censorship of media.
It's entirely my bad for engaging with the same anon I've engaged with multiple times over their attempts to allude the title of pedophile for regularly masturbating to lolicon porn.

>>778538 (me)
>allude
elude

>>778537
>shitting on the daily Discourse(tm)
<youre defending le government tyranny!!!!!!!!!
lmao bro

>>778538
If someone who masturbates to drawn depictions of children is a pedophile does that mean someone who plays violent video games is violent? Does the mere simulation of the act make you guilty of being a societal undesirable and therefore worthy of the gulag?

>>778541
>If someone who masturbates to drawn depictions of children is a pedophile does that mean someone who plays violent video games is violent?
<Does being sexually attracted to simulated images of children make me a pedophile? Think about the artistic merit those images, aren't they similar to le fortnite?
I brought up Martyrs specifically because it's just thinly veiled misogyny disguised as an art house film. There is as much artistic merit in a 30 minute montage of beating and raping a woman as there is in pornography of a cartoon child. If you enjoyed Martyrs, I believe you're a misogynist and if you masturbate to underaged hentai you're a pedophile.
>Does the mere simulation of the act make you guilty of being a societal undesirable and therefore worthy of the gulag?
<Guilty
Being a pedophile is no crime, acting on it is. This is a clear distinction that pedophile apologists make. It doesn't make you any less of a pedophile.

>>778542
>I brought up Martyrs specifically because it's just thinly veiled misogyny disguised as an art house film. There is as much artistic merit in a 30 minute montage of beating and raping a woman as there is in pornography of a cartoon child. If you enjoyed Martyrs, I believe you're a misogynist and if you masturbate to underaged hentai you're a pedophile.
ngl you just sound like a chud. I've watched Martyrs twice and while the story is really stupid there are more layers to the film than just "horror porn go brrrr" and the audience's role in watching it with the expectation that it's horror porn out of morbid curiosity is literally part of its "message" so to speak.
I don't like the film, but you reducing a piece of art to "just violence against women" is just extremely reductive and chuddish.

>Being a pedophile is no crime, acting on it is. This is a clear distinction that pedophile apologists make. It doesn't make you any less of a pedophile.
What's the purpose of the label if not for social ostracization? What's the difference between a "pedophile" who consumes fictional media and someone like GRRM who writes explicit sex scenes involving children but with the consent of the entire media industry and pop culture? Is there literally any point to this distinction when I know you for a fact do not consider applying the same kind of judgement you hold for lolicons onto "professional mainstream pedophiles" like him? It just seems like a way to bully people for something you don't like, and then post "based, nothing of value was lost lolxd" when they're victimized by fascism.

I'm not advocating we support or normalize pedophilia, quite the contrary actually. I think pedophilia should be a label reserved for those who actually victimize children so we can properly ostracize them for their crime and not dilute the label in any way. I don't think fiction has any place in handing out these labels that do nothing but provide us an easy way to hate someone. Particularly when, as in the case in the OP, the person will now be branded a sex offender and put on the registry for the rest of their life with every potential employer now knowing what they get up to behind the privacy of their own home. Is that fair to them, merely for consuming a cartoon?

Like it seems clear to me the goal with expanding the label of "pedophile" onto consumers of random fiction is just to muddy the waters over what people like Epstein do on the regular, to make it seem like it's totally normal behavior your next door neighbor might get up to, and to pollute sex offender registries with victimless criminals so you can't even tell off a glance if someone moving into your neighborhood is an actual piece of shit. It creates this social dynamic where the public is now expected to consider "oh, but did he do something actually bad?" when they find out someone is a pedophile or labeled as one, and like, the title itself should be reserved for people who actually have done something bad, there should not be any "harmless pedophiles" and people shouldn't be able to say "yeah I'm on the sex offender registry but it was for a bullshit reason man". Promoting or even allowing these injustices by labeling the victim a pedophile for not-actually-harming-any-children just seems shortsighted.

>>778542
Oh no the thoughtcrime woe is me I deserve prison :^(

>>778540
>getajob gif spammer downplaying a communications crackdown
Of course he'd be a British flavored glowie. Burger glowies and krumpet glowies are the two least subtle kinds.

jackin it to hentai kids is suspicious af but this is excessive