>>824671no, I'm saying the incel movement has the same validity as the femcel movement: zero.
being sexually undesirable or ugly is not an identity, and being undesirable is not the same as being oppressed, people just find you yucky and want to stay away from you, the same if you don't shower or walk around with shit in your pants.
your identity is not real because it's only defined by the rejection of others, no other identity works like this.
>straights: my identity is that I like to suck and fuck on the opposite sex>gays: my identity is that I like dick and man ass>lesbians: my identity is that I like coochie as a girl>trans: my identity is being a girl/boy but my default settings are differentall of these identities CAN be rejected or discriminated against by society, but the rejection ITSELF is not the core of the identity, they are about dick or coochie or dressing in skirts or whatever, people hating on them is just a side effect
incels and femcels on the other hand have their whole identity based on what others think of them, not what they themselves identify as.
when you say you are an incel what exactly are you? what is the core of your being? what are you attracted to? what do you want from a sexual partner? what would you be if society didn't judge you? trans people, gay people and lesbians can answer this question in a way that informs of their identity, incels and femcels can't.
get a real identity bozo.