how can one woman singlehandedly generate so much seethe from both rightoids and leftoids alike? i kneel…
Who is this?
>>822747>how can one woman singlehandedly generate so much seethe from both rightoids and leftoids alike? i kneel…Post what she's done
she makes comics for people on facebook and everyone just endlessly seethes on facebook even more than xitter
Post her nudes.
>>822750She does OnlyFans
>>822747>she makes comics for people on facebook and everyone just endlessly seethes on facebook even more than xitterIt /pol/, well a type of pol. Poast!
>>822768No evidence
>>822747Comic artist popular with quirk chunguses
>>822747I recall a rightoid threatening to have her fired over Kirk but what about her made left leaning people seethe exactly?
>>822799damn so not only does she make based comics shes also a stacy? i fucking kneel…
>>822861
she's got that alcoholic female body
>>822861
She's not even hot. A mid cat mom bod is what redditoids are throwing their money at? I don't get it.
>>822861
weird ass, anti-social ass post to make. kill yourself
>and leftoids alike
Twitter users don't count. "Leftist" twitter users lean rightward enough to willingly use twitter.
>>822881>thinks weird ass memes make you look like any less of a weirdo terminally online retardmy prescription stands
>>822861
she's just plain, even more plain than the so-called girl next door types, but I bet she's a kinky slut and therein lies the appeal.
Her comics are really basic, not really to get riled up about either way, she comes across as your average american lib (and should therefore be shot with the result them)
>>822886Idk if she's plain, she's pretty hot, but yeah definitely the appeal is the kinkiness
>>822861
I thought she would wear glasses. What a disappointment.
>>822908lol, whats the big deal. not like he was wearing it
>>822911No, no you don't get it, anything sexual must be done several miles away from any child or any stuff owned by a child or else it's pedophilia.
Why was that swimsuit photo deleted?
>>822943Have you considered that when it comes to Anon's opinion of you, perhaps your particular choice of pictures have more weight than the inital reason you posted them?
Also downplaying abuse doesn't really help your case.
>>822946>your particular choice of pictures have more weight than the inital reason you posted themProvocation is a good thing.
>>822947>I'll let them think that I'm a temporary embarrassed sex pest, that'll show them!There is a point where owning da libs become pathological and you clearly passed it.
>>822948its an irony poisoned zoomerboi. just let him cope
>>822747I'm sorry, who even is this and why should we care?
>>822953Some people just wanna have fun
>>822953>its an irony poisoned zoomerboi. just let him copeIf you irony poison them, you can camouflage your madness
>>822915 heehee
>>822834agreed, seethe us absolutely the wrong word🥵
I love how much she makes the chvds seethe, even if her art is mid
>>823207>I love how much she makes the chvds seethe, even if her art is midIt's cool that there's an internet economy for art. Sad that they're shutting it all down.
>>823214>Looks me in the eyes incels and tell me again about women's "impossibly high standards".Post that on an incel space and talk to them about what they want in a woman. I think their first problem with her would be that she's on Patreon.
>>823216They are incels, what they want isnt particularly relevant as nobody wants them.
>>823218>They are incels, what they want isnt particularly relevant as nobody wants them.Is this the trans-chud war again?
>>823214Who are you quoting? Use < instead
>>823224>use the reddit arrows correctly!!!no
>>823226I assure you, those arrows appeared long before Reddit.
>>823214His wife is whoring herself out online and draws comics of him getting cucked.
>>823232>His wife is whoring herself out online and draws comics of him getting cucked.>>823214>>823218<I think their first problem with her would be that she's on Patreon.Told you so
I wonder how her kids feel about her posting nudes online
>>823216>>823232So she is hot enough for people to pay for privilege of looking at her, while he is some fat schlubby guy.
>>823242>So she is hot enough for people to pay for privilege of looking at her, while he is some fat schlubby guy.That's all oofy doofies get
>>823243More than they deserve!
>>823245>More than they deserve!They actually deserve it for being good
>>823240Probably won't care until someone at their school figures out and bully them about it.
>>823251They are mkre likely to get bullied over their dad being cuck than mom being hot.
>>823249Truly it is over. There is nothing out there. You're kicking asphalt in the middle of nowhere. It never began.
>>823252Mom is not hot so that tracks.
>>823242yeah never understood 'your girl posts thirst traps lol', how is that not a self own. he gets to both actually fuck her and spend your money that you spend to look at her
>>823352Because they operate under the logic a woman is a property and letting anyone lust after her is like giving the key to your safe to every robber in the vicinity.
>>823355This. But it's still not really consistent because by this sort of logic it's the people jerking off who are the cucks who just have to watch.
>>823352She's trying to get other men's attention, implying that your attention is not enough, hence the insecurity.
>>823242>So she is hot enough for people to pay for privilege of looking at her, while he is some fat schlubby guy.Yeah, he looks incel
>>823214>Looks me in the eyes incels and tell me again about women's "impossibly high standards".I can't look at you in the eyes but he looks humiliated. Inceldom is better than that but he's got a ball and chains, so it's not his choice. Those are demonic standards.
>>823471The poor make up looks silly but what in his expression screams shame according to you?
FoidGODS won.
>>823487>The poor make up looks silly but what in his expression screams shame according to you?Is this a rhetorical question?
>>823491No enlighten me. Preferably without resorting to vibes.
>>823493>No enlighten me. Preferably without resorting to vibes.Consult this thread
>>816763 >>823471if everywhere you go people smell maybe you just shat yourself
>>823495>if everywhere you go people smell maybe you just shat yourselfHe doesn't look like he smells of shit
>>823471>Inceldom is better than that but he's got a ball and chains, so it's not his choiceDeity level cope, I'm sure it's miserable having a relatively hot girlfriend seems pretty kinky who will dress up for you and sells nudes online for money you get to spend on your own toys
>>823494Hundred of posts repeating how the posters find it icky and they don't like it do not answer my question.
Where do you see the shame in that man's expression?
>>823496real autism speaking here
>>823502>real autism speaking hereIs he gay?
>>823507Anon projects shame on some guy seemingly having fun wearing silly make up because he himself would be toroughly devastated if his hypothetic gf dared not surrendering to him the exclusivity of her image rights.
>>823517>Anon projects shame on some guy seemingly having fun wearing silly make up because he himself would be toroughly devastated if his hypothetic gf dared not surrendering to him the exclusivity of her image rights.Porky if you do, incel if you don't. Either is better than him.
>>823521hope your manage to make your wife wear a burqa if you feel that about her being seen by other (inb4 noooo it's her vajaja it's different)
>>823521Except being an incel and a wannabe Porky is the same option here.
>>823501He has no shame. That’s the problem. NTA btw
>>823523That’s reductive. There’s a difference between a woman’s hair and face being seen in public, and her performing sex acts for the public’s viewing.
>>823573>There’s a difference between a woman’s hair and face being seen in public, and her performing sex acts for the public’s viewingYeah there is, but your specific objection to it seem to be rooted in the same sentiment as muslim men forcing burqas on women.
>>822898She is Canadian actually
>>823596>your specific objection to it seem to be rooted in the same sentiment as muslim men forcing burqas on women.And do you find anything wrong with that sentiment if it’s in moderation? Are you against say, public nudity laws?
>>823689>Are you against say, public nudity laws?NTA but yes, actually.
>>823689>Are you against say, public nudity laws?No because its mostly going to be bunch of slobs and uggos taking advantage of permissive public nudity.
>>823716So you agree with the normative premise that the human body ought to be regulated to some extent. That doesn’t make you equivalent to Islamic extremists, so why claim the man who doesn’t want his wife prostituting herself online is? At the end of the day, morality and normativity are all subjective.
>>822877They are just serving for pussy. They should just fap to Candy Doll’s Laura B pics tbh
>>823721>So you agree with the normative premise that the human body ought to be regulated to some extentMy premise is exact opposite of yours, you want to cover women because they incite lust or whatever, I want to cover the things that make public places unsightly. Which is in no way an equivalent, the same way a graffiti art on a mural is not an equivalent to plastering goatse on a billboard.
>That doesn’t make you equivalent to Islamic extremists, so why claim the man who doesn’t want his wife prostituting herself online is?You are not her husband though, are you? If she was your wife, then not wanting her to post her nudes online would be completely reasonable, thats between you and her. Policing sexual expression of women you are not in relationship with though, that is a reactionary sentiment.
>>823694Cause puritanism and shit. you can't tell me that if we all knew what most bodies look like there wouldn't be less body image psychosis going on.
I'm not dumb enough to think we could just start going out naked right now or anything, it's more of a principal thing. Bodies are not obscene or offensive until we all decide they are.
>>823911>Cause puritanism and shit. you can't tell me that if we all knew what most bodies look like there wouldn't be less body image psychosis going on. >I'm not dumb enough to think we could just start going out naked right now or anything, it's more of a principal thing. Bodies are not obscene or offensive until we all decide they are.Be real. A lot of bodies out there are dogshit.
>>823912that's part of my point though. if we were exposed to the reality of that more often there wouldn't be so many of us obsessed with things we have little to no control over. Hating the body you live in seems miserable, I think it'd be less common if we knew how many different bodies existed. it's not something I'm actively fighting for, and I think we have too much cultural baggage to just dismiss nudity laws, that'd be a bad idea. I'm just saying, there's no reason for us to be so weird about it.
>>823920>that's part of my point though. if we were exposed to the reality of that more often there wouldn't be so many of us obsessed with things we have little to no control over. Hating the body you live in seems miserable, I think it'd be less common if we knew how many different bodies existed. it's not something I'm actively fighting for, and I think we have too much cultural baggage to just dismiss nudity laws, that'd be a bad idea. I'm just saying, there's no reason for us to be so weird about it.I'd probably vomit. Most people are too time-poor to actually take care of their bodies so they end up obese and grotesque. Just let them keep their humanity.
>>823937I'm being honest. Most people have uniquely dogshit bodies and then there's the fucking smell.
>>823772>you want to cover women because they incite lust or whateverWhen did I say I want this?
>My premise is exact opposite of yours, you want to cover women because they incite lust or whatever, I want to cover the things that make public places unsightly.The underlying normative premise is the same. You are in favor of regulating peoples' bodies, just not to the same extent. The purpose might be different, but the premise isn't.
>Policing sexual expression of women you are not in relationship with though, that is a reactionary sentiment.Not necessarily.
>>823911Right. But under actual existing conditions, human genitalia is often synonymous with sex. By walking out in public butt-naked, you subject people to sexual stimuli without their consent, including children who are incapable of giving consent in the first place.
>Hating the body you live in seems miserableThis is actually the result of hyper-individualism caused by a competitive mode of production. Those who can't compete in the social market become alienated.
>I think it'd be less common if we knew how many different bodies existed.Internet pornography is everywhere. You already see all sorts of different bodies.
>>823951>This is actually the result of hyper-individualism caused by a competitive mode of production. Those who can't compete in the social market become alienated.People should be forced to participate in the village culture. Anyone that tries to be unique deserves an immediate backhand or fucking lynched.
>>823954The bourgeois largely controls its proles by compliance and co-option. Exploitation and alienation will exist so long as the majority of people tolerate it. You can't force people to do anything without their compliance. Individualism reinforces this dynamic, which is why you get "my body, my choice" retards like this guy:
>>823523"Individual freedom" is the morphine for collective slavery. Negative freedoms that undermine positive freedoms should be eliminated.
>>823951>But under actual existing conditions, human genitalia is often synonymous with sexYeah yeah, that's what I mean buy "we can't just start doing it now" Like I said somewhere else, I'm not gonna fight for this as a real thing, I just take offense to how all our bodies are made to seem obscene.
>Internet pornography is everywhere. You already see all sorts of different bodies.I haven't watched porn in years, plenty of people don't, and you're being silly if you think pornography has the variety of realistic representation I'm talking about. If anything, it's part of the problem, you don't see a lot of normal looking people fucking.
>>823965>I haven't watched porn in years, plenty of people don'tNot true.
How Many People Actually Watch Porn?
https://www.psychologytoday.com/ca/blog/everyone-on-top/202309/how-much-porn-do-americans-really-watch<[…]<By comparing the amount of traffic to the three highest globally ranked pornography sites (Xvideos, Pornhub, and XNXX) with several prominent digital media properties, it remains true that Americans visit porn sites at astronomical rates.<Using a set of metrics that includes indicators of monthly unique visitors as well as monthly pageviews, the authors found that the top three pornography sites are more highly ranked than the most well-known household name sites (Amazon, Netflix, Yahoo) as well as those that are the most up and coming (TikTok, OpenAI/ChatGPT, Zoom).<Exactly how great is this disparity? In a word, huge. Xvideos, the top-ranked pornography site, had 700,000,000 more total visits than Amazon and 900,000,000, 1,100,000,000, 1,300,000,000, 1,500,000,000, and 1,800,000,000 more total visits than TikTok, OpenAI, LinkedIn, Netflix, and The Weather Channel, respectively.<The authors also looked at bounce rates, which indicate the percentage of visitors who leave a website after only viewing one page. They found that pornography sites (Xvideos, Pornhub, XNXX, and Xhamster) had lower bounce rates than non-pornographic sites. They also found that the pornography sites XNXX and Pornhub had higher pages per visit figures than nonpornographic sites.<In other words, not only do people visit porn sites more often than non-porn sites, but they tend to stick around once there.<[…]
>you're being silly if you think pornography has the variety of realistic representation I'm talking about. If anything, it's part of the problem, you don't see a lot of normal looking people fucking.Why not? The vast majority of pornography on the Internet is indeed created by regular people, not professional studios using actors and actresses. Anyone with a smartphone and an Internet connection can record themselves having sex and post it online. The age of Playboy has long passed.
>>823973I don't know that that proves there aren't plenty of people not watching porn, I still definitely don't, and I still don't believe porn is offering the widest range of representation. But more importantly, this is a weirdly specific part of the discussion to get hung up on, and ultimately not worth changing my position over. You're missing my main point, treating our bodies as obscene creates alienation from our bodies, demystifying nudity would be a big win for us all.
>>823975>I don't know that that proves there aren't plenty of people not watching pornMore Americans are on porn sites than they're on Amazon, TikTok, and Netflix. How is that not "plenty?"
>I still don't believe porn is offering the widest range of representationWhat are you basing this assumption on?
>You're missing my main point, treating our bodies as obscene creates alienation from our bodies, demystifying nudity would be a big win for us all.Except nudity already is demystified. Pornography is everywhere, most people consume it, it's largely produced by regular people with regular bodies. Like I said earlier, alienation is caused by inherent competition. Good looks are high in demand and low in supply, thus they have a high exchange-value in the social market place. Conversely, ugly looks are low in demand and high in supply, thus they have a very low exchange-value. This is the basis of lookism.
>>823998>nudity already is demystifiedwrong, that's the whole point of this silly discussion, if it were, I wouldn't have said it should be unbanned as it wouldn't be banned. Christ you're stupid.
>>824018>>823998also, piss off with this dumbass supply and demand of hotness take, you sound seventeen and lonely. the average person is attractive that's why there's eight billion of us numbnuts
>>823998>>824018Go to gym and get yourself a good fit. Start learning social skills. You're wasting your life on gossip and commentary on an involuntary prole board instead of actually going after what you want.
>This is the basis of lookism.Bullshit definitions
>>824019>the average person is attractiveNo. They're lonely gooners because they can't put the fork down. They belong in a cubicle farm.
>>824018>wrongHow?
>>824019>no argument>that's why there's eight billion of us numbnutsNot for long if fertility stays the way it is, at least in the West. Africa will carry population growth.
>>824047>gym bro, confidence broHow about I drop a dumbbell on your stupid faggot face?
>>824052fuck you
set up your candy shop elsewhere asshole, fucktard
>>824019>the average person is attractivelmao, the average person is horny and desperate
>>824104>lmao, the average person is horny and desperateAnd drunk… it's grim and depressing. It's grim pussy like marmite.
>>824196I'm still reeling that
>stop genociding people plsis a controversial opinion that can put you in trouble.
>>822747I don't get it. I've seen this dozen times but never read any of the comics. Also ran into it on the new Patreon scraper and apparently she does porn, both drawn and IRL. But who goons to that fr the art style is so simplistic and she's just average looking
>>824310You know about rule 34?
>If it exists, there is porn of itWell there is a hidden rule 34,5:
>If it exists, it's someone's fetish >>824104Not really, your adolescent cynicism doesn't reflect reality as a generalization. It just makes it seem like you're either projecting or operating out of a sense of superiority, which no one on an image board should have.
>>824444>It just makes it seem like you're either projecting or operating out of a sense of superiority, which no one on an image board should have.Yet that's something pretty much everyone on imageboards have.
>>824196Holy shit…I'd like to see ol' Netanyahu wriggle his way outta this one
>>824444Your rosy view of things isn't inherently right, I think you're guilty of the latter in your post.
>>824594They know normie life is grim.
>>824196Even when I agree with her I seethe, why is she painting herself as such a hero, struggling, and suffering, just to say something that is basically a common motto nowadays?
I will never understand people who think about or post about "lol cows", you need to watch a telenovela or something, it's better than the shit you are doing.
>>824598>Even when I agree with her I seethe, why is she painting herself as such a hero, struggling, and suffering, just to say something that is basically a common motto nowadays?Leaver her alone!
>>824598I think that's the appeal, she is basically a wine mom so all wine moms love her
>>822908Ok mabye this is like a bot weird or sumthin, not outright comfirmation she is a peidofile from this alone, so i think youre kinda being a sperg here, unless there is like, more way more wierd sus shit, this alone still makes her far from like the worst person eva, like, remember shadman? that mod ass porn artist that drew shit pf REAL KIDS!?!? men (and women #noidentitypolitics) have done wayyyy worst shit and gotten away with it, her being a onlyfans creator is lame cuz onlyfans is owned by zios and some other shady shit lol.
>>824315 rule 34 is an ancient artifact that should have been discarded long ago, all it has caused is have teenagers furry ocs being drawn explictly against their wills by sex pest manchildren, only neckbeared soylent consumers take that shit seriously
>>824624Dumb fat itallian book snob that no one cares about, only lagacy today is edgy teenagers on xitter larping ad le freqking futurists fiumeites and or 50+ literal whos in some random bumfuck clique that styles it self as a ”party” litteral making statements on how gazans should ally with their murderers and opressors and that hamas is le evil or something
>>824669OK, thanks for that emotional, ESL, run-on sentence.
>>824702you was the one getting triggered by a milquetoast comic
>>824196Donated 1 morbillion dollars to mossad so they can make a cheesecake out of her
>>824785Leftcom is false consciousness
>>824793I get really bad diarrhea whenever I eat $1.50 hotdogs from Costco
>>824800Sorry, im a human, can you translate this?
>>824800You can pay for a Costco hot dog in installments?
>>824859Not to act like a dsa cocksuckrr and or lib out and act like dressing up as a frog is somekind of actual resistance towards le fasim and not a display of emberesing aphety and unseriousness but in this case its just some dumb harmless four panels made with good intentions or something like you are being such a chud over nothing
Unique IPs: 76