[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM / ufo / 420 ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]

/siberia/ - Off-topic

"No chin, no right to speak."
Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password(For file deletion.)

Check out our new store at shop.leftypol.org!


File: 1788397612543-3.jpeg (42.44 KB, 554x554, ew.jpeg)

 

Aside from obvious pedophilic acts

>30+ y/os dating older teens or old men hitting on/dating/fucking women like 30-40 years younger then them whether legal or not

>loli and shota
>Being exclusively attracted to petit-women
>Having a dd/lg fetish/ageplay/wanting your partner to dress and act like a child
>Obsessing over moe SoL anime

>>Having a dd/lg fetish/ageplay/wanting your partner to dress and act like a child
this one's bordering on actual pedophilia

>>820362
>30+ y/os dating older teens or old men hitting on/dating/fucking women like 30-40 years younger then them whether legal or not
Not if the women their age can't see it happen. It's fine then.

this is basically the same as those "x hate" threads that /pol/ has all the time. chuds are chuds no matter whether they're left or right. sexless and bitter.

>>820438
>this is basically the same as those "x hate" threads that /pol/ has all the time. chuds are chuds no matter whether they're left or right. sexless and bitter.
The ones on the right are chuds but what do we call the moidcels and the femcels on the left?

>>820438
No it isnt, this is literally just an extremely low effort bait.

low effort thread stating the obvious to attract bait

>>820477
>low effort thread stating the obvious to attract bait
Obvious to the sexless and the bitter.

File: 1788442342772-4.jpg (63.39 KB, 499x560, 1590615718-0.jpg)

>>820362
>whether they actually are or aren't
If you aren't paying attention to whether they actually are or aren't, then you aren't paying heed to what is morally pedophilia to begin with.

>Aside from obvious pedophilic acts

A poor excuse for witch-hunting.
If it isn't an obvious act of pedophilia, then it isn't pedophilia.

>30+ y/os dating older teens or old men hitting on/dating/fucking women like 30-40 years younger then them whether legal or not

That isn't pedophilia morally.
Pedophilia morally is strictly prepubescent children.
The appropriate term is ephebophilia, which isn't really that bizarre, IMHO, compared to pedophilia or hebephilia.

>loli and shota

Somewhat, but not actually.

>Being exclusively attracted to petit-women

Not pedophilia to like short or skinny mature women.

>Having a dd/lg fetish/ageplay/wanting your partner to dress and act like a child

Questionable, but not exactly either.

>Obsessing over moe SoL anime

Liking moe or magical girl stuff is normal for weebs. These anons like cute stuff.

>>820478
fag

>>820481
playing semantics to make yourself look smarter. "zuuuude it's not pedophilia it's ephebophilia".
>somewhat but not exactly
is really telling on yourself.

>>820485
>"zuuuude it's not pedophilia it's ephebophilia"
Ephebophilia isn't on par.
16 through 19 years old is the age of consent in some places.

>morally pedophilia
Tf does that even mean

>>820487
do you define your moral views through law?

>>820489
I actually wanna hear OP's definition on this

>>820489
it means even if it might be "legal" its still just as bad and evil as actual illegal pedophilia.

>>820485
>I called you fag first
projecting

>>820493
>it means even if it might be "legal" its still just as bad and evil as actual illegal pedophilia.
You're either gay or a femcel. Lose the damn weight!

>>820497
Gays are free from these kinds of brainworms, they are completely fine dating a guy half their age at 30.

>>820497
>you find my fetish gross? y-youre fat..!
stop watching porn buddy

>>820438
>chuds are chuds no matter whether they're left or right.
Chuddiness is a measure of how much of one's politics is catharsis-driven, and cathartic politics always leans rightward.

>another thread on pedophilia and muddying it to 25 and 18 realtionships number 54687464

seriously what's with your board sometimes we have this brainworm everyweek in here

>>820499
>Gays are free from these kinds of brainworms, they are completely fine dating a guy half their age at 30.
They're similarly minded so they don't really moralise delusions about how the opposite sex should see them. They get to pick their subcultures with their subgenders and roles without the bullshit. The disadvantages are the low population and the heteronormative species. I'm speaking at both sexes, incels and feminists are the same, always been.

>>820500
>stop watching porn buddy
Not porn, I do casual sports and go to gym. I'm not shit to people but I don't fuck with uggos or gross people. I know I don't have to.

>>820503
>seriously what's with your board sometimes we have this brainworm everyweek in here
Women. Low visual intelligence, high verbal intelligence. We don't have a sense of that kind of creep. It's called envy.

The age of consent should be raised.

>>820513
>The age of consent should be raised.
It should be raised to 50. Romeo and juliet laws for all under and MAiD for above. Won't be missed.

>>820513
not very anarchist of you

File: 1788452850870-0.jpg (206.33 KB, 1024x646, flag-1024x646.jpg)

You will never be free of sin,
no matter how much you whip yourself.

>>820518
>You will never be free of sin,
>no matter how much you whip yourself.
Freedom isn't the point. Spend everything, keep whipping until the heart is bare and naked and then whip the living fuck out of it.

>>820517
I said it only to piss of redditors who come sword and shield in hand to defend 19 year olds dating 50 year olds.

>>820524
>I said it only to piss of redditors who come sword and shield in hand to defend 19 year olds dating 50 year olds.
25+ are hags… don't mind getting rid of the uncs along with them. You can stay if you're a problem solver though.

>>820362
>Things that are morally pedophilia whether they actually are or aren't
a.k.a vibes uh? In that case anything can be pedophilia. Fucking pregnant women? Pedophilia. Imregnating women? Pedophilia. Fucking grannies? Pedophilia. Raising children? Pedophilia. Breathing when children iare in the vicinity? Pedophilia.

Pedophilia Pedophilia Pedophilia. You are all pedophiles. None of you is free from pedophilia.

File: 1788456171364-6.jpg (1.12 MB, 680x1671, pretending.jpg)


I swear to God this board is too obsessed with pedophilia to the point of calling anything not even remotely related to kids as pedophilia

Methinks this board has internalized infantilization

>>820524
Nineteen is an adult though.
If nineteen year olds are expected to fight in war and pay taxes, they should be allowed to romance with fifty-year olds

Things that are morally not pedophilia even if they actually are:
  1. pedophilia, but Trump does it

>>820503
A lot of this board are brain fried from stranger danger, helicopter parenting, and #metoo.
They suffer from delayed maturity and are projecting onto their juniors

>>820491
>do you define your moral views through law?
I think your morality is roastie patrol.
Some people miss out on the phase of having any relationship throughout their youth and want to relive that fantasy.

>>820538
Counterpint: they should do none of that

>>820557
>Some people miss out on the phase of having any relationship throughout their youth and want to relive that fantasy.

big way of saying you're a sore loser. "reliving the fantasy" when there was never any fantasy. live isn't about fantasy.

>>820560
At what age do you think women should be allowed to decide who they have sex with?

File: 1788464351569-0.png (246.74 KB, 630x436, image (24).png)

>>820536
If you think nothing is pedophilia, then i have something to say regarding a concept called "diddiness" which is popular in youth culture right now.
If you talk about adult things, that's "diddy". If you get your willy diddled by a woman, that's "diddy". If you touch people without their consent, "diddy". If you say perverted or freaky things, that's "diddy". If you throw a wild party, that's "didy". If you have a cock, you have a "diddle". Bet you feel kinda didy now don't you?

>>820575
英語でください

>>820536
>>820541
>>820557
>>820538
>Nineteen is an adult though.
They're policing who could date who out of envy and insecurity. That's all that's involved with this topic and the verbage garbage is all rationalisation.

>>820575
You don't like ice-cream, huh?

>>820560
Counterpoint: You are promoting infantilism

>>820575
>T. Brainrotten from groomer panic

I’m not saying that “pedophilia doesn’t exist” but rather that pedophilia is being used to define things that aren’t related to adults raping kids
Also, by your logic, right wingers call anything progressives as “communist”.

>>820607
It’s just that millennials and zoomers are inflicted with sociocognitive infantilization.
Why else is “adulting” a thing?
Hot take: millennials and zoomers are even more draconian than boomers when it comes to sexuality.
They want to extend adolescence to the age of forty.

>>820573
Then you admit that leftism as an actual geopolitical state is a pipe dream

>>820491
You’re defining your morality based on law.
Sixteen thru nineteen isnt pedophilic
It’s ephebophilic.
Not the same

Do we confuse anti-Semitism for anti-Zionism?

>>820574
Millennials and zoomers want everyone to remain sexless throughout their prime years.
They don’t want anyone having sex with anyone outside their birth-year.

>>820524
>redditors
>defending 19 yos dating 50 yos

Bruh, what kind of reality do you live in?!
Reddit treats young adults as sociosexual infants.

>>820438
This board is just asocial assholes whom are butthurt about missing out romance in their prime years.
Why else is this board constantly shat up with “TFW no gf” threads?

File: 1788479307916-5.png (25.64 KB, 600x800, cobson-1538229736.png)

>>820612
>Then you admit that leftism as an actual geopolitical state is a pipe dream
Have you noticed? They don't care about "losers" and they throw the first stone every opportunity they get. There is no real left. It would be good if there was an actual left to balance the right, but you don't. You just have a blue right and a red right.

>>820614
Mate-suppression, it's a type of social aggression

>>820613
>>820616
Self-flagellating males are dangerous to younger cishet males.

>>820624
>This board is just asocial assholes whom are butthurt about missing out romance in their prime years.
>Why else is this board constantly shat up with “TFW no gf” threads?
Why do gays play god with heteros?

>>820491
>do you define your moral views through law?
Whatever you retards are arguing about, but anyone defining their morality through what the law is, is a supreme dumbass. Also, Ironic how they always bring up morality =/= legality when talking about jews and nazi germany, but never to their own countries.

Anyways, we need arranged marriages to cure the incel problem. The woman should be given a whip to straighten out the incel. The incel should be given the gun if it gets out of hand.

>>820653
>Whatever you retards are arguing about, but anyone defining their morality through what the law is, is a supreme dumbass.
Trvke

>Anyways, we need arranged marriages to cure the incel problem.

The problem is that incels and femcels (feminists is the polite term) don't care about each others needs and goon to their filter bubbles.

>>820654
Ban porn then. Although I think we are headed there lol.

File: 1788480711099-4.gif (158.66 KB, 220x124, roblox-star-wars.gif)

>>820504
>Not porn, I do casual sports and go to gym. I'm not shit to people but I don't fuck with uggos or gross people. I know I don't have to

>>820659
>Ban porn then. Although I think we are headed there lol.
They have to go gym and learn at least some social skills. There's a basic minimum otherwise they'll turn each other off.

>>820660
NTA but what they said is kind of true.

>>820661
>>820660
>>820659
>>820654
It's strange how there's enough flavors of incel to have this many sides of an arguement while still fundamentally agreeing on the core principals of incel ideology.

>>820666
>It's strange how there's enough flavors of incel to have this many sides of an arguement while still fundamentally agreeing on the core principals of incel ideology.
What's incel ideology mean to you? Or are you just gay?

>>820666
At this point incel ideology is just a euphemism for "truth"

>>820661
>Tfw need to become a bodybuilder to be allowed to glance at an overweight fem"cel"

>>820687
>Tfw need to become a bodybuilder to be allowed to glance at an overweight fem"cel"
fr fr you have to ascend to plapcel first to get out of incel but sadly i don't associate with plappers

>>820678
>At this point incel ideology is just a euphemism for "truth"
Look up who invented the term incel, it's an anonymous gay person. It's a kickme sign for straight npcs.

>>820651
>Have you noticed? They don't care about "losers" and they throw the first stone every opportunity they get. There is no real left. It would be good if there was an actual left to balance the right, but you don't. You just have a blue right and a red right

We do have a left but it’s mainly lib left
To be fair we don’t have a “real” right wing section either.

But as I said before, most self-proclaimed leftists of the postboomer era are mainly radlibs whom would sell out to capitalism if it was recalibrated to cater to them.

Leftypol is mainly radlib bullshit mixed with alt right bullshit

>Self-flagellating males are dangerous to younger cishet males.


It’s not a crisis of masculinity, more a crisis of maturity and autonomy for young adults
Self-flagellating females are also a thing.

>>820652
>Why do gays play god with heteros?

It’s the inverse. Gays suck up to straights too much. Straight people are pushing their own misery onto LGBT.

>>820513
Unrionically, I seriously think millennials and zoomers are gonna push for this when they hit middle age.
Millennials have already normalised adults hijacking childrens media

>>820678
Incel ideology is mainly just self-righteousness fueled by FOMO for youthful romance.

>>820713
>It’s not a crisis of masculinity, more a crisis of maturity and autonomy for young adults
>Self-flagellating females are also a thing.
The latter had always been a thing and is fraction of what it was now. We don't need women performing to male dickheads so it's better.

There has been a massive increase in self-flagellating numales who perform to femcel moral terrorists and bend and try to be some innocent secular "good". These guys are dangerous to younger cishets because they don't know any better. Their sense of humor is self-deprecation and sarcastic anti-value.

If there's any good in policing age gaps, it's in making these guys fuck off.

>>820362
>Being exclusively attracted to petit-women
Gotta disagree on that. If they're attracted to a body shape on an adult woman, then that by definition isnt being a pedo.

>>820713
>It’s the inverse. Gays suck up to straights too much. Straight people are pushing their own misery onto LGBT.
Nooo, they casually break up couples like it's nothing.

>Incel ideology is mainly just self-righteousness fueled by FOMO for youthful romance.

Invented by an anonymous gay.

>>820771
> Nooo, they casually break up couples like it's nothing.

It’s more that cishet males and females often use cishomo or trans people for extramarital escapades and then dump the blame on them.

> Invented by an anonymous gay.


The original definition has been hijacked.

Just like how “woke” used to mean black American sociopolitical commentary before it was perverted by white radlibs

>>820733
> The latter had always been a thing and is fraction of what it was now. We don't need women performing to male dickheads so it's better.

And yet it’s already happening. Girl boss/boss bitch archetype.

>There has been a massive increase in self-flagellating numales who perform to femcel moral terrorists and bend and try to be some innocent secular "good". These guys are dangerous to younger cishets because they don't know any better. Their sense of humor is self-deprecation and sarcastic anti-value.


That’s less due to gender politics and more to do with fear of worldly/precocious youth

Ever since Gen X and millennials took over as cultural producers (1990s thru present), awkwardness as been glamorized as cute if not virtuous in youth.

There are actual adults on Quora and Reddit who say that having a cringe/awkward phase in youth is necessary otherwise you turn out toxic.

If you notice, a lot of postboomer adults complain about how “kids are no longer kids” because they prefer fashion and politics over exaggerated play-acting.

Never mind the fact that youth recreation historically was a lot more worldly and nuanced in the past to begin with.

There’s a lot of young people who think that fictional teen characters expressing sexual desire is pedophilia.

Teens who prefer to skip the pubertal drama of high school and wanna get their lives up and running are considered self-sabotaging.

>>820888
>The original definition has been hijacked.
Not true but it doesn't matter anyway, the gays and MSM are using it to shame straight people. This is the most common use of the word and not the way incels use it. See >>820666

>>820893
>And yet it’s already happening. Girl boss/boss bitch archetype.
They're not self-flagellating and apologising for being women the way numales are literally cucking themselves. This doesn't compare at all. Numales aren't men.

>>820888
>It’s more that cishet males and females often use cishomo or trans people for extramarital escapades and then dump the blame on them.
Gay people exploit women's gullibility and insecurities about men and cause break ups all the time

>Having yellow fever

File: 1788620171788-2.png (1.85 MB, 1871x1080, d23-3288874457.png)

>>821044
>Numales
Just slapping suffixes on shit and acting like it's a new word

inb4 18 gorillion reppeys

Oh wait…… ;)

File: 1788623036793-2.png (870.2 KB, 1079x1022, 1785915386252q.png)

Having yellow fever

Inb4 MAPhaggots rape the thread

>>821107
fed fed go away come again another day

>>821109
'Nished

File: 1788624309820-8.jpeg (299.56 KB, 1522x1659, IMG_6266.jpeg)

ATTENTION ALL EPHEBOFAGS (pedos) yes, a 50s + man seeking women who while adults are three to four dacades younger than them, mabye he really isnt a pedo, but it is entirerly fair for people to question him or just be concerned, issues with power diffrances and other issues is real, especially in this patriarchical society that is ruled by men who acocsiates with epstein, something dosent need to be a completely unforgiveble crime against humanity for something to be unethical or even just questionble, it's called pattern recognition, no amount of spamming 4chan fight club greentexts or wikipedia pages on age of consent laws (legality =/= ethical) will change this, it dosent matter if its xe freakin wholsome transbian either, its not transphobic for some queer twitter zoomer to question those kind of relationships despite what ”certsin” kinds of theorycels will say, there is a reason why so many rightoids on post musk twitter are so keen in defending these types of age gaps, there is a reason why so many exemples of this involves rich bourgie older guys, the only reason youd get mad at this is if you are either a naive normie, or you have skeletons in your closet that youd like to keep hidden.

>>821044
>They're not self-flagellating and apologising for being women the way numales are literally cucking themselves. This doesn't compare at all. Numales aren't men.

Wrong. I don’t believe in this gatekeeping/mystification of manhood as a strict fashion code

Also a lot of the girlboss bad bitch types apologize for being dainty or accessible to men

>>821046
Wrong. Women fetishize gay men as glamour figures and as “ladies best friend”

>>821112
By that logic, all interracial sex should be banned cuz of muh racial privilege o algo.

Also, Epstein turned out to be a nothingburger, so big deal you envious wench.

>>821139
How is Epstein a nothingburger?
>>821112
This rationale you have is right for the wrong reasons

Age gap relationships are hardly the only kind of relationships with power gaps and theyre not always due to money or age either

There’s more power gap relationships that are due to ethnocultural differences

You remember the mail-in order bride industry that was outlawed due to so many scandals coming out?

Yet, moralfags promote racial diversity in dating

>>821112
>legality =/= ethical

Then you admit that young people are infantilized due to sociolegalities in sex.

>>821139
>>821141
>>821143
>By that logic, all interracial sex should be banned cuz of muh racial privilege o algo
Diffrent things are diffrent, racial equality is something that is achiveble, a poor black person and poor white person can find many things they have in common, what dose a 56 year old multimillonare hollywood exec have in common with a just recentally turned 20 year old drop out? Im not too fermililar with mail-in order bride industry, but from what i have read, its seems obvious why is proje to so many scandals, the comercelziation of relationships and intemetcy under capital
>Epstein turned out to be a nothingburger, so big deal you envious wench.
KYS
>Then you admit that young people are infantilized due to sociolegalities in sex
Oh wow, a generation that spent half their early years in lockdown due to a pademoc and spent time oneline is a bit goofy and quirky regarding relationships sometimes (silly xeets on twitter that gets ratioed to oblivion anyways but other zoomers) and dosent have enough sex for your liking? Grow up

>>821148
>what dose a 56 year old multimillonare hollywood exec have in common with a just recentally turned 20 year old drop out

They can share the same type of upbringing?
Maybe the exec is also a school dropout?

People of different age numbers can share commonalities
You’ve never befriended older people before?

Also you’re using economic differences to justify hatred for inter generational relationships.
Most inter generational relationships aren’t all wage-gap

>Oh wow, a generation that spent half their early years in lockdown due to a pademoc and spent time oneline is a bit goofy and quirky regarding relationships sometimes (silly xeets on twitter that gets ratioed to oblivion anyways but other zoomers) and dosent have enough sex for your liking? Grow up



Nice strawmen there. Not my point anyway.
Also, zoomers didn’t spend all their time in COVID lockdown. Neither did early Gen Alpha
Also online is no different from TV, radio, and magazines
And everyone is goofy and quirky in general anyway when it comes to relationships.

What I’m saying is that whenever young people want and upside sex, there’s always a shitload of red tape that’s thrown over them.

>Diffrent things are diffrent, racial equality is something that is achiveble, a poor black person and poor white person can find many things they have in common


And here we see the naked truth: “Equality” is just a snazzy aesthetic you use for certain people types

All the talk about diversity and equality as usual is just another form of dross platitudes

Any one who actually follows the advice of equality and diversity to its truest literal statement are always branded heretics.

File: 1788636712557-8.jpeg (78.74 KB, 1016x1280, IMG_6269.jpeg)


>>821160

>They can share the same type of upbringing? Maybe the exec is also a school dropout People of different age numbers can share commonalities You’ve never befriended older people before?


<omg why is le hekin wholsome 100 freakin wholsome intergenarational freindships stigametized in susciety™ *100005432000420676900 likes* *32210096665777432 retweets*


36 year old autistic indonesian playong on a minecraft server with a coloradan 19 year old that thinks itallian brainrot and 67 is the peak of comedy or u/donavin aged 63 giving advice on the best fishing hooks to use to u/ujjh aged 26 =/= sex and serious intemate relationships shaped by socital infulunces (often patriarchical and pedophilic)

>zoomers didn’t spend all their time in COVID lockdown. Neither did early Gen Alpha


Look up hyperbole

>Also online is no different from TV, radio, and magazines


Taylor lorenz ahh mf💀

>And everyone is goofy and quirky in general anyway when it comes to relationships.


Bro is the ”funny”and ”understanding” type💀

>What I’m saying is that whenever young people want and upside sex, there’s always a shitload of red tape that’s thrown over them.


Bro is a ”youth lib” activist💀

>Any one who actually follows the advice of equality and diversity to its truest literal statement are always branded heretics.


Its called having more than just one princeple, the french revolutionaries werent advocating letting babies have seats in the goverment when they talked about equality, any bad actor can push their ideas using the language of good ideas, thats why we dont just have our morals and standards focused on one thing, equality between ethnicities, respect towards young people, humane treatment of the mentally ile and prisoners, equality genders and sexualities is good, giving accses of weapons and vecheals to kids is dumb, letting out anti social actors to lash out without consequance is dangerous, and promoting EVERY paraphilia as healthy and normal is a recepie for diaster, you know, you seem to be (just a little) bit more cautious with your wording here than others when they speak on this topic, still, i sense a small, ugly and strange looking gremlin esque creture that lives in sewers and consumes nothing but fiecies infested sea urchins from these posts.

Legally women are hot no matter what so fuck you with your pedo shit. 84 reppeys of pedo projection 💀

>>821199
Legally, and in actuality, women smell horrible, they're bleeding from their gash once a month not to mention any additional smells.

>>821178
>36 year old autistic indonesian playong on a minecraft server with a coloradan 19 year old that thinks itallian brainrot and 67 is the peak of comedy or u/donavin aged 63 giving advice on the best fishing hooks to use to u/ujjh aged 26 =/= sex and serious intemate relationships shaped by socital infulunces (often patriarchical and pedophilic)

Youre confusing grooming for intergenerational relationships by default.

Also your use of Discord stereotypes is especially telling.

>Its called having more than just one princeple, the french revolutionaries werent advocating letting babies have seats in the goverment when they talked about equality, any bad actor can push their ideas using the language of good ideas, thats why we dont just have our morals and standards focused on one thing, equality between ethnicities, respect towards young people, humane treatment of the mentally ile and prisoners, equality genders and sexualities is good, giving accses of weapons and vecheals to kids is dumb, letting out anti social actors to lash out without consequance is dangerous, and promoting EVERY paraphilia as healthy and normal is a recepie for diaster, you know, you seem to be (just a little) bit more cautious with your wording here than others when they speak on this topic, still, i sense a small, ugly and strange looking gremlin esque creture that lives in sewers and consumes nothing but fiecies infested sea urchins from these posts.


And again, youre assuming young adults having relationships with older people is automatically grooming. Youre equating young adults to infants here.

Yet you see no problem with sending young adults to war or jail.

And youre liberally using the word "pedophilic" here to mean anything other than kiddy-diddling.

>Look up hyperbole

Its the only language people like you seem to understand. I eman, youre referring to me as a feces-eating urchin. Your image uses a soyjak with so many plastered meme logos on his shirt. If thats not hyperbole I dont know what is.

>Bro is the ”funny”and ”understanding” type


I take it you never listened to peoples love stories? Theyre mainly goofy and quirky. At least in narration.


>giving accses of weapons and vecheals to kids is dumb,


Yet we give them out to morally unstable adults.
Also kids used to be trained handily on weapons and vehicles before the creation of suburbia. Outside the firstw rold, kids are socialised more into worldly affairs.

>>821199
women on average arent all hot. Legally or otherwise.

>>821200
Unfortune truth thats rejected by Leftypol, the claimer of rational thinking.

Men arent the only ones with offensive bodyodors.

>>821178
>36 year old autistic indonesian playong on a minecraft server with a coloradan 19 year old that thinks itallian brainrot and 67 is the peak of comedy or u/donavin aged 63 giving advice on the best fishing hooks to use to u/ujjh aged 26 =/= sex and serious intemate relationships shaped by socital infulunces (often patriarchical and pedophilic)

Youre using generational stereotypes to justify your argument and your reaction pics especially show it.

File: 1788639486424-9.jpg (359.93 KB, 832x1248, 1787563831407-4.jpg)

>>821148
Whatever wench. Just admit that you’re jealous that you didn’t get BPC when you just reached the double digits.

Unless you can prove that every interpersonal relationship in history is some power struggle with constant struggle sessions of the kind seen in African American households, the notion that there’s this light years chasm between an adult and a “child” (whatever the fuck that even means), let alone a 35 yo incel and a slutty 12 yo woman, that is somehow inherent to that very age gap you arbitrarily abhor isn’t even materialistic, let alone Marxist.

It’s just female jealousy but intellectualised into heterophobia.

>>821206
>Gash Gash Gash · The Gap Band

>>821211
Gap Band was up there with Rick james with that unique blend of disco, funk, and electronic.

>>821215
Irony is, thats how i feel youre acting like. Your soyjak/gigachad pics and generational stereotypes are all based purely on someone who internalised cariactures.

File: 1788640073672-3.png (95.7 KB, 448x658, IMG_6278.png)

>>821204
Continuing with you will be about as fruitful as hitting my head on the wall, so all i will point out is that you have not once responded to any my agurments
>>821207
What? There arent boomers that is into fishing on reddit? Lmao
>>821210
Lame xitter bait slop

I dunno what is happening but I think whatever it is it couldn't hurt with more Gap Band.

>>821218
Continuing with you will be about as fruitful as hitting my head on the wall, so all i will point out is that you have not once responded to any my agurments

I have responded to your arguments. Youre just wanting to shill your cariactures.

Youre already acting like some moralfag whom would bash their own head against a wall for a few minutes out of pure indignation.
>What? There arent boomers that is into fishing on reddit? Lmao

There are. Youre deliberately baiting the question.

>>821222
Post some Rick James

>>821218
Irony is, the pic you posted is exactly the way youre acting

>>821225
>>821225
>Post some Rick James
I'll give you some Mary Jane Girls.

>>821228
Provided to YouTube by Universal Music Group

All Night Long · Mary Jane Girls

Mary Jane Girls

℗ 1983 UMG Recordings, Inc.

Released on: 1983-01-01

Producer, Composer Lyricist: Rick James

None of you faggots have any corresponding anything in the last 20-30 years let alone 1983.l

The problem with shit like >>820362 is that it presumes that there’s an obvious delineation between “adult” and “child”, when in reality the line has often been blurry and more socially contingent than race and gender are.

There’s also the obvious fact that the average heterosexual male is attracted to фоідс below the magic age line, which raises the question as to what is deemed “pedophilic” or not, and whether making it taboo has done more harm than good, as evidenced by how the liberal taboo on adult-minor sex rn is breaking down much like the liberal taboo on conspiracy theories. Both emotional exhaustion over it and the general meltdown of the western world are leading to the subconscious normalisation of minor attraction, especially as edgelords begin to look at the pedo taboo as their next target after being bored with their current shenanigans. This rebellious spirit can also be observed in more subconscious forms, such as the normalisation of cuckoldry within the right due to society making it such a massive taboo. Censorship is futile against it, and there’s nothing we can do about it.

TL;DR: You can kill the man, but not the evolutionary impulse behind it: https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2023/nov/20/child-sexual-abuse-study-finds-94-of-australian-men-report-having-offended-against-a-child

https://wiki.yesmap.net/wiki/images/FreundCostell.png

Ok, I'll be trutful. I have no idea what I was posting in response to in the middle of this thread and the Jewdie Allen and his Asian child-bride. I don't even give a fuck about that. That's between her and him. None of you have yet separated them and I have to say there are many worse things going on then this chick opening her pussy to him. I'll let them be.

File: 1788641520680-3.jpeg (252.55 KB, 1700x905, IMG_6285.jpeg)

>>821227
Yeah, what about it?

>>820491
Imagine being a moralfag whilst having the pfp of North Korea, a racialist socialist ethno-state with an age of consent of 15 that forcibly aborts any mixed-ethnicity baby.

File: 1788642564309-2.png (329.42 KB, 1184x965, Agecuck_soyjak_meme.png)

>>821237
Playing with dolls doesn’t make your non-arguments better.

>>821244
>menstruation doesn't mean that it is time to get pregnant
literally true. Both because it can start as soon as twelve and because it is the least likely time of the cycle for fertilization to work.

File: 1788643557103-0-0.png (70.13 KB, 910x604, IMG_4150.png)

File: 1788643557103-0-1.png (87.17 KB, 912x597, IMG_4149.png)

>>820362
Put most straight men on that list then

>>821246
If you bleed, you’re ready to breed. Simple as.

File: 1788643644010-5.png (3.52 KB, 128x128, IMG_6286.png)

>>821244
>i will build a time machine to go back in time and throw my great grandfather in a woodchipper because he married my grandma when she was 15
>unironically believes teenagers are children

>>821248
>you can run a marathon as soon as you can walk

File: 1788644352897-4.jpg (170.52 KB, 600x844, yes-yes-00951dd7ff.jpg)


>>821249
Low effort trolling. Still no scientific evidence that sex harms kids btw


>>821200
>>821205
So, we've got
  • Women bleed and smell, can't be trusted and therefore aren't hot
  • Women are hot as soon as legal, like fresh bread


Anyone who agecucks is probably projecting or is gay, or both

File: 1788644626559-3.png (168.62 KB, 742x560, 1661974044903.png)


File: 1788644740045-3.png (800.47 KB, 1920x1080, IMG_6290.png)


>>821259
>Low effort trolling. Still no scientific evidence that sex harms kids btw
That creates suicides under 30 and all kinds of unnecessary personality disorders. it's more ethical to suspend human rights for pedos.

I think we've got the real pedos posting now so we've got a Truthy answer to the question. Adult age gaps aren't pedo because the real thing exists.

File: 1788645024867-2.png (695.35 KB, 627x799, 45892658276.png)

>>821262
>like fresh bread
>People are like commodities for me to consoom
How nice of you to out yourself as a Porkoid. Please face the wall

>>821268
>How nice of you to out yourself as a Porkoid. Please face the wall
She's not going to fuck you, you cuckold! Go shoot your own mother for being a creep to women for loving you instead, cucktard.

>>821265
Nice try pedocel, but guess what? Brain undevelopment and liberal contract theory means that all age gap dating is CHILD RAPE

Deal with it😎

File: 1788647759784-4.jpg (793.86 KB, 1220x2196, 6137742_1444445.jpg)

>>821264
>>821263
It’s funny how the so-called “marxists” here act like theists in all but name, and radlib theists to boot. I guess one can only truly be an atheist by being a Marxist.

And of course, the irrationality of the users here is in clear display when it comes to intergenerational intimacy involving an arbitrary age gap the users here subjectively deem as being wrong. Same goes for their deep-rooted ageism where race is a social construct but not age despite the fact that racial differences are more biologically contingent than chronological age is.

I genuinely find it hilarious how the same people that thump their chests over rationality and science in the most superficial way imaginable, only to be give in to irrationality when it comes to something as tame as minor attraction.
Pretty much the arguments against minor attraction and adult-youth intimacy are as fallacious as they can get to downright false. A big talking point is lack of experience by minors. Ok, so let's give them the experience, because how else will they learn if not from experts?
Another one is about “power imbalance“, which when used in this context amounts to an is-ought fallacy that I’ve yet to see anyone resolve, especially as the same dofooses refuse to explain how a stranger adult supposedly has more power over a teen or a child. if physical force is all it takes, then why shouldn’t heterosexual relationships in general be banned or for that matter relationships between normal people and non-abled ones? A lot of essentialism goes on when theists argue with that point.

Another fallacious talking point still is the informed consent argument, which is dumb as ya'll think kids can get abortions but somehow sex is this super uber dangerous thing, like it's clear you're even more puritanical than either the average Bible-thumper or talibanist. But let’s face it: There’s nothing in the concept of “informed consent” that is inherently exclusionary to young people unless you’re into double standards, although to date there’s no evidence that informed consent alone is predictive for harm from a sexual act.

Another one is quite hilarious, and it’s about minor attraction (i.e., hebephilia, pedophilia, nepiophilia, ephebophilia) being a “mental disorder”. Apart from the fact that not even the DSM-V classifies it as such, y’all wouldn’t be so hysterical about it if it was indeed a mental disorder and would treats MAPs the same way as paraplegics. Moving on…

”Herr derp muh brain development“: Every mammalian species is capable of engaging in sex, and the average 9 yo human is smarter than most mammalians, so “muh brainzz“ doesn’t hold water, especially given that sex in itself isn’t particularly difficult and most of the issues like pregnancy are either entirely avoidable with proper sex ed or overhyped with the advances of modern healthcare minimising many of the risk. As for teen pregnanc, here’s a useful resource: https://wiki.yesmap.net/wiki/Research:_Teen_pregnancy

Speaking of animals as well, I should note that bonobos and chimpanzees (the non-human animals closest to humans) have been observed having sex with their young with little to no apparent trauma from the latter, indicating that there’s no evolutionary basis for intergenerational intimacy being inherently harmful but instead with said notion being entirely a modern social construct. Indeed, it’s strange how for all the supposed harms of age gap love touted by puritans today that no source on the alleged harms exists before the 70s in-spite of various historical materials lamenting war and famine since antiquity. Funny that, eh?

Read these: https://www.leonvoss.com/p/a-look-at-roman-marriage-ages

https://wiki.yesmap.net/wiki/Research:_Intergenerational_Relationships_in_History

"Her body her choice" but not until she reached the magic age line is not a tenable position, much less because such magic age of adulthood/maturity can pretty much change to fit societal norms, as it already happened before and today’s age. Legality ≠ Morality, after all, as morality is a spook. Considering how arbitrary the age of consent is in every jurisdiction and given how in many countries marital rape is technically legal and gay anal is illegal (thus marriage = consent to sex, but two men can’t consent to sex with each other) only goes to show the lack of objective standards behind the age of consent, although the same goes for puberty as the baseline for sexual maturity as there’s hardly a difference between a 9 yo and 12 yo as far as sexual performance is concerned.
And before you throw ”le heckin science” at me, I'll let you know that Rind 1998 and Ulrich 2022 already debunked much of what passes as orthodoxy in CSA, where correlation = causation is such a common standard people actually made a list out of it: https://wiki.yesmap.net/wiki/Research:_Methodological_flaws_and_syndrome_construction

To give a sample of actual science:

>Lahtinen, H., et al., (2018). "Children's disclosures of sexual abuse in a population-based sample," Child abuse and Neglect, Feb 2018; 76: 84-94.

>Note: 2.4% of the sample (12 and 15 year olds) reported CSA experiences, of which the majority found them to be positive. For the boys, the experience was often positive (71%) vs (9% negative), whereas for the girls it was less often so evaluated (26%) vs (46%) negative. The most popular reason for not disclosing the contact to an adult was considering the experience not serious enough (41%). Despite a CSA sample of 256, the authors bizarrely refused to test for statistical significance of trends.

So where does most of the harm come from in the cases where the sex in question wasn’t coercive or forced? The answer comes in the form of secondary harm, be it iatrogenic harm, or family background:

>Nelson, Joan A. (1986). "Incest: Self-Report Findings From a Nonclinical Sample," Journal of Sex Research, 22(4), 473-474.

>"No force of any kind was found in 49% (68) of the reports. Yet 30% (14) of these no-force experiences were described as negative. The individuals described their otherwise consensual experiences as affected negatively by guilt or fear of social or parental disapproval, an issue which emerged repeatedly in the interviews and written responses, both positive and negative. Approximately half of the female respondents and 4% of the male respondents stated that they continued to experience conflict in regard to their incest experiences, usually associated with, if not a direct result of, guilt, even though many of the relationships had terminated many years before the report. One respondent commented, "I went crazy trying to understand how anything so good could be so bad.""

>Susan A.Clancy (2010) The Trauma Myth: The Truth About the Sexual Abuse of Children–and Its Aftermath

>"Victims reconceptualized the formerly “confusing and weird experiences” and understood them for what they were—sexual in nature and clearly wrong. Only at this point—when the sexual abuse is fully apprehended— does it begin to damage victims."

>Nash, M.R., Hulsey, T.L., Sexton, M.C., et al. (1993). "Long-term sequelae of childhood sexual abuse: Perceived family environment, psychopathology, and dissociation," Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, >61:1–8. "Our first hypothesis, that sexual abuse itself is associated with broad-spectrum, general psychological impairment, independent of the effects of perceived family environment, was not supported by the findings. Perceived family environment appears to be an important mediating variable in determining general level of adult psychological distress, so important that we found no significant residual effect for abuse per se on the extent of general psychological impairment. For some victims, sexual abuse may be a signal variable that the home environment is profoundly and broadly pathogenic. Subsequent adult impairment may be an effect not only of abuse but of the context in which it was embedded."


Inb4 ”You’re misquoting Susan”: Her conclusion is objectively wrong, since she already admits that much of the trauma is in itself based on self-perception, so her solution is to literally traumatise them for moralistic reasons. Y’know, like how conversion therapists tell gay people that what they experienced was wrong to induce trauma in their “patients” as part of the conversion therapy.

So yh, I can't sympathise with the con side since the arguments they make are just so fallacious, some of them are plain metaphysical (e.g., "childhood innocence" being taken away or whatever). I mean, innocence to a child is like virginity to a woman: the only thing you can do with it is lose it.

So, anyone cares to give me a logical argument for adult-youth intimacy being wrong at all times that isn't either an appeal to authority or some other fallacy, let alone metaphysical mumbling?

>>821275
>Nice try pedocel, but guess what? Brain undevelopment and liberal contract theory means that all age gap dating is CHILD RAPE
>Deal with it😎
>muddying the waters
You might be a real pedo.

We're fucked because women's rights led to pedo takeover, kind of like how GamerGate led to Hormuz.

>>821275
The brain development theory was based on incomplete research
What happens at 25-30 is neurocognitve deceleration not completion

>>821275
>Nice try pedocel, but guess what? Brain undevelopment and liberal contract theory means that all age gap dating is CHILD RAPE
He's mocking us 🤢

>>821276
>Did not read peedo

pedophilia is just one particular rather loosely-defined category of the great diverse colorful spectrum that is sexual abuse and you can't really define it by the behavior itself so much as the the intent of the perpetrator, i.e. whether or not someone is consciously or subconsciously applying some type of manipulative leverage to use another person for sex. pedophilia just happens to be one category where the leverage is more plainly obvious and empirically provable in a court of law - a child by default doesn't have the emotional capacity to understand the nature and implications of sex, there's no ifs ands or buts about that other than where to draw the line between child and adult which varies from jurisdiction to jurisdication but the global average is 16. this is basically just a legal hack, set an arbitrary cut-off point to just take care of a huge load of cases that are more cut-and-dry to free up time and resources to handle all the others. if some old pervert waits until the day of some girl's 16th birthday to have sex with her that doesn't necessarily mean he's off the hook, it just means he's slipped through the first net and now the prosecutor has to delve into the case more deeply and get more information and look for any evidence of coercion or premeditation or past abusive behavior, and the defense attorney now has more of a legal foothold and can start delving into 16-year-old girl's personal life and figure out how to impeach her character and make her look like a whore or a junkie who was asking for it. this is how justice is done.


>>821285
>pedophilia is just one particular rather loosely-defined category of the great diverse colorful spectrum
  • Above statutory = Nothing wrong
  • Pubescent = Get some years
  • Pre-pubescent = Get the noose or some other humane execution

It doesn't have to be that complicated, or else you're performing to some Freudian complex.

>>821287
You’re confusing pedophilia for hebephilia
They’re not the same
Both wrong but not the same

If you think they are, then anti Zionism is the same as anti-Jewry.

>>821301
>If you think they are, then anti Zionism is the same as anti-Jewry.
Why does the water have to be so muddy?

>>821287

another factor, probably the most important factor of all, is the skin tone of the defendant. a whole team of white high school football jocks could rape a 15 year old girl on video camera while wearing their football jerseys with their last names on them and worst case scenario they'll get off with probation and community service, but if a black guy gets accused of assaulting a teenage white girl he's getting 100 years no chance of parole plus a $1000 contempt citation for pleading not guilty and wasting the court's time on frivolous hearings.

>>821285
More liberal BS…
>pedophilia is just one particular rather loosely-defined category of the great diverse colorful spectrum that is sexual abuse

Pedophilia is merely a sexuality, and a queer one at that. Calling it “sexual abuse” is no different than calling Lenin a racist for not centring the lives of POCs’ lived experiences or whatever.

>pedophilia just happens to be one category where the leverage is more plainly obvious and empirically provable in a court of law


Nope

>a child by default doesn't have the emotional capacity to understand the nature and implications of sex


[citation needed]

Also, please define what a child without appealing to legalisms. We here are materialists, not idealists, so you’ll have to do better tricks, shitlib.

>varies from jurisdiction to jurisdication

Then you should be aware that it varies from puberty to 21 across the whole world, thereby invalidating the AoC’s validity as an objective metric, for it has no other objective standards beyond vibes.

Thus we have to ask why is it that such a lousy and arbitrary law is pushed specifically pushed onto adult-minor coupling despite lack of evidence that it’s somehow any worst than peer-peer relationships. After all, I’ve yet to see you lot justify anti-miscegenation laws under the same logic despite interracial relationships being more prone to DV and dysfunctionality.

>this is basically just a legal hack, set an arbitrary cut-off point to just take care of a huge load of cases that are more cut-and-dry to free up time and resources to handle all the others.


Weird how that only applies to age-gap couples, but not to the average couple in the first world. One could your point to its logical conclusion and make the case for an absolute age of consent of 45 and arrest any man who had sex with a woman below the age of 45, for example. Y’know, to take of the workload as you say.

And both your position and my hypothetical are perfectly valid as they rest on the same evidentiary standards.

>this is how justice is done.


For a moralfag that wants their bourgeois moralism be legislated into law, I guess.

>>821265
>That creates suicides under 30 and
[citation needed]

And no, lazy tactics like implying causation from correlation alone aren’t scientific.

>morally
Spooky

>>821452
Read german ideology

Melania is 15-20 years younger than Drumpf. She sometimes tries to debate him but he always molds her into an obedient little ex-yugoslav golden retriever for his own benefit. It's as if he wants to treat her like a little kid and keep her busy.

>>820362
>morality

File: 1788836421676-5.jpg (117.66 KB, 883x1024, 1788826400781746m.jpg)

Sorry Zoomers better luck next life

>>821743
Oh fuck this is real. I think that chick might have an old man fetish.

>>821743
Age gap is based. Get it girl.

>liking skin without wrinkles
>liking shaved pussy, real women are hairy
>liking fit/skinny women
>liking a woman with a high sex drive and energy, real women are tired all the time and are way past enjoying sex
>liking women that don't constantly argue with you and stress you out, real women have baggage and if you cant deal with that you are a chomo

>>821751
youth, energy, innocence, drive, openess, having genuine wonder at the world, being optimistic, being flexible, being happy just by making you happy, being agreeable


all of those traits are traits of children and you are a pedophile for liking them, real women are old fat and have no sex drive

Literally this

>>821772
Are all the "women" on this thread trans? You can't just say this about Asian women.

>>821772
These people are calling 23 year olds victims of pedophilia. Pedophiles actually liking 7 year olds is beyond comprehension.

>>821790
>These people are calling 23 year olds victims of pedophilia. Pedophiles actually liking 7 year olds is beyond comprehension.
The types of people who would call liking 20 year olds pedophilia would actually aid real pedophilia to stay relevant because if it's easy to accuse, it's easy to do.

>>821791
They're all like that.

>>821772
ayo wtf

>>821798
That point >>821792 was actually about women. The women who would accuse legal age gaps of pedophilia would happily aid real pedophilia to stay relevant. They would accuse to stay relevant so they would also engage in it to stay relevant. Non-women who accuse clearly have hard drives because they have something to apologize for.

>>821798
Most people are not pedophiles actually

>>820362
>Things that are morally pedophilia
<Idpol
Thats it.

File: 1788890386281-9.png (63.46 KB, 954x531, IMG_6289.png)

Whats with ephebofags being so whiny ”waaa people think im weird waaa” dude you litteraly have the worlds most powerful men and ten thousand years of patriarchical traditions to back you up, not to mention hordes of fellow men who are inevitebally gonna come into your defense on xitter snd shit, your self pitying is only gonna cause your alls eventual downfall, not that i would mind at all LOL

File: 1788890645292-2.png (92.63 KB, 1059x929, IMG_6572.png)

>>821872
(Not to imply that women cant be ephebofags too of course)

>>821872
ephebes are scum of humanity, there's literally no difference between a 17 year old and an 18 year old aside from feeling risque from breaking the law. I feel infinitely more for the pedophile than for the ephebophile.
Trotsky once said, with Stalin, yes; with Bukharin, never. We could add, with the pedophile, yes; with the ephebophile, never.

>>821869
>Thats it.
Instead of banning things, you should invest in defeating them. You don't have jannies irl.

>>821872
>>821874
>>821897
The thread pits men and women against each other about their subjective morality over something perfectly legal. Actual monsters jump in to take advantage. This >>821791 >>821817 is also true.

Good thread!

>>821899
a 40 year old man dating a barely 18 year old woman is pedophilia. A 27 year old dating an 18 year old is just weird.

>>821905
>a 40 year old man dating a barely 18 year old woman is pedophilia
wrong. pedophilia is not a superlative for 'weird'.

>>821905
The only real problem in those two scenarios is potential lack of maturity with any of those people involved and chance for exploiting the other person due to age and experience. By the way the 18 year old could definitely exploit the older partner but they often don't .

>>821905
>>821908
>>821911
It's legal so just cuck the moralcucks

>>821848
Actually, most men are if we define “pedophilia” as attraction to people below the age of 30 years: https://www.ipce.info/library/journal-article/rind-yuill-hebephilia

File: 1788908858468-7.png (328.25 KB, 827x641, 964aed6d03b0e59a.png)

>>821905
>>821874
>>821872
Subhuman zoomercels will post shit like this and still wonder why normies DGAF about le Epstein Files or le SeePee panic.

And ofc, the obvious result of this woke honor culture has been the demonisation of male sexuality within the left, leaving sexual freedom to rightists who currently are moralfagging about sexuality much less often than leftoids that think Euphoria’s sex scenes promote pedophilia somehow 🤷‍♂️

>>821927
>Subhuman zoomercels will post shit like this and still wonder why normies DGAF about le Epstein Files or le SeePee panic.

>And ofc, the obvious result of this woke honor culture has been the demonisation of male sexuality within the left, leaving sexual freedom to rightists who currently are moralfagging about sexuality much less often than leftoids that think Euphoria’s sex scenes promote pedophilia somehow 🤷‍♂️

They're actually shutting the internet down now so that's not accurate at all

File: 1788909418203-0.png (850.67 KB, 1920x1013, IMG_4155.png)

>>821928
Too bad that it’s largely bipartisan, and that bourgeois moralism is the main justification for it

>>821929
>Too bad that it’s largely bipartisan, and that bourgeois moralism is the main justification for it
It's bipartisan against both /pol/s and most normal users of the internet, so now what?

>another pedo apologia thread on Leftypol
And these people call everyone to the right of Stalin pedos.
Just shut it down at this point.

>>822463
did you read the name, jewish nigger?

>>820362
>Being exclusively attracted to petit-women
i like chunky chicks but this part is the bait, right? why would you pedojacket someone for this?

>>821927
>subhuman zoomercels

These aren’t exclusively zoomers

>>821905
> A 27 year old dating an 18 year old is just weird.

You’re joking.
I can understand if the person was thirty seven but twenty seven is within reason.

>>821790
>>821791

They’re projecting their delayed maturity onto the young.

>>820362
Kill yourself OP… I hope you get ass raped by hundreds of black guys tomorrow.

>>822503
The OP is against pedos, but half the thread are pedo apologists though.

>>820362
>Things that are morally pedophilia whether they actually are or aren't
Spamming pedo threads in si/b/eria.

>>824099
>The OP is against pedos, but half the thread are pedo apologists though.
It's half the population. They don't like age gaps so they're muddying up the waters. They don't even care if that gives the pedos chances because it's like an ugly divorce lol.

>>824100
>Spamming pedo threads in si/b/eria.
It takes one

>>822463
Tbh Stalin is a “pedo”, at least by American, British, Australian, New Zealander, and Canadian standards: https://fstube.net/w/5jDi4SD9sXpEsMHwkx5Lf9

>>824148
poople because they full of poo

File: 1789575620697-6.jpeg (109.07 KB, 1024x712, IMG_3683.jpeg)

>>822463
>Kek, leftists are the ultimate goyslaves
>What, Mr. Schwab? Sex with anyone under 25 now pedophilia? Got it!

Total zoomer genocide when?

>>824107
>>824148
>>824181
>>824202
Gooning to child porn is not free speech.

>>824540
Why not?

File: 1789652993762-2.png (715.57 KB, 562x657, 1782953074583u.png)

>>824181
>Gooning to tranime 'P is a hecking freedomerino and an essential part of free speech o algo sars
Leftypolcacas…

>>824548
You are literally posting an image generated by Jewish AI, you are destroying the West with your existence.


>>824555
Speak human, dude



>>824686
eminem been real quiet since this dropped

>>820438
This site literally has /pol/ in its name its not surprising a large amount of the user base is reactionary

>>824697
Idk is anyone actually taking this topic seriously

>>824181
>>824552
>If you're against pedos, you're a Jewish slave
>I'm resisting le Big Brother by gooning to child porn
Lefty/pol/ACKS not even attempting to beat the allegations

>>824697
>This site literally has /pol/ in its name its not surprising a large amount of the user base is reactionary
It's a fake /pol/ because people get banned over bullshit sensitivities. 4/pol/ is an equal opportunity ragebait containment board.

I LOVE OPPAI LOLIS THOUGHEVER!!! IS IT MORALLY WRONG TO DO SO???!!!

>>821112
Don't care. I'll still goon to busty teens.

>morals
word choice in an opening post matters, comrade!

Daily reminder that attraction to children and abuse of children are surprisingly uncorrelated. Many child sexual abusers have no attraction, and many attracted to children don't cause nor want to harm children. This distinction is important to anyone who actually wants to protect children, especially considering how prevalent the two issues are in the general population.

see also - the Left-Right political split in pedophilia support communities. actually, don't see it. it's fucking revolting. but the point is i'd sooner hire a left-wing pedophile as my daughter's tutor than leave them alone for ten seconds with a right-wing pedophile.

>>824818
You were invented by populist politicians and feminazis in the 90s.

>>825197
>>825202
>>825205
>>825206
>>825212
Leftypolyps will say this and then call everyone to the right of Stalin an Epsteinite Moloch worshipper.

File: 1789907278761-3.jpg (796.68 KB, 2726x1532, truth-nuke-meme.jpg)

>>824818
>If you're against pedos, you're a Jewish slave

Who do you think is best pedo? Pedomommy or Greeks?

>>825287
>Who do you think is best pedo?
Any pedo who doesnt spam its shit here.

>>825287
>16
>already balding
Brvtal

File: 1789909907956-6-0.jpeg (13.67 KB, 512x288, IMG_5698.jpeg)

File: 1789909907956-6-1.jpeg (529.67 KB, 1576x2100, IMG_5696.jpeg)

>>825299
>>16
>>already balding
How do I even fix this?

>>825206
>>825212
>>825285
Power politics >>>/ufo/1613
No one likes evil monsters so they are easy to control but they keep escaping containment. It's real world W40K shit.

>>820362
>Things which are pedophilia in my book :

>About half of male sexuality, with gays being particularly brazen

>An indeterminate, but ever present portion of liberal feminism
>Misogyny
>Arranged marriages
>The indeterminate amount of niche sexual identitarians grooming evangelizing enlightening minors and young adults online
>Most of religion WRT minors and young people
>Honorary pedo mention for "chastity vow" shit that some christoids do
>An indeterminate, but significant portion of school PE curriculum
>Much music/fashion trends aimed at minors
>Much of music/fashion trends aimed at young adults
>Homeschooling
>Helicopter parenting
>Beauty pageants
>Most of corporal punishment

>>825302
Dutasteride

File: 1789975435397-7.png (144.87 KB, 495x620, ClipboardImage.png)

>>825283
>why yes, I love busty lolis
>yes, everyone to the right of Stalin is an Epsteinite Moloch worshipper

File: 1789975666537-9.png (82.63 KB, 554x554, ClipboardImage.png)

>>825287
>Who do you think is best pedo?
Me

>>825441
Just settle on a reasonable number and make a couple of laws criminalizing depicting pedo bullshit. Anyone that unironically messes with that shit is pedo themselves and that includes all age concern trolls.

What's with so many far-leftoids on here and elsewhere on the internet batting for pedos?

>>825971
because anti-pedo hysteria is a negative-autism score trait.

This uyghur thread is straight antimatter from Lassalle Hell.

File: 1790156874896-7.jpeg (287.58 KB, 1069x696, IMG_8738.jpeg)

>>825975
<The strongest predictors of social distance towards people with pedophilia were affective reactions to this group (anger and, inversely, associated, pity) and the political attitude of right-wing authoritarianism (Study 1).
<The results of our survey correspond with common scientific findings on public stigma, such as the fact that people with a higher educational level show fewer tendencies to report stigmatizing opinions (for an overview, see Angermeyer & Dietrich, 2006).
https://sci-hub.ru/storage/2024/2633/c5593c54362a141ae36fd97a07a0c78b/jahnke2014.pdf
>>825984
W Lassalle

>>826002
>Conflating homosexuality with pedophila
OYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY

What si/b/eria needs right now is more pedo spam threads. Lets put this back on first page.

>>826299
Schweitzer was a pederast

But I like short women


Unique IPs: 117

[Return][Go to top] [Catalog] | [Home][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM / ufo / 420 ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]