Why are some "woke" people so angry about male-gaze fanservice in video games?
Nobody complains about the female-gaze romfics or female-gaze soap operas. But why is "goonerbait" seen with such hatred and so much discourse exists to denigrate them?
Im inclined to believe that it's because women get the ick when supposedly "undesirable men", which they view most gamers to be, enjoy female fanservice without paying for it like Onlyfans or prostitution.
But I'm willing to hear your own theories. Btw I'm not a chud at all, I'm a communist, I just call out bullshit no matter where it originates.
50 posts and 4 image replies omitted.>>797948I really wish it was acceptable to speak openly about this. I fucking hate feminism honestly.
>>797913>>797914I’ve been saying the same thing for a few years now. I really think people have become insane from lack of sexual/romantic prospects in youth
>>797960You’re right. In most other animal species, sex is just the most mundane irrelevant thing ever that’s only done in heat cycles or mating seasons
Humans are the only ones that make it into a big deal.
Create whole recreational communities made to socialize each other for incentive to sex
>>797948>sex/kink-positive (it has to be both at once btw) feminism is still progressiveHow is pleasing men via weird shit they picked up in porn produced by Zionists "progressive"?
>>797974That's why the real progressive future of humanity is genetically engineering ourselves to be literally asexual. Grow children in biofactories according to a societal plan. All the psychosexual energy is now freed up to be directed elsewhere.
See one of these evangelical freaks masquerading as leftists already showed up. Just talking about sexuality in a way that isn't a condemnation makes them think you're advocating for the most boogeyman-able possible thing right away.
>>797977It's just astonishing and agonizing thinking of you people's existence:
>Ohh noo the women took away the sexy digital woman from my corporate consumer slop!Again and again and again
Nobody fucking cares. Bro, there is more porn out there than you could consume in your lifetime. Instead of just being happy and consuming the mountain of content you could never finish you're whining all day about someone taking away some new hypothetical porno.
>>797978You're assuming a ton of shit of me. I don't even consume porn I just think that you shouldn't be a nagging 90s evangelical soccer mom and let art or entertainment or whatever be sexual. What's the point of clutching pearls if you yourself say it doesn't matter. If you don't like sexualized games then go play a game that isn't sexualized and call it aday.
>>797980>You're assuming a ton of shit of me. I don't even consume pornMaybe you should. Maybe you wouldn't be so preoccupied with women adulterating your smut.
> If you don't like sexualized games then go play a game that isn't sexualized and call it aday.If you don't like that the corporate slop you're consuming isn't sexualized enough, you should go find some fucking sexualized content and fap it out and call it a day.
>>797975This post about “Gen Z whores” is wrong. Gen Z whores only do webcam sessions. They don’t throw around in meatspace. They have far less sex than previous generations.
>How is pleasing men via weird shit they picked up in porn produced by Zionists "progressive"?You seem to have a problem with porn.
>That's why the real progressive future of humanity is genetically engineering ourselves to be literally asexual. Grow children in biofactories according to a societal plan. All the psychosexual energy is now freed up to be directed elsewhereYou didn’t go far enough. You need to make them have no sexual characteristics. Make them androgynous hermaphrodites with no boobs or testes.
Also abolish gender roles
>>797880Not really. Video games are mostly played alone, playing gooner games doensnt affect your status. It's also not any more low brow that 99% of media out there.
>>797909What is the source of such hatred? Have you ever looked within yourself and asked how you became so misantrhopic?
>>797978>>797990Why the dismissive animosity
>>797913>>797914>Appeal to trivialityJust ignore this discussion if it bothers you. Nobody forced you to read any sex discussion over the past 10 years. That was all you.
Your real frustration comes from your side losing ground in the "culture war"
>>798000Because I'm just tired of it. You and those your complain about in your OP are two sides of the same coin trying to keep us in an endless cyclone of mediocrity. Better yourself or just fap in peace. Not everyone is like you, they find a way to sexually satisfy themselves in a world of endless pornography without needing to inform us of it.
>>798001>Your real frustration comes from your side losing ground in the "culture war"So then you are the other side then I presume?
My side of the war is, you don't need to tell us what you just jerked off to or difficulties you had jerking off just as you don't need to inform us of the intricacies of your bowel movements. It's not that serious bro. It's weird. That's why I'm saying anything. I see it again and again and it's weird.
>>798006Like I said, appeal to triviality to shut down discussion. Do you also feel the same about pride parades?
>>798003My "side" is not "pro-anything" but rather "anti-reacrionary bourgeois feminism" which masquerades as progressive or leftist.
It's bourgeois feminism that is getting raped and gaped in the culture war. Real feminists are doing just fine and don't give a shit about gooner games that cater to men.
>>798018>It's bourgeois feminism that is getting raped and gaped in the culture war. Real feminists are doing just fine and don't give a shit about gooner games that cater to men.So then why do you care so much about gooner games?
You know what, I can make it more broad. I'm just tired of you people complaining about your slop or people's reactions to it, or what narrative choices or censorship decisions were made because of the complaints of X,Y, and Z. I don't care you fucking nerds. You weren't given enough fucking swirlies and wedgies.
>>798021I stand with bourgeois feminists in their attacks against gooner slop.
>>798022I stand with neither. I want to lift us up out of the medium of gooner slop.
>>798023Gooners have to be purged, systematically discriminated against and suffer.
>>798023I mean there are endless avenues to goon. The world is not want for gooning material. You can go goon to 10,000 images of porn of whatever character from your corporate slop you want. You're upset because they made your waifu ugly in the new release of goonernomicon 205 or whatever. You can still find porn in exactly your taste you can go goon to.
>>798019>appeal to trivialityKek
>>798027Yes, you are retarded. There are an infinite number of trivial and retarded statements and subjects you could bring up and the most correct response would be to say there is something wrong with you. That's not a logical falicy, that's a logical statement.
>>798021>Appeal to trivialityYou clearly do care a lot, even more than me since you are now advocating for violence to stop people from simply discussing this.
>>798029I stand with Manchester United in their fight against Gooners
>>798029What do you want? What should I advocate for? How do I solve this real and pressing problem in your life?
>>798024Why do you hate het male sexuality so much? Why are you so bigoted, narrow minded, hateful, sex-negative and reactionary?
>>798026Youre upset by the pushback against ugly women in games.
>>798028Clearly this subject is not trivial at all given your immense emotional reactions to the simple fact that more and more men are pushing back against the uglification of women in video games.
>>798031Since you claim (falsely) that you don't care about this issue, you don't need to do anything.
In fact you could have just scrolled by and posted nothing in this thread.
>>798035I stand with het male sexuality when they set the world on fire for the chick they love, I stand against Gooners, who are neither heterosexual nor male !
>>798036>I support men only when they cater to women's interestsYes this is the position of reactionary bourgeois feminsts, you're correct.
>>798037And you stand with women only when they cater to men's interest !
>>798036Why do you accuse gooners of not being heterosexual or male? Not that gooners are all heterosexual males anyway
>>798024Imagine wasting resources to wage a moral crusade against some chronic masturbators. There’s far more depraved people to watch out for
>>798061They have abandonned their humanity and become pigs eating slop. They are not attracted to women, or any actual human being, they are solely attracted to the exitation of themselves. They are narcissistic and full of self hatred. They are not male since they cannot fufill the male role of impregnating a female.
Meh, it's because men who goon give the ick in people as undisciplined, disgusting, freakish and probably ugly too, maybe misogynistic because they "consume" women… when you think of a male masturbator you tend to imagine balding fat hairy bastards that smell
Most men won't feel this ick if a girl is a gooner.. maybe you'd think whatever she's into is high brow
Ask yourself if you picture a girl gooning all day do you feel disgusted? Is she gross for masturbating or a loser, or is she calm, in her element.. exploring.. probably smelling good.
Whatever a man is sexually into it brings him shame as a pervert and a creep
>>798064This reads as reactionary slop.
“Narcissism”? How is gooning narcissist?
Narcissism is about constant seeking of validation
Also why do you gatekeep manhood as sexual attraction to women?
And what’s so bad about not being attracted to human beings sexually, preferring fictional characters?
Methinks the narcissist is you because you feel entitled to mens attention to adore/glorify women.
And how are gooners any less human?
They haven’t lost their humanity. They have a vice but that’s part of being human.
They’re not raping or killing people
Why do people have hatred for personalized gratification?
>>798064>They are not male since they cannot fufill the male role of impregnating a female.Why do you people always wanna gatekeep manhood as being breeders and servants for women?
By your logic, most current year women are not women because they cannot fulfill their role in getting pregnant
>>798066Irony is, most male gooners are average slim fat guys with plain looks
They neither have any political convictions
I tire of people trying to “figure out” men who don’t conform to machismo affect
>>798064>They are narcissistic and full of self hatredThat would be neopuritans
They’re the ones that want society to conform to their whims of a moral upright efficient society of breeders
Neopuritans are full of self hatred as well due to missing out on youthful romance
>>798036So you want men to be expedable chivalric footsoldiers that amuse female whims without question?
While the women in question are just shallow infantile dames that have no talents or redeeming qualities?
>>798064Just be honest: you hate gooners because they’re not easily-made simps.
They don’t grovel for any nubile meatspace female
And that upsets you.
>>797535It's all reactionary bullshit all the way down. Never forget that the feminists had allied themselves with religious evangelicals during the "Satanic Panic". And so many of their arguments against porn is just rebranded protestant fundamentalist anti-kink/anti-sexuality bullshit.
TL;DR: Both of them are spooked by nonsense that they created and still believe in because they never killed the cop in their head.
>>797535Women too face a lot of ridicule for their romance fantasy slop. My theory is that people tend to blame gooning for all of society's problems because admitting that there are systemic causes for trauma that lead to far worse addictions is a lot more confronting and inconvenient.
>>798081>>797535I almost always ignore such discussion around a piece of media slop and choose to indulge in it (or not) of my own volition. I don't give a shit about popular opinion.
>>798078>feminists had allied themselves with religious evangelicals during the "Satanic Panic"No they didnt, stop making shit up.
>>798078>Never forget that the feminists had allied themselves with religious evangelicals during the "Satanic Panic".wait up im not a westoid, did that happen?
i thought feminists were the antonym of the evangelical types because they see "freedom" in those punk "satanist" types, because the punks are drawing women away from being trad and mothers.
>>798092You can quibble about timescales but women have become one of the most reliable reactionary blocs on many issues
Unique IPs: 16