post any tits, as long as they're attached to something that looks like a human being
>>1931"if it is to be it is up to me"
- anon
>>1945we only have a prilimenary study for now,and it's only for 15 years of bra using against no bra using.
we never had a 60+ years of data on whether or not they are harmful so far,so we just don't know.
>>1952>>1957To think she started doing this the pictosecond she hit 18.
Pure bipolar.
>>1960boobas, also shes cute chill. I for one dont like the bimbo look
>>1961uwucaptain or Touki00
>>1969You can't tell me what to do
>>1970That's what happens when you don't milk your cow gf regularly
>>1989She looks like a 24 year old Romanian or Russian or something.
>>1990What is wrong with people these days? So afraid to aknowledge sexuality of people and always seconds away from from castrating themselves or ripping out their uterus.
>>2022>decide a thin 11 year old should have gigantomastia.Morbidly looked it up
yikes
>>2020>>2023Man, reading this is like like reading an SCP or some shit.
>A disease exists that randomly gives women and even girls hyper furry porn tier breasts>There's no known cause; bloodwork, x-rays, MRIs, ultrasound, family history, drug interactions, and even genetic testing don't reveal anything>The best they can come up with is some temporary sensitivity to hormonesNow we just gotta find out what causes it, and how to induce it artificially to give women huge tities without implants.
>>2023>>2026>>2027ahem
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
>>2030>>2023what in the fuck
This is either microplastics or some demented rich/powerful people are trying to make anime real.
> Recurrences are not exceptionalImagine having to have the breast reduction multiple times.
>25% body weight>15% body weightThat's not even the whole breast either, just the mass that was removed.
>>2042If your gf is lucky or part cow
>>2043Hope the nut was out of this world
>>2044>If your gf is lucky or part cowDude, chicks don't just spontaneously lactate. They're either have a very late term pregnancy, are nursing, or they've intentionally induced it for some fucking reason.
Shit taste btw but I expect nothing less from tit men.
>>2045>chicks don't just spontaneously lactateNo shit.
>Shit taste btwMald harder.
>>20493rd from the end, perfect size.
>>2030>>2023>>2021How do we bottle this and add it to the water supply?
>>2045Lactation can absolutely happen randomly (although to be fair most pregnancies terminate spontaneously before the woman even realizes she was pregnant so it could be due to that a lot of the time).
>>2042Most women and even a lot of men can induce lactation deliberately just by stimulating the nipples. This is (as far as we know) a unique human trait (as are permanent breasts - other mammals only develop mammary glands while pregnant). Humans' permanent breasts are likely an evolutionary advantage resulting from our eusocial nature and community structure. Given the extreme (much more than other mammals) neediness of human newborns, it's likely that our babies were almost always cared for by several adults at once, including multiple breastfeeders. Wet nursing is a well known historical fact that probably has its origins in long-term reproductive behavior. Given how often women die(d) in childbirth, this was probably a very important adaptation to keep babies alive (your tribe's members would share a lot of the same genes, including for permanent mammaries, so it would benefit all parties and the genes to do this). In other words, tits are (very literally) life for us humans.
>>2043Keep it broken. Nofap is incel cringe.
>>2048men just make up shit about women's anatomy lmao. read a fucking book
>>2045it ain't just tit men who do this my dude
>>2069WHY DO YOU LINK ME SOME SHITS ABOUT PERIODS AND UTERUS AND THEIR DADS I WAS TALKING ABOUT LACTATION NOBODY GIVES A SHIT
>>2068Because you retards were soying out at me for asking how is this posible
Thanks for posting an actual answer and not some hysterical feminist rant about a woman's dad not knowing how his daughters pussy work or something like that one weirdo
>>2069 >>2082hypnotic
>>2083a dude but yeah would be great ngl
>>2094I only started feeling the same way after playing csgo and league for less than an hour
So many asshats on those servers looking like they’ve never seen the sun tryharding or having thousands of hours into those games with pornography set as their pfp yelling and whining into the mic. Shit gets annoying and drove me from gaming for a bit
As for this thread I just don’t feel anything for it, not sadness, not horniness, not happiness. Nothing just fucking apathy not just from its content but the fact that nearly every single dumbass idea brought in it has been mentioned so many times it feels like the internet is one giant circle of the same 12 retards only capable of sharing the same retarded info between each other until the sun explodes
>>2107how is it possible to have collar bones and still have titties that big?
Where I am it's literally only bbws who can get to that tier
>>1933 (1st)
>>1942 (3rd)
>>2035>>2107 >Most beautiful busty black chick I've ever seenHow did you even find these clips
>>2115Wrong
>>2109I have my sources, comrade
>>2121> You guys are just a bunch of misogynists.Me? misogynists? Nahh, look how much flowers I gave to my ex.
:( I'm so sad. I can still hear her voice begin me to spare her life
>>2121Porn culture wouldn't be misogynistic if it wasn't for capitalism. At least in using this thread we're not going to the typical venues where ad revenue / tracking / page request analytics fund the exploitation of sex workers, and potentially giving the sex workers direct support.
I think the main problem with this thread is that most people aren't posting sources along with the images. (picrel by SnowyBlue1)
Also because a lot of people on here seem to think feminism is a liberal thing, rather than there existing both leftist feminism and liberal feminism. That's just an issue with imageboard culture in general, but if any board can shake that off it's this one.
>>2125SEX cannot be contained no more, real socialism of the 21th century will invest in porn so good that just looking at a pic will make the person cum, there will be also 5-year plans for the creation of penis and boob enlargement pills and ending the refractory period, as well as free courses in being a
SEX master so you can fuck liberal butts and their wifes more effectively, mark my fucking words.
>>2129fellow "
SEX with Stalin"ist detected, Im glad you're on our team sir
checked, marked and capped.
>>2132Oh I meant
>>2131, the quoted number was chihuahua's post but I forgor to clear that.
>>2132>You're over-theorizing here. How so?
>There's no actionable praxis to be done with that conclusion until we figure out how to put souls into immortal robots.I don't want to wait until we live in robot age while enduring a present and future patriarchy.
>>2132I deleted the post because I read the post from the person I was quoting (
>>2128) again and I noticed that I misinterpreted them.
>>2134The how-so is that there's no actionable praxis for that. It also places too much importance on individual gender rather than looking at patriarchy as a whole construct, a club wielded by capitalism to leverage the anxiety and arrogance of uneducated cis men against the rest of the proletariat. Surely heterosexual sex and reproduction can be carefully conducted without feeding that machine. There's a potential avenue for praxis, figuring out how that would work.
>>2135Ah okay then.
>>2136>a club wielded by capitalism to leverage the anxiety and arrogance of uneducated cis men against the rest of the proletariat.But there is uneducated cis men in the proletariat, do you believe that there is no male domination in the working class by the working class men?
>Surely heterosexual sex and reproduction can be carefully conducted without feeding that machine. Not according to feminist theory.
>>2137That's why I said "against the rest of." Patriarchy is an attempt to create a sub-hierarchy within the working class, a divide and conquer tactic.
>Not according to feminist theory.Feminist theory is a very broad study, which authors do you mean and then what would be the praxis under such theory? No straight sex and just use sperm banks for reproduction?
>>2138Eh, I was being somi- tongue and check there. I have had a lot of bad dreams growing up to now, yeah, but they've been getting nicer lately since the pandemic has given me time away from the usual stress. (replaced with other forms of stress, but easier to cope with.)
>>2146This is trobling because she obviously doesn't seem stupid.
>The Industrial Vagina: The Political Economy of the Global Sex Trade was published in 2009. In it, Jeffreys describes the globalisation of the ±, and calls marriage a form of prostitution. Jeffreys writes, "the right of men to women's bodies for sexual use has not gone, but remains an assumption at the basis of heterosexual relationships", and draws links between marriage and prostitution, such as mail-order brides, which she sees as a form of trafficking.[18] >>2131>>Porn culture wouldn't be misogynistic if it wasn't for capitalism.>No, All sex even consensual sex between a married couple, is an act of violence perpetrated against a woman. I generally agree with this and when horny (as a cishet male) I also quite clearly (in post-nut self-reflection) sexually objectify. This subject causes a lot of internal distress and I'm unsure how to deal with it quite frankly.
>>2151Interesting suggestion.
Is there an imdb-like resource for searching for material like this? Visual novels / erotic media created by bisexual(?) / heterosexual(?) / lesbian(?) women?
>>2153That is partially what I find so strange about this, because there seems to be research pointing to male sexuality being far more "visual"/"physical" (or sexually objectifying?) vs female sexuality (I'm thinking of the study which uncovered the huge difference between homosexual males promiscuity rate vs homosexual females more affective or romantic (for lack of a better description) sensibilities).
>and there is no problem with [sexually objectifying women] until you act like an asshole and treat them like trash for your desires.An approach easier said than done, surely.
Let's unpack this. I just thought about the connection between the stupid ease of sexual reproduction as an act, as well as the Freudian 'structural model of the psyche'; specifically its description of the ego. Then I thought about Lenin being skeptical of Freud, then I found this thread about the topic:
https://www.soviet-empire.com/ussr/viewtopic.php?t=40744There's something to all of this but I'm not smart enough to figure it out yet at this point in time, so I'm just outlining something general.
>>2163Wrong.
This is the monarchist board.
>>2169>>2166booba and bagina
>>2148>This is trobling because she obviously doesn't seem stupid.if that quote doesn't make somebody seem stupid to you, what would
>>2175Maybe one day you'll have sex and come to realize it's not even remotely normal to open a woman's shirt and grope her for 20 seconds like you're filming one of those YouTube videos where people play with foam while she stands there silent and lifeless. Even if she's an active participant, it doesn't
look like she is, which most people find off-putting.
>>2184>>2180women can appreciate booba better than men because of personal experience
it's very funny to me how much sexualization of women is seen as "male gaze" when lesbians can be as bad or worse about it as men
>>2188>>2157>>and there is no problem with [sexually objectifying women] until you act like an asshole and treat them like trash for your desires.>An approach easier said than done, surely. The problem with this is that sexualizing and objectifying are two different things. Sexualizing is applying sexuality or reading sexuality into something. Objectifying is reducing someone to a sex object. Sexualizing is not inherently reductive at all, and it can be used to read
subjectivity into somebody (by focusing on their sexual desires and agency). The problem is that people conflate these two things because of traditional understnding of gender and sex. One common example of this is attention being drawn to prominent cleavage. You can objectify the woman by making it about the intrinsic qualities of her breasts, but you can also subjectify the woman by making it about her
choice of clothing and her intent to emphasize something, exercising ownership over her own body and acting upon men by baiting their attention. It's a question of framing and emphasis. Both factors are in play, but it's the nature of the reaction to the situation that's the question.
As to the distinction between male/female sexual/romantic inclination, the evidence seems to point toward this being regulated a lot by hormones, with higher test giving you higher sex drive and higher estrogen giving you more romantic leanings.
>>2186Based. Everybody at some point sexualise someone else. It's inevitable. It's normal. Unless you are completely asexual. Now, you can have a "male gaze" also watching other men if you are a gay man or a "female gaze" if you are a woman watching men and/or women and/or whoever.
That said, tho, I often hear busty women complaining about the weight of their boobas.
>>2190tbf the average person is going to be more comfortable expressing discomfort about something than enjoyment of it
but the post wasn't about
big tits specifically, so it's interesting that you interpreted it that way
>>2197Sorry, can't help with that
>>2199It's hard to say. Porn has genuinely fucked my sense of what is big, to where I'm just completely flabbergasted when people say D cups are huge; that's basically flat to me.
>>2199>>2204Funny thing is, after 20 mf years of fapping ,what I consider big IRL vs. in porn are two different things.
I still see D cups as big IRL, but in porn I sleep. Simple as. Shit even some C cups on a girl with a small frame will look big to me in person.
>>2206I wouldn't know anything about pheromones or touch since I repel women.
IRL has a better "framerate" and "resolution" and is in 3(or possibly more)D. That's enough to make what I find hot IRL much more reasonable. However, as you implied it isn't unique to me in anyway.
>>2202>Cartoon standards for a cartoon kidcorrect
>>2203>people say D cups are huge; that's basically flat to me.correct
>>2204>most knowledgeable-of-women weeaboocorrect
>>2205interdasting
>>2220There's women who can come solely from nipple stim lol.
>>2221The tits are full of fat so you're just picky about where you want the fat.
>>2222Lots of people play with various body parts to de-stress.
>>2226>The tits are full of fat so you're just picky about where you want the fat.Yes.
Anyway I figured it out, it's just a numbers game. Probability. So all things being equal, if I just keep going out constantly, plus join liberal groups/orgs, and get on every "dating" app, and sign up for university for like one subject just to be on site, I should be able to find someone.
>>2238She doesn't identify as she/her, so would never happen.
I just have to find the energy to go out more to more clubs and events and parties and orgs just to hopefully finally find gf
Maybe I should hire a sex worker at this point tbqh, getting a bit over just not having a realistic shot
>>2242>This is stupid / weird / probably has something to do with body dysphoria or dysphoriaNah, just breast expansion content.
"I've been seeing more of it lately, must be because the main booba market is so saturated booba holders are turning to more niche areas.
>>2245floopa
Also I've come to the conclusion that "trying" to get with women with larger busts is pointless and I should just focus on doing other grass touching stuff.
I just don't get how some dudes can go out or go to events and just… Get it.
>>2248There's such thing as baby face?
Idk why people think there's some physical look that distinguish 13-17 to 18-24.
People over thirty can look any age they want with no problem.
>>2250Yea, I mean it's not uncommon for people to think forty is wrinkles when in reality, alot of late thirties/early forties still have youthful looks.
Why? Because thirties and forties are still young.
Couple that with the vulgar casual fashion sense that's common in that age group nowadays and their speech.
>>2295Clearly the preferred way of death would be suffocation
with tits
>>2295can't even focus on the tits
look at those
abs >>2299>>1946I think God made a mistake giving human females boobs.
Boob size is irrelevant to milk production.
So why not have puffy nipples instead?
I like boobs but theyre not good for women. They affect their center of gravity, they hurt, they cause distraction.
Ass is more practical.
>>2299Abs are good
BUT ALSO
Tummeh are good
>>2309>SAUCEHere you go, comrade:
https://twitter.com/Tokyo_teaa/status/1538927007383359493 I'm afraid I can't help with your latter question, though.
>>2318>those>D cupsProof /leftypol/ posters get no bitches.
Pro-tip: the letter in bra sizing stands for how many inches larger the bust is than the band, each letter corresponding to a one inch increase.
>>2311Perfect form
I prefer bigger and accept more sag, but those are close to anime titties
>>2311>>2312>>2313Spanish girl, has gone by Ares/ella/spanishgrimes and had an IG @patata.sultana but I don't know if it's deleted or I can't access it.
She's LEFTpilled and regularly posts fucking philosophy papers on her patreon honestly I think no human being has the right to be this perfect
Her voice
https://soundcloud.com/ares-18236930 >>2334objectification theory is limited/controversial both in and outside the feminist framework, whether feminism of the Marxist variety, or feminism of the non-Marxist variety.
Is admiring or even lusting after a physical body really the same as dehumanizing a person and reducing them to a physical object? Not everyone agrees.
>>2330@nxttakatta
@nxthxlielockett
Also use base64 on
>>2310 >>2354>I wonder if she's ever been attracted to anyone.probably, but after enough negative attention she'd probably rather be alone than risk being used.
Common with hooge tiddy ladies, they just don't trust guys (and who could blame them), so the put on a bitch shield which inevitable means they end up either alone or shlammed by assholes who just keep going.
Sad.
>>2380I knew a 17yo with tits like that
Don't know what's in the water now, but every even I attend has crazy amounts of milktrucks that are let in because tiddies = age apparently now
>>2382You can tell the blood flow isn't so great to some of them. I bet they can still have big breasts after the reduction though.
I mean the guy with the biggest dick in the world can't get an erection iirc.
>>2387based pit chad
i've thought about eating hot ramen off of a woman's body
where did you find this??
>>2400Stop being so dramatic. That's nothing.
You get offendedby some quirky non-porny fetish? Besides, your son probably already has some deep dark desires before TikTok.
People think sexual desire in kids is because of the Internet.
They're so ignorant. Ironically, kids were more sexually active before the Internet.
Kids used to run off to the woods to fuck and suck each other off. They used to smoke in elementary school. They went on camping trips for the weekend without parents.
>>2407I suppose a kid wouldn't think of things as being cringe without the oversocialization that comes with phones.
I personally plan to give my kid a flip phone, but a really good desktop pc. Think that'd be better for mental development.
>>2408>thinks desktop PC is morally better than cell phone PC.Also, flip phones suck for texting.
Also, people have been calling things cringe since the 80s with the snarky insincerity of Gen X.
>>2411People have claimed desktop PCs, vide games, and plin old TV was bad for the youth.
Before that, it was radio. Before that it was comic books.
Before that, it graphic novels. Or plain old action adventure literature.
Before that, it was writing.
What youe really worried about is "innocence."
The mora obsession with innocence is what's killing our society. The idea of innocenceus hat drives adults to drown kids in bathtubs, lock them away in towers, neglect much needed medicine, shrug off bullying as "kidsbeung kids" etc.
Innocence is what gets kids in trouble and causes them to be stunted.
Innocence is not a virtue. It's a Liability.
Innocence is why western adult society is plagud with nostalgia culture and arrested development.
>>2412Unless you're over 55, you're not old.
35 is not old.
Neither is 40.
Also, the concept of cringe culture kinda existed before then but under different buzzword.
>>2410>morallyI get you're joking, but I suppose I should elaborate why I think a desktop would be healthier. Having spaces where you do certain things is an important mental health thing, see vidrel. Also, I wouldn't want them to browse social media in bed. I did that in high school and I was a nervous wreck with no attention span and no sleep schedule at all up until my phone burned out. Next phone I'm getting is a flip phone.
>flip phones suck for textingrjct mdrn, rtrn t trdtn
>>2415The reason. Why is probably because you never had a proper fulfilling childhood. People blame cell phones and video games when it was really helicopter parenting. The reason why kids play on social media at night is because they're not allowed to have free range play outside during the day.
Our society treats the youth as chattel. The adults actively smother and censor the world to kids, they brush off/condemn kids for venting their frustrations, they get offended by kids having dark humor or developing worldly instincts.
They think maturity is automatic with age. That when. You hit 18 you'll "get it " but then when people in their twenties re struggling, the elderscome up with another convenient diagnosis: brain development.
Yet, people over 25 see less stable/willing to mature than those under 25.
>>2417All true. I want to make sure I raise my kid as an anarchist, not a tyrant. I wouldn't prevent my kid from getting a smartphone if they wanted one, I'm simply talking what I would provide out of pocket. A basic phone so they can talk to friends and meet up with them, and a good PC with a well riced Linux installation (tutoring them on how to rice and configure it for their own ease of use.) and teach them how to safely pirate games.
I was able to go out free range as a teen, but after an early childhood of helicopter parenting and being in a heavily christian neighborhood, all my local friendship attempts failed and were kinda traumatic, hence my tendency to just sink into my phone.
>>2417>Why is probably because you never had a proper fulfilling childhood. People blame cell phones and video games when it was really helicopter parenting If anything it is the lack of parenting that is the problem.
>reason why kids play on social media at night is because they're not allowed to have free range play outside during the day Or because they're addicted and can't stop scrolling and their parents don't say shit?
>Our society treats the youth as chattel etc.I know its (you) from those threads arguing about child labour and I ask you clarify by stating burger or western society, because these are problems there, not a problem for the larger 3/4s of the globe.
>>2426Again, you're using the convenient dead horse. Those kids wouldn't be "addicted" if they had free range play. If we took away tech, they'd just revert back to comic books and historic epics. It wouldn't really change anything.
Also, I do state the geopolitical region often. Besides one can easily get the context in which these problems are.
Again, tech isn't the problem. It's active smothering ofthe youth from the outside world.
Again, people should stop using g academics as a substitute for life training and as a convenient sanctuary.
>>2427>Those kids wouldn't be "addicted" if they had free range play.LMAO no, this isn't the 90s, when computers had been so limited that their appeala only lasted so much and you needed a console to play most video games.
>If we took away tech, they'd just revert back to comic books and historic epics And that'd be better, because reading literature or enjoying comics is probably a hell of a lot better than consuming socmedia since at least those can inspire creativity.
>tech isn't the problem It is part of the problem, parents are supposed to supervise and educate. A child doesn't have the comprehensive capability to recognize addiction or that something may be influencing them poorly, even adults of today are susceptible
>eople should stop using g academics as a substitute for life training and as a convenient sanctuary No shit
>>2428Nice strawman meme you got there.
Also, the 90s had kids watch an awful lot of TV.
>And that'd be better, because reading literature or enjoying comics is probably a hell of a lot better than consuming socmedia since at least those can inspire creativity. You think vidya ad Internet do t inspire creativity? With the amount of sheer fanart and OC content being made?
Ancient Greece thought literature and writing would kill the creativity of youth because people only used oral history.
21 centuries later……
Also, literature isn't always good. Especially alot of those comic books or motivational media.
Again, it doesn't make you smart. Having only books but no outside time is just as bad.
Again, you're completely willfully denying thepoint
Kids aren't allowed free play anymore. Theres been incodents of kids getting cops called on them for socializing outisde y the.mselves. In England, they have anti soliciting machinescammed mosquitoes that emot high pitched noises to deter kids from hanging out.
>>2430That's funny because that's how alot of90s kids grew up to be. Whiny premature midlife crisis neoboomers.
How many Internet discussions are "I'm 25-40 and I'm associated and horns and no skills."?
>>2428>. A child doesn't have the comprehensive capability to recognize addiction or that something may be influencing them poorly, even adults of today are susceptible If adults knew about addiction, there wouldn't be any addiction.
Also, kids can be surprisingly intuitive. Kids aren't inherently defective/unconscious. Society prefers to keep them in the dark because "let kis be kids" means smothering them with innocence/positivity.
Also, adults have always been susceptible to addiction. This isn't just a current year thing.
The problem is using age numbers as automatic metric of maturity.
>>2431>Nice strawman meme Except it isn't, not for burgerland. Take a look at the burger general and ask for the impages of burgerpunk.
>the 90s had kids watch an awful lot of TV Yeah, and they had set hours, you couldn't stream or have netflix you could only flip channels and/or go to Blockbuster or the cinema. It limited the amount of TV you could consume. Not to mention the 90s kept good quality of content. Nevermind that that is STILL better than social media scrolling.
>You think vidya ad Internet do t inspire creativity I've seen a lot more creativity come out of reading than them so yes. the majority of "creativity" from vidya I see in burgerland is demonstrabley mediocre, /v/ and its many clones, youtube streams of people like Ninja, and in the meantime actual creative people making actually interesting things in that industry get shunted aside (see the debacle in regards to the creator of the original Uncharteds)
>Ancient Greece thought literature and writing would kill the creativity of youth because people only used oral history I don't care about Ancient Greece and their inanties, not to mention that this sourceless claim directly contradicts the fact that Ancient Greek citizens like in Alexandria or Athens had expectations for being educated and to read literature.
>literature isn't always good. Especially alot of those comic books or motivational media Admittedly true, but comics and books have taken a long time to catch up to the sheer shittiness of twitter.
>it doesn't make you smart. Having only books but no outside time is just as bad I don't deny that, see the meme. My point is book-reading is a better alternative to socmedia scrolling into the night
>you're completely willfully denying thepoint No I am not, I am pointing out inconsistencies in your rhetoric, not that I disagree in the idea of "children are poorly handled in modern burger society" I merely mean that you should be more specific and detailed so as to not leave open blatant holes.
>Kids aren't allowed free play anymore Mostly due to the Covid hysteria tbh in recent times and also because of burger idiocy. I don't disagree that this is a bad thing, just that your reasoning needs to be a little more detailed.
>that's how alot of90s kids grew up to be. Whiny premature midlife crisis neoboomers Not in my experience, but then I'm not a middle-class liberal and don't associate with them much. Moreover "neoboomer" is retarded, a better term'd be neo-yuppie, since Boomer refers to people from the Baby-Boom, not some kind of social class or ideology.
>How many Internet discussions are "I'm 25-40 and I'm associated and horns and no skills."? <midlife crisis isn't a thing<internet queries matterCome on m8
>>2432>If adults knew about addiction, there wouldn't be any addiction Retarded nonsense. Are you telling me a functioning adult doesn't recognize addiction even though this is blatantly something adults point out in large numbers?
>ids can be surprisingly intuitive At a certain age, and are also surprisingly naive at other times, this doesn't mean shit.
>adults have always been susceptible to addiction. This isn't just a current year thing Never said that.
>problem is using age numbers as automatic metric of maturity in burgerland, yes.
>>2434 Because political/social subreddits are a hive of closet reactionaries and retards to rival /pol/.
>>2435 The fuck is this supposed to mean, take meds schizo.
>>2436There's a new ban evader who's main typing quirk is overusing phrases like kek, lmao/lmfao, lol, ect… Making sure to capslock it. Think 2015-2017 4chan and reddit lingo.
I kinda like these typing quirk anons, takes a bit more effort than just using an avatar.
>>2433<midlife crisis isn't a thing<internet queries matterCome on m8
Midlife crisis is enabled by suburban culture. Also I said "premature". Alot of people in heir thirties fancy themselves as OGs just because they're not in their twenties yet are still baffled by those twice their age.
>At a certain age, and are also surprisingly naive at other times, this doesn't mean shit. As do adults, especially the elderly.
>Retarded nonsense. Are you telling me a functioning adult doesn't recognize addiction even though this is blatantly something adults point out in large numbers? Only when others point it out. And even then they require force.
"I'm an adult I can handle myself/I do what I want!"
>Mostly due to the Covid hysteria tbh in recent times and also because of burger idiocy. I don't disagree that this is a bad thing, just that your reasoning needs to be a little more detailed. You really are willfully ignorant. This predates COVID by three decades.
>I don't care about Ancient Greece and their inanties, not to mention that this sourceless claim directly contradicts the fact that Ancient Greek citizens like in Alexandria or Athens had expectations for being educated and to read literature. Only for the rich folk. By definition, as citizen was someone whom was male, over thirty, owned roperty and had connections.
Ancient Greek philosophers didn't want reading for the plebians.
>Yeah, and they had set hours, you couldn't stream or have netflix you could only flip channels and/or go to Blockbuster or the cinema. It limited the amount of TV you could consume. Not to mention the 90s kept good quality of content. Nevermind that that is STILL better than social media scrolling. People had libraries of VHS that they watched on repeat. Also, the 80s was the start of this drivelyou're. Pop culturehas been stuck on rehash since 1985.
Also movies/VHS is just TV that's in physical limited modules.
>>2433
>I've seen a lot more creativity come out of reading than them so yes. the majority of "creativity" from vidya I see in burgerland is demonstrabley mediocre, /v/ and its many clones, youtube streams of people like Ninja, and in the meantime actual creative people making actually interesting things in that industry get shunted aside (see the debacle in regards to the creator of the original Uncharteds) Literature is bound to the same schlock of rehash. Writers also have been pressured to change or throw away manuscripts.
Then, there's fanfiction.
>Except it isn't, not for burgerland. Take a look at the burger general and ask for the impages of burgerpunk. Kids would've been whining about lack of TV reception or broken toys back then.
Those 90s kids weren't really as badass/virtuous as you claim.
Try the 70s kids.
>>2433>in burgerland, yes.you seem to be willfully/wishfully thinking that this all just an American crisis.
You need to come open your eyes and realize that idiots and infantilization doesn't come from AMERICA only.
But then again, imageboards are dumping grounds for for pseudointellectual idiots.
>>2443>beautifulthey're clearly fake
chick's beautiful though, unfortunate that bad judgement makes them ruin their bodies
>>2445No such thing as fake tits imo
>>2443It was posted by a porn reposter account with no source, sorry comrade.
turn o
>>2454 n ur we
bcam bb girl u'r so pretty
>>2470All sizes are beautiful. They are all nice for different reasons. One thing being good doesn't mean different things are not. Apparently hypnosis can make tits grow bigger though, so if it bothers you enough look into that.
>>2469>there are veins there>poor circulationNo anon, they are part of a human body and therefore need blood, not exactly complicated. If you gain more mass anywhere you get more blood vessels to supply the body mass. Same works with tits, muscles, stomach, whatever.
>>2470I heard progesterone helps with that.
hrt.cafe/progesterone/
>>2476Visible veins =/= varicose veins, those are something else and I'd be surprised to see any on tits considering how they usually form.
You have large diameter veins all over your body, anywhere there is a large amount of tissue. Blood vessels are not laid out fully in your genome, but "procedurally generated" by your body (other than major arteries and veins). This allows your body to grow new blood vessels in areas where you have substantial tissue development, including fairly large blood vessels if there is an area with a lot of tissue that requires blood supply. Bigger piece of tissue = bigger blood vessels. Veins are easier to see because they are closer to the surface and a darker color that looks blue in contrast with the rest of the flesh. Veins being visible is normal, and in any part of the body with significant growth, whether that's biceps or boobs, they will likely be more noticeable.
>>2482>>2484Might be a sense of "she's out of my league" where if someone looks hot enough your brain just writes them off. I'm getting vibes that something's off about her personality. I think it's because of how she's filming herself, feels like ADHD or something.
>>2484Her face is fine. She's just not wearing heavy makeup and her body is a stronger asset than her face.
>>2489>a translation for those interestedhot, thanks
This'd be great animated tbh
>>2489Pretty much
>>2488 too
>>2509>>2507 thi
s is a crustacean fred now :3
>>2511Well there's ghost shrimp, which is likely where the transparent / white comes from.
Farm bred ones can be a lot of colors, though perhaps blue shows up naturally sometimes.
>>2514lol
kind of a shame how sexuality tends to overshadow other potential that tits have, like physical comedy
Unique IPs: 172