Since the last one disappeared somewhere, so I'm creating another thread dedicated to my beloved Tatsuya Ishida (≧◡≦) ♡
51 posts and 22 image replies omitted.>>805037>>803976He can't even bring himself to be nazi enpugh to sign off o generalplan ost, even as a nazi he remains a shitlib
>>805442>Smith and Wesson (including an AI-generated trademark near the handle)<revolverWhat?
>coca cola, burger and friesSo who's gonna tell him it was mostly canned foods and in an amount that would feed a single unit of the Red Army for a month (out of a 48 month war in a 30+ million man army)?
>>805538I look like this and say this
>>806100>atheists’ claims that you don’t need religion to fight to the death by citing Soviet soldiersbrother, the Russian Orthodox Church was quite active in WWII.
>>804806>Chinese are the Germans of Asia if anythingtrunami alert
>>806100neither side of the argument makes sense as most soviet soldiers would be christians or muslims though
>>806968Sinfest has lost his mind
Also, have you noticed that Tatsuya's works from his website have a watermark, but his Twitter ones don't?
>>806968For the context: Barmaley is children's book by Andrey Chukovsky where an evil kid eating pirate Barmaley was swallowed by a good crocodile from doctor Aibolit (other character from same author) and kids plead to let him go. Of course, Tats decided to imbue his schizo beliefs that "showing compassion for an enemy is jewish o algo" or something.
>>807074>Of course, Tats decided to imbue his schizo beliefs that "showing compassion for an enemy is jewish o algo" or something.Isn’t that how some leftists think as well? That showing compassion towards enemies is “bourgeois”?
>>807080Don't think it's comparable tbh.
Mostly because for the leftists violence against the opressor is natural outcome in case where opressor sees "compassion" as the sign that their enemy is a doormat against which any atrocity could be commited against without consequences.
Fascists mostly see the violence through the lenses of the primitive "might makes right" and theatrical display of power. Problem is that this kind of thinking leads to nowhere and you're likely to end up in nuclear apocalypse.
Of course, unless you're thinking about some kind of Nechayvites then I'd agree.
>>807094Except "might makes right" doesn't count for them if you're not on their team, then it becomes "jewish tricks" or some shit that allowed you to win, and that means it's invalid because only 1v1 with the full might of the state behind me is correct
>>807378Also, this uygha got caught using AI again - the Soviet soldier's weapon in the first 3 frames and in the 4th is completely different
>>807378Tats secretly wants BTD
>>807379the sights on the gun are also only there on frame 2. but it could also just be Tats having no idea how guns work. frames 2-3 looks like a rifle
also the angle on the stock on the German gun keeps changing. yeah this feels generated come to think of it
>>807378Ive been laughing at this for the last hour it's genius
>>807378>transwoman is more powerful than cis malesAlso this is just a rehash of bbc jokes from like 2007
>>807628Ishida is in late 50s
Do you think Tats is ever going give his chud schizo take on Harry Truman bombing Japan?
>>807379>>807409>>807628This right here sums up Tats.
Even if his comics didn't have his deranged chud delusions they would still suck because Tats is a lazy/mediocre artist and his 'humor' is stale and unfunny.
>>808139But this is not even suicide
>>808139Man I'm getting bored of this shit, Tats seriously has ADD or something, can't even stick to the topic without gay culture war shit
>>808171You are seeing male feminist at work
>>808207its funny because chuds dont give af about historical accuracy, hollywood always blatantly lied about history because directors think its not interesting or cool enough
>>808209Historical accuracy is largely new-age bullshit. Yes SOME accuracy to old legends or historical events should be present, but it's not a documentary, it's cinema. That's why the old Roman and Greek history and myth films from the 50s and 60s are better than a lot of the current day, 2010s+ intepretations, they tell a story first. Obviously the Spartacist uprising wasn't like how its depicted, but the ideas behind the story, the cinematography, the visual art and story told is what matters. The same can be said for the Soviet Alexander Nevsky film from the 40s. It's not meant to be hyper-historically accurate, it's the story being told and visual art that matters. The new Odyssey is just CGI, mediocre acting, lazy edginess and a nice helping of liberal identity politics slathered on top, because A) is pushes the liberal narrative and B) it gets a nice low-brow reaction out of the right-wing. Win-win for Hollywood. Who needs art when you have SPECTACLE!? Tiresome Fuckers.
>>808209It’s not just Hollywood. Theater in general, whether it be televised or live, rarely rely on historical accuracy
>>808350I agree with you that cinema shouldn’t be held to strict standards of historical accuracy but I think it should come with disclaimer messages first
Also the rest of your rants about older movies being better due to “lack of CGI” or whatever is just plain old vintage bias
>>808139so it was a PPS all along. yet it's shown with wood furniture in
>>807378 >>808381Your reading comprehension is quite poor. The issue with CGI is that it will never be realistic enough to BE real. Even the Avatar movies, which have insanely good CGI only feels truly real when in a 3D movie theater, which is a lot of prerequisites when practical effects are there. CGI should be for things that cannot be done practically.
>old vintage biasYes, older A list and even some B-list films are better. That Jumanji movie with The Rock was okay, but it lacks the charming aspect of the original film, despite the latter's comparatively primitive CGI.
>I think it should come with disclaimer messages I was going to say no, because that's irritating, but then I remember that this is a time that needs instructions for basic common sense things. Too many people look at something like Little Big Man and think it's 100% historically accurate because it fits their narrative.
>>808461>I was going to say no, because that's irritating, but then I remember that this is a time that needs instructions for basic common sense things. Too many people look at something like Little Big Man and think it's 100% historically accurate because it fits their narrative.You underestimate the ignorance/impressionability of people in the past. Most peoples ideas of history comes from movies and fiction.
And alot of these inaccuracies have been allowed to be propagated for decades.
Also you forget the ethically questionable things that were commonalities such as driving without seatbelts and smoking/drinking while pregnant.
>Your reading comprehension is quite poor. The issue with CGI is that it will never be realistic enough to BE real. Even the Avatar movies, which have insanely good CGI only feels truly real when in a 3D movie theater, which is a lot of prerequisites when practical effects are there. CGI should be for things that cannot be done practicallyFair point.
Chroma key is kinda overused too much. I prefer a hybrid of practical effects and CGI
>>808467>ou underestimate the ignorance/impressionability of people in the pastNot really. Glowies systematically degraded the American Education System and Hollywood into propaganda machines. The closer to the 21st century, the more blatant it got. Informationally you can say that the current generation is "more educated" but it's more rote-memorization of facts rather than usable intelligence.
>alot of these inaccuracies have been allowed to be propagated Some are due to incomplete information amended by new discoveries later down the line which then took time to spread, especially when internet was either nonexistent or primitive.
>the ethically questionable things that were commonalities such as driving without seatbelts and smoking/drinking while pregnant. Not ethically questionable, ignorance or misinformation. Smoking was promoted as good by the capitalist medical establishment for many decades. The USSR was very early in condemning them as poison, but either way smoking was so intrinsic to society, near everyone did it. That said, it wasn't common for women to smoke, being considered more of a man thing, especially in the second half of the 20th century and particularly in the Soviet Bloc. Men too started to smoke much less as the century progressed, as it became associated with the poor and stressed and sick.
Early cars in general were dangerous, material progression increased safety over time, but that has nothing to do with common sense of the average layman. By the 70s every automobile produced after 1969 in both the East and West Blocs had seatbelts. The dangerous nature of cars (as well as the minor complexities of a stick-shift) meant people had to be more careful about driving, which meant people were more conscientious. Nowadays people do not give a fuck and think they're indestructible. Hell the past 2 decades of driving seem to have less and less competency.
>I prefer a hybrid of practical effects and CGI THIS
>>808547> Not really. Glowies systematically degraded the American Education System and Hollywood into propaganda machines. The closer to the 21st century, the more blatant it got. Informationally you can say that the current generation is "more educated" but it's more rote-memorization of facts rather than usable intelligence. Our education system was based on rote memorization to begin with.
The K-12 education system was based on semi-militaristic intentions from seventeenth/eighteenth century Prussian think tanks. It was then adapted by Germans, some of whom immigrated to America around the mid-nineteenth century.
Alot of our academic subjects used metrics that were influenced by institutional racism/sexism
There’s been a lot of historical inaccuracies that have been taught in schools for over a century and they and haven’t been corrected.
There’s lots of articles and videos explaining some popular misconceptions taught in history.
> Early cars in general were dangerous, material progression increased safety over time, but that has nothing to do with common sense of the average layman. By the 70s every automobile produced after 1969 in both the East and West Blocs had seatbelts. The dangerous nature of cars (as well as the minor complexities of a stick-shift) meant people had to be more careful about driving, which meant people were more conscientious. Nowadays people do not give a fuck and think they're indestructible. Hell the past 2 decades of driving seem to have less and less competencyBruh, you have no idea how much more common drunk driving was back then. People used to drive immediately after a couple of beers. It didn’t result in extensive jail time. Hell, cops would escort you home.
Also, suburban development was a lot less before the 1980s especially in the South. That meant less worry about bumping into children or the elderly
There’s been alot of suburban sprawl and improper zoning. (Houses being built on high-traffic roads) which makes driving alot more a liability.
> Not ethically questionable, ignorance or misinformation. Smoking was promoted as good by the capitalist medical establishment for many decades. The USSR was very early in condemning them as poison, but either way smoking was so intrinsic to society, near everyone did it. That said, it wasn't common for women to smoke, being considered more of a man thing, especially in the second half of the 20th century and particularly in the Soviet Bloc. Men too started to smoke much less as the century progressed, as it became associated with the poor and stressed and sick. And yet, even amongst the twentieth century smoking was seen as bad for kids. Fathers who caught their kids smoking would force them to smoke the whole pack in one go as punishment.
Even though it wasn’t treated as much a scandal as nowadays.
>>808547> Some are due to incomplete information amended by new discoveries later down the line which then took time to spread, especially when internet was either nonexistent or primitive. This is fair. As Carl Sagan once said, “Science is a self-corrective disclipline”
But I also believe that there may have been scientific discoveries that will never be fully replicated due to time wearing away ancient artifacts.
And especially in the case of genealogy, humans don’t remain the same in terms of who they miscegenate with.
The popular question about when their or not Jewry is real may become less relevant as the centuries go on.
Unique IPs: 31