>>455> So these people were non-proles who infiltrated the workers movement because of a sense of bourgeois guilt and shame at raping the workers and their bourgeois values influenced their beliefs and theories. Scientific socialism is just socialism with bourgeois characteristics stealthily mixed into it.This explanation falls apart the moment you look at
A: Utopian socialism before scientific socialism, who was responsible for it, who was in charge of it
B: Marx and Engels's critique of utopian socialism
Utopian Socialism was the approach taken by Saint-Simon, Charles Fourier, Robert Owen, all of them from wealthy ruling class backgrounds, all of them with the same exact sense of guilt you ascribe to Marx and Engels.
Marx and Engels criticized Utopian socialism on precisely the same lines you claim Marx and Engels are wrong: they attacked the Utopians for their reformist and bourgeois ideas stealthily mixed, for their philosophical idealism, and for its ineffective and overly pacifistic organizational strategies. They denounced bourgeois guilt, bourgeois charity, class collaboration, bourgeois-led workers movements, overreliance on electoralism, reforms, unions, and cooperatives, (i.e. the legal half of the struggle).
If your suggestion is that the struggle should be entirely illegal and that Marx and Engels were wrong for suggesting that there even need to be a legal half of struggle in addition to illegal struggle and violence, then you are of a deviation known as Otzevism which Lenin criticized thoroughly.