I'm not a transgender, but I wish I was born a woman. My life would be substantially better.
Young women make more than men, are more likely to be employed, and are more likely to graduate university. People in general are nicer to the average woman than the average man.
All the while societal expectations are on men to step up and make sacrifices. It’s like the sexes have become equal, but the social expectations on men to provide hasn't changed; if anything, it's gotten worse because now looks matter more than before.
The future is unironically female.
83 posts and 16 image replies omitted.>>827367Then neither do women.
>>827369>Then neither do women.Are you contrarian trolling?
>>827362>what will the methods beLeaving it to science for now. I won't have another strawman today.
>>827367Think that's just you mate. Practice what you're preaching and kill yourself.
>>827366leftists who preach reading theories btw
>>827376reading is different from posting cherrypicked statistics
>>827375>Think that's just you mate.No it's you, you're being useless.
>>827378up until the slop confirm something you already believed in or don't sound rub you off the wrong way, that's what all people do.
>>827380to whom? when people spoke of the wage gap twenty years ago, didn't they speak of how its because of unfairness? lack of favoritism and totally isn't because those women aren't "unskilled"? now its the reverse and we just say yes, its because moids aren't needed, useless. they all don't work hard enough. its pure skill and they don't measure up
Did anyone here watch the brazilian video that can't be posted?
>>827385No, what is it and why can't you post it?
>>827377What's cherrypicked?
>>827380You said all men though. If you really think that, then kill yourself. Dead serious. Practice what you preach. We need more women and less psuedo-intellect men like you! Chop, chop!
>>827384>to whom? when people spoke of the wage gap twenty years ago, didn't they speak of how its because of unfairness? lack of favoritism and totally isn't because those women aren't "unskilled"? now its the reverse and we just say yes, its because moids aren't needed, useless. they all don't work hard enough. its pure skill and they don't measure upChickens in farms have ratios of 12:1. In mammals this goes up to 50:1.
>>827386>No, what is it and why can't you post it?It's some brutal stuff.
>>827388i don't think using farms as an argument, human ran farms where they actively use female animals to create more food. next you're gonna use more animal analogy and tell me about lions and their one man takes all mentality
guess what, we aren't animals, you're using the same natural biology concept right wingers use to define transgender people are their own sex and nothing else, they can't breed, or that races exist and its just natural that some should out exist others. but because its men, the one concept we do not care for, its all normal with people like you to bring up biology and identity as a reason why its all normal to selectively cull them based on their own sex, their own biology. what is this progressive eugenics?
>>827285That Socrates quote is fake btw.
Retard can't even verify the most basic things.
>>827392>i don't think using farms as an argument, human ran farms where they actively use female animals to create more food. next you're gonna use more animal analogy and tell me about lions and their one man takes all mentalityIt proves that without work or status, men are essentially useless. There's nothing cool about the lion because it's nature for it to be eviscerated and removed in the end. Chimpanzee alphas have it far worse because they get killed worse than dictators.
>guess what, we aren't animals, you're using the same natural biology concept right wingers use to define transgender people are their own sex and nothing else, they can't breed, or that races exist and its just natural that some should out exist others. but because its men, the one concept we do not care for, its all normal with people like you to bring up biology and identity as a reason why its all normal to selectively cull them based on their own sex, their own biology. what is this progressive eugenics?<anti-essentialism<culling strawman againAre you a woman or queer or something?
My point is that work ends and humans simply exist. There will be fewer men.
>>827394so basically the same as "if you want to know who rules over you find the people you can't criticize" by voltaire being actually said by a neo-nazi.
>It proves that without work or status, men are essentially useless.funny you would say that, and this entire thread is part of it, if you were to say without beauty, a woman is useless, that would be considered patriarchal, dehumanizing even, forcing rigid gender norms on somone that didn't ask to be ugly, make it about a man's ability to provide shelter, and if he's average he's simply not a woman's option, and is useless
>My point is that work ends and humans simply exist. There will be fewer men.you keep dodging it, but we say culling because there's no other word, do you think women can have less men without any intervention during pregnancy? do you think society will have fewer men on a massive scale, just like that?..to have fewer men you need to actively preach and promote and have entire departments dedicated to your social experiment on an entire population, but you can't admit it so you resort to just saying science and the future will see this happening.
>people are nicer to women than men
Women are raped more, they're sexually assaulted more, abused more, they get paid less than moids and they are getting shat on by the increasingly rightoid society. Being a foid or moid is a double-edged sword, buddy.
>>827398>funny you would say that, and this entire thread is part of it, if you were to say without beauty, a woman is useless, that would be considered patriarchal, dehumanizing even, forcing rigid gender norms on somone that didn't ask to be ugly, make it about a man's ability to provide shelter, and if he's average he's simply not a woman's option, and is uselessYes? False body positivity is probably one of the most asinine forms of abuse people could to to each other. It's the same for any other handicap like status, social skills or wealth. If someone is ugly, they're worth less than dog shit and they've done it to themselves. Same for anything else. Worthless.
>>827400>they get paid less than moidsdisproven in this thread, and the worse part it seems from the discussion it had towards this year is that its a good thing actually men are just lazy bums
>and they are getting shat on by the increasingly rightoid societyif we're talking america, i firmly think in two years they'll have another one of their elections and if trump leaves, all his stuff might regress back.
but this aside, this thread might come from OP's lived experience, he might feel invisible because men aren't that approached, and the expectations on them are arbitrary and rigid at the same time, beauty wise and actions wise, but especially looks. maybe he thinks if he was born an average girl, took care of himself then suddenly society cater to him, he can either live life all day inside, or make friends, be a furry, be bisexual, choose one man or one woman or many, or have people from all sexes treat them nicely simply because they are the fair empathetic gender.
isn't this the fantasy OP? to live a life where people treat you as less disposable? because some women probably still find it not enough and wish they were men to be "taken seriously" or not deal with blood period, or to not be approached too much by men.
but i get it, its this feeling your sex is both opressors and not providers enough, not allowed to be pretty or dress in more than just jeans, be invisible unless they manage to turn stunning or be born with the right features. get to complain about being approached feels better than never being approached at all right?
>>827400>Women are raped more, they're sexually assaulted more, abused moreOnly applies to a very small portion of women. Most men aren't going out and raping women, lol.
Men get raped more if you count prison rape, btw.
>they get paid less than moidsNot really true for childless, single women and especially not true for women under 30. As women have less and less kids, they will probably overtake men entirely. Makes sense considering women are more likely to attend and graduate post-secondary.
>getting shat on by the increasingly rightoid societyLol no. Manosphere is not real life, and tradwife whores are one the biggest grifts on the right. Women are the more hateful gender.
>>827387its not even worth arguing with people on this website bc half of leftists are just ex stormfags who repeat the same rightoid debate tactics bc they genuinely do not believe in the concept of truth. youre trying to distort statistics to say that women are privileged in the job market, youre a fucking clown
genuinely fuck all leftists this is why fascism is winning. yall uyghas are retarded and epstein was right
>>827424>epstein was rightwhy does every thread here turn into this?
>>827415>>827418Yeah, we really need to produce fewer men and then raise them to be more sociable. This won't do.
>>827424What statistics did I distort?
>genuinely fuck all leftists this is why fascism is winning. yall uyghas are retarded and epstein was rightWow, that's a little dramatic. Are you a woman by any chance? Wanna have sex and make babies?
>>827437>you wish to be handsome anon, handsome to the other sexNo, anon is right. It's just too brutal out there as a man. All the societal expectations are on men. It’s like the sexes have become equal, but the social expectations on men to provide has doubled. In the future everyone is a woman.
>if men display hatred towards women for XYZ they are in the wrong, bitter, or just hateful, if women display hatred towards men for XYZ. its all valid no matter what, in fact we need to reduce the existence of men for their sake.
brutal stuff.
>>827451You actually hate women?
>>827187>The future is unironically female.This.
If we're making up fantasy solutions like "cull the male population". There is actually a far more plausible solution.
Attractiveness is genetic. We can modify female genes to make them more attracted to average or even ugly men. That permanently solves the gender war.
>>827426because he was right. you people are cattle
>>827601oh yeah very dysgenic, we should stay the course where a dadbod is an off season strongman with some gut. we have to tell to ourselves that most men are trash by genes and not extreme standarts. just play it all off as letting the unattractive goblins breed
Who cares about the discussion can you post more fetish porn like the OP
>>827626change the flag diogenes we know its you
>>827635I like this meme format
>>827718>I get my worldview from trashy reality TVTruly the peak of male excellence.
>>827719Why don't women lead in manual labour jobs, anon?
Keep deluding yourself.
>>827720>why dont women low pay backbreaking labourWe already have the disposable sex for that.
>>827718It gets me thinking that if women are that useless in the wild or whatever and the man is so much better at living off the land, then why bother with women? I know the video says we need each other and love and that other shit, but why? They seem useless in that video. I'm not saying I want to live in a homosexual paradise with other men but if I could live alone like that then why would I need other people? Although that video does make a point that it might be better to just live in a commune with a bunch of dudes at least to me. Just some thoughts I had.
>>827724Those shows don't take place in "the wild"
Actually "wilderness" has not existed for thoussnds of years now and is a modern romantic (fascist) concept
as a man I'm happy that women are having a good time in life, good for them.
imagine going from second class citizen with no right to vote to empowered lively people who actually can speak their mind in more or less a century? they deserve it, go off queens, get your money, get your pussy licked, the world is yours!
Unique IPs: 22