lololololololololololololololololololololololol
Thanls for the thread comrade but could you please delete it and put a #3 in the subject ajd link the previous one and the archived version?
https://archive.ph/TBTMX2nd image is so based
He sure overuses the cyan, doesn't he?
>>779079>flying a tsarist flag in 1939uhhh, is that guy retarded or?
>>779129I mean I think it's fine to not want to make the same thing for 26 years, I think the more amusing thing is how he went from generic lib, to radfem, to neonazi
>>779130He could simply not make anything, I think that would be pretty great
>>779139The world is better with his works than without it.
>>779130>from generic lib, to radfem, to neonaziit's more likely than you think
>>779129It's apparently the Edgier, Hornier Calvin & Hobbes to All-Men-Are-Evil Radical Feminism to Anti-Vaxx MAGA to Neopagan Nazi Crusade against the Judaeo-Bolsheviks pipeline.
What a journey.
Pretty much no one except a small sliver of Dworkinoid feminists liked his initial transition into making his comic into the man-hating feminism power hour, and then it's just been a lurid spectacle even since he then transitioned into MAGA and Nazism.
>>779442Loling at the judeo bolshevik caricature. What even is the target audience for this
>>779159can you think of other examples
>>779442>>780050These are so bad because of how easy it is to reply with a gigachad saying "yes, we did kill the white army reactionaries and the fascists"
>>780064idk why he cares because these old believers who worshipped the tsars were gigachristians and earlier he was critisising christianity for being woke, trans, communist, and jewish
Does this thread really think the Jewish conspiracy is true?
>>780086ZOG is fake bullshit. Israel and the US are in collaboration with eachother, Israel holds outsized influence in the US as a result of the US' cultivation of the Zionist lobby to build support for its imperialist ally Israel (So much so that it's gotten a bit too big for the US to properly control), but the US is ultimately the more powerful side of the partnership and holds more influence over Israel than vice versa. If US support for Israel didn't benefit US imperial interests then the US wouldn't do it. The interests of capital will always outweight the interests of some large spider web of lobbying and blackmail. The problem with ZOG is that it works under the assumption that capital is not the god of the AmeriKKKans, and that they can simply be bribed into prioritizing a far weaker country over their bottom line. This is nonsense and only works if the country being manipulated has so little power that the benefits of collaboration either outweigh the power gained from the success of the nation's capital or are preferable to invasion.
Why did you ask this anyway? Do you think we support Sinfest's slop?
>>780086Keir Starmer is making me believe it
>>780644Isn't armed men of military age an euphemism for pesky immigrants?
>>780694
you know we can just hide your posts, right? retarded uyghur
>>780804Notice how so much of it is just AI generated? Look at the fucking map, it's genuinely pathetic. No effort anymore.
>>780897the borders are just gibberish. very poor showing tetsuya.
>>780080reactionaries are incoherent. wow. you're telling me this now for the first time
>>779086>archived version Better link:
https://archive.ph/MdspK Also crosslink
>>743937 >>780804I want to be bred by Stalin
>>779129This dudes comics degraded in many ways I would say, artistic as well as ideology
>>781269idk the old stuff seems to be reactionary trash too
>>781458 >reactionary Full stop, you need to read a book. Reactionary isn't "being rightwing" or having a "bad" or edgy opinion. He IS a reactionary and the current comics are revisionist sewage but the older comics are just mildly edgy teen humor. You could MAYBE see some incel in it given the context of his current comics, but that's a stretch.
>>781377 What the fuck even is that tank.
>le kid taking down le flag<literally aped from archival footage of someone doing the same with a nazi flag from a liberated Soviet city. Dude is coping so hard lol.
>>781468Tats has to be really dumb not know Starscream is a villain and so wouldn’t help an innocent woman in need.
Then again, he is also the same guy whose example of (literal) “good immigrant aliens” are those who went through legal means and checkpoints like…
Goku of DBZ and DC Comics’ Superman. Yes, really:
https://sinfest.xyz/view.php?date=2023-09-22 >>781468What was he trying to say with this one
>>781486Just inane boomer shit
>>781483>Starscream is a villain and so wouldn’t help an innocent woman in need.Not only that but I'd imagine energon or whatever they run off is clean fuel considering Transformers are a far more advanced species than us.
>>781628The statistician, I can't say what race…
>>781640soldiers, famously unable to tell the difference between a belt fed machine gun and a bolt action rifles sound report
>>781640Why nitpick? It's prolly just made by AI
>>781648Because its THAT fucking egregious. Even AI gens usually have a rifle being held like a rifle.
>>781646Nah that's the police
Can someone post the radfem shit? I'm curious now.
>>781463>Reactionary isn't "being rightwing" or having a "bad" or edgy opinion. He IS a reactionary and the current comics are revisionist sewage but the older comics are just mildly edgy teen humor. explain the difference between "rightwing" and "reactionary" provide the definition for each and what makes them different from each other. I am convinced communists just say "Revolutionary "Reformist" "Reactionary" to avoid the lazy spatial metaphor of "Left" "Center" "Right" which mostly map 1:1 onto the same concepts.
>>781486climate change is le good, how dare libs stop me from rolling coal, rolling coal helps me save white women being stabbed by ISIS
>>779129>drawing himself as hugh heffner, the founder of playboy mag, with his iconic bathrobe and pipei wonder if this reference is still legible to people born after, say 2005.
>>782131He's overusing this template. There weren't colour television screens on the walls during WW2 when the technology had only just been invented, this doesn't work or make sense and he is just producing slop.
>>782131Noooo not the heckin Romanovarinoooos
>>782131His chronology is all fucked
>>781551Does anyone else think that fascism is pedophillic and fetishistic as fuck?
Like this whole thing feels like someone’s barely disguised domination fetish?
>>782134>"Revolutionary "Reformist" "Reactionary" to avoid the lazy spatial metaphor of "Left" "Center" "Right" which mostly map 1:1 onto the same concepts. Actual communists know the difference but you are correct that many 'self-proclaimed communists' use the terms interchangeably because they're ignoramuses. Most of leftypol hasn't been actual communists for years now, ever since the liberals were given space after reddit banned Chapo and other shitholes. But I digress.
Right-wing is complicated but in the most simplest of definitions is
"a division holding relatively conservative views within a larger political group." For example The SRs or Socialist Revolutionaries, a group in Imperial/post-Imperial Russia, They were split into Left and Right SRs with the latter having views mostly considered centrist/moderate, but were still to the Right of the Left SRs and the Bolsheviks, making them Right Wing.
Reactionary is not just conservative; Reactionary means to use government policy to force things to "go back" which makes it theoretically anti-progressive, which is government policy to go forward. I.E it is an oppositionary REACTION to implemented progressive policy. This is in contrast to Conservatism which isn't just 'traditionalism' but also supports gradual change over radical reform. The terms are relative to what the past and present of any given country is. An example of this would be Russia's government in 1991-1996, and the forced dissolution of the USSR.
Reactionary is right-wing because historical material dialectics demonstrate that what is progressive is relative to socio-economy, thus modern imperialism is progressive compared to pre-monopoly Capitalism, which is progressive compared to mercantilism and feudalism, which is in turn progressive compared to older forms of society, etc. Socialism is the next step of progress and therefore positions that are anti-socialist and wish to revert to Capitalist socio-economic modes of production are inherently Reactionary AND Right-Wing. Liberals for example are heralds of 'false progress' being centrists that seek to preserve the general capitalist status quo, and only do nominal societal changes that don't matter because Base > Superstructure in socio-economics. Thus they are also reactionary and technically Right-Wing relative to Communists, being ideological Centrists.
>>782147>i wonder if this reference is still legible to people born after, say 2005. I'm from the 90s and I didn't even notice that reference, so I reckon that's more of a Western/US reference. Don't think most people in the CIS born before 2005 would know that reference either.
>>782131All he does is draw people stopping mid step
>>782131Ah I see Tatsuya watched 'mission to Moscow'
>>782299That is funny!
Good thing you pointed it out, I ought to be more careful in the future, a less clear minded individual would use that against me in a debate.
To clarify to anyone else; What I meant is that "Reactionary" isn't "THE Right Wing" even if it IS Right Wing socio-politically/economically. Basically the "A Square is a rectangle, but not all rectangles are squares."
How has this guy gotten two or three threads? Did Ben Garrison get this amount of attention?
>>782479It's the only one where it's his thread, and yes ben garrison did have multiple threads + permanent residence in /USApol/ for two years
>>782476 Man, dude could have at least done some rhyme or an actual joke.
>Jews to the East, Jews to the West, >Stuck in the Middle with Hitler or
>Jews in the East >Jews in the West >A Bloody Beast >In Innocent Dress Not perfect but a hell of a lot more creative than this recycled Goebbel's spiel.
>>782479Ben doesn't do this level of /pol/shit and in this amount to warrant a thread, Tatusya is shitting this out like a mill.
Pic 1 rel is probably Garrison's most offensive thing. Pic 2 is his standard fair. Way more mild than Tatsy
>>782479the comics are like catnip for autists for pointing out mistakes becaue there are just that bad.
>>782476this guy has to be on a glowie payroll or something. burger glowies are trying to speedrun a fascist comeback, and the favorite thing of burger glowies right now is "everything bad we did between 1945 and now as because da jooz hypnotized us"
Why is Leftypol so obsessed with right wing comic artists
>>782511Sinfest is actually hilarious though, both his comics and the comics in relation to who he is.
I agree that previous leftist obsessions like stonetoss and ben garrison is gay because they're just conservatards.
>>782511because it's fucking funny anon it's called having a sense of humour and laughing you should try it sometime
>>782563It seems that way on the surface, but you also constantly obsess over right wingers’ sexual fetishes (or rather the stereotypical impression of right wingers sexual fetishes).
“Because it’s funny” falls flat on its face after a while. I think it’s because most of you are bored and aimless in your amusement
>>782579Why don’t you post YouTube Poop videos or something.
This doesn’t seem like “because it’s funny” but rather more for indignation farming. The same way you all obsess over right wingers alleged obsession with BBC
>>782525stonetoss was an actual nazi but his comics were boring mostly, at least tats is deranged enough to be entertaining
>>782549you should get that pic tattooed on your chest
>>782719I'd rather put it on your face, make sure you can't hide your power level.
>>782606This comic makes no sense lol
>>782606Does Hillary actually have a big ass? She was kind of hot when she was young but I've never paid attention to her ass.
>>782878bill didnt look too bad either
>>782890This guy is fuckin 63?!
>>782476dude loves his limericks
>>783110that's not a limerick. a limerick would go something like
>there once was a smart Jew in Brest>who was pals with a Jew in the West>both of them were sly>they bled nations dry>and played victim like one of the best >>782131not the romanovs…
>>782890but the ussr did demolish synagogues lmao
>>783187Damn how did you come up with that, did you ask AI lol
>>783187Also you better delete it before Tatsuya uses that in his next non sequitur, you know he is probably the type to troll the internet for mentions of himself 😔
>>783210it's called having an imagination and also figuring out how to rhyme with West
>>783219oh and I just realized "from Brest" would work better with the format
>>783198Their anti-religious propaganda also featured happy merchant charicatures but being a romanov guy in 2026 demands some kind of abstraction from reality
>>783219>>783253I wasn't saying it was impossible, just quite good for something off the cuff. I dunno I guess I've never tried it
>>783481lol what did Fuentes do to piss him off?
>>783481i didn't see this twist coming tbf
bravo tatsuya
>>783482He's not nice enough to white women probably.
>>783482>>783484>>783486Its probably reference to his defense of Epstein.
>>783481anyone else sick of the endless stream of schizophrenic nonsense? the endless ahistorical gish gallop?
>>783481>The rape campsWat. dude has lost the plot he was weaving. Not even Gulags, just straight up "rape camps" lol.
>>783721
This post was written by a Stalinist
I wish I was a commisar in an NKVD rape camp and could torture Tsarists all day long for fun.
>>783481I think Tats is being unintentionally clever here, considering how Fuentes is nowadays a full-on Trump’s government and establishment shill. Notice how even in his (temporary) anti-Drumpf flux, Nick only ever calls for voting Dems out of spite for Trump instead of actually disengaging with the electoral process altogether. Almost as if he doesn’t want his listeners to think that the US is under a uniparty, instead trying to keep young me engaged with mainstream politics, as is the case with much of the MAGA mockingbird influencer network that Fuentes’ rivals like Captive_Dreamer and Matt Forney are part of.
>>783713Bro what the fuck is this
>>783713Why does he need a ball and chain when he's already in jail?
>>784142It's hotter that way. It's makes the titty taste sweeter.
>>784087This reminds me of /pol/'s Cromagnons vs Vampires shit from years ago.
Also
>Le Germans liberating da Stalinist campsHAHAHAHA Give me "Things That Never Happened" for 500. Even the Russian anti-communist schlock movies in the 90s never went that far with their movies about 'muh gulags"
>>784087 NOOOO NOT THE CAMPS
>>784089dude is just typing shit
>>784224They love their idealism and feeling special through unearned means.
>>784507Uncle Joe said we're having Twice Pulled Porky again.
>>784507can someone fluent in schizo explain this one to me? it seems to be pushing holocaust denial. but if Mr. Ishida is anti-communist and pro-nazi then why would he suggest that holocaust denialism is dumb? or is it a case of him suggesting that the gommies are accusing their enemies of that which they are guilty?
>>784507Every fuckin comic is someone walking then looking up at something
What are they holding? He can't even draw shitty guns now
>>784518Pretty sure that's supposed to be a gulag rather than a reference to the holocaust. I'm guessing that the Holocaust is going to be portrayed as a cross between "it wasn't that bad and the 6 million number is made up" and "Hitler had to do it because the Jews were terrorists and trying to destroy Gehr-mania, they basically forced him". That's if we even address it at all (we haven't mentioned T4 at all which doesn't surprise me but would have been good to see Tatsuya's take on the utter woke nonsense that the disabled have a right to life).
>>784525Actually didn't he already do a comic about the "swimming pool and opera at Auschwitz" shit? So I'm guessing he will just say that the Holocaust was just like American internment camps and anyone who might have inadvertently died during it is just because of allied bombings
He's obviously saying that the real Holocaust was the Gulag.
>>784554I really don't understand why the USSR bothered treating the germans like human beings
Did anyone thank them for it? No
Should have just wiped them out, no mo problems
>>784507That'a THE PEOPLE'S STOVE to you, Jap
>>784525he already portrayed it as not that bad
>>783481I thought he was suggesting nick is a psyop and fed who makes nazis look gay and stupid. But apparently he is saying nick is a pro-communist influencer?
>>784518>case of him suggesting that the gommies are accusing their enemies of that which they are guilty?It's a suggestion but not a direct accusation because even the Black Book of (anti)Communism never dared to make such a stupid claim.
>>784527That anon wouldn't last 5 minutes trying to bond with actual wolves. I've met some and you either have to be very careful with body language, emotional energy and attitude, or you have to be there 24/7 and dominate them, otherwise they'll go for the throat.
>>784562>Did anyone thank them for it?The DDR and its people mostly did. Many German POWs stayed in the USSR, build new lives and renounced fascism.
the guy looking at things comics continue
>>784694Nothing about fuentes saying epstein was based, how telling
>>784694>ignores that Yagoda was literally shot for treason.Dude has lost the plot entirely.
>>785141Are they Witnesses or jewish commies?
>>785147For Tats, it might as well be both. For now, we’ll see if he will ever dare to portray Hitler’s final moments with historical accuracy, or just draw more copium over it. Bet it’ll be dumb shit like
<“And so the giant Jewish space laser, manufactured by the devil via Judeo-Bolshevist slave labor and commissioned by the Jews, shoots its beam on the innocent Japanese and German volk who overthrow St Hitler and co., ending the golden age for the Marvel neopagan imperium of men”. >>785180Tats only mentioned Japan so far just to explain why it was actually a gigabrain genius move on Hitler's part to declare war against the US. I wouldn't be surprised if he doesn't mention them again, he really wishes he was German.
so why are you guys giving this CIA propaganda attention
>>785431taking the piss out of right wing comics is literally one of the reasons /leftypol/ was created anon
>>785431Because its so goddawful that only people that already believe in this Stormfront shit will like it. If its propaganda, it's horribly ineffective.
>>785574It's not even coherent since it treats the Nazis as liberators from le Judeobolshevik oppression. Meanwhile many neo-Nazis don't even see it this way, and the original Nazis definitely didn't. Their view of the USSR was basically that it was a race of dim witted savage orcs (Slavs) led by a race of cunning manipulative wizards (Jews). They were invading it to exterminate them both, not free the "orcs."
>>785622waow
basedbasedbasedbasedbasedbased >>785699For those who don't get it, I equate antisocial vermin to the Simbari sperm rapist tribe
>>785826Oh my fucking Marx YES
>>785826Please show the comic this is from
>>785833Obviously an edit cmon
>>785885Holy shit, he went full sexual pathology, you never go full sexual pathology
>>785885>>785899I don't think he knows enough about communism to really slander it properly, so he went back to his standard "toxic masculinity" stuff
tats has only ever read one author (andrea dworkin) and it shows
>>785849Apparently not #OWNED #RESPECTTHEBOLSHEVIKCOCK
>>785885BIG BVLLSHEVIK COCK RULES OVER ALL #RAPESTARVEANDDESTROY
>>786003i'm not even an edgelord or a tankie, but i'm soy facing over this video
>>786045man he just can't keep from projecting
>>786045Are women the source of all evil?
>>786053So it seems, so it seems
>>785885bourgeois cunt is a pretty good slur i'm gonna keep that one for later
>>786045hes not even a classical anti communist, he just projects whatever he dislikes onto communism
>>785885This is a reference from Frank’s seminar in the movie Magnolia, for those who didn’t get it:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=G2y6zxvMtPEPretty sure he referenced it more than twice by now in many of his strips.
As for his spitefulness towards Nick Fuentes, I think it has to do with both the fact that Nick is generally a misogynist and his defence of Epstein which included him wearing the same sweatshirt Epstein wore (hence the reference to the sweatshirt merch in 05/20/2026 strip). But I think it’s also possible that the biggest reason Tats hates Fuentes might have to do with how Nick somewhat reminds Tats of both his past sexist self as well as the PUAs Tats has come to despise and blame for his personal failings. Those ar just theories though, so who knows.
>>786078Isn’t that what modern right-wingers since at least the 2010s do? Project whatever they dislike from the welfare state to trans kids onto communism?
>>786080I think the reason he hates Fuentes is because he's an anti Trumper (kinda) who mockingly says he's a moderate Democrat and people obsessed with the culture war are dumb, Tatsuya takes offense to this because he's an orthodox Neonazi and finds someone making a joke out of it to upsetting.
>>786104Perhaps. Tats has always been thin-skinned, whether it’s him blocking anyone on X’itter who mocks or criticises him and his comic, or way before his radfem arc where he once threatened to sue one of his colleagues for copyright infringement just for making a parody of Sinfest.
>>786076>does the <I am the Captain Now meme<throws in soy and a pedobearProjection indeed
>>786121>or way before his radfem arc where he once threatened to sue one of his colleagues for copyright infringement just for making a parody of Sinfest.wvt ?
>>786153you forgot to remove the "soy jackboot" text
>>786459>>786459Tats is seriously claiming that the bolsheviks would consider the killing of Russian tsarists as something criminal and shameful that would need to be covered up.
So they supposedly would have to pretend the tsarists were Nazis to legitmise the killing of them.
Of course completely forgetting that:
A. It happened during WW1, so the Nazis didn't even exist back then.
B. The Russian revolution happened as a direct result of opposition to the tsar and the terrible circumstances of Russian commoners.
C. The nobility and the tsar kept the war going, were repressing people with a secret police, sending prisoners to the tsarist equivalent of gulags, and refused to let the people have any say in politics which was all a fertile ground for a revolution.
The Bolsheviks would have been proud to execute a Russian noble, not be ashamed of it that they needed to frame it as Antifa assassination.
Tats is an utter know-nothing moron who mixes up various symbols and both history and modern culture war slop to create a melting pot of gibberish. He's to human intelligence what Typhoid Mary was to disease prevention.
Should it be surprising coming from a man who is pushing 60s by now and likely caught dementia early on?
>>786466>Tats is seriously claiming that the bolsheviks would consider the killing of Russian tsarists as something criminal and shameful that would need to be covered up.not siding with ishida's reactionary rewriting history, but the soviet government didn't reveal the death of the romanovs until the mid 20s, and even then they denied killing the family, and it was only revealed that they killed the family through forensics in the 1970s. and they did try to destroy the bodies for an obvious reason: Most of the peasantry, even the bolshevik-sympathizing peasantry, were uneducated and simply thought the tsar and his families had "corrupt bourgeois advisors". Trotsky wanted to give the tsar a Jacobin-style show trial, but the tsar was killed before he could be brought to moscow. stalin as late as the 30s complained about the backwardness of russian culture, and tried cut back on the cult of his own personality, only to be repudiated by the CPSU, who found it politically useful. see his interview with feuchtwanger. today in russia you see guys who paradoxically have tsar nicholas and stalin tattoos at the same time, and regard both of them as great conservative leaders who purged degenerate jewish influence in the government. so the truth is … people are retarded. Now why was the tsar and his family killed if the soviets government planned a trial? because a white army legion was nearby and the group that held the tsar hostage in yekaterinberg were afraid of the romanovs falling into the white army's hands and becoming a source of political legitimacy for them. so they executed the tsar and the heirs. Now what remains a historical mystery is not the fact of the killing nor even the fact that the soviets covered it up, both due to civil war secrecy and due to tsarist sympathies among the uneducated peasantry, but what remains a mystery rather is whether the central committee, or lenin specifically, ordered the killing. we have plenty of records of the bolsheviks ordering killings, but not this specific incident.
>>786497 The Ural Soviet are the ones that executed the Czar, making the decision to do so independently. The Soviets didn't release information on it because that news would make him a martyr, and until the White Guards could be driven out, that information could work against them.
>>786526> The Soviets didn't release information on it because that news would make him a martyrThat's what anon suggested, if you read carefully:
<Most of the peasantry, even the bolshevik-sympathizing peasantry, were uneducated and simply thought the tsar and his families had "corrupt bourgeois advisors" >>785699Sexual Pietism has to be the worst and most hypocritical branches of gay liberation and feminism. I blame it on sexology and Freud.
>>786903>>786904Welp, I guess the Baba Yaga subplot is dead, and it’s time for more imaginary Nazi victories.
Not surprised since Tats has this habit of dropping plotlines either out of convenience or because he forgot. But honestly? His shit has gotten staler recently, and I wouldn’t be surprised if he churned out his “stories” via some LLM.
>>786903He still copes, even though Communism opposes all kinds of Zionism
>>787105>Kept him Jewishgeg
>>786908he's a permanently online manchild with the attention span of the neonazi teenager spaces he's part of
>>786904Then what happened?
>>787609the jews control dragons now
>>787609Again with a guy walking
>>787609Again, Sinfest is ignorant about the fact that Communism is incompatible with religious theocracy. Therefore, these comics feel like complete schizo babble
>>787657>religious theocracy Are you saying there's a such thing as secular theocracies?
>>787657It went over your head, but essentially Tats is trying to say that Christians, Muslims, BLM, communists and capitalists are all puppets of the Jews, serving as battering ram against national socialism. Yes, that’s how much of a boomer he is, that he has to try and hamfist BLM into a story supposedly about WW2. And given his other ahistorical takes, I doubt that he knows anything about the predecessors to the black power and civil rights movements in WW2-era America.
Btw, I’m surprised he even brought back the puppets considering how they last appeared 2 years ago in one of his (dropped) plotlines featuring Alice in Wonderland characters, and it was notable for being one of Tats’ anti-Semitic strips:
https://sinfest.xyz/view.php?date=2024-07-14 >>787721At this point, I’m not sure if Tats is so braindead that he filters everything through radfem/nazi slop, him just projecting his own flaws onto others (like he did with Slick or people he ideologically hates), or is it just him actually using AI to churn out his comics. Because at a senior age, I doubt you can make webcomics on a daily basis. Because I don’t think he ever skipped a day of not making comics, if you think about it.
>>787724He does use AI at least for backgrounds, and he recycles ideas and character drawings.
>>787724also he just shoots randomly and sees what sticks like the japan storyline that only lasted 2 comics. at this rate i'm curious how he will deal with the endgame of the 'fuhrer' but i doubt we'll get there.
>>788458What are we even trying to say with this one?? The commies froze women into statues?
At this point, Tats is just a schizo with no life
>>788458Pretty sure he did one about le leftist woman being made to work naked and freezing to death already. But lol at the handmaidens tale outfits and Trotsky.
why does he hate fuentes so much all of a sudden, that stalin was based vid is from years ago
>>788458>TrotskyIs he genuinely unaware?
>>788458isn't this a plotpoint in shutter island ?
>>788458I don't even think he really hates Jews since he drew Trotsky not like a caricature, every time it's an actual IRL Jewish person he draws them normal.
>>788492Fuentes isn't far off from the Nazis (ideology-wise)
>>788681Still walking and looking at things
>>788681does Tats think people freeze instantly like in Demolition Man? or is this Jewish magic at play?
>>788681>Communists>crucifying someoneSo are they Jews or not? And the only records of crucifixtion in WW2 are reports of Nazis crucifying Jews.
https://www.jta.org/archive/jewish-boy-crucified-by-nazis-saved-by-russian-sailors-jewish-heroes-honored https://trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper/article/71440819 >>788458 >Trotsky next to Lenin and Stalin<In 194?s KEK
>>788681The first priest to die in a concentration camp was also crucified.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Otto_Neururer >>788681i thought he was against cucktianity. he was pro-paganism in the earlier ones
>>788950>>Trotsky next to Lenin and Stalin><In 194?s >KEKremember they lie brazenly and openly because we do nothing to stop them. this is the power of "Free speech." for every second it takes them to make people dumber, it takes you 10 seconds to "refute" them…
>>788962>priest tells girl not to get with some divorced chud because of his questionable morals >divorced chud gets mad and has his buddies in the NSDAPO throw the priest thrown in a concentration camp no wonder tats loves hitler
Still can't believe this guy is in his 60s
Ishida's funniest period by far was when he was morphing from radfem to christpilled. The jump from christpilled to PAGANG was the weirdest and most unogarnic of his rebrand, that's also when his comics have become completely incoherent.
>>789059male radfems will never not be funny. it's like a black klansman
>>789140Hitler put the jews in camps to protect them from the Bolshevik Golden Horde bro…
>>789142Posted on the day of Pride Month
>>789096I read the file names
>>789142>>789161Women are women, men are orcs
>>789161Mfw I'll always be skull-clocked
>>789141Perhaps Hitler killed himself because hr realized jews were the real aryans
>>789170Wrong on the last sentence
>>789398Tats really got butthurt by Nick Fuentes. Is it envy at being left in the dust by more talented people, or Nick not prostrating himself to women that causes great anguish on Tats?
Because as much as Nick is a sexist, let’s not forget that Tats is an unprincipled bigots who nowadays shows his female characters as being either mouthpieces for his propaganda, agency-less blobs that only exist to show how bad the target of the day Tats wants to demonise, or vessels of purity.
And the last part is both ironic since he criticised it back when he was a radfem, and notable as it shows that Tats truly doesn’t view women as humans with their own flaws and sexuality considering he views any hint of sexuality in women as a bad thing that only exist because ebil moids impose it on them (TOTALLY not Tats’ projection). Indeed, if you’ve read the comic since at least 2022, you may have noticed how Tats will at most show a mother with her child to give any hint of sexuality to his female characters. But beyond that, the only time we ever see female characters in any sexual situations are either when they’re shown as fantasies of the male strawmen characters Tats wants to show as bad, or in forceful situations (e.g., the “Soviet rape camp” thing Tats seems to be weirdly fond of).
It certainly hasn’t escaped from my purview how Tats still uses the “handmaiden” symbol both to show female “gender traitors” (e.g., the prosties working for that purple pimp guy in that storyline from years ago) and women oppressed against their will, or whatever.
What does it say about Tatsuya Ishida himself then? It shows that his brain hasn’t progressed at all. Despite all these years, he is still the same thin-skinned asshole with a weird sense of guilt over his sexuality that he projects onto ALL males. From the time he was a radfem to the present where he is a Neo Nazi paternalist “feminist”, he is still wrangling over his own sexual complexes. On the top of that, even modern politics and online memes are filtered by him through his own “software” which looks like hasn’t been updated past the 2000s, as shown by how most of his pop culture references are all from the 2000s or earlier and how he still filters events via this bizarro pedestalisation of women that both serves to demonise men and remove women of their agency., made even more bizarre by how he treats Nazi Germany as if it was a feminist haven for (white) women.
I’m beating a dead horse at this point, but Tats seriously needs someone to come over to his house, take away his devices to be placed in some locked garage, and force him to go on an asylum. Because Tats has to be seriously unwell at this point.
>>789398This is true though. Many liberals advocate for complete freedom of speech, but it only leads to this.
>>789142sadly i doubt we will ever get to hitler's death because of his habit of randomly canning storylines
>>789479I feel like it's been 30 pages since we even actually discussed the real events of WW2 instead of just some deranged walking and looking of a fever dream of 'The Jewish War Against Germany' combined with modern culture war shit.
>>789483free speech 🤓
correct speech 😎
tats is getting so esoteric
>>789484where do correct ideas come from
>>789688This is ironic, since the entirety of this arc has been Tats arguing on how the Nazis did nothing wrong.
>>789692the meme would work better if he made the 'jak black. but he didn't
>>789690Its really just been "Nazis noble and benevolent, everyone against them are ruled by Jews and actually committed the crimes and blamed the Nazis"
tatsuya is in this thread if you see him post remind him how hapas aren't white
>>789706i dont think he is honestly. hes like some 60 year old boomer
>>789690Every accusation is a confession.
>>789707>i dont think he is honestly. hes like some 60 year old boomerhes a 50 year old gen x er and he's clearly drawing chan memes like soyjaks so he is probably immature for his age
>>789760he's probably on /pol/
>>789764probably. considering how obsessed they are with transhumanists and leftypol its not a stretch that he heard of this place or lurks here.
>>789441I appreciate effortposts about bad webcomics! I'm tempted to read his body of work from the beginning, but I know i'd get tired quick.
>>789692It's so jarring. How much further can his style deteriorate?
>>789820change the swastika to the RFB fist or something
>>788486also the handmaid outfits are so schizo when this is supposed to be a polemic against bolsheviks or communism or whatever when those outfits are from a criticism of theocratic governments. Is that the only way he knows how to draw "oppressed womyns" after the radfem arc no matter how incoherent it is or something?
Hitler wanted to stop bolshiviks and jews from opressing womens and minorities
>>789894I knew a bisexual who said that Jews invented the idea that Hitler was homophobic.
>>789894so true natsie, love that for you natsie
>>790220
tats is a based onee san chad?
>>790220
???
>>789441Radfems and traditionalists have always went hand in hand when it came to sexuality
>>789847>gifit would be funny if he turned into a vampire in a coffin in the last frame
>>790260Given the deep layers of revisionism and wehraboo-ism Tats is in, he’ll either brush off Japanese war crimes (like the invasion of French indochina, the Nanjing massacre and other war crimes in China that led to the American oil embargo) completely or somehow pin the blame onto Jews, the Soviets, or the Chinese. Whether it’ll be the CCP or the Kuomintang or both remains to be seen, assuming that Tats won’t go back to Hitler naturally.
>>790260not gonna mention china at all then?
is there a single honest nazi?
>>790264I don’t think he’ll even mention the Japanese American internment camps just like he’ll never show the allies defeating the Japanese empire.
It remains to be seen if he’ll even show the nuclear bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, or just pretend it never happened because he finds it too humiliating.
But you never know since Tats is one crazy old man.
>>790271how is it different besides spooks
more people believe in revisionist history than true history, because most people don't know any history period. to give a shit about history in the first place you have to be "weird" and that means the people who give a shit about history tend to be more ideological, and therefore fall down a revisionist rabbit hole like tats here.
>>790333Okay but there's being ideological and then there's just being a liar. Like I can give reasons/justifications but the Molotov-Rippentrop pact happened, the USSR did invade Poland, even if I was a fanatical Stalinist I would still admit that if I was doing a fucking comic about WW2
>>790333This is why I prefer earth science
I’ve always used to be pre fascinated with natural events than human events
Getting involved in political discourse has worn me out and has proven to me that learning about the planets is better than obsessing over some mediocre human being
>>790260Genuinely who finds these enjoyable for any reason other than irony
>>790345see i had the opposite trajectory. i started out as very "science will solve everything" carl sagan style liberal and then realize dit wouldn't because science is an institution that relies on funding from bourgeois sources, and cannot be apolitical under class society
>>790260>>790347the US is unironically doing the asset freezing thing to Iran
>>790355Japan deserved it, Iran does not
>>790355good + they should've done it in 1931
>>790354I see.
I meant to say that I was enthusiastic about earth science as a kid but fell off around age thirteen and revisited it a decade ago
But yea, science is gatekept by the bourgeois and lots of scientific study articles often use heavily biased language and motives and they focus on the dumbest consensus.
In fact it seems to me science nowadays more geared towards customer service phenomenon than any cosmic phenomenon
>>790263To be fair the oil embargo wasn't because of warcrimes but because the US didn't want an economic rival in the Pacific that wasn't one of the already established Western colonies.
>>790260>kuse monoI can fucking HEAR the line lmao. Such a common phrase in anime.
>>790354Not that anon, but while I was never a liberal, I went from someone very into 'facts' and 'science' to utterly disillusioned with bourg institutions (and also laboratory work is 90% bullshit because most of it is data that nobody will ever give a fuck about to read, and will just confirm an existing conception ad nauseum. The peer-review system alone is a perfect encapsulation of goddawful gatekeeping. The irony is that its the same sort of corruption that the US accused the USSR and "communism" of having, but that primarily applied to socio-cultural aspects, rather than hard science.
>>790748japan is controlled by jews somehow
>>790731WALKING AMD LOOKING
>>790731This is so stupid, since:
- Prostitution in Japan existed even before the Perry expedition or the first documented arrival of Jews into Japan
- Japanese society wasn’t even bothered by the prostitution and sexual slavery of Japanese women since they themselves partook in it for centuries. In fact, certain Japanese right wing orgs during the Meiji restoration period even supported the prostitution of Japanese women as a barrier to protect the “purity” of Japanese female non-prostitutes
- The sex industry in Japan still thrives to this day much like in the feudal period, despite Japan having minimal Jewish influence, and the industry would remain in place even if all the US troops fucked off from Japan altogether
Who am I kidding tho? Making sense of Tats’ pictorial ramblings is the equivalent of make sense out of a schizophrenic’s mumblings.
maybe its a coincidence but a couple people were complaninig here about him shitcanning storylines a couple days ago. in particular the japan arc. then he brought them back lol
>>790979>>791062what if tats is crypto lefty and is pretending to be a nazi retard on purpose because his historical revisionism is so obviously bad that even the most nazi-curious person would notice.
Comrades, I discovered sinfest back in 2002 when I was a highschool kid. I quit reading around 2008-ish, and the absolute trainwreck since the mid 10s has been something to see.
This new slop is incredible, how he got so rotted is something we need to study. Does anyone in media/online know him personally? We need a comrade on the inside.
I feel like someone needs to find this recluse and interview him.
>>790979>>791135tats gives BPD energy. i feel like hes the type of person who would look his name up just to read what people are saying about him, haters or fans.
>>791182>we dindu nuffinWhy do 99.999% of fascists do this and then those same people also go "haha we kill and rape and we don't care about slave morality"
Simultaneously reject slave morality and opportunistically engage in it when it's useful
>>791182>Aggressor Japan, Innocent ChinaDude is probably lurking this thread.
Hi Tats! You're either an extremely gay retard, or the most dedicated troll.
Stalin did nothing wrong and achieved more with the USSR than Hitler ever did. Reject fascism, accept socialist superiority.
>>791186>Why do 99.999% of fascists do this and then those same people also go "haha we kill and rape and we don't care about slave morality"because their incoherence and cruelty is the point. if they can't get their hands on you and torture you to death, they'll do the next best thing which is to say a few words in the hopes that you'll type paragraphs to debunk it.
>>791220FDR wasn't communist either. the nazis like to say that Capitalism and Communism are both "Jewish" and that they are the real alternative…. despite fascists always licking capitalist boot, and rallying petty bourgeois feelings.
>>791182>like you "helped" Polandis Tats implying the Nazis invading Poland was bad? he can't even keep his fascist simping internally consistent
>>791254I hate to sound like a lib but this comic is classic Deny, Attack, and Reverse Victim and Offender. Somehow the allies are responsible for Poland getting invaded because they didn't help enough, not the Nazis for actually doing it. Also, he's so lazy he has FDR be accused of betraying Poland, the USA had nothing to do with anything, you could have easily had Churchill here, Britain was also in the Pacific theatre you know.
Also could you please explain how China is not in fact the victim and Japan the aggressor? I would love to hear your take on how the Marco Polo bridge incident was China's fault
>>791261Although, Japan and Poland did have a historic friendship for reasons I don't remember, so if this is a reference to that, bravo Tatsuya. But shouldn't the samurai guy be upset at Germany then? Also, they should probably be mad that Germany was helping train/supply the Chinese army until like 1938?
>>791206or maybe dont. i mean, the stalinists here would look like geniuses compared to a hypothetical commie tats, try to imagine it
Wait, when is he going to show american and british atrocities? I thought they were also controlled by jews?
Why only heat for the bolsheviks?
>>791346>In addition to their belief that US soldiers in WWII thought that the Nazis were le awesome and were only fighting them for nationalist reasons, they like to claim that Union soldiers in the American Civil War were virulently opposed to black people having rights.Unfortunately they’re not entirely wrong on this
>They live in a fantasy world where everybody before 2011 was actually le Far-Right because they are completely incapable of accepting how modern and rootless their ideology is. I remember seeing a Nazi claim Grant would be against Black people having the same rights as Whites. BITCH, HE SIGNED IT INTO LAW!Just because someone signs something into law doesn’t mean they believe or want it
Lincoln was actually for having black peoples remain slaves to keep the United States stable.
>>791350>Unfortunately they’re not entirely wrong on thisThis is false. The surveys of US soldiers in WWII (The main source of this claim) were extremely poorly done with samples immensely unrepresentative of the actual military, so they don't really say much about their actual beliefs. I make absolutely no claim that US soldiers in WWII were Left-Wing, that they opposed segregation or that they weren't antisemitic. I am simply saying that, while WWII was one in which the Allied nations' main motivation was nationalism, the idea that they had no problem with the Nazi ideology is completely ridiculous. They saw it as a threat to their values and, as outsiders looking in, were more open to opposing their oppression of many minority groups despite the hypocrisy of doing so. "Jews are greedy lying crooks" and "I don't think we should slaughter Jews in the streets" aren't mutually exclusive opinions, especially when the oppression you're condemning is in a country that you already see as an enemy of your own. There was obvious ideological opposition to the Nazi's beliefs, before during and after the war. Was it in the same way we often view WWII? No, but it was there.
As for Union soldiers in the Civil War, their views were mixed and evolved over time but one way or another, they largely opposed the ideology of the Confederacy. This is even more true for the Civil War than it is for WWII. If somebody thought "Wow I really love the Confederacy and I actually think slavery is fucking awesome" then they went and joined the Confederate army, Union state or otherwise. Something like 1/3rd of the soldiers of Kentucky (A Union State) were Confederate, for fuck's sake. It's true that many soldiers who initially joined in 1861 saw the war as being more about preserving the Union than ending slavery, but this would change drastically over the course of the war and it doesn't even mean that they actually supported slavery. Most Anti-Slavery people before the Civil War were NOT abolitionists, this is something people never seem to get. They were worried about the economic and societal effects of abruptly ending slavery nationwide, but they absolutely did not support it. Otherwise, they wouldn't have voted to end slavery in their own states. The plan of most Anti-Slavery people was to end the expansion of slavery and gradually choke it out without running the risk of fighting a Civil War, eventually abolishing it when it was safer to do so. Abolitionists rightfully disagreed, and recognized that slavery was so evil that its abolition was imperative and could not wait, regardless of the danger of doing so. But most Anti-Slavery people did not believe black people should have equal rights (Abolitionists generally did, though). Then the war happened. Over the course of the war, Union soldiers became increasingly hostile to slavery and its supporters. They saw firsthand what slavery really was in a way that many Northerners at the time did not understand, they saw the brutality and they met black people who fled it. They weren't Marxists, but believe me when I tell you and listen clearly: By the end of the war, something like half of Union soldiers supported equal rights for black people and a majority, at a minimum, wanted to expand their rights beyond emancipation. It was FAR, FAR more popular than they would like you to believe. Official newspapers of regiments openly called for full equal rights for black men, and the political groups formed by Union veterans after the war were heavily aligned with Radical Republicans and called for universal male suffrage. Many even supported reparations in the form of giving the land of slave owners to their slaves, which was implemented to some extent before being reversed by Andrew Johnson. This myth of the White Supremacist Union Soldier was only even remotely true early in the war and was blatantly false by the end of it. Speaking of White Supremacy, George Pendleton (The running mate of pro-Slavery 1864 Democratic presidential candidate George McClellan) would run around giving speeches about how America was a "White Man's country" and people HATED it. Even the Democrats saw it as an enormous detriment to their campaign, and the same shit would happen AGAIN in 1868 with Francis Preston Blair Jr. (Democratic Vice Presidential candidate in 1868) giving revolting speeches about the "evil of the Black man" and described a future of "Black men raping White women". People were horrified! Furthermore, they didn't even see the war as being purely about preserving the Union by the end of it, fuck, the US GOVERNMENT ACTIVELY WENT OUT OF THEIR WAY TO MAKE THE WAR ABOUT THE ISSUE OF SLAVERY. This was one of the main purposes of the Emancipation Proclomation, issued after Lincoln had gained sufficient goodwill from the Union victory at Antietam. It was to envision the war as a struggle not just for the Union, but against slavery, thereby making the possibility of British or French pro-Confederate intervention political poison among their respective populations. Please learn about the Civil War before making stupid claims, Union soldiers OVERWHELMINGLY voted for Lincoln in 1864 after he had openly stated that his intention was to end slavery once and for all.
>Just because someone signs something into law doesn’t mean they believe or want itDoes it even matter at that point? Do you think Grant, who signed basically every bill that came to his desk that expanded Civil Rights for Black people (popular or not, typically the latter) and was broadly considered to have been aligned with the Radical Republicans was actually repulsed by the idea of black people having equal rights? This was not an exceptionally controversial opinion at the time.
>Lincoln was actually for having black peoples remain slaves to keep the United States stable.False. Lincoln never once believed that slavery should remain, this is so historically innaccurate that it hurts. Lincoln was very much against slavery. In fact, it seems clear that he was far more progressive on Civil Rights than he was willing to admit to the public. Lincoln had even made a speech in favor of women's suffrage, although he later denounced it for political reasons. As previously mentioned, Lincoln went out of his way to make the public perception of the war about ending slavery and had signed off on Sherman's "40 Acres and a Mule" order. From his run for president in 1860, he promised to end the expansion of slavery and he as well as the Republican party as a whole refused to support an amendment that would end the expansion of slavery in return for enshrining it in the South. The plan was to END SLAVERY. Nobody in the Republican party in the 1850's and 1860's was fucking pro-slavery, that's ridiculous.
>>791254Tats is probably reversing the Soviet explanation for the Molotov Ribbentrop pact. the Soviets invaded Poland to set up a better front line against the eventual nazi invasion, not to terrorize Polish workers and take their land. But the Tats narrative is inverted the nazis invaded Poland to protect the Polish people from Soviets.
>>791416
Let’s not forget that Churchill wanted to continue World War Two to eradicate German bloodlines
>>791422Please jannies make an exception just this one time
>>791251you hear a variation of this that left and right dont matter its globalismn vs nationalism. 99.9% of the time its the same old reactionary shite
>>791412I stand corrected
I’m glad that someone is well read on American history that isn’t liberal or right wing apologia
>>791316
why did the background randomly change from amidst a bunch of skyscrapers in sepia to blue tinted battery park. the AI slop is so obvious bro
Hitler invaded USSR to protect women and minorities :'(
>>791474first radlib neo nazi
>>791430In their defense, this is functionally identical to wanting to continue WWII in order to eradicate German bloodlines.
>>791442Thank you for understanding and I apologize for being a bit rude at times in my response. A couple things I neglected to mention, Lincoln was extremely pragmatic to a fault and compromised with his ideological enemies in order to maintain "order". I am obviously not defending this, as "Order" doesn't really matter when it relies on injustice. One of the more agregious examples is his decision to pay reparations to slave owners when he abolished slavery in Washington DC. This was to avoid Confederate support in the capital, of course, as well as the border states (Many of which were inches away from joining the Confederacy early in the war) but was entirely unforgivable. At any rate, I do believe that he genuinely opposed slavery and he certainly would have supported Civil Rights for black people if he had lived to see Reconstruction (Assuming, of course, that he hadn't already supported it which is not at all out of the question).
And another thing, Lincoln did not make a speech in support of Women's suffrage, I misremembered this. I double checked much of the other stuff but not this. He made a statement that, at face value, supported women's suffrage but there is good reason to believe he was joking. Lincoln was interestingly pretty consistently more progressive on a variety of issues, however, despite his contemporaries not as often managing to do so, such as thinking that the rabid anti-immigrant and anti-catholic sentiment so common in the US at the time was idiotic and went against the founding ideals of the country.
>>790731This is the Chinese way of writing 料.
In Japanese, 米 is written with the two final strokes starting from the horizontal stroke.
>>791261>how the Marco Polo bridge incident was China's faultThe initial gunshot in the Marco Polo bridge incident, unlike the Mukden Incident, is not widely considered to be a Japanese false-flag anymore. Japan had done a lot to intimidate the Chinese army stationed there and I think its perfectly reasonable to think that one of the many untrained, teenage conscripts of the Chinese Army facing down a Japanese army itching to encroach from across the Bridge might have fired off a shot thinking it would get them to back off.
Of course Japan was obviously looking for a fight and could easily have disengaged, and was only there because of the illegal occupation of Manchuria in the first place.
Anyway, considering how Tats does things like insinuate Jews were in control of the Japanese economy, I doubt he has any understanding of the Japanese revisionist narrative. But if he did, it would make sense that he wouldn't mention China at all. Most Japanese revisionists like to downplay Japan's actions from 1931 to 1941 as just an aberration from muddleheaded military figures, and instead focus on 1941-1945 as Japan fighting to liberate western colonies throughout Asia. In this narrative, the Marco Polo Bridge Incident is an embarrassment, because although China was in the wrong, Japan still should have been the adult in the room and should not have let military officers on the ground push it into an unwinnable quagmire.
>>791220Chiang Kai-shek was indeed depicted as a Communist puppet in Japanese propaganda due to him getting Soviet support.
First excerpt is from Kotkin's Vol 1, the second excerpt is from Ayako Ishigaki's Restless Wave.
>>790265The US was still selling resources to Japan even from 1937, despite Bloody Saturday being one of the most widely published photos that year, and despite Nanjing. The blockade was because of the seizure of Indochina from Vichy France.
>>790339A "fanatical Stalinist" would not say that, Grover Furr for example says that Poland did not exist by the time of the USSR's invasion, and that therefore the USSR was annexing Terra Nullius.
>>791254He's saying that the US isn't acting out of genuine concern for China, just as Britain didn't ultimately have concern over Poland.
The idea is that Britain pushed Poland to attack the German minority in the Polish Corridor by lying to them that Britain would be there if Germany ever reacted, when in reality Britain responded to Poland getting annexed with the Phoney War. Therefore Britain used Poland as an expendable anti-German cudgel in order to legitimize the Jewish conspiracy against Germany.
>>791262Japan and Poland were allies because of mutual hatred of Russia. Japan didn't like the annexation of Poland because it was allowed the USSR to annex the Kresy. There were also some ideological things as well, basically Poland having more of an aristocratic culture (this is also why Nietzsche liked Poland).
Funny that he didn't even consider to include a side story for the Italians.
>>791773yeah but shitsuya has 80 years of hindsight to realize that wasn't the case
>>790333If we're pretending pop history is all there is, sure.
>>791186Because evil fascinates people.
>>791846This unfortunately.
It's why Leftypol is plagued with threads about alleged microtrends amongst right wingers
>>792304that's greek uygha
>>792306Most chuds arent cool enough to be evil this is just leftypolacks letting them live rent free in their brain
>>792304uygha we wuz romanz n sheeiii
does anyone have that comic where the dad finds out his kids teachers is woke? ithink its from the greek arc
i got a funny edit idea
>>792432do you really think tats knows this
>>791261>the allies are responsible for Poland getting invaded because they didn't help enoughWell besides Poland having its own share of blame for the war, France and Britain didn't actually do anything except make empty threats to the point of it being called The Phony war.
>>791316Where did this post go?
>>792304I wonder how KISS would react to Hitler being painted up like them.
>>790339The Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact occurred, but there was no secret clause about invading Poland together, as is claimed.
>>791780>Grover Furr for example says that Poland did not exist by the time of the USSR's invasionNot quite, his work in part is based on the efforts of Yuri Muhin, and the nuance of it is that the USSR sent a note to the Polish Embassy stating that it would be sending troops to secure the East Side of Poland and did not recieve a notice contradicting this, furthermore Polish Generals did not declare war and ordered troops to not engage the Red Army. TL;DR: Officially the Polish Government did not become anulled until later, but functionally it was nonexistant by that time.
>>792584the real hitler was the friends we mnade along the way
>>792304small nitpick but nobody had a tv that big in 1942 hell most people went to salons to watch tv because they were expensive as shit until the 1950s
>>792584>hitler_suicide2Where is the first one?
>>792584TIL Hitler didnt actually shot himself in the mouth because he was too shakey and physically diminished he died by swallowing a cyanide pill.
>>792617Most people had radios as world media back then.
>>792624What does it feel like to suffer from cyanide poisoning?
Does it feel like you’re choking?
I know that cyanide works by chemically binding to red blood cells, displacing diatomic oxygen
>>792644it displaces oxygen, brain needs oxygen to function, you lose consciousness, seizure and have cardiac arrest.
>>792624he swallowed a cyanide pill and shot himself immediately after. he was shaky, but that doesn't matter. if you can stick a pill in your mouth you can stick a gun in your mouth
>>792881I wonder if tats even speaks japanese
>>792883Most likely based on the fact he is full japanese with japanese first and last name. That means his parents wanted him to be raised japanese.
>>792885so is he Chinese or Japanese?
>>792886He is a japanese-american guy named Tatsuya Ishida who was born and raised in Seattle
He also used to make lefty comics for ACLU in the 1990s
>>792881Is he claiming that the 7 or 8 Jews who lived in Japan at the time convinced them to bomb Pearl Harbor? Or is he claiming that Jews tried to convince Japan to bomb Pearl Harbor but failed, and then FDR conducted a false flag attack on Pearl Habor? I don't know which is dumber, thinking the negligible number of Jews in Japan had any effect on their military policy or thinking that Japan did not conduct an attack that they very openly and transparently committed.
>>792911And considering america is the jewed aggressor in this universe, why is it bad to attack them?
Despite being a nazi he still has a totally soy ethos and morality, so to him, nazis were the good guys which means they were soy
>>792881>The Jews made Japan attack AmericaLMAO the Japanese military got knocked about at Khalkin Gol which is why they reconsidered attacking the USSR, how fucking schizo is this dude.
>>792911 No dude, don't you know? Anyone that did the bad thing is a jew bolshevik demon! The Catholic Crusades attacking Byzantium? Nah the Pope was actually a jew bolshevik! Israel supporting the South Africans? Nah they're not real jews! Wait…
>>792881i got curious so i looked up facts about jews in japan
>The first synagogue to open on Japanese soil was established in Yokohama in 1895. That building no longer operates; a devastating earthquake in 1923 forced the Jews of Yokohama to relocate to Kobe, which became the hub of Jewish life in Japan until World War II. Today, Japan’s oldest functioning synagogue is Ohel Shelomoh in Kobe, which has been serving the local Jewish community since the 1930s.>Although Japan was an Axis power during World War II, it did not adopt antisemitic policies. The Jews living in Japan were safe from deportation and persecution—a remarkable fact given Japan’s alliance with the Nazis. When the caretaker of the Kobe synagogue painted over the building’s name to make it less conspicuous, the local chief of police personally instructed him to restore the lettering and assured him that the community had nothing to fear>During the Holocaust, a number of extraordinary individuals risked their careers and lives to save Jews from certain death. One of these heroes was Chiune Sugihara, a Japanese diplomat stationed in Kaunas, Lithuania. Defying direct orders from his superiors, he issued transit visas to thousands of Lithuanian Jews, allowing them to travel through Japan until they could find a third country to take them in. After several months in Kobe, most refugees spent the remainder of the war years in Japanese-occupied Shanghai, China.
>Kobe (神戸市, Kōbe-shi) is a port city in the Kansai region of Japan on the main island of Honshū. An important city throughout Japanese history, Kobe also has a significant Jewish history. Already housing a modest Jewish community by the start of World War II, Kobe existed as a safe haven for thousands of Jews fleeing Europe during 1940 and 1941. At its height, the Jewish community of Kobe had thousands of residents, two synagogues, and recognition from the Japanese government. After World War II, however, the community became greatly diminished and remains extremely small today.>As a trickle of Jewish immigrants continued, by the start of World War II Kobe had a well-off Jewish community of about 1000 people and 50 families.tats is so intelectually incurious he couldnt even look this up.
>>792885Man, you're just guessing at that point. Its a stereotype amongst Chinese-Americans that parents might try to speak in Chinese/enroll in a language school for a few years and then just give up on it and communicate in English.
>>793784wait… did we miss pearl harbor? a more cynical reading of history would have Roosevelt know it was coming but allow it to occur to push america into the war… is this what he's doing while floating over the pacific?
Will Tats portray Pearl Harbor as a Jewish false flag op?
>>792974It's called the Jewish
conspiracy because you can handwave it by saying they were hiding or cryptojews or fabricated records or any intellectually lazy shit like that.
>>793789Even a non-speaker could make figures vaguely fit some hanzi
>>793787He will portray pearl harbor as a defensive move
>>793885If the Us can claim the nukes were to save time and civilian lives, pearl harboring the entire US Navy can be seen in the same way if we're being honest
>>793953he just gave up. this is the slop his fans are paying for
>>794237It was nice of Stalin to lend FDR his weather machine for this
>>794237we really need to know what the fuck the tengu are supposed to represent. like it's one thing being revisionist but this is just actually incoherent.
>>794237When you have to bomb pearl harbor cuz flying old men with long noses are making wind at you with their leaves. All according to FDRs plan
Fuck dude, this whole arc has been retarded. But this shit is just so fucking dumb. What is he even trying to say? Jews made japan attack America with wind?
>>794257i thought it was because his flying wheelchair is levitating and the cig holder is floating too
>>794252They’re supposed to be Jews but in Japan, or something.
>>794237hes just adding pngs now instead of drawing
>>794263i dont understand other than they have boxes on their heads = jewish tefillin
and big nose
>>793209Bro why tf did you sage
>>793784Fucked up and gave FDR too much aura and is trying to reverse it now
>>793789It doesn't seem like his comics were ever "good" but they at least held a sort of charm that is completely gone now and replaced with Adolf Hitler sonnenrad cuck porn with AI-generated backgrounds.
>>794237Is this seriously what he's going with
>>794255It really feels like he's given up
>>794257It's been too consistent to be a result of AI. He's definitely using AI in the comics, though.
>>794257I thought it was a katana lol
>>794263I mean I got that but there was hardly any Jews in Japan. And he also has them attacking Japan from outside, which like, idk, is that just supposed to be a metaphor for the oil embargo? this is the problem with over-analogising/overuse of metaphor, it comes incomprehensible
>>794257there is definitely AI being used to some extent but 'guy with a cigarette floating next to his mouth' is a fairly common comic/animation trope
>>794281>'guy with a cigarette floating next to his mouth' is a fairly common comic/animation tropeHuh? Where?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1944_T%C5%8Dnankai_earthquakeTurns out that this was because of the FDR-controlled flying Jewish weather leprechauns.
>>794305eh idk, i can't really think of an example now but i've definitely seen it before and it was too consistent to just be a style error
>>794326Yeah I've seen it before as well. I think it's usually easier to animate a character smoking that way while still showing their expression. Tatsu is just being lazy tho I think
>>783269not the same anon but it's not that hard. I used to write poems and stuff before SlopGPT made it so that anything i write gets accused of being slop if it's good enough. There are also rhyming dictionaries online so even if you don't stoop to SlopGPT you can pull out a rhyming dictionary or a thesaurus to help you choose between words slowly if you can't do it off the dome. I remember going on /lit/ back before SlopGPT and people would say if you used thesaurus you weren't a real writer. now the bar is much lower lol.
i want the nazis losing the war cope already, i want to see how far he can stretch it
>>794483the chief jew infiltrates the Wehrmacht and starts making bad descisions do the nazis lose.
hitler is ambushed inside the fuhrer bunker by the chief jew. he stages a suicide. hitler is killed. but hitler becomes ethereal like a ghost.
the message is : for the allies it was a material victory but the nazis was a spiritual victory.
hitler's spirit is alive. cut to 2026. we see a young chud who is about to be brainwashed by the chief jew who is hiding behind the smartphone/TV screen. he is startled and sees hitler's spirit coming through the screen. he's given a copy of mein kampf and he's red pilled. he starts a trad family with 4 little chinlets.
>>794281>there is definitely AI being used to some extent but 'guy with a cigarette floating next to his mouth' is a fairly common comic/animation trope>>794305>Huh? Where?I've seen the same thing tbh. I searched for a few minutes for an example but I'm coming up dry. Maybe I'm crazy. I thought the mayor from powerpuff girls had a pipe floating in his mouth sometimes but it seems I was thinking of something else.
>>794637Why can't he just stick to a plotline?
>>794637i thought nick fuentes was le bad and a communist ?
>>795171these have to be fake, right?
>>795170Is this guy literally saying that it's better to be burning in hell forever than to try overthrow the regime? Does he realise how retarded that makes him sound? Have we found the biggest status quo cuck imaginable?
>>795186I don't see my face there?
>>795176I mean he probably is one of those twats that went gaga for Hazbin Hotel's generic ass trope about "good Hell/Lucifer and Heaven is evil uthoritarinism"
>>795256 Kek
>>795186Westoids hate stalin way more than hitler tbh
>>795170>>795171why is he acting like nazis dont do hitler salutes and make jokes about firing up the ovens in private? i swear all nazis ever do is advertise how treacherous they are.
>>795367because he's a liberal that somehow diluded himself into thinking hitler was a liberal too. all the points he tries to make in the comics are either liberal points or "da jooz!"
he even somehow belives the japanese propaganda about being the "bastion against western imperialism" lmao
>>795371 how lonely would this guy be in a nazi rally ? he's not white, he's not hateful enough and he's massively contrarian
>>795373I would definitely smash
>>795171What… He thinks neo nazis are feds? Then what the hell is the point of all these pro-nazi revisionism comics? Is the reader meant to go "Oh my God Hitler was right" and then go "but we shouldn't holocaust anyone! Hitler was wrong!" ???
>>794489VGH…
he can finally breed…
>>792888So he’s just like Gavin McInnes in that he started out liberal and turned reactionary
>>795748This is your future
>>794983Why is he leaving the top left panel blank instead of adding Chiang Kai-Shek?
>>795933why would Stalin have his own men executed? this make no sense
>>796146its an old tale from German officer memoirs. They also said that Soviet officers forced human wave attacks by threatening Roman Decimations if anyone got cold feet.
>>795933This is true though
>>796146It's a deliberate obfuscation about NKVD-SMERSH filtration, where anyone that 'escaped' or was liberated from a POW camp would be interrogated because the possibility that they were diversants, spies or outright traitors was a big risk. The fact of the matter is that Soviet military tribunals over the war executed a very small portion of POWs or other arrestants, usually for proven treason or war crimes, such as looting.
Between 1940 and 1955, roughly 3.6 million soldiers and officers were found guilty of various offenses by the Military Tribunal. Out of these only 235,964 were executed, most during the war. This comes from a direct report to Voroshilov. Most POWs were found Not Guilty and either released home or rejoined the ranks of the Red Army. The same for Osterbeiters and other captured civilians, including foreign nationals.
Considering that roughly 34.4 million soldiers served in the Red Army during that time period which means that out of those just over 1/10th were subject to military tribunal, and less than 1/40th were executed, which is very far from a majority count. Pictured; General Vlasov and Co.'s hanging.
https://archive.ph/P5Tz3 https://archive.ph/nEKxj >>796177No, Stalin never said that captured soldiers would be executed if they returned. What this is likely referring to Order 270 from August 16 of 1941 wherein it states that commanders and political officers that remove their rank insignias and attempt to flee the frontline or who willingly surrender or attempt to surrender to the enemy are to be considered traitors and to be shot and that soldiers of any rank should consider it their duty to convince their commanders to fight on or to remove them if they want to surrender. This was a response to several high-ranking officers being interned as POWs. The only cases otherwise were when an officer is injured beyond the ability to fight, which is why some of the commanding officers captured at Brest Fortress were executed by the Tribunal and some were given medals.
https://archive.ph/IkP6a https://archive.ph/op6oT https://archive.ph/1UK1C >>796307Looks like Tats got to the “USSR couldn’t have done it without US lend lease/aid” talking point which, tbf, isn’t really controversial as Soviet leaders themselves like Stalin and Zhukov acknowledged how helpful it was for the Soviet war effort in WW2:
https://www.rbth.com/defence/2016/03/14/lend-lease-how-american-supplies-aided-the-ussr-in-its-darkest-hour_575559 >>796311>>796312it was helpful but it wasn't the majority of supplies as the comic implies (and as thousands of liberals imply to this day)
>>79630790% of these are just tats denying basic history. is he saying the USSR wasnt industrialised? they were producing more tanks than germany was at this point
>>796311>>796312 >>796307Not this again: Stalin and Zhukov never said they would have lost without Lend Lease, and there's A British Historian that argues the exact opposite to your rbth link.
In Zhukov's own autobiography he wrote the following:
>"The Soviet people give their due to the people of the United States and Britain, to their soldiers, sailors, officers and military leaders who did everything in their power to bring closer the victory over Nazi Germany. We sincerely honour the memory of the killed British and American seamen who despite the dangerous situation at sea, despite the fact that they faced death every mile of the way, delivered to us the cargoes under the Lend-Lease agreement. We highly appreciate the valiance of the participants in the Resistance movement in many European countries." (…) "We also touched upon the deliveries under the Lend-Lease programme. Everything seemed clear in that respect then. Nevertheless, for years after the war bourgeois historiography has asserted that it was the Allied deliveries of armaments, materials and foodstuffs that had played a decisive role for our victory over the enemy. True, the Soviet Union did receive supplies the economy needed so badly: machinery, equipment, materials, fuel and foodstuffs. For example, over 400,000 vehicles, a great number of locomotives and communication facilities were brought from the United States and Britain. But could all that have had a decisive influence on the course of the war? I have already mentioned that the Soviet industry developed on such a scale during the war that it provided the front and rear with everything needed. I see no sense in going into all that once more. As for the armaments, what I would like to say is that we received under Lend-Lease from the United States and Britain about 18,000 aircraft and over 11,000 tanks. That comprised a mere 4 per cent of the total amount of armaments that the Soviet people produced to equip its army during the war. Consequently, there is no ground for talk about the decisive role of the deliveries under Lend-Lease. As for the tanks and aircraft supplied to us by the British and US governments, they, to be frank, did not display high fighting qualities; especially tanks which, running on petrol, would burn like torches" -2014 edition of his memoirs ("Marshal of Victory: The Autobiography of General Georgy Zhukov")The fact of the matter is, even the United States’ own calculations determined that at maximum, Lend-Lease made up 10% of the Soviet War Effort, and Soviet economic calculations determined it at 4%.
See:
https://www.quora.com/Could-the-Soviet-Union-have-defeated-the-Germans-without-U-S-support-or-Lend-Lease/answer/Chuck-Garen And
https://leftypedia.miraheze.org/wiki/Lend-Lease_Act Both of which I wrote (I never completed the leftypedia article)
Vid rel is by an acquaintance of mine who debunks anti-Soviet myths often.
My favorite artists:
- Fips (Philipp Rupprecht)
- A. Wyatt Mann (Nick Bougas?)
- Sinfest (Tatsuya Ishida)
- Ben Garrison
- Qwarz Atarz
This uygha is unironically funny. I want him to make comics about the cold war.
I really do like his art style. Guy should have been an animator instead of doing this dumb chudslop
>>792888>ACLU>>792896>UCLAUCLA =/= ACLU
UCLA = University of California, Los Angeles
ACLU = American Civil Liberties' Union
if 100 years from now, there are still palestinians, and they start oppressing and genociding some other group of people, would that make it "based" to suddenly revise history about the genocide of palestinians happening today? Of course not, so why do so many people think this is the case with jews and WW2? I've noticed this line of thinking a lot lately
>israel genociding palestinians
>israel = jewish
>therefore jews are always bad
>therefore nothing bad has ever happened to jews
>therefore the holocaust is fake, hitler was innocent, and WW2 history is a jewish lie
….why are people stupid?
>>796570I assure you, Holocaust denial was around even before Israel existed.
Not a big fan of this artist.
>>796581FUCK SINFEST
FUCK TATSUYA… IN MINECRAFT
>>796530second this aswell.
maybe we could have a mini arc where stalin starts getting 'red pilled' to the end of his life
but the chief rabbi puts a curse and stalin dies. this is actual chabad lore.
Why bother with all this elders of zion shit when you've got aipac acting out in the open? Is it because ishida is a pussy loser and doing this kind of vague historical revisionist shit is safer than talking about ben gvir or bari weiss or whatever
>>796786it must be so easy being a Nazi
stub your toe?
>the Jews did thisfail a test?
>the Jews did thislose a war you yourself started?
>the Jews did this >>796684>ab->duct100% AI.
>>796617think of all the kino in the chinese arc. Someone on here who is more socially competent do us a favor by nudging him into making cold war era comics.
>>796809huh? there's not going to be a chinese arc, this comic is aimed at american rightoids who don't even know there was a war in china
>>797213Wow, he actually did something remotely subtle for once. (Bloody mattresses is a reference to "The liberators" shit about "rapin' da womyn on le dirty mattresses"
>>796843proof that Tats is addicted to shitty copium
I still maintain Ishida's funniest arc was when he was transitioning from radfem to christpilled, i was laughing like a lunatic at some of these comics, especially the ones that have the @endwokeness @gigabaseddad nordic wojak
>>796803>>796684also "hordes treasure"
"Horde" = Mongols coming to sack your city
"Hoard" = big pile of gold
>>797448What if I combine booty juice and chad juice? What then?
>>797448Why is Alfred on the booty juice machine?
>>797541so we're currently living in eternal darkness?
>>797541What do you think triggers Tats the most?
- Being told that he’ll never be an Aryan
- Being told that he’ll remain an incel forever
- Being reminded that Hitler killed more Europeans than Stalin
- Being told that Britain and Japan always sucked ass
- Being told to go outside and touch grass
>>797678Being told that white women won't date him
>>797541Trvke. We are in the age of darkest reaction
>>797684Literally rice-cel hell
>>797541natsoys never answer when you ask them what comes next after da jooz are all gone. because they have no plan. they think everything bad is caused by da jooz and humanity will be a utopia. the honest ones will at least admit they intend to target other groups as well.
>>797678All of them plus tell him that his propaganda will never be gems
>>797678>Being told that Britain and Japan always sucked ass>Being told to go outside and touch grassactual poetry
>>796579holocaust denial in general, yes
the specific form of holocaust denial where chuds use the israel's genocide of palestiniansas a shield from criticism? no. the post was clearly talking about the latter.
>>798014uhh, did he forget to put his name and title on it.
>>798014Why is the third character a family guy ripoff?
>>798014>the text is crooked>font is way too big>cover is leather? on a report?also yeah that 3rd and 4th panel
>>796570I'm more of the opinion that the proto-zionists had betrayed and sold out their fellow Jews to Hitler and the Nazis so that they could get first dibs on Palestine.
>>798014whats he even referencing
>>798014this guy is definitely on CIA payroll and just churing these out for money
>>798514historically accurate
>>798514least negationist bourgeois historian
>>798596oh no not the intelligentsya!
>>798914Wait, aren't you that uyghur who posted bait on /leftypol/ about your shithole banning LGBT? You have no moral right to even talk shit about Ukraine.
>>798900Do you have any proof that rusich are neo Nazis? I’m not trying to say you’re wrong I just can’t really find any evidence of it
>>798952It's not a swastika, it's a kolovrat. Which is basically a swastika, but you really should call it what it is.
Best thread in /siby/ imo, btw, but
>>799358What him problem w grunge?
Grunge gr8.
>Vidrel, great Grunge artist from Nervonae, titled Kurtz Kombaine>>799358https://www.marxists.org/archive/trotsky/1930/hrr/ch04.htm
>This dim, equable and “well-bred” man was cruel – not with the active cruelty of Ivan the Terrible or of Peter, in the pursuit of historic aims – What had Nicholas the Second in common with them? – but with the cowardly cruelty of the late born, frightened at his own doom. At the very dawn of his reign Nicholas praised the Phanagoritsy regiment as “fine fellows” for shooting down workers. He always “read with satisfaction” how they flogged with whips the bob-haired girl-students, or cracked the heads of defenceless people during Jewish pogroms. This crowned black sheep gravitated with all his soul to the very dregs of society, the Black Hundred hooligans. He not only paid them generously from the state treasury, but loved to chat with them about their exploits, and would pardon them when they accidentally got mixed up in the murder of an opposition deputy. Witte, who stood at the head of the government during the putting down of the first revolution, has written in his memoirs: “When news of the useless cruel antics of the chiefs of those detachments reached the sovereign, they met with his approval, or in any case his defence.” In answer to the demand of the governor-general of the Baltic States that he stop a certain lieutenant-captain, Richter, who was “executing on his own authority and without trial non-resistant persons,” the tzar wrote on the report: “Ah, what a fine fellow!” Such encouragements are innumerable. This “charmer,” without will, without aim, without imagination, was more awful than all the tyrants of ancient and modern history.
>But why did the people repay with such open hatred a tzarina who, in the words of Paléologue, had so completely assimilated their soul? The answer is simple. In order to justify her new situation, this German woman adopted with a kind of cold fury all the traditions and nuances of Russian mediaevalism, the most meagre and crude of all mediaevalisms, in that very period when the people were making mighty efforts to free themselves from it. This Hessian princess was literally possessed by the demon of autocracy. Having risen from her rural corner to the heights of Byzantine despotism, she would not for anything take a step down. In the orthodox religion she found a mysticism and a magic adapted to her new lot. She believed the more inflexibly in her vocation, the more naked became the foulness of the old régime. With a strong character and a gift for dry and hard exaltations, the tzarina supplemented the weak-willed tzar, ruling over him.
>On March 17, 1916, a year before the revolution, when the tortured country was already writhing in the grip of defeat and ruin, the tzarina wrote to her husband at military headquarters: “You must not give indulgences, a responsible ministry, etc. … or anything that they want. This must be your war and your peace, and the honour yours and our fatherland’s, and not by any means the Duma’s. They have not the right to say a single word in these matters.” This was at any rate a thoroughgoing programme. And it was in just this way that she always had the whip hand over the continually vacillating tzar.
>After Nicholas’ departure to the army in the capacity of fictitious commander-in-chief, the tzarina began openly to take charge of internal affairs. The ministers came to her with reports as to a regent. She entered into a conspiracy with a small camarilla against the Duma, against the ministers, against the staff-generals, against the whole world – to some extent indeed against the tzar. On December 6, 1916, the tzarina wrote to the tzar: “… Once you have said that you want to keep Protopopov, how does he (Premier Trepov) go against you? Bring down your first on the table. Don’t yield. Be the boss. Obey your firm little wife and our Friend. Believe in us.” Again three days late: “You know you are right. Carry your head high. Command Trepov to work with him … Strike your fist on the table.” Those phrases sound as though they were made up, but they are taken from authentic letters. Besides, you cannot make up things like that.
>On December 13 the tzarina suggested to the tzar: “Anything but this responsible ministry about which everybody has gone crazy. Everything is getting quiet and better, but people want to feel your hand. How long they have been saying to me, for whole years, the same thing: ’Russia loves to feel the whip.’ That is their nature!” This orthodox Hessian, with a Windsor upbringing and a Byzantine crown on her head, not only “incarnates” the Russian soul, but also organically despises it. Their nature demands the whip – writes the Russian tzarina to the Russian tzar about the Russian people, just two months and a half before the monarchy tips over into the abyss. >>799360Oh my god, trotzKKKy, decide if you want to be a novelist or a revolutionary, ffs
>>798900i didn't say anything positive about russia. did you even read my post retard? but since you brought it up here. Compare the length of these two articles
Nazi Monuments in Russia (1, privately owned, on private property)
https://archive.ph/EwLdVNazi Monuments in ukraine (tons, publicly owned, government funded, mostly in West Ukraine, which is the region most loyal to the government and against the separatists)
https://archive.ph/tBrSa >>798900btw my position is that russia and ukraine are both reactionary bourgeois governments, because of the western backed shock doctrine that wiped away all trace of soviet culture, and now NATO has nazified the entire region and is actively making things worse. since you never bothered to ask. but my question was on topic, and you ignored it:
i wonder if tats was mindbroken by 2022. radlibs all sided with neo nazi glowed up azovites in ukraine. most of them coped by pretending nazi ukrainians are made up, but a few doubled down and decided nazism was based. Maybe tats is that second type? >>799384so true. russia is hecking nazi. better support NATO backed ukrainian nazis so we can replace putler with an even bigger nazi
>>799385if russia really wanted to denazify ukraine why dont they do it at their own fucking country? eastern europe is a shithole filled with neonazis, but putler doesnt care if theyre politically convenient to him
>>799358The 80's produced perhaps the worst music in recent history and Comrade Cobain saved us from it.
>>799443The 80s are the most popular era for 'retro' music by far, but ok go off
>>799443The early 80s was good. It got corny after 1983
>>798916>uyghur who posted bait on /leftypol/ about your shithole banning LGBTNope, I don't post on /leftypol/, haven't done so in months. Makes sense that you'd bring up idpol though, typical lib-bait.
>>799443>>799463>not listening to The Smiths, Rites of Spring, Spacemen 3, McCarthy, Cocteau Twins, Beat Happening, Galaxie 500, Pizzicato Five, Flipper, The Pixies, Talk Talk, Sonic Youth, Strawberry Switchblade, Husker Du, Mazzy Star, The Pastels, Dead Can Dance, Bitch Magnet, Aztec Camera, The Jesus and Mary Chain, Big Black, The Dream Syndicate, The Wedding Present, The Minutemen, A.R. Kane, Age of Chance, The House of Love >>799384>here look at my cherry-picked individuals!Lets see, Barshakov and related
<Russian National Unity or All-Russian civic patriotic movement "Russian National Unity" was an unregistered neo-Nazi, irredentist group based in Russia and formerly operating in states with Russian-speaking populations. It was founded in 1990 by the ultra-nationalist Alexander Barkashov.<Dissolved in 2000 Oh wow, it's fucking LARPer remnants from a defunct party, just like I predicted. By that metric I can show dozens of photographs of soviet symbolism and flags and patches used by Russians in Ukraine, it doesn't change the fact that the government is capitalist. Moron.
>>799413 >Do it in their own countryThey do. While monarchist-nationalists sometimes get a pass from the government, they are mostly minority groups and heavily opposed by a large portion of the population, and politically have no sway. They're also not Neo-Nazis. Actual Neo-Nazi groups in Russia are banned and are arrested very often. Parties that managed to be created in the 1990s were dissolved by the 2000s and their remnants are politically inconsequential. Fuck the hell off.
>>799442 This
>>799524My post applies to you too, I don't care about anti Ukraine shit either
>>799569Critical support to neo-nazi death squads in their fight against Tuareg imperialism.
>>799569>>799586Sure. Then again no one cares since it’s happening in Africa, just like nobody gives a shit about whatever’s happening in that continent unless their favorite influencer whom they have a parasocial relationship with brings it up (e.g., Rwanda’s proxy invasion of eastern Congo to loot it of its resources).
Sad but true, even doe a lot of these conflicts have some degree of western and Israeli involvement (e.g., Rwanda being a key French security partner in Africa, the UAE funding terrorists in Sudan to ensure an Israeli ally takes power for the country’s strategic position in the Red Sea that contains an important Israeli port site).
>>799413>keep trying to re-anchor the conversation on NATO<but russia bad? hurr durr their denazification claims are hypocritical lies>Russia and ukraine are products of NATO-meddling in the region going back 30 years<fucking zigger>i never said I liked russia or that denazification is a real thing they're doing<fucking ziggerrinse and repeat this conversation 100000x
>>799384>apoliticalnot a thing
>But Russia is better than heckin Nazi Ukraine! Heil Putler o algo!wasn't stated. just pointed out that the metrics show a clear difference in just how much nazis have sway in either country. there should be zero in both but ukraine is clearly more aligned with the west and clearly more glowed up with CIA trained neo nazis. all this reflects is that NATO has had an easier time fucking up and nazifying ukraine. Russia isn't "denazifying" anything but NATO is nazifying everything including Russia. Gonna acknowledge this or just screech zigger zigger zigger zigger like a racist teenager? It's really bizarre how you guys do this btw. Way to prove you're not a nazi by revealing that your first instinct is to assume every anti-NATO statement is a pro-russia statement and then conclude that the best thing to do is to turn a slur for black people into a slur for russians.
>>799609Poor Shelomov, NATO forced him to attack someone again.
>>799612>ukraine is clearly more aligned with the west* the ukrainian govt. the people of ukraine reject the govt. don't even know why i'm trying to be nuanced and edit my own post when I know you're just gonna screech zigger some more and say I like Putler
>>799613are you capable of a good faith? no i don't think reactionaries are "forced" to do anything by NATO. I think NATO supported the destruction of the soviet union, and the rise of Yeltsin. the only reason NATO has any beef with Putin's government is because it's not reactionary enough, and doesn't behave like a puppet, like Ukraine's government, which contributed troops to the NATO coalitions invasion of iraq, and after the 2014 coup took out IMF loans.
Ukraine's government got couped even after being obedient. That is my point. They clearly want to do the same thing to Russia. That is the point. NATO always wants to make the region MORE reactionary. If they could replace Putin with someone more reactionary they would. That doesn't mean "support" russia or "support" putin it means acknowledge the actual most powerful actor in this whole fiasco, which is NATO, which has meddled in the region and done its best to provoke conflict and empower reactionaries, both through covert and overt means.
Owning CP is legal in Russia, while all porn in Ukraine is banned but the fact is that this means the average ukro normie has no incentive to make a distinction between adult and youth еготiса, so most tolerate it unless they get gringofied.
>>799626read the post more slowly
Can't even have a nice thread without you kids ruining it
>>799569 >Sahel Alerte, a French funded supposed independent news group and another account with unclear origins. >A single photograph with no details of where it was actually taken, when and by whom. <It must be da russkiez! You might as well post Fox News, for all the credibility this shit has.
This photo has no fucking details and is essentially hearsay until further proof of Russians being involved is provided. This is much more likely to be done by the various involved extremist groups who are known for dismembering people (anyone can go on 4gif and request/find videos of this). Furthermore the majority of combat operations by the African Corps has been at range, using drones, attack helicopters, strike aircraft and so on. Most of the land operations have been by the Malian military forces themselves.
>>799648>Owning CP is legal in RussiaI'm fairly sure this is untrue. Child exploitation (including sexual) and accessing sites that contain materials of such is illegal as of 2012 at the very least.
Made a new thread since this one is full. Russo-Ukrainian war discussion is BANNED in this one.
https://leftypol.org/siberia/res/799760.htmlUnique IPs: 294